Abstract
Nine well-trained subjects were tested on a complex-performance device involving tracking, monitoring, and mental arithmetic during exposure to altitude (14,000 ft.) and heat (60° C) both singly and in combination. Several physiological measures were taken. Exposure durations were 30 min. for each condition with both pre- and posttesting. The only clear-cut effects of the conditions were significant differences across the environmental conditions on the tracking task. Altitude was clearly a more powerful variable than temperature in this study. This was evidenced by the fact that performance under the temperature-plus-altitude and the altitude-only conditions were approximately the same; performance under the temperature-only condition was significantly better than performance for either of the other two conditions. There was some evidence that the two environments in combination produced a persistent effect on performance that did not dissipate with return to normal conditions. Measured physiological functions of the subjects were within the tolerable range.
Get full access to this article
View all access options for this article.
