The innate and state-of-the-art limitations on human operator manual control speed, frequency, and flexibility are reviewed and analyzed. Advanced manual control techniques for overcoming these limitations are suggested and research relating to these suggestions is reviewed. It is concluded that a considerable increase in human operator response speed, frequency, and flexibility could accrue from use of the suggested manual control techniques.
Get full access to this article
View all access options for this article.
References
1.
AdamsJ. L.An investigation of the effects of the time lag due to long transmission distances upon remote control, Phase I. NASA TN D-1211, December 1961
2.
AdamsJ. L.An investigation of the effects of time lag due to long transmission distances upon remote control, Phases II & III. NASA TN D-1351, April 1962
3.
BarlowJ. S.Evoked responses in relation to visual perception and occulamotor reaction times in man.Annals N. Y. Acad. Sci., 1964,112(1), 432–467
4.
BartleyS. H.Relation of intensity and duration of brief retinal stimulation by light to the electrical responses of the optic cortex of the rabbit.Amer. J. Physiol., 1934,108, 397–408
5.
BartleyS. H.BishopG. H.Optic nerve response to retinal stimulation in the rabbit.Proc. Soc. Exp. Biol., 1940,44, 39–41
6.
BartzA. E.Eye movement latency, duration, and response time as a function of angular displacement.J. exp. psychol., 1962,64, 318–324
7.
BasmajianJ. V.Conscious control of single nerve cells.New Scientist, 1963,12, 662–664
8.
BennettR. L.Principles of therapeutic exercise. In LichtS. (Ed.) Therapeutic exercises.New Haven, Connecticut: Elizabeth Licht, Publisher, 1958
9.
BernotatR.WidlokH.Prediction display. Paper presented at the MIT-NASA Working Conference on Manual Control, Cambridge, Mass., February 28-March 2, 1966
10.
BescoeR. O.Manual attitude control systems: Volume II. Display format considerations.Culver City, California: Hughes Aircraft Co., NASA Technical Report, March 1964
11.
BishopG. H.O'LearyJ. S.Electrical activity of the lateral geniculate of cats following optic nerve stimulation.J. Neurophysiol., 1940,3, 308–22
12.
BlissC. B.Investigations in reaction time and attention.Stud. Yale psychol. Lab., 1893,1, 1–55
13.
BlissJ. C.CraneH. D.Experiments in tactual perception.Washington, D. C.: NASA Report No. CR-322, November 1965
14.
BlissJ.CTownsendJ. T.CraneH. D.LinkS. W.Tactual perception: experiments and models. Menlo Park, California: NASA Report No. NAS2-2751, Stanford Research Institute, December 1965
15.
BontragerE. L.The application of muscle education techniques in the investigation of electromyographic control. Unpublished Masters Thesis, Case Institute of Technology, November 1965
16.
BottomleyA.WilsonA. B. K.NightingaleA.Muscle substitutes and myoelectric control.J. Brit. I. R. E., 1963,26(6), 439–448
17.
BrebnerJ.GordonI.Ensemble size and selective response times with a constant signal rate.Quart. J. exp. Psychol., 1962,14, 113–116
BrownJ. S.Slater-HammelA. T.The effect of speed-up instructions upon the performance of discrete movements in the horizontal plane. State University of Iowa, Department of Psychology, Project Report No. 3, Contract N5ori-57, January 1948
20.
BucknerD. N.McGrathJ. J.Vigilance: a symposium.New York: McGraw-Hill,1963
21.
BurkeD.GibbsC. B.A Comparison of free-moving and pressure levers in a positional control system.Ergonomics, 1965,8, 23–29
22.
CanfieldA. A.ComreyA. L.WilsonR. C.A study of reaction time to light and sound as related to increased positive radial acceleration.Aviat. Med., 1949,20, 350–355
23.
ChangH-T.KaadaB. R.An analysis of primary response of visual cortex to optic nerve stimulation in cats.J. Neurophysiol., 1950,13, 305–18
24.
ConklinJ. E.Effect of control lag on performance in a tracking task.J. exp. psychol., 1957,53, 261–268
25.
ConklinJ. E.Linearity of the tracking performance function.Percept, mot. skills, 1959,9, 387–391
26.
CraikK. J. W.Theory of the human operator in control systems. I. The operator as an engineering system.Brit. J. Psychol., 1947,38, 56–61
27.
DavisD. R.Pilot error: some laboratory experiments.Cambridge, England: Applied Psychol. Research Unit, Medical Research Council,1948
28.
deFlorezL.True blind flight.J. of Aeronautical Sciences, 1936,3, 168–170
29.
DodgeC. H.Bioelectrically controlled upper extremity prostheses. ATD Report No. 66-46, Aerospace Technology Division, Library of Congress, April 1966
30.
DurrL. B.The effect of error amplitude information. M. A. Thesis, University of Virginia, Charlottesville, 1961
31.
ElliotF. R.LouttitC. M.Auto braking reaction times to visual vs. auditory warning signals.Proc. Ind. Acad. Sci., 1948,47, 220–225
32.
ElyJ. H.BowenM.OrlanskyJ.Man-machine dynamics. In MorganC. T.CookJ. S.ChapanisA.LundM. W. (Eds.), Human engineering guide to equipment design.New York: McGraw-Hill, 1963,217–245
33.
EpplerW. G.Study of human tracking performance based on the use of various output variables.Lockheed Missiles and Space Co., October 1965
ForbesG.The effect of certain variables on visual and auditory reaction times.J. exp. Psychol., 1945,35, 153–162
36.
ForbesT. W.GarnerW. R.HowardJ. G.Flying by auditory reference (FLYBAR).OSRD Report No. 5123, Psycho-Acoustic Lab., Harvard University, June 1945
37.
FordA.WhiteC. T.The effectiveness of the eye as a servo-control system.San Diego, California: U. S. Navy Electronics Lab. Report No. 934, October 1959
38.
FroebergS.The relation between the magnitude of stimulus and the time of reaction.Arch. Psychol., 1907,16, 1–38
39.
GarveyW. D., Sweeney, J. S. & Birmingham, H. P. Differential effects of “display lags” and “control lags” on the performance of manual control tracking systems.J. exp. psychol., 1958,56, 8–10
GeldardF. A.Cutaneous channels of communication. In RosenblithW. A. (Ed.) Sensory communications, New York: Wiley, 1961, pp. 73–87
42.
GibbsC. B.The continuous regulation of skilled response by kinesthetic feedback.Brit. J. Psychol., 1954,45, 24–39
43.
GoldmanA. Technical Report 789-11-1, Naval Training Device Center, Port Washington, N. Y., 1959
44.
GranitR.Receptors and sensory perception.New Haven: Yale University Press,1955
45.
HarrisJ. D.PiklerA. G.MurphyJ. E.Compensatory and pursuit tracking of pitch.J. Acoustical Soc. Amer., 1963,35(4), 581–587
46.
HathawayS. R.An action potential study of neuromuscular relations.J. exp. Psychol., 1935,11, 285–298
47.
HenmonV. A. C.The time of perception as a measure of differences in sensations.Arch. Philos. Psychol. sci. Meth., N. Y., 1906,8
48.
HirshJ.KadushinI.Experiments in tactile control of flying vehicles. In 6th Ann. Conf. on Aviation and Astronautics, Israel, February 1964
49.
HodgsonD. A.Preliminary studies of auditory flight control displays.Renton, Washington: Boeing Co., Code Ident. No. 81205(D6-57104), June 1966
50.
HowellW. C.BriggsG. E.An initial evaluation of a vibrotactile display in complex control tasks.Columbus, Ohio: Ohio State University, Technical Report (813)-5, October 1959
51.
HumphreyC. E.ThompsonJ. E.Auditory displays. II. Comparison of auditory and visual tracking in one dimension. A. Discontinuous signals, simple course.Johns Hopkins University, Appl. Physics Lab., Report TG-146, September 1952a
52.
HumphreyC. E.ThompsonJ. E.Auditory displays. II. Comparison of auditory tracking with visual tracking in one dimension. B. Discontinuous signals, complex course.Johns Hopkins University, Applied Physics Lab., Report TG-147, September 1952b
53.
HumphreyC. E.ThompsonJ. E.Auditory displays. II. Comparison of auditory tracking with visual tracking in one dimension. C. Continuous signals, simple, intermediate and complex courses.Johns Hopkins University, Appl. Physics Lab., Report TG-194, April 1953
54.
KelleyC. R.A predictor instrument for manual control. Paper read at the 8th Office of Naval Research Human Engineering Conference, Ann Arbor, Michigan, September 1958
55.
KelleyC. R.Developing and testing the effectiveness of the predictor instrument.Dunlap and Associates, Inc. Technical Report 252-60-1 to the Office of Naval Research, March 1960a
56.
KelleyC. R.Further research on the predictor instrument.Dunlap and Associates, Inc. Technical Report 252-60-2 to the Office of Naval Research, December 1960b
57.
KelleyC. R.Predictor instruments look into the future.Control Engineering, 1962,9(3), 86–90
58.
KempE. H.Copp&eAeG. E.RobinsonE. H.Electrical responses of the brain stem to unilateral auditory stimulation.Amer. J. Physiol., 1937,120, 304–322
59.
KristoffersonA. B.Attention in time discrimination and reaction time.Washington, D. C.: NASA Contract No. NAS 2-1790, April 1965a
60.
KristoffersonA. B.A time constant involved in attention on neural information processing.California: NASA Ames Research Center. Moffcit Field, Contract No. NAS 2-2486, July 1965b
61.
LeslieJ. M.ThompsonD. A.Human frequency response as a function of visual feedback delay. Paper delivered at 10th Annual Meeting of Human Factors Society, November 1966
62.
LockardR. S.FozardJ. L.The eye as a control mechanism.China Lake, California: Naval Ordnance Test Station, Technical Report NOTS 1546, 1956
63.
LoebM.HawkesC.Rise and decay time in vigilance for weak auditory and cutaneous stimuli.Percept. mot. skills, 1961,13, 235–242
64.
LovelessN.HoldingD.Reaction time and tracking ability.Percept. mot. skills, 1959,9, 134
65.
LymanJ.WeltmanG.GrothH.Studies in skilled myoelectric control. USAF: AFAL-TR-66-83. April 1966
66.
MackworthN. H.Research on the measurement of human performance.Cambridge, England: Applied Psychology Research Unit, Report APU-263, Medical Research Council, 1950
67.
MarshallW. H.TalbotS. A.AdesH. W.Cortical response of the anesthetized cat to gross photic and electrical afferent stimulation.J. Neuraphysiol., 1943,6, 1–15
68.
McCoyW. K.Jr.FrostG. G.A predictor display for orbital rendezvous.USAF: AMRL Memorandum P-79, July 1964
69.
McRuerD. T.MagdalenoR. E.Human pilot dynamics with various manipulators.USAF: AFFDL-TR-66-138, December 1966
70.
MillerJ.GlicksteinM.Reaction time to cortical stimulation.Science, 1964,146, 1594–1595
71.
MucklerF. A.ObermayerR. W.Control system ags and man-machine system performance.NASA CR-83, July 1964
72.
NorthJ. D.LomnickiZ. A.Further experiments on human operators in compensatory tracking tasks.Ergonomics, 1961,4, 339–353
73.
ParkerJ. F.FleishmanE. A.Ability factors and component performance measures as predictors of complex tracking behavior.Psychol. Monographs, 1960,74(16)
74.
PattonH. D.Special properties of nerve trunks and tracks. In RuchT. C.FultonJ. F. (Eds.) Medical physiology and biophysics.Philadelphia: Saunders, 1961a
75.
PattonH. D.Reflex regulation of movement and posture. In RuchT. C.FultonJ. F. (Eds.) Medical physiology and biophysics.Philadelphia: Saunders, 1961b
76.
PiklerA. G.HarrisJ. D.Compensatory and pursuit tracking of loudness.Acoustical Soc. Amer., 1960,32(9), 1129–1133
77.
PoffenbergerA. T.Reaction time to retinal stimulation, with special reference to the time lost in conduction through nerve centers.Arch. Psychol., 1912,23, 1–73
78.
PollackI.FickL.The information of elementary auditory displays.J. Acoustical Soc. Amer., 1954,26, 155–158
79.
PoultonE. C.Tracking behavior. In BilodeauE. A. (Ed.) Acquisition of Skill.New York: Academic Press, 1966
80.
RobinsonE. S.Work of the integrated organism. In MurchisonJ. C. (Ed.) Handbook of general experimental psychology.Worcester, Mass.: Clark University Press, 1934
81.
RuchT. C.FultonJ. F.Medical physiology and biophysics.Philadelphia: W. B. Saunders, 1960
82.
SampsonP. B.ColemanP. B.ElkinE. H.The possibility of using the eye as a source of control signals in tracking.Medford, Mass.: Tufts University, Technical Report to ONR, 1959
83.
SegarleL. V.TaylorF. V.Studies of trackin behavior. I. Rate and time characteristics of simple corrective movements.J. exp. psychol., 1948,38, 615–631
84.
SeashoreS. H.SeashoreR. H.Individual differences in simple auditory reaction times of hands, feet, and jaws.J. exp. psychol., 1941,29, 342–345
85.
SeeleyH. F.BlissJ. C.Compensatory tracking with visual and tactile displays.IEEE Transactions on Human Factors in Electronics, 1966,HFE-7(2), 84–90
86.
SmithW. M.Sensitivity to apparent movement in depth as a function of stimulus dimensionality.J. exp. psychol., 1952,43, 149–155
87.
SpectorW. S. (Ed.) Handbook of biological data.Philadelphia: W. B. Saunders,1956
88.
StarkL.VossiusG.YoungL. R.Predictive control of eye tracking movements.IRE Transactions on Human Factors in Electronics, 1962,HFE-3(2), 52–57
89.
SwinkJ. R.Intersensory comparisons of reaction times using an electro-pulse tactile stimulus.Human Factors, 1966,8, 143–145
90.
TaylorF. V., personal communication to J. D. Harris contents in:J. Acoustical Soc. Amer., 1963,35(4), 581–587
91.
TeichnerW. H.Recent studies of simple reaction time.Psychol. Bull., 1954,51, 128–149
92.
ToddJ. W.Reaction to multiple stimuli.Arch. Psychol., 1912,25, 1–65
93.
VinceM. A.Corrective movements in a pursuit task.Quart. J. exp. Psychol., 1948,1, 85–103
94.
VodovnikL.Ing.Dr.An electromagnetic brake activated by eyebrow muscles.Elect. Eng., 1964,36(440), 694–5
95.
VörckelH.Reaktionszeit bei willkurlicher kontraktion und erschlaffung der beuger und strecker des vorder-arms.Z. Biol., 1922,75, 79–90
96.
WargoM. J., The effect of delay in motion-produced visual or auditory feedback on manual control behavior. Paper presented at the Western Psychological Assoc. Meeting, April 1966. Unpublished doctoral dissertation, Medford, Mass.: Tufts University, December 1965
97.
WargoM. J.Delayed sensory feedback in visual and auditory tracking.Percept. mot. skills, 1967,24, 55–62
98.
WargoM. J.KelleyC. R.MitchellM. B.ProsinD. J.Human operator response speed, frequency, and flexibility: A review, analysis and device demonstration.Santa Monica, California: Dunlap and Associates, Inc., NASA Technical Report, Contract NAS 12-103, March 1967 in press
99.
WargoM. J.KelleyC. R.ProsinD. J.MitchellM. B.Muscle action potential and hand switch disjunctive reaction time to visual, auditory, and combined visual-auditory displays. Paper read at Eastern Psych. Assoc. Meeting, Boston, April 1967. (IEEE Transactions on Human Factors in Electronics, in press.)
100.
WarrickM. J.Effect of transmission-type control lags on tracking accuracy. USAF Air Material Command Technical Report No. 5916, September 1949
101.
WassermanW. L.Human amplifiers.Science and Technology, October 1964
102.
WeddellG.The anatomy of cutaneous sensibility.Brit. Med. Bull., 1945,3, 167–172
103.
WeissenbergerS.SheridanT. B.Dynamics of human operator control systems using tactile feedback.J. Basic Eng., 1962,84, 297–301
104.
WigginsJ. S.Two determinants of reaction time.J. exp. Psychol., 1957,54, 144–147
105.
WoodburyW. F.RuchT. C. Muscle In RuchT. C.FultonJ. F. (Eds.) Medical physiology and biophysics.Philadelphia: W. B. Saunders, 1961
106.
WoodworthR. S.SchlosbergH.Experimental psychology.New York: Holt, Rinehart and Winton, 1965
107.
WrightG. W.The latency of sensations of warmth due to radiation.J. Physiol., 1951,112, 344–358
108.
YoungL. R.A sampled data model for eye tracking movements. Unpublished Sc.D. Dissertation, MIT, Cambridge, 1962
