The influence of extraneous stimulation on vigilance performance was investigated by the method of repeated threshold measurement. During part of a 48-min. vigil subjects were required to stand, stretch, and breathe deeply under one condition and to converse with the experimenter during another condition. Performance during the continuing watch improved under both conditions. The results are interpreted as evidence supporting the activation hypothesis of vigilance.
Get full access to this article
View all access options for this article.
References
1.
AdamsJ. A.BoulterL. R.Monitoring of complex visual displays: I. Effects of response complexity and intersignal interval on vigilant behavior when visual load is moderate. USAF CCDD Tech. Note No. 60-63, 1960
2.
AdamsJ. A.BoulterL. R.An evaluation of the activationist hypothesis of human vigilance.J. exp. Psychol., 1962,64, 495–504
3.
AdamsJ. A.StensonH. H.HumesJ. M.Monitoring of complex visual displays: II Effects of visual load and response complexity on human vigilance.Hum. Factors, 1961,3, 213–221
4.
BakanP.Discrimination decrement as a function of time in a prolonged vigil.J. exp. Psychol., 1955,50, 387–390
5.
BergumB. O.LehrD. J.Vigilance performance as a function of paired monitoring.J. appl. Psychol., 1962,46, 341–343
6.
BroadbentD. E.Perception and communication.New York: Pergamon,1958
7.
DeeseJ.Some problems in the theory of vigilance.Psychol. Rev., 1955,62, 359–368
8.
EdwardsA. L.Experimental design in psychological research. (Rev. ed.) New York: Holt, Rinehart, & Winston,1960
9.
FrankmannJudithAdamsJ. A.Theories of vigilance.Psychol. Bull., 1962,59, 257–272
10.
HebbD. O.Drives and the C. N. S. (conceptual nervous system).Psychol. Rev., 1955,62, 243–254
11.
LindsleyD. B.Psychophysiology and motivation. In JonesM. R. (Ed.) Nebraska symposium on motivation.Lincoln: Univer. of Nebraska Press, 1957. Pp. 44–104
12.
LuceT. S.Vigilance as a function of stimulus variety and response complexity.Hum. Factors, 1964,5, 101–110
13.
MackworthN. H.Researches on the measurement of human performance. Medical Research Council Special Report Series 268, H. M. Stationery Office, London, England, 1950. Reprinted in Sinaiko, H. W. (Ed.) Selected papers on human factors in the design and use of control systems. New York: Dover, 1961. Pp. 174-331
14.
McBainW. N.Noise, the “arousal hypothesis,” and monotonous work.J. appl. Psychol., 1961,45, 309–317
15.
McFarlandR. A.HolwayA. N.HurvichL. M.Studies of visual fatigue. Report, 1942, Harvard Graduate School of Business Administration
16.
McGrathJ. J.The effect of irrelevant environmental stimulation on vigilance performance. Project on human factors problems in antisubmarine warfare, Tech. Rep. No. 6. Psychological Sciences Division, Office of Naval Research. November, 1960
17.
MontyR. A.Effects of post-detection response complexity on subsequent monitoring behavior.Hum. Factors, 1962,4, 201–207
18.
ScottT. H.Literature review of the intellectual effects of perceptual isolation. Report No. HR66, 1957, Department of National Defence, Defence Research Board, Canada
19.
SharplessS.JasperH.Habituation of the arousal reaction.Brain, 1956,79, 655–680
20.
WhittenburgJ. A.RossS.AndrewsT. G.Sustained perceptual efficiency as measured by the Mackworth “Clock” Test.Percept. mot. Skills, 1956,6, 109–116
