The problem of short term blindness following exposure to intense flashes of light has important practical implications for military aviators in the atomic age. Experimental studies of flash blindness are reviewed and the physiological bases for the phenomenon are inferred for a wide range of conditions. Several methods of developing a descriptive equation are considered and an empirical formulation is presented.
Get full access to this article
View all access options for this article.
References
1.
AulhornE.Das Verhalten der Netzhautempfindlichkeit im Nachbildereich. XVIII Councilium Ophthalmologicum, 1958, Belgium, 1605–1609.
2.
BarlowH. B.SparrockJ. M. B.The role of afterimages in dark adaptation. Science, 1964, 144, 1309–1314.
3.
BrindleyG. S.The Bunsen-Roscoe law for the human eye at very short durations. J. Physiol., 1952, 118, 135–139.
4.
BrindleyG. S.The discrimination of afterimages. J. Physiol., 1959, 147, 194–203.
5.
BrownJ. L.The effect of different preadapting luminances on the resolution of visual detail during dark adaptation. J. Opt. Soc. Amer., 1954, 44, 48–55.
6.
BrownJ. L.The use of the colored filter goggles for protection against flash blindness. U.S. Naval Air Development Center Report MA 5917, October 22, 1959.
7.
BrownJ. L.Time required for detection of acuity targets following exposure to short adapting flashes. J. Bngng. Psychol., 1964, 3, 53–71.
8.
BrownJ. L.GrahamC. H.LeibowitzH. W.RankenH. B.Luminance thresholds for the resolution of visual detail during dark adaptation. J. Opt. Soc. Amer., 1953, 43, 197–202.
9.
BrownJ. L.PharesL.FletcherD. E.Spectral energy thresholds for the resolution of acuity targets. J. Opt. Soc. Amer., 1960, 50, 950–960.
10.
BrownJ. L.WoodwardL. K.Rod-cone interaction in the dark adapted eye. Optica Acta, 1957, 4, 108–114.
11.
CampbellF. W.RushtonW. A. H.Measurement of the scotopic pigment in the living human eye. J. Physiol., 1955, 130, 131–147.
JohannsenD. E.The duration and intensity of the exposure light as factors in determining the course of subsequent dark adaptation. J. gen. Psychol., 1934, 10, 4–41.
18.
MetcalfR. D.HornR. E.Visual recovery times from high intensity flashes of light. WADC Technical Report 58–232, October 1958.
19.
MillerN.Visual recovery from brief exposures to very high luminance levels. Spring Meeting, Optical Society of America, 1964.
20.
MoteF. A.RiopelleA. J.The effect of varying the intensity and the duration of preexposure upon subsequent dark adaptation in the human eye. J. Comp. and Physiol. Psychol., 1953, 45, 49–55.
21.
RushtonW. A. H.Dark adaptation and the regeneration of rhodopsin. J. Physiol., 1961, 156, 166–178.
22.
SchoutenJ. F.OrnsteinL. S.Measurements on direct and indirect adaptation by means of binocular method. J. Opt. Soc. Amer., 1939, 29, 168–182.
23.
SeverinS. L.NewtonN. L.CulverJ. F.A new approach to the study of flash blindness. Arch. Ophthal., 1962, 67, 578–582.
24.
SeverinS. L.AlderA. V.NewtonN. L.CulverJ. F.Photostress and flash blindness in aerospace operations. USAF School of Aerospace Med., Brooks Air Force Base, Texas, Technical Documentary Report No. SAM-TDR-63-67. 1963.
25.
ShlaerS.The relation between visual acuity and illumination. J. gen. Physiol., 1937, 21, 165–188.
