Increased interest in portability and load-carrying problems among Army human factors specialists is hading to the eventual compilation of a handbook for these areas. Available research material and handbook data are summarized and evaluated. The nature of portability research is examined, and the work required for the preparation of a useful handbook is indicated. Emphasis is placed upon the critical areas of criteria selection, training and motivation.
Get full access to this article
View all access options for this article.
References
1.
BaileyT. L.McDermottW. N.Review of research on load-carrying.U.S. Army Quartermaster Corps, Research and Development Branch, Tentage Series Report No. 9, February 1952.
2.
CarlockJ.WeasnerM. H.Human factors evaluation of Bell Aerosystems “Hip Pack”. Picatinny Arsenal Engineering Sciences Laboratory Information Report 48, February 1963.
3.
CathcartE. P.LathianN. V.GreenwoodN.A note on the rate of marching and the expenditure of energy in man. J. Roy. Army Med. Corps, 1920, 34 (4), 297–305.
4.
CathcartE. P.RichardsonD. T.CampbellW. C.The maximum load to be carried by the soldier. J. Roy. Army Med. Corps, 1923, 40, 435, 41.87.
5.
DanielsF.LymanJ.VanderbieJ. H.Physiology of load-carrying: VII. A study of the experimental pack T 53-8 (with a review of methods for studying load-carrying systems).U.S. Army Quartermaster Research and Development Center, Environmental Protection Division Report No. 225, Natick Massachusetts, March 1954.
6.
DanielsF.VanderbieJ. H.BonmaritoC. L.Physiology of load-carrying: I. Energy cost of carrying thru load distributions on a treadmill.U.S. Army Quartermaster Climatic Research Laboratory, Environmental Protection Branch Report No. 203, Lawrence Massachusetts, March 1953.
7.
DanielsF.VanderbieJ. H.WinsmannF. R.Physiology of load-carrying: VI. Energy cost of treadmill walking compared to road walking. U.S. Army Quartermaster Research and Development Laboratory Environmental Protection Branch Report No. 220, Lawrence Massachusetts, August 1953.
8.
DanielsF.Physiology of load-carrying: XI. Observations on the Korean A-frame. U.S. Army Environmental Protection Branch Technical Report EP-29, Natick Massachusetts, May 1956.
9.
EriksonL.SimonsonE.TaylorH. L.AlexanderH.KeysA.The energy cost of horizontal and grade walking on the motor-driven treadmill. Amer. J. Physiol., 1946, 145, 391–401.
10.
ErvingLora M.Physiology of load-carrying: XII. The use of strap pressure as a criterion for evaluating army packs. U.S. Army Quartermaster Research and Development Technical Report EP-69, Natick Massachusetts, October 1957.
11.
GrayR. F.LiaryJ. R.A survey of human burden-carrying in sub-Saharan Africa.New Haven, Connecticutt: Human Relation Area Files, 1960.
12.
HaleC. J.KarpovichP. V.Physiology of load-carrying: XIII. Performance tests for the evaluation of Army packs.U.S. Army Quartermaster Research and Engineering Center, Environmental Protection Research Division Technical Report EP-70, Natick Massachusetts, October 1957.
13.
HaleC. J.ColemanF. R.KarpovichP. V.Physiology of load-carrying: V. Trunk inclination in carrying low and high packs of various weights.U.S. Army Quartermaster Research and Engineering Division, Research Report 216, Natick Massachusetts, July 1953.
14.
HellebrandtF. A.The influence of the Army pack on postural stability and stance mechanics. Amer. J. Physiol., 1944, 140, 645–655.
15.
KarpovichP. V.HahC. J.Physiology of load-carrying: IV. Pressure exerted by pack straps as related to load carried and chest dimensions.U.S. Army Quartermaster Research and Development Division, Research Report 213, Natick Massachusetts, June 1953.
16.
KolnickerN.TolcottM. A.A survey of the effects o load-carrying and equipment design upon tasks performed by the combat infantryman.Stamford Connecticut: Dunlap and Associates, Inc., November 1962.
17.
LippoldO. C. J.TaylorP. F. D.The design of load-carrying equipment for marching and fighting. Great Britain: Army Operational Research Group Report No. 3151, April 1951.
18.
LothianN. W.Load carried by the soldier.U.S. Army Quartermaster Corps Research and Development Branch, Tentage Series Report No. 11, January 1954.
SmithH. M.Gasious exchange and physiological requirements for level and grade walking.Washington, D.C.: Carnegie Institution of Washington, April 1922.
21.
TanE. H.HaleC. J.KarpovichP. V.Physiology of load-carrying: XIV. Evaluation of combat packs by measuring energy costs and speed of movement.U.S. Army Quartermaster Research and Engineering Center, Environmental Protection Research Division Technical Report EP-71, Natick Massachusetts, October 1957.
22.
U.S. Army Quartermaster Research and Engineering Center, Engineering Psychology Branch.Back packing the lightweight Davy Crockett system. September 1963, report forthcoming.
23.
VanderbieJ. H.Physiology of load-carrying: VIII. Simulated sled pulling on the treadmill.U.S. Army Quartermaster Research and Development Center, Environmental Protection Division Technical Report EP-21, Natick Massachusetts, January 1956.
24.
VanderbieJ. H.Physiology of load-carrying: III. Some experimental load distributions on the treadmill.U.S. Army Quartermaster Climatic Research Laboratory, Environmental Protection Branch Rep. 212, Lawrence, Massachusetts, June, 1953.
25.
VaughanJ. A.DanielsF.Physiology of load-carrying: IX. The energy cost of sled pulling by one man.U.S. Army Quartermaster Research and Development Center, Environmental Protection Division Technical Report EP-26, Natick Massachusetts, January 1956.
26.
WinsmannF. R.DanielsF.Physiology of load-carrying: X. Pack carrying in the desert.U.S. Army Quartermaster Research and Development Center, Environmental Protection Division Technical Report EP-28, Natick Massachusetts, May 1956.
27.
WinsmannF. R.VanderbieJ. H.DanielsF.Physiology of load-carrying: II. Energy cost of wearing armored vests and carrying pack loads on treadmill level course, and mountain slopes.U.S. Army Climatic Research Laboratory, Environmental Protection Branch Report No. 208, Lawrence Massachusetts, May 1953.