Monitoring of Complex Visual Displays: IV. Training for Vigilance

Abstract

An experiment was performed to test the hypothesis that knowledge of results (KR) in a vigilance task can be used as a training technique that will transfer positively to subsequent non-KR sessions where feedback is absent. Three groups, fifteen subjects each, participated in a visual monitoring task for four sessions of three hours each. One group received KR about response proficiency after each response in the first two sessions and a second group received only a neutral remark each time from the experimenter. The final two sessions were standard vigilance tasks without feedback. A third control group had the standard task throughout. The KR group had reliably superior performance on all sessions although within-session vigilance decrement was uninfluenced. The neutral stimulation group did not differ from the control condition. It is suggested that KR administered in a training situation can produce improved vigilance during actual system use where KR is absent.

Get full access to this article

View all access options for this article.

References

Adams

J. A.

Boulter

L. R.

Monitoring of complex visual displays: I. Effects of response complexity and intersignal interval on vigilant behavior when visua load is moderate. Air Force Command and Control Development Division Technical Note 60–63, 30 October 1960.

Adams

J. A.

Boulter

L. R.

An evaluation of the activationist hypothesis of human vigilance. J. exp. Psychol., 1962, 64, 495–504.

Adams

J. A.

Humes

J. M.

Stenson

H. H.

Monitoring of complex visual displays: III. Effects of repeated sessions on human vigilance. Human Factors, 1962, 4, 149–158.

Adams

J. A.

Stenson

H. H.

Humes

J. M.

Monitoring of complex visual displays: II. Effects of visual load and response complexity on human vigilance. Human Factors, 1961, 3, 213–221.

Baker

C. H.

Towards a theory of vigilance. Canad. J. Psychol., 1959, 13, 35–42. (a).

Baker

C. H.

Three minor studies of vigilance. Defence Research Board, Canada. Defence Research Medical Laboratories, DRML Report No. 234–2, April 1959. (b).

Baker

C. H.

Young

Phyllis

Feedback during training and retention of motor skills. Canad. J. Psychol., 1960, 14, 257–264.

Bilodeau

E. A.

McD. Bilodeau

Ina

Schumsky

D. A.

Some effects of introducing and withdrawing knowledge of results early and late in practice. J. exp. Psychol., 1959, 58, 142–144.

Davis

R. C.

Electromyographic factors in aircraft control: The relation of muscular tension to performance. USAF School of Aviation Medicine, Randolph AFB, Texas. Report 55–122, December 1956.

10.

Frankmann

Judith P.

Adams

J. A.

Theories of vigilance. Psychol. Bull., 1962, 59, 257–272.

11.

Lindquist

E. F.

Design and analysis of experiments in psychology and education New York: Houghton-Mifflin, 1953.

12.

Mackworth

N. H.

Researches on the measurement of human performance. In Sinaiko

H. W.

(Ed.) Selected papers on human factors in the design and use of control systems. New York: Dover, 1961. Pp. 174–331.

13.

McCormack

P. D.

Performance in a vigilance task with and without knowledge of results. Canad. J. Psychol., 1959, 13, 68–71.

14.

McCormack

P. D.

Binding

F. R. S.

Chylinski

Joanne

Effects on reaction-time of knowledge of results of performance. Percept, mot. Skills, 1962, 14, 367–372.

15.

Weidenfeller

E. W.

Baker

R. A.

Ware

J. R.

Effects of knowledge of results (true and false) on vigilance performance. Percept, mot. Skills, 1962, 14, 211–215.