Proprioception Variables as Determiners of Anticipatory Timing Behavior

Abstract

Anticipatory timing, where the human operator initiates an accurate response before the actual occurrence of the environmental event, is one of the most striking and least studied aspects of skilled motor performance. An experiment was performed on temporal and control system variables that could influence the timing of responses in a tracking task. Verification was sought for a proprioceptive trace hypothesis that holds the time-varying proprioceptive after-effects of movements to be the internal trace that persists in time and cues the occurrence of a future response. Ninety-six subjects participated. A 2×2×2 randomized factorial design used two values each of movement amplitude, spring loading, and signal duration as a means of manipulating proprioceptive stimuli and their time trace. Results supported the hypothesis. Signal duration and spring loading of the control induced significant effects for the number of beneficial anticipations, but movement amplitude had no significant effect. It was concluded that proprioception has a role in response timing, in addition to its traditional one of informative feedback.

Get full access to this article

View all access options for this article.

References

Adams

J. A.

Human tracking behavior. Psychol. Hull., 1961, 58, 55–79.

Adams

J. A.

Chambers

R. W.

Response to simultaneous stimulation of two sense modalities. J. Exp. Psychol., 1962, 63, 198–206.

Adams

J. A.

Creamer

L. R.

Anticipatory timing of continuous and discrete responses. J. Exp. Psychol., 1962, 63, 84–90.

Adams

J. A.

Xhignesse

L. V.

Some determinants of two-dimensional visual tracking behavior. J. Exp. Psychol., 1960, 60, 391–403.

Bahrick

H. P.

An analysis of stimulus variables influencing the proprioceptive control of movements. Psychol. Rev., 1957, 64, 324–328.

Bahrick

H. P.

Bennett

W. F.

Fitts

P. M.

Accuracy of positioning responses as a function of spring loading in a control. J. Exp. Psychol., 1955, 49, 437–444.

Bahrick

H. P.

Fitts

P. M.

Schneider

Reproduction of simple movements as a function of factors influencing proprioceptive feedback. J. Exp. Psychol., 1955, 49, 445–454.

Bartlett

F. C.

Anticipation in human performance. In Ekman

Husen

Johannson

Sandstrom

C. I.

(eds.), Essays in psychology. Uppsala: Almquist & Wiksells, 1951, pp. 1–17.

Briggs

G. E.

Fitts

P. M.

Bahrick

H. P.

Effects of force and amplitude cues on learning and performance in a complex tracking task. J. Exp. Psychol., 1957, 54, 262–268.

10.

Gibbs

C. B.

The continuous regulation of skilled response by kinaesthetic feed back. Brit. J. Psychol., 1954, 45, 24–39.

11.

Goss

A. E.

A stimulus-response analysis of the interaction of cue-producing and instrumental responses. Psychol. Rev., 1955, 62, 20–31.

12.

Helson

Design of equipment and optimal human operation. Amer. J. Psychol., 1949, 42, 473–497.

13.

Howland

Noble

M. E.

The effect of physical constants of a control on tracking performance. J. Exp. Psychol., 1953, 46, 353–360.

14.

Lindquist

E. F.

Design and analysis of experiments in psychology and education. New York: Houghton-Mifflin, 1953.

15.

Osgood

C. E.

Method and theory in experimental psychology. New York: Oxford, 1953.

16.

Poulton

E. C.

Perceptual anticipation in tracking with two-pointer and one-pointer displays. Brit. J. Psychol., 1952, 43, 222–229.

17.

Poulton

E. C.

On prediction in skilled movements. Psychol. Bull., 1957, 54, 467–478.

18.

Vince

Margaret A.

The part played by intellectual processes in sensori-motor performance. Quart. J. Exp. Psychol., 1953, 5, 75–86.

19.

Vince

Margaret A.

The relation between hand movements and intellectual activity in a skilled task. Quart. J. Exp. Psychol., 1955, 7, 82–90.

20.

Weiss

The role of proprioceptive feedback in positioning responses. J. Exp. Psychol., 1954, 47, 215–224.

21.

Woodrow

Time perception. In Stevens

S. S.

(Ed.), Handbook of Experimental Psychology. New York: Wiley, 1951.