This research investigated effects for new traffic markings on the user behaviour of motorcycle riders.
Background
Across motorised vehicles, motorcycles represent the most vulnerable road users.
Method
A road sign and traffic markings were installed at six trial sites. Data from video cameras at each site provided measures of rider behaviour in relation to speed, road position, brake use, and use of the traffic markings, before and after installations. Throughout this research 4652 motorcycle riders travelled through the sites. Of these 1542 riders were analysed in more detail to investigate the effects of the road safety intervention on rider behaviour.
Results
At five sites speed was reduced by a significant margin. At four sites there were significant improvements in road position at the final traffic marking. At five of the trial sites on the apex of a bend, there were significant improvements in road position. Braking behaviour decreased at two of the trial sites. For use of the traffic markings a significant increase was observed across all the trial sites. Across the behaviour measures, the changes were still present 4 weeks later. At a comparison site no changes in behaviour were observed.
Conclusion
The findings provide evidence of improved rider behaviour which are placed in reference to the Safe System principles for road safety and casualty reduction.
Application
This research has generated international interest for installing the road sign and traffic markings in other regions and contributes to the Scottish Government’s Road Safety Framework to 2030 by reducing motorcycle casualties.
ArmstrongR. A. (2014). When to use the Bonferroni correction. Ophthalmic and Physiological Optics: The Journal of the British College of Ophthalmic Opticians (Optometrists), 2014(34): 502–508. https://doi.org/10.1111/opo.12131
2.
BEAR Scotland Ltd. (2019). North West unit motorcycle accident investigation. [Unpublished Report Prepared for]. Transport Scotland, Trunk Road and Bust Operations (TBRO) Directorate. Scheme Ref: 18/NW/0801/042.
3.
BissellH. H.PilkingtonG. B.MasonJ. M.WoodsD. L. (1982). Roadways cross section and alignment. In ByingtonS.R. (Ed.), Synthesis of safety research related to traffic control and roadway elements (1, pp. 1.1–1.16). US Department of Transportation, Federal Highway Administration.
4.
BriceljA.MerkunA.BrumecU.HudejG. (2016). Report for the implementation of measures to reduce the speed of motorcyclists and to improve traffic safety for all road users. DRI Engineering and Consulting. Number: 4200-1/8-AB-AM-UB-GH.
5.
ClarkeD. D.WardP. J.BartleC.TrumanW. A. (2007). The role of motorcyclist and other driver behaviour in two types of serious accident in the UK. Accident Analysis & Prevention, 39(5), 974–981. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.aap.2007.01.002
6.
CoolicanH. (1999). Research methods and statistics in psychology (3rd ed.). Hodder and Stoughton.
7.
CrundallE.CrundallD.StedmonA. W. (2012). Negotiating left-hand and right-hand bends: A motorcycle simulator study to investigate experiential and behaviour differences across rider groups. PLoS One, 7(1), Article e29978. https://doi.org/10.1371/journal.pone.0029978
8.
de MoraesV. Y.GodinK.Dos ReisF. B.BellotiJ. C.BhandariM. (2014). Status of road safety and injury burden: Brazil. Journal of Orthopaedic Trauma, 28(Suppl 1), S45–S46. https://doi.org/10.1097/BOT.0000000000000107
FildesB.CorbenB.NewsteadS.MacaulayJ.GunatillakeT.TziotisM. (2005). Perceptual countermeasures to speeding. Annual Proceedings - Association for the Advancement of Automotive Medicine, 49, 1–18.
16.
GardenerR.TateF.MackieH.StedmonA. W.Southey-JonesB. (2017). Motorcycle-friendly roads: Applying a customer lens on the journey from identification to implementation. Proceedings of Australasian Road Safety Conference 2017, Perth, Australia, 10–12 October 2017.
17.
GibreelG. M.EasaS. M.HassanY.El-DimeeryI. A. (1999). State of the art of highway geometric design consistency. Journal of Transportation Engineering, 125(4), 305–313. https://doi.org/10.1061/(asce)0733-947x(1999)125:4(305)
HirschL.MooreD.StedmonA. W.MackieH.ScottR. (2017). Keeping you in the loop: A human factors approach to motorcycling safety. Human Factors and Ergonomics Society of New Zealand (HFESNZ) Annual Conference, Wellington, New Zealand, 5–7 September, 2017.
20.
HirschL.ScottR.MackieH.StedmonA. W.MooreD. (2018). Motorcycle safety on the coromandel curves: The development and evaluation of perceptual counter-measures to influence rider speed, position and braking. Prepared for the Accident Compensation Corporation.
21.
JobR. F. S.TruongJ.SakshitaC. (2022). The ultimate safe system: Redefining the safe system approach for road safety. Sustainability, 14(5), 2978. https://doi.org/10.3390/su14052978
22.
LehmanR. S. (1991). Statistics and research design in the behavioural sciences. Wadsworth Publishing Co.
23.
LiY.ZhangJ.LuY.JiangY. (2024). Exploring the effect of nudge approach on driver’s willingness to use driver tracking. Transportation Research Part F: Traffic Psychology and Behaviour, 101, 15–32. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.trf.2023.12.016
24.
MackieH.ScottR. (2015). Evaluation of perceptual countermeasures for the southern coromandel motorcycle safety demonstration project. DRAFT. Mackie Research and Consulting Ltd.
25.
MaresP.CoyneP.MacDonaldB. (2020). Motorcycle roadcraft: The police rider’s handbook. The Stationery Office.
MatirnezA.MantarasD. D.LuqueP. (2013). Reducing posted speed and perceptual countermeasures to improve safety in road stretches with a high-concentration of accidents. Safety Science, 60, 160–168. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.ssci.2013.07.003
28.
MulvihillC.CandappaN.CorbenB. (2008). Evaluation of perceptual countermeasures for motorcyclists stages 1 and 2: Final report. Monash University Accident Research Centre.
StedmonA. W.McKenzieD.LanghamM.McKechnieK.PerryR.WilsonS. (2022). Safer road users: Investigating the influence of PRIME road markings on motorcycle rider behaviour. Transportation Research Part F: Traffic Psychology and Behaviour, 83(2021), 368–385. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.trf.2022.10.020
31.
StedmonA. W.McKenzieD.LanghamM.McKechnieK.PerryR.WilsonS. (2021). Safeguarding motorcyclists: Trialing new PRIME road markings for casualty reduction. Transportation Research Part F: Traffic Psychology and Behaviour, 83(2021), 333–350. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.trf.2021.11.001
32.
StedmonA. W.McKenzieD.LanghamM.McKechnieK.PerryR.WilsonS.MackayM.GeddesS. (2024). Participatory ergonomics: The design of PRIME road markings for motorcycle casualty reduction. In GolightlyD.BalfeN.CharlesR. (Eds.), Contemporary ergonomics and human factors 2024 (pp. 502–509). Chartered Institute of Ergonomics and Human Factors.
33.
StewartD.CudworthC. J. (1990). A remedy for accidents at bends. Traffic Engineering and Control, 31, 88–93.
34.
StewartD. L. (1977). The case of the left-hand Bend. Highway Engineer, 24(6), 12–17.
35.
Transport Scotland. (2020). Reported road casualties Scotland 2019: Key findings report. Transport Scotland. Crown Copyright.
36.
Transport Scotland. (2021). Scotland’s road safety framework to 2030: Together making Scotland’s roads safer. Transport Scotland. Crown Copyright.
37.
VanlaarW.HingM. M.BrownS.McAteerH.CrainJ.McFaullS. (2016). Fatal and serious injuries related to vulnerable road users in Canada. Journal of Safety Research, 58, 67–77. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jsr.2016.07.001
38.
WalmsleyD.SummersgillI.BinchC. (1998). Accidents on modern rural single-carriageway trunk roads. TRL report 336. Transport Research Laboratory.
