This study aimed to conduct a systematic literature review of gestural interaction research by tracing its evolution from a focus on functionality and performance toward a human-centered paradigm, and to develop a theoretical framework that structures the understanding of gestural interaction processes.
Background
Despite extensive research, no comprehensive review has yet been conducted on gestural interaction from a human-centered perspective, highlighting the need for a structured synthesis to inform design and evaluation practices.
Method
We first developed a conceptual Person-Action-Target-Environment (PATE) model for gestural interaction. Guided by this model, we conducted a systematic review using the Preferred Reporting Items for Systematic Reviews and Meta-Analyses (PRISMA) method. Our review included 197 articles to identify key topics, measurement indicators, and influencing factors.
Results
The review identified three phases in gesture research: an early focus on functionality, followed by performance-oriented studies, and a recent emphasis on user experience. Four key dimensions emerged in the measurement of gestural interaction: efficiency, ease of use, subjective experience, and tolerance degree. At least ten categories (40 factors in total) were found to influence gestural interaction, with factors related to person, interacting target and actions being extensively explored.
Conclusion
This review identifies trends, measures, and influencing factors in gestural interaction research, and utilizes the PATE model to effectively structure the analysis and understanding of gestural interaction processes.
Application
This review provides insights and tools for researchers and designers aiming to enhance user experience in gestural interaction technologies.
AdhikaryJ.VertanenK. (2021). Text entry in virtual environments using speech and a midair keyboard. IEEE Transactions on Visualization and Computer Graphics, 27(5), 2648–2658. https://doi.org/10.1109/TVCG.2021.3067776
2.
AhlströmD.HasanK.IraniP. (2014). Are you comfortable doing that? Acceptance studies of around-device gestures in and for public settings. Proceedings of the 16th international conference on human-computer interaction with mobile devices & services, Toronto, ON, Canada, 23 September 2014, pp. 193–202. https://doi.org/10.1145/2628363.2628381
3.
AhmadB. I.LangdonP. M.SkrypchukL.GodsillS. J. (2018). How does eye-gaze relate to gesture movement in an automotive pointing task?Advances in human aspects of transportation: Proceedings of the AHFE 2017 international conference on human factors in transportation, July 17− 21, 2017, the Westin Bonaventure Hotel, Los Angeles, California, USA 8 (pp. 423–434). Springer International Publishing. https://doi.org/10.1007/978-3-319-60441-1_42
4.
AhnJChoiSLeeMKimK (2017). Investigating key user experience factors for virtual reality interactions. Journal of the Ergonomics Society of Korea, 36(4), 267–280. https://doi.org/10.5143/JESK.2017.36.4.267
5.
AliA. (2015). Sequential gestural passcodes on google glass. Proceedings of the 17th international ACM SIGACCESS conference on computers & accessibility, Lisbon, Portugal, 26 October 2015, pp. 359–360. https://doi.org/10.1145/2700648.2811326
6.
AnthonyL.StoferK. A.LucA.WobbrockJ. O. (2016). Gestures by children and adults on touch tables and touch walls in a public science center. Proceedings of the 15th international conference on interaction design and children, Manchester, UK, 21 June 2016, pp. 344–355. https://doi.org/10.1145/2930674.2930682
7.
ArifA. S.SyllaC. (2013). A comparative evaluation of touch and pen gestures for adult and child users. Proceedings of the 12th international conference on interaction design and children (pp. 392–395). Association for Computing Machinery. https://doi.org/10.1145/2485760.2485804
8.
AsakawaD. S.DennerleinJ. T.JindrichD. L. (2017). Index finger and thumb kinematics and performance measurements for common touchscreen gestures. Applied Ergonomics, 58, 176–181. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.apergo.2016.06.004
9.
AustinC. R.EnsB.SatriadiK. A.JennyB. (2020). Elicitation study investigating hand and foot gesture interaction for immersive maps in augmented reality. Cartography and Geographic Information Science, 47(3), 214–228. https://doi.org/10.1080/15230406.2019.1696232
BampatziaS.AntoniouA.LepourasG.RoumeliotiE.BravouV. (2015). Comparing game input modalities: A study for the evaluation of player experience by measuring emotional state and game usability. 2015 IEEE 9th international conference on Research Challenges in Information Science (RCIS), Athens, Greece, 13–15 May 2015, pp. 530–531. https://doi.org/10.1109/RCIS.2015.7128922
12.
BeeseN. O.ReinhardR.LachmannT. (2023). The right tools for the job: Towards preference and performance considerations in the design of virtual reality interactions. Behaviour & Information Technology, 42(3), 278–288. https://doi.org/10.1080/0144929X.2022.2125831
13.
BhaskaraA.SkinnerM.LoftS. (2020). Agent transparency: A review of current theory and evidence. IEEE Transactions on Human-Machine Systems, 50(3), 215–224. https://doi.org/10.1109/THMS.2020.2965529
14.
BoltR. A. (1980). ‘Put-that-there’ voice and gesture at the graphics interface. Proceedings of the 7th annual conference on computer graphics and interactive techniques (pp. 262–270). Association for Computing Machinery.
BoothA.SuttonA.PapaioannouD. (2016). Systematic approaches to a successful literature review. Sage Publications.
17.
BorgG. (1990). Psychophysical scaling with applications in physical work and the perception of exertion. Scandinavian Journal of Work, Environment & Health, 16(Suppl 1), 55–58. https://doi.org/10.5271/sjweh.1815
BrownQ.AnthonyL. (2012). Toward comparing the touchscreen interaction patterns of kids and adults. Proceedings of the SIGCHI workshop on educational software, interfaces and technology (p. 4). Association for Computing Machinery.
20.
ChanT. C.LeowM. C.OngL. Y. (2022). A practical usability study framework using the sus and the affinity diagram: A case study on the online roadshow website. Pertanika Journal of Science and Technology, 30(2), 1439–1455. https://doi.org/10.47836/pjst.30.2.33
21.
ChatzidakiE.XenosM. (2017). A case study on learning through natural ways of interaction. 2017 IEEE global engineering education conference (EDUCON) (pp. 746–753). IEEE. https://doi.org/10.1109/EDUCON.2017.7942931
22.
ChenK. B.PontoK.TredinnickR. D.RadwinR. G. (2015). Virtual exertions: Evoking the sense of exerting forces in virtual reality using gestures and muscle activity. Human Factors, 57(4), 658–673. https://doi.org/10.1177/0018720814562231
23.
ChenX.TangX.ZhaoY.HuangT.QianR.ZhangJ.ChenW.WangX. (2023). Evaluating visual consistency of icon usage in across-devices. International Journal of Human-Computer Interaction, 40(9), 1–17. https://doi.org/10.1080/10447318.2022.2162275
24.
ChenY.HuynhW.McgrawT.QianC.HassanR. (2018). Unobtrusive touch-free interaction on mobile devices in dirty working environments. Human Factors and Ergonomics in Manufacturing & Service Industries, 28(2), 250–259. https://doi.org/10.1002/hfm.20741
25.
ChenZ.MaX.PengZ.ZhouY.YaoM.MaZ.WangC.GaoZ.ShenM. (2018). User-defined gestures for gestural interaction: Extending from hands to other body parts. International Journal of Human-Computer Interaction, 34(3), 238–250. https://doi.org/10.1080/10447318.2017.1342943
26.
ChenZ.YunD.ZhouJ. (2023). Handwriting on touch screens through fingers and stylus: Investigating the optimal size of the input box for younger and older adults. International Journal of Human-Computer Interaction, 40(14), 1–10. https://doi.org/10.1080/10447318.2023.2192107
27.
ChêneD.PillotV.Bobillier ChaumonM.-É. (2016). Tactile interaction for novice user: Uncolocated gestures. Human aspects of IT for the aged population. Design for aging: Second international conference, ITAP 2016, held as part of HCI international 2016, Toronto, ON, Canada, July 17–22, 2016, proceedings, Part I 2 (pp. 412–423). Springer International Publishing. https://doi.org/10.1007/978-3-319-39943-0_40
28.
ChourasiaA. O.WiegmannD. A.ChenK. B.IrwinC. B.SestoM. E. (2013). Effect of sitting or standing on touch screen performance and touch characteristics. Human Factors, 55(4), 789–802. https://doi.org/10.1177/0018720812470843
29.
CockburnA.MassonD.GutwinC.PalanqueP.GogueyA.YungM.GrisC.TraskC. (2019). Design and evaluation of braced touch for touchscreen input stabilisation. International Journal of Human-Computer Studies, 122(2019), 21–37. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.ijhcs.2018.08.005
CouttsL. V.PlantK. L.SmithM.BoltonL.ParnellK. J.ArnoldJ.StantonN. A. (2019). Future technology on the flight deck: Assessing the use of touchscreens in vibration environments. Ergonomics, 62(2), 286–304. https://doi.org/10.1080/00140139.2018.1552013
32.
DetjenH.FaltaousS.PflegingB.GeislerS.SchneegassS. (2021). How to increase automated vehicles’ acceptance through in-vehicle interaction design: A review. International Journal of Human-Computer Interaction, 37(4), 308–330. https://doi.org/10.1080/10447318.2020.1860517
33.
de VisserE. J.PakR.ShawT. H. (2018). From ‘automation’ to ‘autonomy’: The importance of trust repair in human–machine interaction. Ergonomics, 61(10), 1409–1427. https://doi.org/10.1080/00140139.2018.1457725
34.
DubeT. J.RenY.LimerickH.MacKenzieI. S.ArifA. S. (2022). Push, tap, dwell, and pinch: Evaluation of four mid-air selection methods augmented with ultrasonic haptic feedback. Proceedings of the ACM on Human-Computer Interaction, 6(ISS), 207-225. https://doi.org/10.1145/3567718
35.
EisensteinJ.DavisR. (2006). Natural gesture in descriptive monologues. ACM SIGGRAPH 2006 courses (p. 26). Association for Computing Machinery. https://doi.org/10.1145/1185657.1185787
36.
EndsleyM. R. (2021). Situation awareness. In GavrielS.WaldemarK. (Eds.), Handbook of human factors and ergonomics (1st ed., pp. 434–455). Wiley. https://doi.org/10.1002/9781119636113.ch17
37.
EndsleyM. R.JonesD. G. (2025). Designing for situation awareness: An approach to user-centered design (3rd ed.). CRC Press.
38.
FabroyirH. (2019). Multitouch interface is not good for spatial navigation in virtual reality. Proceedings of 2019 international conference on information and communication technology and systems (pp. 323–326). ICTS 2019. https://doi.org/10.1109/ICTS.2019.8850980
39.
FaresE.CheungV.GirouardA. (2017). Effects of bend gesture training on learnability and memorability in a mobile game. Proceedings of the 2017 ACM international conference on interactive surfaces and spaces (pp. 240–245). Association for Computing Machinery. https://doi.org/10.1145/3132272.3134142
40.
FeldmanA.TapiaE. M.SadiS.MaesP.SchmandtC. (2005). ReachMedia: On-the-move interaction with everyday objects. Ninth IEEE international symposium on wearable computers (ISWC’05) (pp. 52–59). IEEE. https://doi.org/10.1109/ISWC.2005.44
41.
FigueiredoL. S.MolnarD.VeanesM.LivshitsB. (2017). Prepose: Privacy, security, and reliability for gesture-based programming. IEEE Security & Privacy, 15(2), 14–23. https://doi.org/10.1109/MSP.2017.44
42.
FindlaterL.FroehlichJ. E.FattalK.WobbrockJ. O.DastyarT. (2013). Age-related differences in performance with touchscreens compared to traditional mouse input. Proceedings of the SIGCHI conference on human factors in computing systems (pp. 343–346). Association for Computing Machinery.
43.
FisherS. S.McGreevyM.HumphriesJ.RobinettW. (1987). Virtual environment display system. Proceedings of the 1986 workshop on interactive 3D graphics (pp. 77–87). Association for Computing Machinery. https://doi.org/10.1145/319120.319127
44.
GaoQ.MaZ.GuQ.LiJ.GaoZ. (2023). Working memory capacity for gesture-command associations in gestural interaction. International Journal of Human-Computer Interaction, 39(15), 3045–3056. https://doi.org/10.1080/10447318.2022.2091213
45.
GaoQ.SunQ. (2015). Examining the usability of touch screen gestures for older and younger adults. Human Factors, 57(5), 835–863. https://doi.org/10.1177/0018720815581293
46.
GaoY.Bianchi-BerthouzeN.MengH. (2012). What does touch tell us about emotions in touchscreen-based gameplay?ACM Transactions on Computer-Human Interaction, 19(4), 1–30. https://doi.org/10.1145/2395131.2395138
47.
GavgiotakiD.NtoaS.MargetisG.ApostolakisK. C.StephanidisC. (2023). Gesture-based interaction for ar systems: A short review. Proceedings of the 16th international conference on pervasive technologies related to assistive environments (PETRA’ 23), July 05-07, 2023, Corfu, Greece (p. 9). Association for Computing Machinery. https://doi.org/10.1145/3594806.3594815
48.
GeorgiouOFrierWFreemanEPacchierottiCHoshiT. (2022). Mid-air haptics: Future challenges and opportunities. In GeorgiouO.FrierW.FreemanE.PacchierottiC.HoshiT. (Eds.), Ultrasound Mid-Air Haptics for Touchless Interfaces. Human–Computer Interaction Series. Springer. https://doi.org/10.1007/978-3-031-04043-6_18
49.
GraichenL.GraichenM. (2024a). Do users desire gestures for in-vehicle interaction? Towards the subjective assessment of gestures in a high-fidelity driving simulator. Computers in Human Behavior, 156, 108189. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.chb.2024.108189
50.
GraichenL.GraichenM. (2024b). Do we have gestures in our hands? On the influence of hand characteristics in mid-air gesture recognition. In Proceedings of the IADIS international conference on interfaces and human computer interaction. Budapest, Hungary, July 2024. IADIS-Press.
51.
GraichenL.GraichenM.KremsJ. F. (2019). Evaluation of gesture-based in-vehicle interaction: User experience and the potential to reduce driver distraction. Human Factors, 61(5), 774–792. https://doi.org/10.1177/0018720818824253
52.
GraichenL.GraichenM.KremsJ. F. (2022). Effects of gesture-based interaction on driving behavior: A driving simulator study using the projection-based vehicle-in-the-loop. Human Factors, 64(2), 324–342. https://doi.org/10.1177/0018720820943284
53.
GreenhalghT.ThorneS.MalterudK. (2018). Time to challenge the spurious hierarchy of systematic over narrative reviews. European Journal of Clinical Investigation, 48(6), Article e12931. https://doi.org/10.1111/eci.12931
54.
GulM. I.KhanI. A.ShahS.El-AffendiM. (2023). Can nonliterates interact as easily as literates with a virtual reality system? A usability evaluation of VR interaction modalities. Systems, 11(2), 101. https://doi.org/10.3390/systems11020101
55.
GutwinC.GreenbergS. (2002). A descriptive framework of workspace awareness for real-time groupware. Computer Supported Cooperative Work, 11(3-4), 411–446. https://doi.org/10.1023/a:1021271517844
56.
HafziA.HendersonJ.NeshatiA.ZhouW.LankE.VogelD. (2023). In-vehicle performance and distraction for midair and touch directional gestures. Proceedings of the 2023 CHI conference on human factors in computing systems (pp. 1–13). Association for Computing Machinery. https://doi.org/10.1145/3544548.3581335
57.
HanI. X. (2023). Ninja locker: A hand-gesture-enabled knowledge-based vr authentication interface. 2023 IEEE conference on virtual reality and 3D user interfaces abstracts and workshops (VRW) (pp. 943–944). IEEE. https://doi.org/10.1109/VRW58643.2023.00314
58.
HartS. G.StavelandL. E. (1988). Development of NASA-TLX (task load index): Results of empirical and theoretical research. Advances in Psychology, 52(1988), 139–183. https://doi.org/10.1016/S0166-4115(08)62386-9
59.
HassenzahlM.BurmesterM.KollerF. (2003). AttrakDiff: Ein Fragebogen zur Messung wahrgenommener hedonischer und pragmatischer Qualität. In SzwillusG.ZieglerJ. (Eds.), Mensch & computer 2003: Interaktion in bewegung (pp. 187–196). Vieweg+Teubner Verlag. https://doi.org/10.1007/978-3-322-80058-9_19
60.
HeS.TungW.-F.LinS.-L. (2023). Analysis of user experience of hand gestures for interaction with wearable devices. International Journal of Human-Computer Interaction, 40(16), 4252–4264. https://doi.org/10.1080/10447318.2023.2212217
61.
HeinrichF.BornemannK.PolenzL.LawonnK.HansenC. (2023). Clutch & grasp: Activation gestures and grip styles for device-based interaction in medical spatial augmented reality. International Journal of Human-Computer Studies, 180(2023), 103117. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.ijhcs.2023.103117
62.
HoldenK.GreeneM.VincentE.SándorA.ThompsonS.FeivesonA.MunsonB. (2023). Effects of long-duration microgravity and gravitational transitions on fine motor skills. Human Factors, 65(6), 1046–1058. https://doi.org/10.1177/00187208221084486
63.
HuC.-Y.LinH.-Y.ChenL.-C. (2016). The effects of screen size on rotating 3D contents using compound gestures on a mobile device. Displays, 41, 25–32. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.displa.2015.11.002
64.
HürstW.van WezelC. (2013). Gesture-based interaction via finger tracking for mobile augmented reality. Multimedia Tools and Applications, 62(1), 233–258. https://doi.org/10.1007/s11042-011-0983-y
65.
HussainN. H.Tengku WookT. S. M.Mat NoorS. F.MohamedH. (2016). Children’s interaction ability towards multi-touch gestures. International Journal of Advanced Science, Engineering and Information Technology, 6(6), 875. https://doi.org/10.18517/ijaseit.6.6.1380
66.
HussainN. H.WookT. S. M. T.NoorS. F. M.MohamedH. (2017). Multi-touch gestures in multimodal systems interaction among preschool children. 2017 6th international conference on electrical engineering and informatics (ICEEI) (pp. 1–6). IEEE. https://doi.org/10.1109/ICEEI.2017.8312436
67.
HuuP. N.ThuH. N. T. (2019). Proposal gesture recognition algorithm combining cnn for health monitoring. 2019 6th NAFOSTED conference on information and computer science (NICS) (pp. 209–213). IEEE. https://doi.org/10.1109/NICS48868.2019.9023804
68.
IbaT.YoshikawaA.MunakataK. (2017). Philosophy and methodology of clustering in pattern mining: Japanese anthropologist Jiro Kawakita’s KJ method. Proceedings of the 24th conference on pattern languages of programs (pp. 1–11). Association for Computing Machinery. https://doi.org/10.5555/3492252.3492263
69.
IqbalS.AshfaqT.TaibC. A. B.School of Business Management, Universiti Utara Malaysia, MalaysiaSchool of Technology Management and Logistics, Universiti Utara Malaysia, Malaysia. (2022). A systematic literature review on organizational performance in global higher education: An affinity diagram approach. Pakistan Journal of Scientific Research, 4(1), 688–701. https://doi.org/10.52567/pjsr.v4i1.935
70.
JanczykM.XiongA.ProctorR. (2019). Stimulus-response and response-effect compatibility with touchless gestures and moving action effects. Human Factors, 61(8), 001872081983181. https://doi.org/10.1177/0018720819831814
71.
Jaramillo-YánezA.BenalcázarM. E.Mena-MaldonadoE. (2020). Real-time hand gesture recognition using surface electromyography and machine learning: A systematic literature review. Sensors, 20(9). 2467. https://doi.org/10.3390/s20092467
72.
JennettC.CoxA. L.CairnsP.DhopareeS.EppsA.TijsT.WaltonA. (2008). Measuring and defining the experience of immersion in games. International Journal of Human-Computer Studies, 66(9), 641–661. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.ijhcs.2008.04.004
73.
JeongH.LiuY. (2017). Effects of touchscreen gesture’s type and direction on finger-touch input performance and subjective ratings. Ergonomics, 60(11), 1528–1539. https://doi.org/10.1080/00140139.2017.1313457
74.
JeongH.LiuY. (2019). Computational modeling of touchscreen drag gestures using a cognitive architecture and motion tracking. International Journal of Human-Computer Interaction, 35(6), 510–520. https://doi.org/10.1080/10447318.2018.1466858
75.
JiangJ.WeiZ.YangT.LiuY.LiB.DuF. (2022). Swiping angles differentially influence young and old users’ performance and experience on swiping gestures. Engineering Psychology and Cognitive Ergonomics, 13307(HCII 2022), 33–48. https://doi.org/10.1007/978-3-031-06086-1_3
76.
JingA.GuptaK.McDadeJ.LeeG. A.BillinghurstM. (2022). Comparing gaze-supported modalities with empathic mixed reality interfaces in remote collaboration. 2022 IEEE international symposium on mixed and augmented reality (ISMAR) (pp. 837–846). IEEE. https://doi.org/10.1109/ISMAR55827.2022.00102
77.
JungY. H.QinS. (2011). User-defined gesture sets using a mobile device for people with communication difficulties. The 17th international conference on automation and computing (pp. 34–39). IEEE.
78.
JurewiczK. A.NeyensD. M.CatchpoleK.ReevesS. T. (2018). Developing a 3D gestural interface for anesthesia-related human-computer interaction tasks using both experts and novices. Human Factors, 60(7), 1007–1992. https://doi.org/10.1177/0018720818780544
79.
KajastilaR.LokkiT. (2012). Combining auditory and visual menus. Acta Acustica united with Acustica, 98(6), 945–956. https://doi.org/10.3813/AAA.918578
80.
KaneS. K.WobbrockJ. O.LadnerR. E. (2011). Usable gestures for blind people: Understanding preference and performance. Proceedings of the SIGCHI conference on human factors in computing systems (pp. 413–422). Association for Computing Machinery. https://doi.org/10.1145/1978942.1979001
81.
KangH.ShinG. (2017). Effects of touch target location on performance and physical demands of computer touchscreen use. Applied Ergonomics, 61, 159–167. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.apergo.2017.01.015
82.
KarafotiasG.TeranishiA.KorresG.EysselF.CoptiS.EidM. (2017). Intensifying emotional reactions via tactile gestures in immersive films. ACM Transactions on Multimedia Computing, Communications, and Applications, 13(3), 1–17. https://doi.org/10.1145/3092840
83.
KennedyR. S.LaneN. E.BerbaumK. S.LilienthalM. G. (1993). Simulator sickness questionnaire: An enhanced method for quantifying simulator sickness. The International Journal of Aviation Psychology, 3(3), 203–220. https://doi.org/10.1207/s15327108ijap0303_3
84.
KitaS. (2009). Cross-cultural variation of speech-accompanying gesture: A review. Language & Cognitive Processes, 24(2), 145–167. https://doi.org/10.1080/01690960802586188
85.
KosticZ.DumasC.PrattS.BeyerJ. (2023). Exploring mid-air hand interaction in data visualization. IEEE Transactions on Visualization and Computer Graphics, 30(9), 1–18. https://doi.org/10.1109/TVCG.2023.3332647
86.
KoutsabasisP.VogiatzidakisP. (2019). Empirical research in mid-air interaction: A systematic review. International Journal of Human-Computer Interaction, 35(18), 1747–1768. https://doi.org/10.1080/10447318.2019.1572352
87.
KrishnanN. C.LadeP.PanchanathanS. (2010). Activity gesture spotting using a threshold model based on adaptive boosting. 2010 IEEE international conference on multimedia and expo (pp. 155–160). IEEE. https://doi.org/10.1109/ICME.2010.5583013
88.
KvålsethT. O. (2021). Hick’s law equivalent for reaction time to individual stimuli. British Journal of Mathematical and Statistical Psychology, 74(1), 275–293. https://doi.org/10.1111/bmsp.12232
89.
LargeD. R.HarringtonK.BurnettG.GeorgiouO. (2019). Feel the noise: Mid-air ultrasound haptics as a novel human-vehicle interaction paradigm. Applied Ergonomics, 81, 102909. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.apergo.2019.102909
90.
LauC. W.QuZ.DraperD.QuanR.BrayteeA.BluffA.ZhangD.JohnstonA.KennedyP. J.SimoffS.NguyenQ. V.CatchpooleD. (2022). Virtual reality for the observation of oncology models (VROOM): Immersive analytics for oncology patient cohorts. Scientific Reports, 12(1), 11337. https://doi.org/10.1038/s41598-022-15548-1
91.
LeH. V.MayerS.SteuerleinB.HenzeN. (2019). Investigating unintended inputs for one-handed touch interaction beyond the touchscreen. Proceedings of the 21st international conference on human-computer interaction with mobile devices and services (pp. 1–14). Association for Computing Machinery. https://doi.org/10.1145/3338286.3340145
92.
LeeH.-K.KimJ. H. (1999). An HMM-based threshold model approach for gesture recognition. IEEE Transactions on Pattern Analysis and Machine Intelligence, 21(10), 961–973. https://doi.org/10.1109/34.799904
93.
LeeJ.AggarwalS.WuJ.StarnerT.WooW. (2019). Selfsync: Exploring self-synchronous body-based hotword gestures for initiating interaction. Proceedings of the 2019 ACM international symposium on wearable computers (pp. 123–128). Association for Computing Machinery. https://doi.org/10.1145/3341163.3347745
LiB.WeiZ.YangT.LiuY.DuF. (2023). Searching names in contact list by three touch-screen gestures. International Journal of Human-Computer Interaction, 39(1), 151–163. https://doi.org/10.1080/10447318.2022.2041883
96.
LiD.GeX.MaQ.MehraB.LiuJ.HanT.LiuC. (2022). Evaluating three touch gestures for moving objects across folded screens. Proceedings of the ACM on Interactive, Mobile, Wearable and Ubiquitous Technologies, 6(3), 1–28. https://doi.org/10.1145/3550309
97.
LiuJ.HuangJ.TianF.HuW.DaiG.WangH. (2017). Hybrid gesture interaction model in the continuous interaction space. Journal of Software, 28(8), 2080–2095. https://doi.org/10.13328/j.cnki.jos.005123
98.
LiuL.MeiS. (2016). Visualizing the GVC research: A co-occurrence network based bibliometric analysis. Scientometrics, 109(2), 953–977. https://doi.org/10.1007/s11192-016-2100-5
99.
LiuN.YuR. (2018). Investigation of force, contact area and dwell time in finger-tapping tasks on membrane touch interface. Ergonomics, 61(11), 1519–1529. https://doi.org/10.1080/00140139.2018.1484178
100.
LiuQ.ChenJ.YangK.LiuD.HeL.QinQ.WangY. (2023). An integrating spherical fuzzy AHP and axiomatic design approach and its application in human–machine interface design evaluation. Engineering Applications of Artificial Intelligence, 125(C), 106746. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.engappai.2023.106746
101.
LiaoY.VitakJ.KumarP.ZimmerM.KritikosK. (2019). Understanding the role of privacy and trust in intelligent personal assistant adoption. In Information in contemporary society (pp. 102–113). Springer.
102.
LiuX.SunH.GaoY.ZhangW.GeY.QuW. (2022). Exploring the performance of click and slide gestures on large in-vehicle touch screens. Applied Ergonomics, 99, 103613. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.apergo.2021.103613
103.
López-BlancoR.Benito-LeónJ.Llamas-VelascoS.Del CastilloM. D.SerranoJ. I.RoconE.RomeroJ. P.VelascoM. A. (2021). Interaction with touchscreen smartphones in patients with essential tremor and healthy individuals. Neurologia, 36(9), 657–665. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.nrleng.2018.05.009
104.
LouX.LiX. A.HansenP.DuP. (2021). Hand-adaptive user interface: Improved gestural interaction in virtual reality. Virtual Reality, 25(2), 367–382. https://doi.org/10.1007/s10055-020-00461-7
105.
LyonsJ. B.SycaraK.LewisM.CapiolaA. (2021). Human–autonomy teaming: Definitions, debates, and directions. Frontiers in Psychology, 12(2021), 589585. https://doi.org/10.3389/fpsyg.2021.589585
106.
MaarofF.MadzinH.NorowiN. M.SulaimanP. S.KhambariM. N. M. (2021). Designing touchless hand gestures interactions on desktop virtual reality (dVR) in classroom: Understanding issues through thematic analysis. 2021 7th International HCI and UX Conference in Indonesia (CHIuXiD) (pp. 6–11). IEEE. https://doi.org/10.1109/CHIuXiD54398.2021.9650610
107.
MarentakisG.BrewsterS. (2004). A study on gestural interaction with a 3D audio display. In Mobile human-computer interaction - Mobilehci 2004, proceedings (3160, pp. 180–191). Springer Berlin Heidelberg. https://doi.org/10.1007/978-3-540-28637-0_16
108.
McKnightL.FittonD. (2010). Touch-screen technology for children: Giving the right instructions and getting the right responses. Proceedings of the 9th international conference on interaction design and children (pp. 238–241). Association for Computing Machinery. https://doi.org/10.1145/1810543.1810580
109.
MiT.-W.WangJ.-J.ChanL. (2023). LapTouch: Using the lap for seated touch interaction with HMDs. Proceedings of the ACM on Interactive, Mobile, Wearable and Ubiquitous Technologies, 7(3), 1–23. https://doi.org/10.1145/3610878
110.
MihajlovM.Lai-Chong LawE.SpringettM. (2015). Intuitive learnability of touch gestures for technology-naïve older adults. Interacting with Computers, 27(3), 344–356. https://doi.org/10.1093/iwc/iwu044
111.
MihajlovM.SpringettM.Lai-Chong LawE. (2019). Learning to drag: The effects of social interactions in touch gestures learnability for older adults. ISS 2019 - proceedings of the 2019 ACM international conference on interactive surfaces and spaces (pp. 205–215). Association for Computing Machinery. https://doi.org/10.1145/3343055.3359716
112.
MoherD.LiberatiA.TetzlaffJ.AltmanD. G.PRISMA Group. (2009). Preferred reporting items for systematic reviews and meta-analyses: The PRISMA statement. Annals of Internal Medicine, 151(4), 264–269. https://doi.org/10.7326/0003-4819-151-4-200908180-00135
113.
MonteroC. S.AlexanderJ.MarshallM. T.SubramanianS. (2010). Would you do that? Understanding social acceptance of gestural interfaces. Proceedings of the 12th international conference on human computer interaction with mobile devices and services (pp. 275–278). Association for Computing Machinery. https://doi.org/10.1145/1851600.1851647
114.
MorrisM. R.WobbrockJ. O.WilsonA. D. (2010). Understanding users’ preferences for surface gestures. Proceedings of graphics interface 2010 (pp. 261–268). Association for Computing Machinery.
115.
NacentaM.KamberY.QiangY.KristenssonP. O. (2013). Memorability of pre-designed and user-defined gesture sets. Proceedings of the SIGCHI conference on human factors in computing systems (pp. 1099–1108). Association for Computing Machinery. https://doi.org/10.1145/2470654.2466142
116.
NacherV.CalizD.JaenJ.MartinezL. (2018). Examining the usability of touch screen gestures for children with down syndrome. Interacting with Computers, 30(3), 258–272. https://doi.org/10.1093/iwc/iwy011
117.
NanjappanV.ShiR.LiangH.-N.XiaoH.LauK. K.-T.HasanK. (2019). Design of interactions for handheld augmented reality devices using wearable smart textiles: Findings from a user elicitation study. Applied Sciences, 9(15), 3177. https://doi.org/10.3390/app9153177
118.
NgC.MarquardtN. (2022). Eliciting user-defined touch and mid-air gestures for co-located mobile gaming. Proceedings of the ACM on Human-Computer Interaction, 6(ISS), 303–327. https://doi.org/10.1145/3567722
NovakD.BeyelerB.OmlinX.RienerR. (2015). Workload estimation in physical human-robot interaction using physiological measurements. Interacting with Computers, 27(6), 616–629. https://doi.org/10.1093/iwc/iwu021
122.
NunesF.SilvaP. A.CevadaJ.Correia BarrosA.TeixeiraL. (2016). User interface design guidelines for smartphone applications for people with Parkinson’s disease. Universal Access in the Information Society, 15(4), 659–679. https://doi.org/10.1007/s10209-015-0440-1
123.
OhleiA.WesselD.HerczegM. (2019). Usability of direct manipulation interaction methods for augmented reality environments using smartphones and smartglasses. In DePaolisL.BourdotP. (Eds.), Usability of direct manipulation interaction methods for augmented reality environments using smartphones and smartglasses (11614, pp. 84–98). WOS. 000612937500008. https://doi.org/10.1007/978-3-030-25999-0_8
124.
OlveraC.LaraG.ValdiviaA.PeñaA. (2022). A literature review of hand-based interaction in virtual environments through computer vision. In New perspectives in software engineering (pp. 113–122). Springer International Publishing. https://doi.org/10.1007/978-3-030-89909-7_9
125.
O’NeillT.McNeeseN.BarronA.SchelbleB. (2022). Human–autonomy teaming: A review and analysis of the empirical literature. Human Factors, 64(5), 904–938. https://doi.org/10.1177/0018720820960865
126.
OudahM.Al-NajiA.ChahlJ. (2020). Hand gesture recognition based on computer vision: A review of techniques. Journal of Imaging, 6(8), 73. https://doi.org/10.3390/jimaging6080073
127.
Ozmen GaribayO.WinslowB.AndolinaS.AntonaM.BodenschatzA.CoursarisC.FalcoG.FioreS. M.GaribayI.GriemanK.HavensJ. C.JirotkaM.KacorriH.KarwowskiW.KiderJ.KonstanJ.KoonS.Lopez-GonzalezM.Maifeld-CarucciI.Ten HolterC. (2023). Six human-centered artificial intelligence grand challenges. International Journal of Human-Computer Interaction, 39(3), 391–437. https://doi.org/10.1080/10447318.2022.2153320
128.
PangX.GuoR.YaoN.YuJ.YuS.WangC.GaoZ. (2014). Human factor studies on gestural interaction: Past, present, and future. Chinese Journal of Applied Psychology, 20(3), 243–251. https://doi.org/10.3785/1006-6020.2014.03.0243
129.
PavlovicV. I.SharmaR.HuangT. S. (1997). Visual interpretation of hand gestures for human-computer interaction: A review. IEEE Transactions on Pattern Analysis and Machine Intelligence, 19(7), 677–695. https://doi.org/10.1109/34.598226
130.
PereiraA.WachsJ. P.ParkK.RempelD. (2015). A user-developed 3-D hand gesture set for human-computer interaction. Human Factors, 57(4), 607–621. https://doi.org/10.1177/0018720814559307
131.
PfeufferK.MeckeL.Delgado RodriguezS.HassibM.MaierH.AltF. (2020). Empirical evaluation of gaze-enhanced menus in virtual reality. Proceedings of the 26th ACM symposium on virtual reality software and technology (pp. 1–11). Association for Computing Machinery. https://doi.org/10.1145/3385956.3418962
132.
Pomboza-JunezG.Holgado-TerrizaJ. A.Medina-MedinaN. (2019). Toward the gestural interface: Comparative analysis between touch user interfaces versus gesture-based user interfaces on mobile devices. Universal Access in the Information Society, 18(1), 107–126. https://doi.org/10.1007/s10209-017-0580-6
133.
ProctorR. W.SchneiderD. W. (2018). Hick’s law for choice reaction time: A review. Quarterly Journal of Experimental Psychology, 71(6), 1281–1299. https://doi.org/10.1080/17470218.2017.1322622
134.
RahmanMd. A.HossainM. S. (2016). A gesture-based smart home-oriented health monitoring service for people with physical impairments. Inclusive Smart Cities and Digital Health: 14th International Conference on Smart Homes and Health Telematics, pp. 464-476. https://doi.org/10.1007/978-3-319-39601-9_42
135.
ReiterU.BrunnströmK.De MoorK.LarabiM.-C.PereiraM.PinheiroA.YouJ.ZgankA. (2014). Factors influencing quality of experience. In MöllerS.RaakeA. (Eds.), Quality of experience: Advanced concepts, applications and methods (pp. 55–72). Springer International Publishing. https://doi.org/10.1007/978-3-319-02681-7_4
136.
RekimotoJ. (2001). GestureWrist and GesturePad: Unobtrusive wearable interaction devices. Proceedings fifth international symposium on wearable computers (pp. 21–27). IEEE. https://doi.org/10.1109/ISWC.2001.962092
137.
RemizovaV.SandA.MacKenzieI. S.SpakovO.NyyssonenK.RakkolainenI.KylliainenA.SurakkaV.GizatdinovaY. (2023). Mid-Air gestural interaction with a large fogscreen. Multimodal Technologies and Interaction, 7(7), 63. https://doi.org/10.3390/mti7070063
138.
ReskiN.AlissandrakisA. (2020). Open data exploration in virtual reality: A comparative study of input technology. Virtual Reality, 24(1), 1–22. https://doi.org/10.1007/s10055-019-00378-w
139.
RoiderF.RaabK. (2018). Implementation and evaluation of peripheral light feedback for mid-air gesture interaction in the car. 2018 14th international conference on Intelligent Environments (IE) (pp. 87–90). IEEE. https://doi.org/10.1109/IE.2018.00021
140.
RomanoM.BellucciA.AedoI. (2015). Understanding touch and motion gestures for blind people on mobile devices. Human-Computer Interaction–INTERACT 2015: 15th IFIP TC 13 International Conference, pp. 38-46. https://doi.org/10.1007/978-3-319-22701-6_3
141.
SaianoM.GarbarinoE.LumachiS.SolariS.SanguinetiV. (2015). Effect of interface type in the VR-based acquisition of pedestrian skills in persons with ASD. 2015 37th annual international conference of the IEEE Engineering in Medicine and Biology Society (EMBC) (pp. 5728–5731). IEEE. https://doi.org/10.1109/EMBC.2015.7319693
142.
SalmonP. M. (2019). The horse has bolted! Why human factors and ergonomics has to catch up with autonomous vehicles (and other advanced forms of automation): Commentary on Hancock (2019) Some pitfalls in the promises of automated and autonomous vehicles. Ergonomics, 62(4), 502–504. https://doi.org/10.1080/00140139.2018.1563333
143.
SezenE.TseklevesE.MautheA. (2023). Tap or swipe? Effects of interaction gestures for retrieval of match statistics via second screen on watching soccer on TV. Proceedings of the 2023 ACM international conference on interactive media experiences (pp. 303–308). Association for Computing Machinery. https://doi.org/10.1145/3573381.3596473
144.
ShafanaA. R. F.SilpasuwanchaiC. (2023). Investigating the role of gesture modalities and screen size in an AR 3D game. Multimedia Tools and Applications, 83(6), 18169–18184. https://doi.org/10.1007/s11042-023-16052-y
145.
ShawA.AnthonyL. (2016). Analyzing the articulation features of children’s touchscreen gestures. Proceedings of the 18th ACM international conference on multimodal interaction (pp. 333–340). Association for Computing Machinery. https://doi.org/10.1145/2993148.2993179
146.
ShermanM.ClarkG.YangY.SugrimS.ModigA.LindqvistJ.OulasvirtaA.RoosT. (2014). Video: User-generated free-form gestures for authentication: Security and memorability. Proceedings of the 12th annual international conference on mobile systems, applications, and services (391, p. 391). Association for Computing Machinery. https://doi.org/10.1145/2594368.2602429
147.
SmaradottirB. F.HalandJ. A.MartinezS. G. (2018). User evaluation of the smartphone screen reader voice over with visually disabled participants. Mobile Information Systems, 2018(6941631), 1–9. https://doi.org/10.1155/2018/6941631
148.
SmithK.HancockP. A. (1995). Situation awareness is adaptive, externally directed consciousness. Human Factors: The Journal of the Human Factors and Ergonomics Society, 37(1), 137–148. https://doi.org/10.1518/001872095779049444
149.
SoniN.GleayesS.NeffH.Morrison-SmithS.EsmaeiliS.MayneI.BapatS.SchumanC.StoferK. A.AnthonyL. (2019). Do User-defined gestures for flatscreens generalize to interactive spherical displays for adults and children?8th ACM international symposium on pervasive displays (pervasive displays 2019). Association for Computing Machinery. https://doi.org/10.1145/3321335.3324941
150.
SterkenburgJ.LandryS.FakhrHosseiniS.JeonM. (2023). In-vehicle air gesture design: Impacts of display modality and control orientation. Journal on Multimodal User Interfaces, 17(4), 215–230. https://doi.org/10.1007/s12193-023-00415-8
151.
SunM.RenX. (2009). An evaluation of thumb interface for menu selection on mobile equipment. 2009 fourth international conference on innovative computing, information and control (ICICIC) (pp. 805–809). IEEE. https://doi.org/10.1109/ICICIC.2009.83
TanZ.ZhuJ.ChenJ.LiF. (2019). The effects of response time on user perception in smartphone interaction. In AntonaM.StephanidisC. (Eds.), Advances in usability, user experience and assistive technology (pp. 342–353). Springer. https://doi.org/10.1007/978-3-319-94947-5_34
154.
TaoD.ZengJ.LiuK.QuX. (2021). Effects of control-to-display gain and operation precision requirement on touchscreen operations in vibration environments. Applied Ergonomics, 91, 103293. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.apergo.2020.103293
155.
TorresW. O.StuartH. S. (2023). Tap and swipe smartphone gestures indicating hand tremor and finger joint range in motion. 2023 IEEE 5th Eurasia conference on biomedical engineering, healthcare and sustainability (ECBIOS) (pp. 104–107). IEEE. https://doi.org/10.1109/ECBIOS57802.2023.10218438
156.
TroianoG. M.PedersenE. W.HornbækK. (2014). User-defined gestures for elastic, deformable displays. Proceedings of the 2014 international working conference on advanced visual interfaces (pp. 1–8). Association for Computing Machinery. https://doi.org/10.1145/2598153.2598184
157.
TsaiT.-H.TsengK. C.ChangY.-S. (2017). Testing the usability of smartphone surface gestures on different sizes of smartphones by different age groups of users. Computers in Human Behavior, 75, 103–116. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.chb.2017.05.013
158.
TuH.HuangQ.ZhaoY.GaoB. (2020). Effects of holding postures on user-defined touch gestures for tablet interaction. International Journal of Human-Computer Studies, 141(2017), 102451. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.ijhcs.2020.102451
159.
UbaJ.JurewiczK. A. (2024). A review on development approaches for 3D gestural embodied human-computer interaction systems. Applied Ergonomics, 121, 104359. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.apergo.2024.104359
160.
Villarreal-NarvaezS.VanderdoncktJ.VatavuR.-D.WobbrockJ. O. (2020). A systematic review of gesture elicitation studies: What can we learn from 216 studies?Proceedings of the 2020 ACM designing interactive systems conference (pp. 855–872). Association for Computing Machinery.
161.
VuleticT.DuffyA.HayL.McTeagueC.CampbellG.GrealyM. (2019). Systematic literature review of hand gestures used in human computer interaction interfaces. International Journal of Human-Computer Studies, 129(2019), 74–94. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.ijhcs.2019.03.011
162.
WangC.QiC.TianY.LiuW.HanB.TangW.XuX.WangD.CaiB. (2024). Influence of touch screen key design on interaction performance and user experience. Manned Spaceflight, 30(1), 37–44. https://doi.org/10.16329/j.cnki.zrht.2024.01.017
163.
WangF.RenX. (2009). Empirical evaluation for finger input properties in multi-touch interaction. Proceedings of the SIGCHI conference on human factors in computing systems (pp. 1063–1072). Association for Computing Machinery. https://doi.org/10.1145/1518701.1518864
164.
WangM.ZhangZ.ZhangX.TuD. (2020). Gesture recognition algorithm based on combined features and dynamic threshold circle-all databases. Application Research of Computers, 37(2), 630–634. https://doi.org/10.19734/j.issn.1001-3695.2018.06.0491
165.
WangQ.SunX.CaoD.LiuG. (2022). Enhanced interactive performance of zoom-in/out gestures using electrostatic tactile feedback on touchscreens. The Computer Journal, 65(2), 261–274. https://doi.org/10.1093/comjnl/bxaa026
166.
WangX. (2022). The influence of interactive gestures on users’ emotional cognition from the perspective of embodied cognition. Packaging Engineering, 43(24), 153–158. https://doi.org/10.19554/j.cnki.1001-3563.2022.24.017
167.
WangY.LiY.LiangH.-N. (2023). Comparative analysis of artefact interaction and manipulation techniques in vr museums: A study of performance and user experience. 2023 IEEE International Symposium on Mixed and Augmented Reality (ISMAR) (pp. 761–770). IEEE. https://doi.org/10.1109/ISMAR59233.2023.00091
168.
WangY.YuC.ZhaoY.HuangJ.ShiY. (2014). Defining and analyzing a gesture set for interactive TV remote on touchscreen phones. 2014 IEEE 11th international conference on ubiquitous intelligence and computing and 2014 IEEE 11th international conference on autonomic and trusted computing and 2014 IEEE 14th international conference on scalable computing and communications and its associated workshops (pp. 362–365). IEEE. https://doi.org/10.1109/UIC-ATC-ScalCom.2014.84
169.
WatanabeT.KagaH.ShinkaiS. (2018). Comparison of onscreen text entry methods when using a screen reader. IEICE - Transactions on Info and Systems, E101D(2), 455–461. https://doi.org/10.1587/transinf.2017EDP7101
170.
WinterJ. d.HappeeR.MartensM. H.StantonN. A. (2014). Effects of adaptive cruise control and highly automated driving on workload and situation awareness: A review of the empirical evidence. Transportation Research Part F: Traffic Psychology and Behaviour, 27(2014), 196–217. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.trf.2014.06.016
171.
WobbrockJ. O.MorrisM. R.WilsonA. D. (2009). User-defined gestures for surface computing. Proceedings of the SIGCHI conference on human factors in computing systems (pp. 1083–1092). Association for Computing Machinery. https://doi.org/10.1145/1518701.1518866
172.
WohleberR. W.StowersK.BarnesM.ChenJ. Y. C. (2023). Agent transparency in mixed-initiative multi-uxv control: How should intelligent agent collaborators speak their minds?Computers in Human Behavior, 148, 107866. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.chb.2023.107866
173.
WoodwardJ.ShawA.AlobaA.JainA.RuizJ.AnthonyL. (2017). Tablets, tabletops, and smartphones: Cross-platform comparisons of children’s touchscreen interactions. Proceedings of the 19th ACM international conference on multimodal interaction (pp. 5–14). Association for Computing Machinery. https://doi.org/10.1145/3136755.3136762
WuH.WangJ.DaiG. (2013). Personalized interaction techniques of vision-based 3d dynamic gestures based on small sample learning. Acta Electonica Sinica, 41(11), 2230–2236. https://doi.org/10.3969/j.issn.0372-2112.2013.11.018
176.
WuH.YangL. (2020). User-defined gestures for dual-screen mobile interaction. International Journal of Human-Computer Interaction, 36(10), 978–992. https://doi.org/10.1080/10447318.2019.1706331
177.
WuJWangXLiJTangR (2022). Effect of icon size, icon position and sex on clicking motion when operating smartphones with single hand. Ergonomics, 66(7), 1031–1041. https://doi.org/10.1080/00140139.2022.2129098
178.
WuJ.WangX.LiJ.TangR. (2023). Effect of icon size, icon position and sex on clicking motion when operating smartphones with single hand. Ergonomics, 66(7), 1031–1041. https://doi.org/10.1080/00140139.2022.2129098
179.
XiaH.GlueckM.AnnettM.WangM.WigdorD. (2022). Iteratively designing gesture vocabularies: A survey and analysis of best practices in the HCI literature. ACM Transactions on Computer-Human Interaction, 29(4), 54. https://doi.org/10.1145/3503537
180.
XuW.DainoffM. J.GeL.GaoZ. (2023). Transitioning to human interaction with ai systems: New challenges and opportunities for HCI professionals to enable human-centered AI. International Journal of Human-Computer Interaction, 39(3), 494–518. https://doi.org/10.1080/10447318.2022.2041900
181.
XuW.YuC.LiuJ.ShiY. (2015). RegionalSliding: Facilitating small target selection with marking menu for one-handed thumb use on touchscreen-based mobile devices. Pervasive and Mobile Computing, 17(A), 63–78. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.pmcj.2014.02.005
182.
YadavS.ChakrabortyP.MeenaL.YadavD.MittalP. (2021). Children’s interaction with touchscreen devices: Performance and validity of Fitts’ law. Human Behavior and Emerging Technologies, 3(5), 1132–1140. https://doi.org/10.1002/hbe2.305
183.
YanB.PanW.LüJ.WangY.ZhaoZ. (2021). Prediction of natural gesture interaction time for VR placement task. Chinese Journal of Engineering Design, 28(3), 296–304. https://doi.org/10.3785/j.issn.1006-754X.2021.00.031
184.
YehY.-T.RoyQ.IrudayarajA. A. R.VogelD. (2020). Expanding side touch input on mobile phones: Finger reachability and two-dimensional taps and flicks using the index and thumb. Proceedings of the ACM on Human-Computer Interaction, 4(ISS), 1–20. https://doi.org/10.1145/3427334
185.
ZahediE.DargahiJ.KiaM.ZadehM. (2017). Gesture-based adaptive haptic guidance: A comparison of discriminative and generative modeling approaches. IEEE Robotics and Automation Letters, 2(2), 1015–1022. https://doi.org/10.1109/LRA.2017.2660071
186.
ZhaiY.GuoyingZ.HuangX. (2015). Application and research on somatosensory interaction in large touchscreen environment. Computer Engineering, 41(3), 317–321. https://doi.org/10.3969/j.issn.1000-3428.2015.03.060
187.
ZhangG.LaoS.LingY.YeT. (2010). Research on multiple and multimodal interaction in C2. Journal of National University of Defense Technology, 32(5), 153–159.
188.
ZhangT.LiuX.ZengW.TaoD.LiG.QuX. (2023). Input modality matters: A comparison of touch, speech, and gesture based in-vehicle interaction. Applied Ergonomics, 108, 103958. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.apergo.2022.103958
189.
ZhaoJ.SoukoreffR. W.RenX.BalakrishnanR. (2014a). A model of scrolling on touch-sensitive displays. International Journal of Human-Computer Studies, 72(12), 805–821. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.ijhcs.2014.07.003
190.
ZhaoY.DuN.XuX.GuQ.WangL.GaoZ.WangC. (2014b). The influence of user-tracking feedback format on gestural interaction’s user experience: A Kinect-based usability study. Chinese Journal of Applied Psychology, 20(4), 367–374. https://doi.org/10.3785/1006-6020.2014.04.0367
191.
ZhaoL.LiuY.YeD.MaZ.SongW. (2020). Implementation and evaluation of touch-based interaction using electrovibration haptic feedback in virtual environments. 2020 IEEE conference on virtual reality and 3D user interfaces (VR) (pp. 239–247). IEEE. https://doi.org/10.1109/VR46266.2020.00043
192.
ZhouX.BaiR. (2023). User-defined mid-air gestures for multiscale GIS interface interaction. Cartography and Geographic Information Science, 50(5), 481–494. https://doi.org/10.1080/15230406.2023.2183900
193.
ZhouX.GuoY.JiaL.JinY.LiH.XueC. (2023). A study of button size for virtual hand interaction in virtual environments based on clicking performance. Multimedia Tools and Applications, 82(10), 15903–15918. https://doi.org/10.1007/s11042-022-14038-w
194.
ZinckG.CodyR.YanC.HuangD.-Y.LiW.VogelD. (2023). Evaluating across-hinge dragging with pen and touch on curved and foldable displays. Proceedings of the 2023 CHI conference on human factors in computing systems (pp. 1–12). Association for Computing Machinery. https://doi.org/10.1145/3544548.3580825
195.
ZuoS.SiggS. (2022). Personalized gestures through motion transfer: Protecting privacy in pervasive surveillance. IEEE Pervasive Computing, 21(4), 8–16. https://doi.org/10.1109/MPRV.2022.3210156
Supplementary Material
Please find the following supplemental material available below.
For Open Access articles published under a Creative Commons License, all supplemental material carries the same license as the article it is associated with.
For non-Open Access articles published, all supplemental material carries a non-exclusive license, and permission requests for re-use of supplemental material or any part of supplemental material shall be sent directly to the copyright owner as specified in the copyright notice associated with the article.
