To examine the effect of dual tasking on hand dominance during a bimanual visuomotor task.
Background
Many operators need to perform separate tasks with each hand. Yet, there is no comprehensive study examining whether the right-hand visuomotor advantage found in right handers remains stable, increases or attenuates when another task is performed concurrently with the other hand.
Methods
Twenty-eight right-handed participants (mean age = 22) performed 2D visuomotor tracking under either unimanual (one target, one hand) or bimanual conditions (two targets, one for each hand). Various gaze contingencies and visual displays were tested. Tracking performance of each hand was evaluated through the mean cursor-target distance.
Results
A clear right-hand advantage was found under all unimanual conditions. Under bimanual conditions, tracking accuracy decreased for both hands albeit more extensively for the left hand than the right when gaze was free, thus amplifying the above right-hand advantage. Prioritization of the right hand was associated with a gaze preference toward this hand. However, this increase in manual asymmetry was greatly alleviated when participants were instructed to fixate straight ahead, a benefit obtained at no cost in terms of overall tracking performance.
Conclusions
During bimanual/dual tracking, there is a natural tendency for right handers to prioritize their right hand. However, this effect is strongly reduced by fixating straight ahead.
Application
Performing separate tasks with the right and left hands is common when piloting an aircraft. Fixating straight ahead may be useful for pilots that seek to divide more equally the negative impact of dual/bimanual tasking.
AdamA.LucaC. J. D.ErimZ. (1998). Hand dominance and motor unit firing behavior. Journal of Neurophysiology, 80(3), 1373–1382. https://doi.org/10.1152/jn.1998.80.3.1373
2.
AmazeenE. L.AmazeenP. G.TreffnerP. J.TurveyM. T. (1997). Attention and handedness in bimanual coordination dynamics. Journal of Experimental Psychology: Human Perception and Performance, 23(5), 1552–1560. https://doi.org/10.1037/0096-1523.23.5.1552
3.
AokiT.RivlisG.SchieberM. H. (2016). Handedness and index finger movements performed on a small touchscreen. Journal of Neurophysiology, 115(2), 858–867. https://doi.org/10.1152/jn.00256.2015
4.
BacksR. W. (1997). Psychophysiological aspects of selective and divided attention during continuous manual tracking. Acta Psychologica, 96(3), 167–191. https://doi.org/10.1016/S0001-6918(97)00010-3
5.
BeurskensR.BockO. (2012). Age-related decline of peripheral visual processing: The role of eye movements. Experimental Brain Research, 217(1), 117–124. https://doi.org/10.1007/s00221-011-2978-3
6.
BorodJ. C.CaronH. S.KoffE. (1984). Left-handers and right-handers compared on performance and preference measures of lateral dominance. British Journal of Psychology, 75(2), 177–186. https://doi.org/10.1111/j.2044-8295.1984.tb01889.x
7.
BrauneR.WickensC. D. (1985). The functional age profile: An objective decision criterion for the assessment of pilot performance capacities and capabilities. Human Factors, 27(6), 681–693. https://doi.org/10.1177/001872088502700607
BuckinghamG.CareyD. P. (2015). Attentional asymmetries – cause or consequence of human right handedness?Frontiers in Psychology, 5(1), 1587. https://doi.org/10.3389/fpsyg.2014.01587
10.
CareyD. P.LiddleJ. (2013). Hemifield or hemispace: What accounts for the ipsilateral advantages in visually guided aiming?Experimental Brain Research, 230(3), 323–331. https://doi.org/10.1007/s00221-013-3657-3
11.
CareyJ. R.ComnickK. T.LojovichJ. M.LindgrenB. R. (2003). Left- versus right-hand tracking performance by right-handed boys and girls: Examination of performance asymmetry. Perceptual and Motor Skills, 97(3 Pt 1), 779–788. https://doi.org/10.2466/pms.2003.97.3.779
CoudiereA.de RugyA.DanionF. R. (2024). Right-left hand asymmetry in manual tracking: When poorer control is associated with better adaptation and interlimb transfer. Psychological Research, 88(2), 594–606. https://doi.org/10.1007/s00426-023-01858-0
15.
DamosD. L.LinternG. (1981). A comparison of single- and dual-task measures to predict simulator performance of beginning student pilots. Ergonomics, 24(9), 673–684. https://doi.org/10.1080/00140138108924890
16.
DanionF. R.FlanaganJ. R. (2018). Different gaze strategies during eye versus hand tracking of a moving target. Scientific Reports, 8(1), Article 10059. https://doi.org/10.1038/s41598-018-28434-6
17.
DanionF. R.ScottoC. R.ChoisayF.DebrayL.ReyA.FerrandezV. (2025). Investigating the influence of multitasking and gender in visuomotor skills of 1578 pilot candidates. International Journal of Industrial Ergonomics, 106(1), Article 103710. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.ergon.2025.103710
18.
de PoelH. J.PeperC. L.BeekP. J. (2008). Laterally focused attention modulates asymmetric coupling in rhythmic interlimb coordination. Psychological Research, 72(2), 123–137. https://doi.org/10.1007/s00426-006-0096-9
19.
DiedrichsenJ. (2007). Optimal task-dependent changes of bimanual feedback control and adaptation. Current Biology: CB, 17(19), 1675–1679. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.cub.2007.08.051
20.
ElliottD.RoyE. A.GoodmanD.CarsonR. G.ChuaR.MarajB. K. V. (1993). Asymmetries in the preparation and control of manual aiming movements. Canadian Journal of Experimental Psychology/Revue canadienne de psychologie expérimentale, 47(3), 570–589. https://doi.org/10.1037/h0078856
21.
EwoldsH. E.BrökerL.de OliveiraR. F.RaabM.KünzellS. (2017). Implicit and explicit knowledge both improve dual task performance in a continuous pursuit tracking task. Frontiers in Psychology, 8(1). 2241. https://doi.org/10.3389/fpsyg.2017.02241
22.
FranzE. A. (2004). Attentional distribution of task parameters to the two hands during bimanual performance of right- and left-handers. Journal of Motor Behavior, 36(1), 71–81. https://doi.org/10.3200/JMBR.36.1.71-81
23.
FreemanG. L.ChapmanJ. S. (1935). The relative importance of eye and hand dominance in a pursuit skill. American Journal of Psychology, 47(1), 146–149. https://doi.org/10.2307/1416715
GouirandN.MathewJ.BrennerE.DanionF. (2019). Eye movements do not play an important role in the adaptation of hand tracking to a visuomotor rotation. Journal of Neurophysiology, 121(5), 1967–1976. https://doi.org/10.1152/jn.00814.2018
27.
HadjipanayiV.ShimiA.LudwigC. J. H.KentC. (2022). Unequal allocation of overt and covert attention in Multiple Object Tracking. Attention, Perception, & Psychophysics, 84(5), 1519–1537. https://doi.org/10.3758/s13414-022-02501-7
28.
HondaH. (1982). Rightward superiority of eye movements in a bimanual aiming task. The Quarterly Journal of Experimental Psychology. A, Human Experimental Psychology, 34(4), 499–513. https://doi.org/10.1080/14640748208400833
LlaurensV.RaymondM.FaurieC. (2008). Why are some people left-handed? An evolutionary perspective. Philosophical Transactions of the Royal Society B: Biological Sciences, 364(1519), 881–894. https://doi.org/10.1098/rstb.2008.0235
31.
MartinJ.LongJ.BroomeD. (1984). The division of attention between a primary tracking task and secondary tasks of pointing with a stylus or speaking in a simulated ship’s-gunfire-control task. Ergonomics, 27(4), 397–408. https://doi.org/10.1080/00140138408963504
32.
MastroianniG. R.SchopperA. W. (1986). Degradation of force-loaded pursuit tracking performance in a dual-task paradigm. Ergonomics, 29(5), 639–647. https://doi.org/10.1080/00140138608968299
33.
MathewJ.BernierP.-M.DanionF. R. (2018). Asymmetrical relationship between prediction and control during visuomotor adaptation. eNeuro, 5(6). https://doi.org/10.1523/ENEURO.0280-18.2018
34.
MathewJ.de RugyA.DanionF. R. (2020). How optimal is bimanual tracking? The key role of hand coordination in space. Journal of Neurophysiology, 123(2), 511–521. https://doi.org/10.1152/jn.00119.2019
McManusI. C.MooreJ.FreegardM.RawlesR. (2010). Science in the making: Right Hand, Left Hand. III: Estimating historical rates of left-handedness. Laterality, 15(1-2), 186–208. https://doi.org/10.1080/13576500802565313
37.
MiallR. C. (1996). Task-dependent changes in visual feedback control: A frequency analysis of human manual tracking. Journal of Motor Behavior, 28(2), 125–135. https://doi.org/10.1080/00222895.1996.9941739
38.
MossS. M. (1964). Tracking with a differential brightness display: II. Peripheral tracking. Journal of Applied Psychology, 48(4), 249–254. https://doi.org/10.1037/h0048543
NeilsonP. D.NeilsonM. D. (2002). Anisotropic tracking : Evidence for automatic synergy formation in a bimanual task. Human Movement Science, 21(5-6), 723–748. https://doi.org/10.1016/s0167-9457(02)00181-1
Peña-PérezN.EdenJ.IvanovaE.FarkhatdinovI.BurdetE. (2023). How virtual and mechanical coupling impact bimanual tracking. Journal of Neurophysiology, 129(1), 102–114. https://doi.org/10.1152/jn.00057.2022
43.
PrzybylaA.GoodD. C.SainburgR. L. (2012). Dynamic dominance varies with handedness: Reduced interlimb asymmetries in left-handers. Experimental Brain Research, 216(3), 419–431. https://doi.org/10.1007/s00221-011-2946-y
44.
PuttemansV.WenderothN.SwinnenS. P. (2005). Changes in brain activation during the acquisition of a multifrequency bimanual coordination task: From the cognitive stage to advanced levels of automaticity. Journal of Neuroscience, 25(17), 4270–4278. https://doi.org/10.1523/JNEUROSCI.3866-04.2005
SchmidtK.-H.KleinbeckU.BrockmannW. (1984). Motivational control of motor performance by goal setting in a dual-task situation. Psychological Research, 46(1), 129–141. https://doi.org/10.1007/BF00308598
47.
SimonJ. R.CrowT. W. D.LincolnR. S.SmithK. U. (1952). Effects of handedness on tracking accuracy. Motor Skills Research Exchange, 4(3), 53–57. https://doi.org/10.2466/pms.1952.4.3.53
48.
SoechtingJ. F.RaoH. M.JuveliJ. Z. (2010). Incorporating prediction in models for two-dimensional smooth pursuit. PLoS One, 5(9), Article e12574. https://doi.org/10.1371/journal.pone.0012574
49.
SrinivasanD.MartinB. J. (2010). Eye–hand coordination of symmetric bimanual reaching tasks: Temporal aspects. Experimental Brain Research, 203(2), 391–405. https://doi.org/10.1007/s00221-010-2241-3
50.
SwinnenS. P.JardinK.MeulenbroekR. (1996). Between-limb asynchronies during bimanual coordination : Effects of manual dominance and attentional cueing. Neuropsychologia, 34(12), 1203–1213. https://doi.org/10.1016/0028-3932(96)00047-4
51.
SwinnenS. P.WalterC. B. (1991). Toward a movement dynamics perspective on dual-task performance. Human Factors, 33(4), 367–387. https://doi.org/10.1177/001872089103300401
52.
TsangS. N. H.ChanA. H. S. (2015). Tracking and discrete dual task performance with different spatial stimulus–response mappings. Ergonomics, 58(3), 368–382. https://doi.org/10.1080/00140139.2014.978901
53.
VangheluweS.WenderothN.SwinnenS. P. (2005). Learning and transfer of an ipsilateral coordination task : Evidence for a dual-layer movement representation. Journal of Cognitive Neuroscience, 17(9), 1460–1470. https://doi.org/10.1162/0898929054985392
54.
WickensC. D. (1986). The effects of control dynamics on performance. In Handbook of perception and human performance, Vol. 2 : Cognitive processes and performance (pp. 1–60). John Wiley & Sons.
55.
WickensC. D.GopherD. (1977). Control theory measures of tracking as indices of attention allocation strategies. Human Factors: The Journal of the Human Factors and Ergonomics Society, 19(4), 349–365. https://doi.org/10.1177/001872087701900404
56.
WightmanD. C.LinternG. (1985). Part-task training for tracking and manual control. Human Factors: The Journal of the Human Factors and Ergonomics Society, 27(3), 267–283. https://doi.org/10.1177/001872088502700304
