Restricted accessResearch articleFirst published online 2025-11
An Exploratory Study on Auditory Experience in Electric Vehicles: Understanding User Characteristics and Driving Contexts Through Real-Driving Experiments
This study investigated how user characteristics and driving context influence auditory experiences (AX) in electric vehicles (EVs), identifying distinct user types and their specific auditory needs and evaluation.
Background
Electric vehicles (EVs) present unique opportunities for designing auditory experiences (AX) due to their quiet operation characteristics and acoustic vehicle alert systems (AVAS).
Method
Forty participants conducted real-driving experiments with an EV, experiencing sounds at low, medium, and high speeds. We applied systematic analysis combining topic modeling (BERTopic) and qualitative coding of think-aloud interviews and statistical analysis of questionnaire responses.
Results
Four user types were segmented by attitude (Dynamic vs. Conservative) and car type (EV vs. ICV owners). Text analysis revealed varying frequencies of concerns across user types regarding driving contexts, functional aspects, and affective aspects of AX. Statistical analysis showed significant differences among user types in sporty preferences and perceptions of affective properties (Sporty, Stylish, Comfort, and Calm). Driving contexts significantly influenced perceived Stylish and Calm characteristics.
Conclusion
This study provides empirical evidence and design implications for customized AX in EVs design based on user characteristics and driving contexts.
Application
The findings can guide the development of personalized AX systems in EVs, enhancing both user satisfaction and safety through context-aware and user-centered design approaches.
BartonB. K.LewR.KovesdiC.CottrellN. D.UlrichT. (2013). Developmental differences in auditory detection and localization of approaching vehicles. Accident Analysis & Prevention, 53, 1–8. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.aap.2012.12.040
2.
BelenguerF. M.Martínez-MillanaA.RamónF. S. C.Mocholí-SalcedoA. (2020). The effectiveness of alert sounds for electric vehicles based on pedestrians’ perception. IEEE Transactions on Intelligent Transportation Systems, 23(4), 2956–2965. https://doi.org/10.1109/TITS.2020.3025499
3.
BettmanJ. R.ParkC. W. (1980). Effects of prior knowledge and experience and phase of the choice process on consumer decision processes: A protocol analysis. Journal of Consumer Research, 7(3), 234–248. https://doi.org/10.1086/208812
4.
BurgessM.KingN.HarrisM.LewisE. (2013). Electric vehicle drivers’ reported interactions with the public: Driving stereotype change?Transportation Research Part F: Traffic Psychology and Behaviour, 17, 33–44. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.trf.2012.09.003
5.
ChiC.-F.DewiR. S.HuangM.-H. (2017a). Psychophysical evaluation of auditory signals in passenger vehicles. Applied Ergonomics, 59(Pt A), 153–164. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.apergo.2016.08.019
6.
ChiC.-F.DewiR. S.SurbaktiY. Y.HsiehD.-Y. (2017b). The perceived quality of in-vehicle auditory signals: A structural equation modelling approach. Ergonomics, 60(11), 1471–1484. https://doi.org/10.1080/00140139.2017.1323121
7.
CocronP.KremsJ. F. (2013). Driver perceptions of the safety implications of quiet electric vehicles. Accident Analysis & Prevention, 58, 122–131. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.aap.2013.04.028
8.
DateY.IshimitsuS.YamagiwaN. (2019). Improvement of heart rate variability analysis for sound design. ICIC Express Letters Part B: Applications, 10(2), 159–166.
9.
DoleschalF.VerheyJ. (2022). Pleasantness assessment of electric vehicle interior sounds using a long short-term memory model. Journal of the Acoustical Society of America, 151(4), A232. https://doi.org/10.1121/10.0011161
10.
DupréT.DenjeanS.AramakiM.Kronland-MartinetR. (2023). Spatial integration of dynamic auditory feedback in electric vehicle interior. Journal of the Audio Engineering Society, 71(6), 349–362. https://doi.org/10.17743/jaes.2022.0087
11.
EnglerO. (2016). Mercedes-benz SLS AMG coupé electric drive: NVH development and sound design of an electric sports car. SAE Technical Paper, 2016-01-1783, https://doi.org/10.4271/2016-01-1783
12.
FortinoA.EcksteinL.ViehöferJ.PampelJ. (2016). Acoustic vehicle alerting systems (AVAS)-regulations, realization and sound design challenges. SAE International Journal of Passenger Cars - Mechanical Systems, 9(2016-01-1784), 995–1003. https://doi.org/10.4271/2016-01-1784
13.
GaoP.RuanJ.DuY.WalkerP. D.ZhangN. (2019). The prediction of braking noise in regenerative braking system using closed-loop coupling disk brake model. Proceedings of the Institution of Mechanical Engineers - Part D: Journal of Automobile Engineering, 233(14), 3721–3735. https://doi.org/10.1177/0954407019832766
14.
GreenbergS.CarpendaleS.MarquardtN.BuxtonB. (2012). Sketching user experiences: The workbook. Elsevier.
GuQ.ZhangJ.TanR.CaiY.WangC. (2024, June). Event Graph Study of Typical Battery Electric Vehicle User Experience Based on Online Comments. In International Conference on Human-Computer Interaction (pp. 211–222). ChamSwitzerland: Springer Nature. https://doi.org/10.1007/978-3-031-61963-2_20
17.
GuskiR. (1999). Personal and social variables as co-determinants of noise annoyance. Noise and Health, 1(3), 45–56.
HuangH.HuangX.DingW.YangM.FanD.PangJ. (2022). Uncertainty optimization of pure electric vehicle interior tire/road noise comfort based on data-driven. Mechanical Systems and Signal Processing, 165, 108300. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.ymssp.2021.108300
20.
HuangH.LimT. C.WuJ.DingW.PangJ. (2023). Multitarget prediction and optimization of pure electric vehicle tire/road airborne noise sound quality based on a knowledge-and data-driven method. Mechanical Systems and Signal Processing, 197, 110361. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.ymssp.2023.110361
21.
HuangH. B.WuJ. H.HuangX. R.YangM. L.DingW. P. (2019). The development of a deep neural network and its application to evaluating the interior sound quality of pure electric vehicles. Mechanical Systems and Signal Processing, 120, 98–116.
22.
JeonK.OhJ.-S. (2022). Study on quantification of stress according to sound pressure level of road noise: Case of salivary cortisol and heart rate. Applied Acoustics, 192, 108695. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.apacoust.2022.108695
23.
JeonM.WalkerB. N.YimJ.-B. (2014). Effects of specific emotions on subjective judgment, driving performance, and perceived workload. Transportation Research Part F: Traffic Psychology and Behaviour, 24, 197–209. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.trf.2014.04.003
24.
KatoT.YokoteR. (2023). Effect of driving sound of electric vehicle on product attractiveness. Human-Centric Intelligent Systems, 3(3), 416–424. https://doi.org/10.1007/s44230-023-00030-6
25.
KimS.AltinsoyM. E. (2022). Perceptual differences in automotive acceleration sounds between drivers and passengers. Applied Acoustics, 201, 109092. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.apacoust.2022.109092
26.
KimS.ParkD. C.HongS.SellerbeckP.FiebigA.CsakanM.ApelianC. (2013). Target sound development for luxury sedan based on driving experience and preference study (SAE Technical Paper 2013-01-1983) (pp. 0148–7191). SAE International.
27.
KimY.ChoiS. B.OhJ. J.EoJ. (2024). Satisfactory driving mode classification based on pedal operation characteristics. IEEE Transactions on Intelligent Vehicles, 9(1), 2988–2998. https://doi.org/10.1109/TIV.2023.3304656
28.
LeeJ. D.KolodgeK. (2020). Exploring trust in self-driving vehicles through text analysis. Human factors, 62(2), 260–277. https://doi.org/10.1177/0018720819872672
29.
LeeS. C.NadriC.SanghaviH.JeonM. (2020, April). Exploring user needs and design requirements in fully automated vehicles. In Extended abstracts of the 2020 CHI conference on human factors in computing systems. https://doi.org/10.1145/3334480.3382881
30.
LindsayP. H.NormanD. A. (2013). Human information processing: An introduction to psychology. Academic Press.
31.
LiuL.-L.TengH.-Y. (2023). How perceived coolness and wow affect customer engagement: The role of self-image congruity. Journal of Hospitality and Tourism Insights, 7(5), 2844–2861. https://doi.org/10.1108/JHTI-07-2023-0477
32.
LiuZ.LiH.ChenA.ZhangR.LeeY.-C. (2024). Understanding public perceptions of AI conversational agents: A cross-cultural analysis. In Proceedings of the 2024 CHI conference on human factors in computing systems. https://doi.org/10.1145/3613904.3642840
33.
MaibergerD.LetensU.WeberR.van de ParS. (2018). Individual influences on the evaluation of vehicle sounds: A typology of premium car drivers with regard to their attitude towards cars and sounds. Acta Acustica united with Acustica, 104(3), 509–520. https://doi.org/10.3813/aaa.919193
34.
MaibergerD.StrasserE.LetensU.van de ParS. (2019). Contextual aspects in subjective vehicle sound assessment. Acta Acustica united with Acustica, 105(3), 530–544. https://doi.org/10.3813/aaa.919334
35.
MarchegianiL.FafoutisX. (2021). How well can driverless vehicles hear? An introduction to auditory perception for autonomous and smart vehicles. IEEE Intelligent Transportation Systems Magazine, 14(3), 92–105. https://doi.org/10.1109/mits.2021.3049425
36.
MarinA.WellmanB. (2011). Social network analysis: An introduction (pp. 11–25). The Sage Handbook of Social Network Analysis.
37.
MelmanT.VisserP.MoutonX.de WinterJ. (2021). Creating the illusion of sportiness: Evaluating modified throttle mapping and artificial engine sound for electric vehicles. Journal of Advanced Transportation, 2021(1), 4396401–4396415. https://doi.org/10.1155/2021/4396401
38.
MiedemaH. M.VosH. (2003). Noise sensitivity and reactions to noise and other environmental conditions. Journal of the Acoustical Society of America, 113(3), 1492–1504. https://doi.org/10.1121/1.1547437
39.
MoonS.ParkS.ParkD.KimW.YunM. H.ParkD. (2019). A study on affective dimensions to engine acceleration sound quality using acoustic parameters. Applied Sciences, 9(3), 604. https://doi.org/10.3390/app9030604
40.
NotbohmG. (2010). A questionnaire on the individual attitude towards the acoustical environment.INTER-NOISE and NOISE-CON Congress and Conference Proceedings, 2010, No. 5, 5340–5349.
41.
Pardo-FerreiraM. C.Torrecilla-GarcíaJ. A.Heras-RosasC. d. L.Rubio-RomeroJ. C. (2020). New risk situations related to low noise from electric vehicles: Perception of workers as pedestrians and other vehicle drivers. International Journal of Environmental Research and Public Health, 17(18), 6701. https://doi.org/10.3390/ijerph17186701
42.
ParkD.ParkS.KimW.RhiuI.YunM. H. (2019). A comparative study on subjective feeling of engine acceleration sound by automobile types. International Journal of Industrial Ergonomics, 74, 102843. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.ergon.2019.102843
43.
PetiotJ. F.KristensenB. G.MaierA. M. (2013, August). How should an electric vehicle sound? User and expert perception. In International Design Engineering Technical Conferences and Computers and Information in Engineering Conference(Vol. 55928, p. V005T06A028). American Society of Mechanical Engineers. https://doi.org/10.1115/DETC2013-12535
44.
PruittJ.AdlinT. (2010). The persona lifecycle: Keeping people in mind throughout product design. Elsevier.
RauhN.GüntherM.KremsJ. F. (2020). Positive influence of practical electric vehicle driving experience and range related knowledge on drivers’ experienced range stress. Transportation Research Part F: Traffic Psychology and Behaviour, 71, 182–197. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.trf.2020.03.013
47.
RospleschA.TousignantT. (2018). Optimization of electric vehicle exterior noise for pedestrian safety and sound quality. In 18. Internationales Stuttgarter Symposium: Automobil-und Motorentechnik (pp. 1321–1333). Wiesbaden: Springer Fachmedien.
48.
SandbergU.GoubertL.MioduszewskiP. (2010). Are vehicles driven in electric mode so quiet that they need acoustic warning signals. Proceedings of 20th International Congress on Acoustics, 1–11.
49.
SchmalfußF.MühlK.KremsJ. F. (2017). Direct experience with battery electric vehicles (BEVs) matters when evaluating vehicle attributes, attitude and purchase intention. Transportation Research Part F: Traffic Psychology and Behaviour, 46(Part A), 47–69. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.trf.2017.01.004
50.
SongY.KimW.YunM. H. (2024). Auditory experience in vehicles: A systematic review and future research directions. Heliyon, 10(15), Article e34838. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.heliyon.2024.e34838
51.
SongY.LeeJ.WangC.YunM. H. (2023a). Enhance auditory experience by identifying user needs and classifying user types while driving electric vehicles. Proceedings of the Human Factors and Ergonomics Society - Annual Meeting, 67(1), 1710–1711. https://doi.org/10.1177/21695067231192425
52.
SongY.ChoiM. B.AhnS. H.YunM. H. (2023, September). A systematic literature review for measure, estimation, and mitigation of motion sickness in vehicle environment. Proceedings of the Human Factors and Ergonomics Society Annual Meeting, 67(1), 1567–1569. https://doi.org/10.1177/21695067231192257
SwartD.BekkerA. (2019). The relationship between consumer satisfaction and psychoacoustics of electric vehicle signature sound. Applied Acoustics, 145, 167–175. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.apacoust.2018.09.019
55.
SwartD. J.BekkerA.BienertJ. (2018). The subjective dimensions of sound quality of standard production electric vehicles. Applied Acoustics, 129, 354–364. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.apacoust.2017.08.012
56.
VästfjällD.GulbolM.-A.KleinerM. (2003). “Wow, what car is that?”: Perception of exterior vehicle sound quality. Noise Control Engineering Journal, 51(4), 253–261. https://doi.org/10.3397/1.2839721
57.
WangY.ShenG.XingY. (2014). A sound quality model for objective synthesis evaluation of vehicle interior noise based on artificial neural network. Mechanical Systems and Signal Processing, 45(1), 255–266. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.ymssp.2013.11.001
58.
WassermanS.FaustK. (1994). Social network analysis: Methods and applications. Cambridge University Press.
59.
WickiM.BrückmannG.QuossF.BernauerT. (2023). What do we really know about the acceptance of battery electric vehicles? Turns out, not much. Transport Reviews, 43(1), 62–87. https://doi.org/10.1080/01441647.2021.2023693
60.
XiaW.LeeG. (2000). The influence of persuasion, training, and experience on user perceptions and acceptance of IT innovation. ICIS 2000 Proceedings, 34. https://aisel.aisnet.org/icis2000/34.
61.
XuG.WangS.LiJ.ZhaoD. (2020). Moving towards sustainable purchase behavior: Examining the determinants of consumers’ intentions to adopt electric vehicles. Environmental Science and Pollution Research International, 27(18), 22535–22546. https://doi.org/10.1007/s11356-020-08835-9
62.
YangZ.FengH.MaB.KhalifaA. A. A. (2020). Evaluation and improvement of the sound quality of a diesel engine based on tests and simulations. Energies, 13(4), 777. https://doi.org/10.3390/en13040777
63.
ZhaD.ForoudiP.MelewarT.JinZ. (2024). Examining the impact of sensory brand experience on brand loyalty. Corporate Reputation Review, 28, 1–29. https://doi.org/10.1057/s41299-023-00175-x
64.
ZiefleM.Beul-LeusmannS.KasugaiK.SchwalmM. (2014). Public perception and acceptance of electric vehicles: Exploring users’ perceived benefits and drawbacks. In Design, user experience, and usability. User experience design for everyday life applications and services: Third International Conference, DUXU 2014 (Vol. 8519). https://doi.org/10.1007/978-3-319-07635-5_60
Supplementary Material
Please find the following supplemental material available below.
For Open Access articles published under a Creative Commons License, all supplemental material carries the same license as the article it is associated with.
For non-Open Access articles published, all supplemental material carries a non-exclusive license, and permission requests for re-use of supplemental material or any part of supplemental material shall be sent directly to the copyright owner as specified in the copyright notice associated with the article.
