The current study investigated the factors that predict drowsy drivers’ decisions regarding whether to take breaks versus continue driving during long simulator drives.
Background
Driver drowsiness contributes to substantial numbers of motor vehicle crashes, injuries, and deaths. Previous research has shown that taking a nap and consuming caffeine can temporarily mitigate drowsiness and enable continued safe driving.
Method
Ninety drivers completed a 150-mile highway drive in a driving simulator after a day of partial sleep restriction. Drivers passed several simulated rest areas where they could take breaks. To replicate drivers’ motivation to reach their destination safely but also quickly, drivers were told that they would be paid more for completing the simulated drive faster but would forfeit their payment if they crashed.
Results
Break taking was predicted by drivers’ self-ratings of drowsiness and by the severity of lane departures. However, even at the highest levels of drowsiness, most drivers bypassed simulated rest areas without stopping. In comparing self-rated drowsiness to drowsiness measured by eye closures, drivers often under- and over-estimate their own level of drowsiness.
Conclusion
Drowsy drivers use their own self-assessed drowsiness when deciding whether to take breaks. These self-assessments are often incorrect, and even when drivers rate themselves as severely drowsy they are unlikely to stop to rest during long drives.
Application
The findings reveal the need for effective drowsy driving countermeasures to motivate drivers to stop to take breaks. Results underscore the need to educate and/or motivate drivers to respond sooner to warning signs of drowsiness.
ÅkerstedtT.GillbergM. (1990). Subjective and objective sleepiness in the active individual. International Journal of Neuroscience, 52(1–2), 29–37. https://doi.org/10.3109/00207459008994241
3.
AlvaroP. K.BurnettN. M.KennedyG. A.MinW. Y. X.McMahonM.BarnesM.JacksonM.HowardM. E.HowardM. E. (2018). Driver education: Enhancing knowledge of sleep, fatigue and risky behaviour to improve decision making in young drivers. Accident Analysis & Prevention, 112(1), 77–83. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.aap.2017.12.017
4.
AyasS.DonmezB.TangX. (2023). Drowsiness mitigation through driver state monitoring systems: a scoping review. Humanfactors, 00187208231208523.
5.
BatesD.MaechlerM.BolkerB.WalkerS. (2015). Fitting linear mixed-effects models using lme4. Journal of Statistical Software, 67(1), 1–48. https://doi.org/10.18637/jss.v067.i01
6.
BayneA.TrivediN.LiottaM.SiegfriedA.GasparJ.CarneyC. (2022). Countermeasures to reduce drowsy driving: Results of a literature review and discussions with experts (technical report). AAA Foundation for Traffic Safety.
7.
BerkaC.LevendowskiD. J.WestbrookP.DavisG.LumicaoM. N.OlmsteadR. E.PopovicM.ZivkovicV. T.RamseyC. K. (2005). Implementation of a closed-loop real-time EEG-based drowsiness detection system: Effects of feedback alarms on performance in a driving simulator. In 1st international conference on augmented cognition (pp. 151–170). Las Vegas.
8.
CaiA. W.ManousakisJ. E.LoT. Y.HorneJ. A.HowardM. E.AndersonC. (2021). I think I’m sleepy, therefore I am–awareness of sleepiness while driving: A systematic review. Sleep Medicine Reviews, 60(1), 101533. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.smrv.2021.101533
9.
CausseM.BaracatB.PastorJ.DehaisF. (2011). Reward and uncertainty favor risky decision-making in pilots: Evidence from cardiovascular and oculometric measurements. Applied Psychophysiology and Biofeedback, 36(4), 231–242. https://doi.org/10.1007/s10484-011-9163-0
10.
CausseM.PéranP.DehaisF.CaravassoC. F.ZeffiroT.SabatiniU.PastorJ. (2013). Affective decision making under uncertainty during a plausible aviation task: An fMRI study. NeuroImage, 71(1), 19–29. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.neuroimage.2012.12.060
11.
CochranK. R.LetvakS. A.McCoyT. P.BaconC.KarperW. B. (2021). Can nurses self-assess fatigue? Implications for nurse leaders. JONA. The Journal of Nursing Administration, 51(10), 507–512. https://doi.org/10.1097/NNA.0000000000001055
12.
FaircloughS. H.Van WinsumW. (2000). The influence of impairment feedback on driver behavior: A simulator study. Transportation Human Factors, 2(3), 229–246. https://doi.org/10.1207/sthf0203_4
13.
FitzharrisM.LiuS.StephensA. N.LennéM. G. (2017). The relative importance of real-time in-cab and external feedback in managing fatigue in real-world commercial transport operations. Traffic Injury Prevention, 18(sup1), S71–S78. https://doi.org/10.1080/15389588.2017.1306855
14.
FriardO.GambaM. (2016). BORIS: A free, versatile open-source event-logging software for video/audio coding and live observations. Methods in Ecology and Evolution, 7(11), 1325–1330. https://doi.org/10.1111/2041-210X.12584
GasparJ. G.SchwarzC. W.MarshallD.JennessJ.De LeonardisD.BlennerJ. A. (2023). In-vehicle drowsy driving detection and alerting (No. DOT HS 813 438). Department of Transportation. National Highway Traffic Safety Administration.
17.
GolzM.SommerD.TrutschelU.SiroisB.EdwardsD. (2010). Evaluation of fatigue monitoring technologies. Somnologie - Schlafforschung und Schlafmedizin, 14(3), 187–199. https://doi.org/10.1007/s11818-010-0482-9
18.
HallvigD.AnundA.ForsC.KecklundG.ÅkerstedtT. (2014). Real driving at night–predicting lane departures from physiological and subjective sleepiness. Biological Psychology, 101(1), 18–23. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.biopsycho.2014.07.001
19.
HanowskiR. J.BowmanD.AldenA.WierwilleW. W.CarrollR. (2008). PERCLOS+: Development of a robust field measure of driver drowsiness. 15th world congress on intelligent transport systems and ITS America’s 2008 annual meeting, New York, NY, November, 2008.
20.
Hashemi NazariS. S.MoradiA.RahmaniK. (2017). A systematic review of the effect of various interventions on reducing fatigue and sleepiness while driving. Chinese Journal of Traumatology, 20(5), 249–258. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.cjtee.2017.03.005
21.
HayashiH.KamezakiM.SuganoS. (2021). Toward health–related accident prevention: Symptom detection and intervention based on driver monitoring and verbal interaction. IEEE Open Journal of Intelligent Transportation Systems, 2(1), 240–253. https://doi.org/10.1109/ojits.2021.3102125
22.
HigginsJ. S.MichaelJ.AustinR.ÅkerstedtT.Van DongenH. P.WatsonN.CzeislerC.PackA. I.RosekindM. R. (2017). Asleep at the wheel—the road to addressing drowsy driving. Sleep, 40(2), zsx001. https://doi.org/10.1093/sleep/zsx001
MastenS. V.StuttsJ. C.MartellC. A. (2006). Predicting daytime and nighttime drowsy driving crashes based on crash characteristic models. 50th. Annual Proceedings of the Association for the Advancement of Automotive Medicine.
25.
OwensJ. M.DingusT. A.GuoF.FangY.PerezM.McClaffertyJ.TefftB. C. (2018). Prevalence of drowsy driving crashes: Estimates from a large-scale naturalistic driving study (research brief). AAA Foundation for Traffic Safety.
26.
ReynerL. A.HomeJ. A. (1998a). Evaluation of ‘in-car’ countermeasures to sleepiness: Cold air and radio. Sleep, 21(1), 46–51. https://doi.org/10.1093/SLEEP/21.1.46
27.
ReynerL. A.HorneJ. A. (1998b). Falling asleep whilst driving: Are drivers aware of prior sleepiness?International Journal of Legal Medicine, 111(3), 120–123. https://doi.org/10.1007/s004140050131
28.
SchwarzC.GasparJ.MillerT.YousefianR. (2019). The detection of drowsiness using a driver monitoring system. Traffic Injury Prevention, 20(sup1), S157–S161. https://doi.org/10.1080/15389588.2019.1622005
29.
SmithB. P.BrowneM.ArmstrongT. A.FergusonS. A. (2016). The accuracy of subjective measures for assessing fatigue related decrements in multi-stressor environments. Safety Science, 86(1), 238–244. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.ssci.2016.03.006
30.
SommerD.GolzM. (2010). Evaluation of PERCLOS based current fatigue monitoring technologies. 2010 annual international conference of the IEEE engineering in medicine and biology, Buenos Aires, Argentina (pp. 4456–4459). IEEE. https://doi.org/10.1109/IEMBS.2010.5625960
31.
StewartT. (2022). Overview of motor vehicle crashes in 2020 (Report No. In DOT HS (813). National Highway Traffic Safety Administration.
32.
TefftB. C. (2012). Prevalence of motor vehicle crashes involving drowsy drivers, United States, 1999–2008. Accident Analysis & Prevention, 45(1), 180–186. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.aap.2011.05.028
33.
TefftB. C. (2014). Prevalence of motor vehicle crashes involving drowsy drivers, United States, 2009–2013. AAA Foundation for Traffic Safety.
34.
TefftB. C. (2018). Acute sleep deprivation and culpable motor vehicle crash involvement. Sleep, 41(10), zsy144. https://doi.org/10.1093/sleep/zsy144
35.
WatlingC. N.ArmstrongK. A.RadunI. (2015). Examining signs of driver sleepiness, usage of sleepiness countermeasures and the associations with sleepy driving behaviours and individual factors. Accident Analysis & Prevention, 85(1), 22–29. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.aap.2015.08.022
36.
WesenstenN. J.BalkinT. J.BelenkyG. (2015). Countermeasures for mitigating fatigue in motor vehicle operators. Reviews of Human Factors and Ergonomics, 10(1), 115–137. https://doi.org/10.1177/1557234x15574827
37.
WierwilleW. W.EllsworthL. A.WreggitS. S.KirnC. L.FairbanksR. J. (1994). Research on vehicle-based driver status/performance monitoring; development, validation, and refinement of algorithms for detection of driver drowsiness. National Highway Traffic Safety Administration. Report No. DOT HS 808 247.
