We investigated the impact of low-tempo, repetitive hand movements on vibrotactile sensitivity by employing various temporal and spatial patterns in the hand and wrist area.
Background
The investigation of a human’s ability to perceive vibrotactile stimuli during dynamic hand movements remains understudied, despite the prevalence of slow to mild hand motions in applications such as hand navigation or gesture control using haptic gloves in Virtual Reality (VR) and Augmented Reality (AR).
Method
We investigated vibrotactile sensitivity, analyzing the impact of various factors, including Motion (static and low-tempo repetitive hand movements), Temporal Patterns (Single or Double vibrations with varying onset times), Tactor Placements (hand and wrist), Spatial Patterns, and Biological Sex.
Results
Our study revealed that Motion significantly influences vibrotactile sensitivity in the hand and wrist areas, leading to reduced accuracy rates during dynamic conditions. Additionally, as the stimulus onset approached in Double vibrations, accuracy rates markedly decreased. Notably, Hand Placement resulted in significantly higher accuracy rates compared to the Wrist Placement.
Conclusion
Our findings underscore the impact of motion in reducing vibrotactile sensitivity on the back of the hand and around the wrist.
Application
This research has wide-ranging practical applications, particularly in the field of VR/AR experiences, rehabilitation programs, and accessibility solutions through the use of haptic gloves. Insights from our study can be harnessed to enhance the efficacy of haptic gloves in conveying vibrotactile cues within these contexts.
AfzalN.WangD.SerirA.ZhangY. (2016). A novel spatial-temporal encoding strategy for presenting time on the wrist using vibrotactile cues. In 2016 IEEE international conference on mechatronics and automation (pp. 2179–2184). IEEE.
2.
AndersenH. J.MorrisonA.KnudsenL. (2012). Modeling vibrotactile detection by logistic regression. In Proceedings of the 7th Nordic conference on human-computer interaction: Making sense through design (pp. 500–503). ACM.
3.
BahrinM.NorasramM.YusofH. M.GhazaliA.SidekS. (2023). Haptic glove for tactile graphics reader. Journal of Engineering and Technology, 14(1), 101–120.
4.
BikahM.HallbeckM. S.FlowersJ. H. (2008). Supracutaneous vibrotactile perception threshold at various non-glabrous body loci. Ergonomics, 51(6), 920–934. https://doi.org/10.1080/00140130701809341
5.
BoldtR.GogulskiJ.Gúzman-LopézJ.CarlsonS.PertovaaraA. (2014). Two-point tactile discrimination ability is influenced by temporal features of stimulation. Experimental Brain Research, 232(7), 2179–2185. https://doi.org/10.1007/s00221-014-3908-y
6.
BrewsterS. A.BrownL. M. (2004). Tactons: Structured tactile messages for non-visual information display.
7.
CasalinoA.MesseriC.PozziM.ZanchettinA. M.RoccoP.PrattichizzoD. (2018). Operator awareness in human–robot collaboration through wearable vibrotactile feedback. IEEE Robotics and Automation Letters, 3(4), 4289–4296. https://doi.org/10.1109/lra.2018.2865034
8.
ChenQ.PerraultS. T.RoyQ.WyseL. (2018). Effect of temporality, physical activity and cognitive load on spatiotemporal vibrotactile pattern recognition. In Proceedings of the 2018 international conference on advanced visual interfaces (pp. 1–9). ACM.
9.
ChoiS.KuchenbeckerK. J. (2012). Vibrotactile display: Perception, technology, and applications. Proceedings of the IEEE, 101(9), 2093–2104. https://doi.org/10.1109/jproc.2012.2221071
10.
CholewiakR. W.CollinsA. A. (2013). Sensory and physiological bases of touch. In The psychology of touch (pp. 23–60). Psychology Press.
11.
CollinsA. A.BrillJ. C.CholewiakR. W. (2001). Spatial factors in vibrotactile pattern perception. In Eurohaptics (p. 41). Proceedings of EuroHaptics 2001, The University of Birmingham.
Cybulska-KlosowiczA.MeftahE.-M.RabyM.LemieuxM.-L.ChapmanC. E. (2011). A critical speed for gating of tactile detection during voluntary movement. Experimental Brain Research, 210(2), 291–301. https://doi.org/10.1007/s00221-011-2632-0
14.
DimN. K.RenX. (2017). Investigation of suitable body parts for wearable vibration feedback in walking navigation. International Journal of Human-Computer Studies, 97(2), 34–44. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.ijhcs.2016.08.002
15.
ElsayedH.WeigelM.MüllerF.SchmitzM.MarkyK.GüntherS.RiemannJ.MühlhäuserM. (2020). Vibromap: Understanding the spacing of vibrotactile actuators across the body. Proceedings of the ACM on Interactive, Mobile, Wearable and Ubiquitous Technologies, 4(4), 1–16. https://doi.org/10.1145/3432189
16.
ElvitigalaD. S.MatthiesD. J.DissanayakaV.WeerasingheC.NanayakkaraS. (2019). 2bit-tactilehand: Evaluating tactons for on-body vibrotactile displays on the hand and wrist. In Proceedings of the 10th augmented human international conference 2019 (pp. 1–8). ACM.
17.
EstesL. T.BackusD.StarnerT. (2015). A wearable vibration glove for improving hand sensation in persons with spinal cord injury using passive haptic rehabilitation. In 2015 9th international conference on pervasive computing technologies for healthcare (pervasivehealth) (pp. 37–44). IEEE.
18.
FaugloireE.LejeuneL.RivièreM.-A.MantelB. (2022). Spatiotemporal influences on the recognition of two-dimensional vibrotactile patterns on the abdomen. Journal of Experimental Psychology: Applied, 28(3), 606–628. https://doi.org/10.1037/xap0000404
19.
FaulF.ErdfelderE.BuchnerA.LangA.-G. (2009). Statistical power analyses using g* power 3.1: Tests for correlation and regression analyses. Behavior Research Methods, 41(4), 1149–1160. https://doi.org/10.3758/BRM.41.4.1149
20.
GerberC. N.KunzB.van HedelH. J. (2016). Preparing a neuropediatric upper limb exergame rehabilitation system for home-use: A feasibility study. Journal of NeuroEngineering and Rehabilitation, 13(1), 1–12. https://doi.org/10.1186/s12984-016-0141-x
21.
GescheiderG. A.BolanowskiS.HallK.HoffmanK.VerrilloR. (1994). The effects of aging on information- processing channels in the sense of touch: I. Absolute sensitivity. Somatosensory & Motor Research, 11(4), 345–357. https://doi.org/10.3109/08990229409028878
22.
GiannopoulosE.PomesA.SlaterM. (2012). Touching the void: Exploring virtual objects through a vibrotactile glove. International Journal of Virtual Reality, 11(3), 19–24. https://doi.org/10.20870/ijvr.2012.11.3.2847
23.
GomesK.BetzaS.RiggsS. L. (2020). Now you feel it, now you don’t: The effect of movement, cue complexity, and body location on tactile change detection. Human Factors, 62(4), 643–655. https://doi.org/10.1177/0018720819850278
24.
GüntherS.KratzS.AvrahamiD.MühlhäuserM. (2018). Exploring audio, visual, and tactile cues for syn- chronous remote assistance. In Proceedings of the 11th pervasive technologies related to assistive environments conference (pp. 339–344). ACM.
25.
HongJ.PradhanA.FroehlichJ. E.FindlaterL. (2017). Evaluating wrist-based haptic feedback for non-visual target finding and path tracing on a 2d surface. In Proceedings of the 19th international ACM Sigaccess conference on computers and accessibility (pp. 210–219). ACM.
26.
HwangI.SeoJ.KimM.ChoiS. (2013). Vibrotactile perceived intensity for mobile devices as a function of direction, amplitude, and frequency. IEEE Transactions on Haptics, 6(3), 352–362. https://doi.org/10.1109/TOH.2013.2
27.
JohanssonR. S.VallboA. B. (1979). Tactile sensibility in the human hand: Relative and absolute densities of four types of mechanoreceptive units in glabrous skin. The Journal of Physiology, 286(1), 283–300. https://doi.org/10.1113/jphysiol.1979.sp012619
28.
JonesL. A.SarterN. B. (2008). Tactile displays: Guidance for their design and application. Human Factors, 50(1), 90–111. https://doi.org/10.1518/001872008X250638
29.
JuravleG.DeubelH.SpenceC. (2011). Attention and suppression affect tactile perception in reach-to-grasp movements. Acta Psychologica, 138(2), 302–310. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.actpsy.2011.08.001
30.
JuravleG.DeubelH.TanH. Z.SpenceC. (2010). Changes in tactile sensitivity over the time-course of a goal-directed movement. Behavioural Brain Research, 208(2), 391–401. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.bbr.2009.12.009
31.
KarueiI.Foley-FisherZ.KochS.MacKenzieR.El-ZohairyM.MacLeanK. E. (2010). Vibration perception in mobile contexts. In Graphics interface, Ottawa, Canada, 28–29.
32.
KarueiI.MacLeanK. E.Foley-FisherZ.MacKenzieR.KochS.El-ZohairyM. (2011). Detecting vibrations across the body in mobile contexts. In Proceedings of the Sigchi conference on human factors in computing systems (pp. 3267–3276). ACM.
33.
KaulO. B.MeierK.RohsM. (2017). Increasing presence in virtual reality with a vibrotactile grid around the head. Human-Computer Interaction–Interact 2017: 16th ifip tc 13 International Conference, Mumbai, India, September 25-29, 2017, Proceedings, Part iv, 16 (pp. 289–298). Springer.
34.
KeyesA.D’SouzaM.PostulaA. (2015). Navigation for the blind using a wireless sensor haptic glove. In 2015 4th Mediterranean conference on embedded computing (meco) (pp. 361–364). IEEE.
35.
KilianJ.NeugebauerA.ScherffigL.WahlS. (2022). The unfolding space glove: A wearable spatio-visual to haptic sensory substitution device for blind people. Sensors, 22(5), 1859. https://doi.org/10.3390/s22051859
36.
KimK.RenX. (2014). Assisting visually impaired people to acquire targets on a large wall-mounted display. Journal of Computer Science and Technology, 29(5), 825–836. https://doi.org/10.1007/s11390-014-1471-4
37.
KlinenbergE.SoY.RempelD. (1996). Temperature effects on vibrotactile sensitivity threshold measurements: Implications for carpal tunnel screening tests. The Journal of Hand Surgery, 21(1), 132–137. https://doi.org/10.1016/S0363-5023(96)80166-3
38.
KorresG.JensenC. B. F.ParkW.BartschC.EidM. (2018). A vibrotactile alarm system for pleasant awakening. IEEE transactions on haptics, 11(3), 357–366. https://doi.org/10.1109/toh.2018.2804952
39.
KrishnaS.BalaS.McDanielT.McGuireS.PanchanathanS. (2010). Vibroglove: An assistive technology aid for conveying facial expressions. In Chi’10 extended abstracts on human factors in computing systems (pp. 3637–3642). ACM.
40.
LeeM.InH. (2023). Novel wrist-worn vibrotactile device for providing multi-categorical information for Orien- Tation and mobility of the blind and visually impaired. IEEE Access.
41.
LehtinenV.OulasvirtaA.SalovaaraA.NurmiP. (2012). Dynamic tactile guidance for visual search tasks. In Proceedings of the 25th annual ACM symposium on user interface software and technology (pp. 445–452). ACM.
42.
LiaoY.-C.ChenY.-L.LoJ.-Y.LiangR.-H.ChanL.ChenB.-Y. (2016). Edgevib: Effective alphanu- meric character output using a wrist-worn tactile display. In Proceedings of the 29th annual symposium on user interface software and technology (pp. 595–601). ACM.
43.
LouisonC.FerlayF.MestreD. R. (2017). Spatialized vibrotactile feedback contributes to goal-directed move- ments in cluttered virtual environments. In 2017 IEEE symposium on 3d user interfaces (3dui) (pp. 99–102). IEEE.
44.
LuzhnicaG.VeasE. (2017). Vibrotactile patterns using sensitivity prioritisation. In Proceedings of the 2017 ACM international symposium on wearable computers (pp. 74–81). ACM.
45.
LuzhnicaG.VeasE.PammerV. (2016). Skin reading: Encoding text in a 6-channel haptic display. In Proceedings of the 2016 ACM international symposium on wearable computers (pp. 148–155). ACM.
46.
MartínezJ.GarcíaA.OliverM.MolinaJ. P.GonzálezP. (2014). Identifying virtual 3d geometric shapes with a vibrotactile glove. IEEE computer graphics and applications, 36(1), 42–51. https://doi.org/10.1109/MCG.2014.81
47.
Mas-MoudiM.ZenatiN.BenbelkacemS.HadjadjZ.DjekouneO.GuerroudjiM. A.IzountarY. (2021). Low-cost haptic glove for grasp precision improvement in virtual reality-based post-stroke hand rehabilitation. In 2021 international conference on artificial intelligence for cyber security systems and privacy (AI-CSP) (pp. 1–3). ACM.
48.
MuramatsuY.NiitsumaM.ThomessenT. (2012). Perception of tactile sensation using vibrotactile glove interface. In 2012 IEEE 3rd international conference on cognitive infocommunications (coginfocom) (pp. 621–626). IEEE.
49.
NeelyG.BurströmL. (2006). Gender differences in subjective responses to hand–arm vibration. International Journal of Industrial Ergonomics, 36(2), 135–140. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.ergon.2005.09.003
OsawaN. (2006). Automatic adjustments for efficient and precise positioning and release of virtual objects. In Proceedings of the 2006 ACM international conference on virtual reality continuum and its applications (pp. 121–128). ACM.
52.
PakkanenT.LylykangasJ.RaisamoJ.RaisamoR.SalminenK.RantalaJ.SurakkaV. (2008). Perception of low-amplitude haptic stimuli when biking. In Proceedings of the 10th international conference on multimodal interfaces (pp. 281–284). ACM.
53.
PaneelsS.AnastassovaM.StrachanS.VanS. P.SivacoumaraneS.BolzmacherC. (2013). What’s around me? Multi-Actuator haptic feedback on the wrist. In 2013 world haptics conference (WHC) (pp. 407–412). IEEE.
54.
PezentE.IsrarA.SamadM.RobinsonS.AgarwalP.BenkoH.ColonneseN. (2019). Tasbi: Multisensory squeeze and vibrotactile wrist haptics for augmented and virtual reality. In 2019 IEEE world haptics conference (WHC) (pp. 1–6). IEEE.
55.
PostL.ZompaI.ChapmanC. (1994). Perception of vibrotactile stimuli during motor activity in human subjects. Experimental Brain Research, 100(1), 107–120. https://doi.org/10.1007/BF00227283
56.
RyuJ.KimG. J. (2004). Using a vibro-tactile display for enhanced collision perception and presence. In Proceedings of the ACM symposium on virtual reality software and technology (pp. 89–96). ACM.
57.
SandersonP.McLandersM.SantomauroC.TranJ.FouhyS.ShapiroJ.BrownD.McNultyE. (2022). Examining the efficacy of vibrotactile displays for monitoring patient vital signs: Six laboratory studies of change detection and state identification. Journal of Experimental Psychology: Applied, 28(1), 10–34. https://doi.org/10.1037/xap0000373
58.
SatputeS. A.CanadyJ. R.KlatzkyR. L.StettenG. D. (2019). Fingersight: A vibrotactile wearable ring for assistance with locating and reaching objects in peripersonal space. IEEE transactions on haptics, 13(2), 325–333. https://doi.org/10.1109/TOH.2019.2945561
59.
SchättinA.PicklesJ.FlagmeierD.SchärerB.RiedererY.NiedeckenS.VilligerS.JurtR.KindN.ScottS. N.StettlerC.Martin-NiedeckenA. L. (2022). Development of a novel home-based exergame with on-body feedback: Usability study. JMIR Serious Games, 10(4), Article e38703. https://doi.org/10.2196/38703
60.
SchmuntzschU.FeldhausL. H. (2013). The warning glove: Wearable computing technology for maintenance assistance in ips2. IFAC Proceedings Volumes, 46(15), 70–75. https://doi.org/10.3182/20130811-5-us-2037.00007
61.
SchönauerC.MosselA.Zaiti, I.-A.VatavuR.-D. (2015). Touch, movement and vibration: User perception of vibrotactile feedback for touch and mid-air gestures. Human-computer Interaction–Interact 2015: 15th IFIP TC 13 International Conference, Bamberg, Germany, September 14-18, 2015, Proceedings, Part IV, 15 (pp. 165–172). Springer.
62.
SeahS. A.GriffinM. J. (2008). Normal values for thermotactile and vibrotactile thresholds in males and females. International Archives of Occupational and Environmental Health, 81(5), 535–543. https://doi.org/10.1007/s00420-007-0252-6
63.
ShahV. A.CasadioM.ScheidtR. A.MrotekL. A. (2019). Spatial and temporal influences on discrimination of vibrotactile stimuli on the arm. Experimental Brain Research, 237(8), 2075–2086. https://doi.org/10.1007/s00221-019-05564-5
64.
SherrickC.CholewiakR. (1986). Handbook of perception and human performance, chapter cutaneous sensitivity. Wiley.
65.
SongM.McLaughlinS.DoerzaphZ. (2017). An on-road evaluation of connected motorcycle crash warning interface with different motorcycle types. Transportation Research Part C: Emerging Technologies, 74, 34–50. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.trc.2016.11.005
66.
StronksH. C.ParkerD. J.BarnesN. (2016). Vibrotactile spatial acuity and intensity discrimination on the lower back using coin motors. IEEE Transactions on Haptics, 9(4), 446–454. https://doi.org/10.1109/TOH.2016.2569484
67.
van HedelH. J.HäfligerN.GerberC. N. (2016). Quantifying selective elbow movements during an exergame in children with neurological disorders: A pilot study. Journal of NeuroEngineering and Rehabilitation, 13(1), 1–12. https://doi.org/10.1186/s12984-016-0200-3
68.
VechevV.ZarateJ.LindlbauerD.HinchetR.SheaH.HilligesO. (2019). Tactiles: Dual-mode low- power electromagnetic actuators for rendering continuous contact and spatial haptic patterns in vr. In 2019 IEEE conference on virtual reality and 3d user interfaces (VR) (pp. 312–320). IEEE.
WuH.-C.LiaoY.-C.ChengY.-H.ShihP.-C.TsaiC.-M.LinC.-Y. (2017). The potential effect of a vibrotactile glove rehabilitation system on motor recovery in chronic post-stroke hemiparesis. Technology and Health Care, 25(6), 1183–1187. https://doi.org/10.3233/THC-171001
74.
YuZ.HorvathS.DelazioA.WangJ.AlmasiR.KlatzkyR.StettenG. (2016). Palmsight: An assistive technology helping the blind to locate and grasp objects. In Carnegie Mellon university (pp. 16–59). Tech. Rep.
75.
ZhangY.LiangR.SunZ.KochM. (2021). Haptmr: Smart haptic feedback for mixed reality based on computer vision semantic. In International conference on human-computer interaction (pp. 242–258). HCI.
76.
ZhaoK.SerranoM.OriolaB.JouffraisC. (2020). Vibhand: On-hand vibrotactile interface enhancing non-visual exploration of digital graphics. Proceedings of the ACM on Human-Computer Interaction, 4(ISS), 1–19. https://doi.org/10.1145/3427335
