Testing Senders’ Visual Occlusion Model: Do Operators (Drivers) Really Predict During Visual Occlusion?

Abstract

Objective

The present study tests the hypothesis that humans are capable of predicting the state of a system during visual occlusion, an assumption often made in models of sampling behaviour, but seldom tested.

Background

In 1967, John Senders introduced the visual occlusion paradigm to evaluate attentional demand of tasks such as automobile driving. Despite multiple studies employing this paradigm, the concept of operators actually being able to resolve uncertainty during occlusion by predicting system output has remained unvalidated.

Method

A self-paced visual occlusion monitoring task was contrived, involving a randomly rotating basin with a ball at the bottom. Participants were required to detect critical events (ball falling off the edge) while looking only as often as subjectively deemed necessary. Assuming the need to resolve uncertainty imposed by the random rotations, we examined relations between occlusion durations and system states preceding occlusion, for different glance durations, to infer whether predicting may have taken place.

Results

Results suggested that glance requests were consistent with the use of simple first order predictions. This pertained not only for longer (300 and 500 ms) glances, but even for 100 ms glances whenever critical events were imminent.

Conclusion

The presumption that human operators are capable, under certain circumstances, of predicting system state in the absence of visual information appears feasible; however, glance duration plays an important role.

Applications

By providing support for some of its basic premises, the use of Senders’ visual occlusion paradigm as a potential tool for evaluating human monitoring performance has been strengthened.

Keywords

instrument monitoring visual information processing attentional models self-paced visual occlusion

Get full access to this article

View all access options for this article.

References

Baron

Levison

W. H.

(1977). Display analysis with the optimal control model of the human operator. Human Factors: The Journal of the Human Factors and Ergonomics Society, 19(5), 437–457. https://doi.org/10.1177/001872087701900502

Blaauw

G. J.

Godthelp

Milgram

(1984). Optimal control model applications and field measurements with respect to car driving. Vehicle System Dynamics, 13(2), 93–111. https://doi.org/10.1080/00423118408968769

Box

G. E. P.

Jenkins

G. M.

(1976). Time Series Analysis: Forecasting and Control. Holden-Day.

Burnham

K. P.

Anderson

D. R.

(2002). A practical information-theoretic approach. Model Selection and Multimodel Inference (2nd ed.). Springer.

Chen

H. Y. W.

(2013). A Model of Information Sampling Using Visual Occlusion. Doctoral Dissertation, University of Toronto.

Chen

H.-Y. W.

Milgram

(2011). Determining fixed glance duration for visual occlusion research. Proceedings of the Human Factors and Ergonomics Society Annual Meeting, 55(1), 1904–1908. https://doi.org/10.1177/1071181311551396

Chen

H.-Y. W.

Milgram

(2013). A framework for modelling and analysing variability in visual occlusion experiments. Proceedings of the Human Factors and Ergonomics Society Annual Meeting, 57(1), 1884–1888. https://doi.org/10.1177/1541931213571420

Dainton

(2017). Temporal consciousness. In The Stanford Encyclopedia of Philosophy. Fall 2017 Edition https://plato.stanford.edu/archives/fall2017/entries/consciousness-temporal/

Godthelp

Milgram

Blaauw

G. J.

(1984). The development of a time-related measure to describe driving strategy. Human Factors: The Journal of the Human Factors and Ergonomics Society, 26(3), 257–268. https://doi.org/10.1177/001872088402600302

10.

Kujala

Mäkelä

Kotilainen

Tokkonen

(2015). The attentional demand of automobile driving revisited. Human Factors: The Journal of the Human Factors and Ergonomics Society, 58(1), 163–180. https://doi.org/10.1177/0018720815595901

11.

Liu

Ahlström

Forsman

Å.

Kircher

(2020). Attentional demand as a function of contextual factors in different traffic scenarios. Human Factors: The Journal of the Human Factors and Ergonomics Society, 62(7), 1171–1189. https://doi.org/10.1177/0018720819869099

12.

Milgram

(1983). A multivariate autoregressive display monitoring model. In Proceedings of the 3rd European Annual Conference on Human Decision-Making and Manual Control.

13.

Milgram

Godthelp

Blaauw

G. J.

(1982). An investigation of decision-making criteria adopted by drivers while monitoring vehicle state in the temporary absence of visual input. In Proceedings of the 2nd European Annual Conference on Human Decision-Making and Manual Control.

14.

Mourant

R. R.

(1997). Measuring attentional demand in a virtual environments driving simulator. Proceedings of the Human Factors and Ergonomics Society Annual Meeting, 41(2), 1268–1272. https://doi.org/10.1177/1071181397041002121

15.

Senders

J. W.

(1983). Visual Sampling Processes. Doctoral Dissertation. Katholieke Hogeschool Tilburg.

16.

Senders

J. W.

Kristofferson

A. B.

Levison

W. H.

Dietrich

C. W.

Ward

J. L.

(1967). The attentional demand of automobile driving. Highway Research Record, (195), 15-33. https://doi.org/10.1177/0018720815595901.

17.

Sheridan

T. B.

(2004). Driver distraction from a control theory perspective. Human Factors: The Journal of the Human Factors and Ergonomics Society, 46(4), 587–599. https://doi.org/10.1518/hfes.46.4.587.56807

18.

Tsimhoni

Green

(1999). Visual demand of driving curves determined by visual occlusion. Proceedings of Vision in Vehicles Conference, 8, 22-25. https://doi.org/10.1177/154193120104502305.

Supplementary Material

Please find the following supplemental material available below.

For Open Access articles published under a Creative Commons License, all supplemental material carries the same license as the article it is associated with.

For non-Open Access articles published, all supplemental material carries a non-exclusive license, and permission requests for re-use of supplemental material or any part of supplemental material shall be sent directly to the copyright owner as specified in the copyright notice associated with the article.

0.00 MB

0.17 MB