Team Self-Maintenance during Long-Duration Space Exploration: A Conceptual Framework

Abstract

Objective

We developed a conceptual framework of Team Self-Maintenance (TSM) within long-duration space exploration (LDSE), which we define as the process of monitoring, adjusting, and maintaining the psychological well-being of a team in the absence of external support.

Background

Specific to LDSE and isolated, confined, and extreme (ICE) environments, periods of routine can have a debilitating effect on the crew’s well-being and performance, and TSM is a critical process for avoiding these detrimental effects.

Method

Based on themes drawn from nine subject matter expert interviews combined with an extensive literature review on related concepts, we developed an integrative conceptual framework of the key inputs, processes, and outputs involved in TSM within LDSE contexts.

Results

Our TSM framework suggests team well-being as a key outcome that must be maintained during LDSE and information sharing, self-regulation, resource recovery, and emotional support as the key processes that enable team well-being. We also identify several contextual inputs that can serve as intervention points for enabling effective TSM.

Conclusion

Our framework suggests that future research and practice aimed at effective LDSE should emphasize team well-being, rather than just performance, and that there are many open questions in terms of how teams will manage their own socio-emotional needs (e.g., conflict, recovery activities, and boredom) without external systems and support.

Application

This conceptual framework describes the primary inputs, processes, and outcomes involved in the team self-maintenance process. This framework reflects context-specific theorizing most likely to be applicable only to LDSE contexts.

Keywords

teamwork spaceflight well-being performance boredom

Get full access to this article

View all access options for this article.

References

Anania

E. C.

Disher

T. J.

Kring

J. P.

Iwig

C. L.

Keebler

J. R.

Lazarra

E. H.

Salas

(2017). Communication in the spaceflight multi-team system: training and technology recommendations to support boundary spanners. Proceedings of the Human Factors and Ergonomics Society Annual Meeting, 61(1), 150–154. https://doi.org/10.1177/1541931213601520

Baeriswyl

Krause

Elfering

Berset

(2017). How workload and coworker support relate to emotional exhaustion: The mediating role of sickness presenteeism. International Journal of Stress Management, 24(Suppl 1), 52–73. https://doi.org/10.1037/str0000018

Bishop

S.L.

(2011). From Earth analogs to space: Getting there from here. In Vakoch

D. A.

(Ed.), Psychology of space exploration: Contemporary research in historical perspective (pp. 47–78). US Government Printing Office.

Braun

Clarke

(2006). Using thematic analysis in psychology. Qualitative Research in Psychology, 3(2), 77–101. https://doi.org/10.1191/1478088706qp063oa

Bunderson

J. S.

Sutcliffe

K. M.

(2002). Comparing alternative conceptualizations of functional diversity in management teams: Process and performance effects. Academy of Management Journal, 45(5), 875–893. https://doi.org/10.2307/3069319

Burke

C. S.

Stagl

K. C.

Salas

Pierce

Kendall

(2006). Understanding team adaptation: A conceptual analysis and model. Journal of Applied Psychology, 91(6), 1189. https://doi.org/10.1037/0021-9010.91.6.1189

Collins

D. L.

(2003). Psychological issues relevant to astronaut selection for long-duration spaceflight: A review of the literature. Journal of Human Performance in Extreme Environments, 7(1), 43–67. https://doi.org/10.7771/2327-2937.1021

DiazGranados

Curtis

M. T.

Wildman

J. L.

(2016). Team self-maintenance: A literature review, an operational assessment, and recommendations for practice and research. Technical report prepared under contract NNJ15HK22P for the National Aeronautics and Space Administration (NASA): Lyndon B. Houston, TX: Johnson Space Center.

DiazGranados

Wildman

Curtis

(2020). Extremely stressed and extremely bored: Team self-maintenance in long duration spaceflight. In Landon

L. B.

Slack

K. J.

Salas

(Eds.), Psychology and human performance in space programs: Extreme applications. CRC Press.

10.

Draguns

J. G.

Harrison

A. A.

(2011). Spaceflight and cross-cultural psychology. In Vakoch

D. A.

(Ed.), Psychology of space exploration: Contemporary research in historical perspective (pp. 177–194). US Government Printing Office.

11.

Fiore

S. M.

Carter

D. R.

Asencio

(2015). Conflict, trust, and cohesion: examining affective and attitudinal factors in science teams. In Salas

Vessey

W. B.

Estrada

A. X.

(Eds.), Research on managing groups and teams (Vol. 17, pp. 271–301). Emerald Group Publishing Limited. https://doi.org/10.1108/S1534-085620150000017011

12.

Fischer

Mosier

Orasanu

(2013). The impact of transmission delays on mission control-space crew communication. Proceedings of the Human Factors and Ergonomics Society Annual Meeting 57(1), 1372–1376. https://doi.org/10.1177/1541931213571303

13.

Francis

R. D.

(1969). Introversion and isolation tolerance. Perceptual and Motor Skills, 28(2), 534. https://doi.org/10.2466/pms.1969.28.2.534

14.

Harrison

A. A.

Fiedler

E. R.

(2011). Behavioral health. In Vakoch

D. A.

(Ed.), Psychology of space exploration: Contemporary research in historical perspective (pp. 17–46). US Government Printing Office.

15.

Inoue

Matsuzaki

Ohshima

(2004). Group interactions in SFINCSS-99: Lessons for improving behavioral support programs. Aviation, Space, and Environmental Medicine, 75(7), C28-C35. 15267073.

16.

Jiang

J. Y.

Zhang

Tjosvold

(2013). Emotion regulation as a boundary condition of the relationship between team conflict and performance: A multi‐level examination. Journal of Organizational Behavior, 34(5), 714–734.https://doi.org/10.1002/job.1834

17.

Kanas

Manzey

(2008). Space psychology and psychiatry. 2nd ed. Microcosm Press and Springer.

18.

Kanas

Sandal

Boyd

J. E.

Gushin

V. I.

Manzey

North

Leon

G.R.

Suedfeld

Bishop

Fielder

E.R.

Inoue

Johannes

Kealey

D. J.

Kraft

Matsuzaki

Musson

Palinkas

L.A.

Salnitskiy

V.P.

Sipes

Wang

(2009). Psychology and culture during long-duration space missions. Acta Astronautica, 64(7–8), 659–677. https://doi.org/10.1007/978-3-642-30583-2_9

19.

Kozlowski

S. W. J.

Klein

K. J.

(2000). A multilevel approach to theory and research in organizations: Contextual, temporal, and emergent processes. In Klein

K. J.

Kozlowski

S. W. J.

(Eds.), Multilevel theory, research, and methods in organizations: Foundations, extensions, and new directions (pp. 3–90). Jossey-Bass

20.

Kring

J.P.

Kaminski

M.A.

(2011). Gender composition and crew cohesion during long-duration space missions. In Vakoch

D. A.

(Ed.), Psychology of space exploration: Contemporary research in historical perspective (pp. 125–142). US Government Printing Office.

21.

Lahart

I. M.

Lane

A. M.

Hulton

Williams

Godfrey

Pedlar

Wilson

M.G.

Whyte

G. P.

(2013). Challenges in maintaining emotion regulation in a sleep and energy deprived state induced by the 4800Km ultra-endurance bicycle race; The Race Across AMerica (RAAM). Journal of Sports Science & Medicine, 12(3), 481–488. 24149155.

22.

Landon

L. B.

Slack

K. J.

Barrett

J. D.

(2018). Teamwork and collaboration in long-duration space missions: Going to extremes. American Psychologist, 73(4), 563–575. https://doi.org/10.1037/amp0000260

23.

Marks

M. A.

Mathieu

J. E.

Zaccaro

S. J.

(2001). A temporally based framework and taxonomy of team processes. Academy of Management Review, 26(3), 356–376. https://doi.org/10.2307/259182

24.

Maynard

M. T.

Kennedy

D. M.

(2016). Team adaptation and resilience: What do we know and what can be applied to long-duration isolated, confined, and extreme contexts. American Psychologist, 73(4), 563–575. https://doi.org/10.1037/amp0000260

25.

Mesmer-Magnus

J. R.

DeChurch

L. A.

(2009). Information sharing and team performance: A meta-analysis. Journal of Applied Psychology, 94(2), 535–546. https://doi.org/10.1037/a0013773

26.

Millward

L. J.

Banks

Riga

(2010). Effective self‐regulating teams: A generative psychological approach. Team Performance Management: An International Journal, 16(1/2), 50–73. https://doi.org/10.1108/13527591011028924

27.

Noe

R. A.

Dachner

A. M.

Saxton

Keeton

K. E.

EASI

(2011). Team training for long-duration missions in isolated and confined environments: A literature review, an operational assessment, and recommendations for practice and research. Report number: NASA/TM-2011-216162. Houston, TX: National Aeronautics and Space Administration.

28.

Palinkas

L. A.

Johnson

J. C.

Boster

J. S.

(2004). Social support and depressed mood in isolated and confined environments. Acta Astronautica, 54(9), 639–647. https://doi.org/10.1016/S0094-5765(03)00236-4

29.

Palinkas

L. A.

Keeton

K. E.

Shea

Leveton

L. B.

(2011). Psychosocial characteristics of optimum performance in isolated and confined environments. NASA Technical Report# NASA/TM-2011-216149.

30.

Roddenberry

G. (Writer)

Berman

R. (Writer)

Kroeker

(Writer) (2000). Inside man (Season 7, Episode 6) [TV series episode]. In Berman

(Executive Producer), StarTrek: Voyager. Paramount Television Studios.

31.

Ryff

C. D.

Keyes

C. L. M.

(1995). The structure of psychological well-being revisited. Journal of Personality and Social Psychology, 69(4), 719–727. https://doi.org/10.1037/0022-3514.69.4.719

32.

Sandal

G. M.

(2004). Culture and tension during an International space station simulation: Results from SFINCSS’99. Aviation, Space, and Environmental Medicine, 75(7), C44-C51. 15267075.

33.

Shayler

(2000). Disasters and accidents in manned spaceflight. Springer Science & Business Media.

34.

Siltaloppi

Kinnunen

Feldt

Tolvanen

(2011). Identifying patterns of recovery experiences and their links to psychological outcomes across one year. International Archives of Occupational and Environmental Health, 84(8), 877–888. https://doi.org/10.1007/s00420-011-0672-1

35.

Sonnentag

Fritz

(2007). The recovery experience questionnaire: development and validation of a measure for assessing recuperation and unwinding from work. Journal of Occupational Health Psychology, 12(3), 204. https://doi.org/10.1037/1076-8998.12.3.204

36.

Stuster

(2016). Behavioral issues associated with long-duration space expeditions: Review and analysis of astronaut journals: Experiment 01-E104 (Journals). Houston, TX: National Aeronautics and Space Administration, Johnson Space Center.

37.

Stuster

J. W.

(2011). Recreational opportunities. In Bold endeavors: Lessons from polar and space exploration. Naval Institute Press.

38.

Suedfeld

Steel

G. D.

(2000). The environmental psychology of capsule habitats. Annual Review of Psychology, 51(1), 227–253. https://doi.org/10.1146/annurev.psych.51.1.227

39.

Summers

R. L.

Johnston

S. L.

Marshburn

T. H.

Williams

D. R.

(2005). Emergencies in space. Annals of Emergency Medicine, 46(2), 177–184. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.annemergmed.2005.02.010

40.

Tachibana

(2019). A Hobbesian qualm with space settlement. Futures, 110(June 2019), 28–30. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.futures.2019.02.011

41.

Tannenbaum

S. I.

Cerasoli

C. P.

(2013). Do team and individual debriefs enhance performance? A meta-analysis. Human Factors, 55(1), 231–245. https://doi.org/10.1177/0018720812448394

42.

Tews

M. J.

Michel

J. W.

Ellingson

J. E.

(2013). The impact of coworker support on employee turnover in the hospitality industry. Group & Organization Management, 38(5), 630–653. https://doi.org/10.1177/1059601113503039

43.

Van Wijk

C. H.

(2018). Coping during conventional submarine missions: Evidence of a third quarter phenomenon? Journal of Human Performance in Extreme Environments, 14(1), 12. https://doi.org/10.7771/2327-2937.1108

44.

Vohs

K. D.

Baumeister

R. F.

(Eds.). (2016). Handbook of self-regulation: Research, theory, and applications. Guilford Publications.

45.

Wang

Jing

Bai

Luo

Chen

(2014). During the long way to Mars: Effects of 520 days of confinement (Mars500) on the assessment of affective stimuli and stage alteration in mood and plasma hormone levels. PloS one, 9(4), e87087. https://doi.org/10.1371/journal.pone.0087087

46.

Wichman

(2011). Managing negative interactions in space crews: The role of simulator research. In Vakoch

D. A.

(Ed.), Psychology of space exploration: Contemporary research in historical perspective (pp. 103–124). US Government Printing Office.

Supplementary Material

Please find the following supplemental material available below.

For Open Access articles published under a Creative Commons License, all supplemental material carries the same license as the article it is associated with.

For non-Open Access articles published, all supplemental material carries a non-exclusive license, and permission requests for re-use of supplemental material or any part of supplemental material shall be sent directly to the copyright owner as specified in the copyright notice associated with the article.

0.00 MB

0.08 MB