Spacesuit Center of Gravity Assessments for Partial Gravity EVA Simulation in an Underwater Environment

Abstract

Objective

The objective is to analytically determine the expected CG and build hardware to measure and verify the suited subject’s CG for lunar extravehicular activity (EVA) training in an underwater environment.

Background

For lunar EVAs, it is necessary for astronauts to train with a spacesuit in a simulated partial gravity environment. NASA’s Neutral Buoyancy Laboratory (NBL) can provide these conditions by producing negative buoyancy for a submerged suited subject. However, it is critical that the center of gravity (CG) for the human-spacesuit system to be accurate for conditions expected during planetary EVAs.

Methods

An underwater force-transducer system and individualized human-spacesuit model was created to provide real-time measurement of CG, including recommendations for weight placement locations and quantity of weight needed on the spacesuit to achieve a realistic lunar spacesuit CG. This method was tested with four suited subjects.

Results

Across tested weighout configurations, it was observed that an aft and high CG location will have large postural differences when compared to low and fore CG locations, highlighting the importance of having a proper CG. The system had an accuracy of ±5lbs of the total lunar weight and within ± 15 cm for fore-aft and left-right CG directions of the model predictions.

Conclusion

The developed method offers analytical verification of the suited subject’s CG and improves simulation quality of lunar EVAs. Future suit design can also benefit by recommending hardware changes to create ideal CG locations that improve balance and mobility.

Application

The developed methodology can be used to verify a proper CG location in future planetary EVA simulations such as different reduced gravity training analogs (e.g. active cable offloading systems).

Keywords

computational modeling physical ergonomics gait and posture balance extreme environments

Get full access to this article

View all access options for this article.

References

Attwells

Birrell

Hooper

Mansfield

(2006). Influence of carrying heavy loads on soldiers’ posture, movements and gait. Ergonomics, 49(14), 1527–1537. https://doi.org/10.1080/00140130600757237

Barbier

Allard

Guelton

Colobert

Godillon-Maquinghen

(2003). Estimation of the 3-D center of mass excursion from force-plate data during standing. IEEE Transactions on Neural Systems and Rehabilitation Engineering, 11(1), 31–37. https://doi.org/10.1109/TNSRE.2003.810433

Chappell

Abercromby

Todd

Gernhardt

M L

(2011). Final report of NEEMO 14: Evaluation of a space exploration vehicle, cargo lander, and crew lander during simulated partial-gravity exploration and construction tasks. (NASA Technical Paper 216152)

Chappell

Gernhardt

(2009). Extravehicular activity testing in analog environments: evaluating the effects of center of gravity and environment on human performance. In Human Research Program Investigators Workshop. NASA Techinical Paper 17775.

Chappell

Norcross

Clowers

Clark

Cowley

Harvill

Desantis

Morency

Vos

Gernhardt

(2010). Final report of the integrated parabolic flight test: Effects of varying gravity, center of gravity, and mass on the movement biomechanics and operator compensation of ambulation and exploration tasks. (NASA Technical Paper TM-2010-216137)

Clowers

Jaramillo

Margerum

Nguyen

Rajulu

Sweet

(2006). A mathematical model to predict and maintain the neutral buoyancy of suited astronauts. (SAE Technical Paper 0148–7191).

Davis

Meginnis

(2019). Testing of the NASA Exploration extravehicular mobility unit demonstration (xemu demo) architecture at the neutral buoyancy laboratory. In 49th International Conference on Environmental Systems, Boston, Massachusetts, 2019.

Demur

Demura

(2010). Relationship among gait parameters while walking with varying loads. Journal of Physiological Anthropology, 29(1), 29–34. https://doi.org/10.2114/jpa2.29.29

Gage

Winter

Frank

Adkin

(2004). Kinematic and kinetic validity of the inverted pendulum model in quiet standing. Gait & Posture, 19(2), 124–132. https://doi.org/10.1016/S0966-6362(03)00037-7

10.

Gernhardt

ML.

Jones

JA.

Scheuring

RA.

Abercromby

A F.

Tuxhorn

JA.

Norcross

JR.

(2008). Risk of compromised EVA performance and crew health due to inadequate EVA suit systems. In NASA’s Human Research Program Evidence Book. ■■■(pp. 333–358).

11.

Hakamada

Funato

(2012). Estimation of center of gravity obtained from 3d whole body scanning anthropometry method. In Proceedings of the 1st Asian workshop on 3D body scanning Technologies, Tokyo, Japan, 17–18 April 2012 (pp. 64–70). https://doi.org/10.15221/A12.064

12.

Heller

Challis

Sharkey

(2009). Changes in postural sway as a consequence of wearing a military backpack. Gait & Posture, 30(1), 115–117. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.gaitpost.2009.02.015

13.

Hernandez

Kim

K. H.

Benson

Jarvis

Meginnis

Rajulu

(2019). Underwater space suit performance assessments part 1: Motion capture system development and validation. International Journal of Industrial Ergonomics, 72(8), 119–127. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.ergon.2019.04.008

14.

Karlsson

Lanshammar

(1997). Analysis of postural sway strategies using an inverted pendulum model and force plate data. Gait & Posture, 5(3), 198–203. https://doi.org/10.1016/s0966-6362(96)01082-x

15.

Mulugeta

Chappell

S. P.

Skytland

N. G.

(2009). The effect of center of gravity and anthropometrics on human performance in simulated lunar gravity. (SAE Technical Paper 2009-01-2561)

16.

Norcross

JR.

Chappell

SP.

Gernhardt

ML.

(2010a). Effect of changing weight and mass on human performance in a lunar prototype spacesuit. Medicine & Science in Sports & Exercise, 42(5), 513–514. https://doi.org/10.1249/01.MSS.0000385169.73828.b3

17.

Norcross

JR.

Clowers

KG.

Clark

Cowley

MS.

Harvill

Chappell

Stroud

LC.

Desantis

Paloski

WH.

Morency

RM.

Vos

JR.

Gernhardt

ML.

(2010b). Effects of changing center of gravity on shirtsleeve human performance in reduced gravity. (NASA Technical Paper TM-2010-216127)

18.

Strube

Sumner

Kollock

Games

Lackamp

Mizutani

Sefton

(2017). The effect of military load carriage on postural sway, forward trunk lean, and pelvic girdle motion. International Journal of Exercise Science, 10(1), 25-36.

19.

Watson

RD.

(2014). Modified advanced crew escape suit intravehicular activity suit for extravehicular activity mobility evaluations. In 44th International Conference on Environmental Systems, Tuscon, Arizona, 13–17 July 2014.

20.

Zhou

Sun

Roos

P. E.

Corner

(2016). Anthropometry model generation based on ANSUR II database. International Journal of the Digital Human, 1(4), 321. https://doi.org/10.1504/IJDH.2016.084584.