Sage Journals: Discover world-class research

Abstract

Objective

To review practical, evidence-based strategies that may be implemented to promote teleworker safety, health, and well-being during and after the coronavirus pandemic of 2019 (COVID-19).

Background

The prevalence of telework has increased due to COVID-19. The upsurge brings with it challenges, including limited face-to-face interaction with colleagues and supervisors, reduced access to ergonomics information and resources, increased social isolation, and blurred role definitions, which may adversely affect teleworker safety, health, and well-being.

Method

Evidence-based strategies for improving occupational safety, health, and well-being among teleworkers were synthesized in a narrative-based review to address common challenges associated with telework considering circumstances unique to the COVID-19 pandemic.

Results

Interventions aimed at increasing worker motivation to engage in safe and healthy behaviors via enhanced safety leadership, managing role boundaries to reduce occupational safety and health risks, and redesigning work to strengthen interpersonal interactions, interdependence, as well as workers’ initiation have been supported in the literature.

Application

This review provides practical guidance for group-level supervisors, occupational safety and health managers, and organizational leaders responsible for promoting health and safety among employees despite challenges associated with an increase in telework.

Keywords

leadership management telework participatory ergonomics

Get full access to this article

View all access options for this article.

References

Amstad

F. T.

Meier

L. L.

Fasel

Elfering

Semmer

N. K

. (2011). A meta-analysis of work-family conflict and various outcomes with a special emphasis on cross-domain versus matching-domain relations. Journal of Occupational Health Psychology, 16, 151–169.https://doi.org/10.1037/a0022170

21280939

Asundi

Odell

Luce

Dennerlein

J. T

. (2010). Notebook computer use on a desk, LAP and LAP support: Effects on posture, performance and comfort. Ergonomics, 53, 74–82.https://doi.org/10.1080/00140130903389043

20069483

Bailey

Kurland

N. B

. (1999). The advantages and challenges of working here, there, anywhere, and anytime. Organizational dynamics, 28, 53–68.

Bandura

. (1991). Social cognitive theory of self-regulation. Organizational Behavior and Human Decision Processes, 50, 248–287.https://doi.org/10.1016/0749-5978(91)90022-L

Belzunegui-Eraso

Erro-Garcés

. (2020). Teleworking in the context of the Covid-19 crisis. Sustainability, 12, 3662.https://doi.org/10.3390/su12093662

Bentley

T. A.

Teo

S. T. T.

McLeod

Tan

Bosua

Gloet

. (2016). The role of organisational support in teleworker wellbeing: A socio-technical systems approach. Applied Ergonomics, 52, 207–215.https://doi.org/10.1016/j.apergo.2015.07.019

26360212

Bergouignan

Legget

K. T.

De Jong

Kealey

Nikolovski

Groppel

J. L.

Jordan

O'Day

Hill

J. O.

Bessesen

D. H

. (2016). Effect of frequent interruptions of prolonged sitting on self-perceived levels of energy, mood, food cravings and cognitive function. International Journal of Behavioral Nutrition and Physical Activity, 13, 1–12.https://doi.org/10.1186/s12966-016-0437-z

27809874

Bubric

Hedge

. (2016). Differential patterns of laptop use and associated musculoskeletal discomfort in male and female college students. Work, 55, 663–671.https://doi.org/10.3233/WOR-162419

27768002

Burgess-Limerick

. (2018). Participatory Ergonomics: Evidence and implementation lessons. Applied Ergonomics, 68, 289–293.https://doi.org/10.1016/j.apergo.2017.12.009

29409647

10.

Butts

M. M.

Casper

W. J.

Yang

T. S

. (2013). How important are work–family support policies? A meta-analytic investigation of their effects on employee outcomes. Journal of Applied Psychology, 98, 1–25.https://doi.org/10.1037/a0030389

11.

Campion

M. A.

Mumford

Morgeson

F. P.

Nahrgang

J. D

. (2005). Work redesign: Eight obstacles and opportunities. Human Resource Management, 44, 367–390.https://doi.org/10.1002/hrm.20080

12.

Carayon

Smith

M. J

. (2000). Work organization and ergonomics. Applied Ergonomics, 31, 649–662.https://doi.org/10.1016/S0003-6870(00)00040-5

11132049

13.

Chambers

A. J.

Robertson

M. M.

Baker

N. A

. (2019). The effect of sit-stand desks on office worker behavioral and health outcomes: A scoping review. Applied Ergonomics, 78, 37–53.https://doi.org/10.1016/j.apergo.2019.01.015

31046958

14.

Christian

M. S.

Bradley

J. C.

Wallace

J. C.

Burke

M. J

. (2009). Workplace safety: A meta-analysis of the roles of person and situation factors. Journal of Applied Psychology, 94, 1103–1127.https://doi.org/10.1037/a0016172

19702360

15.

Clarke

. (2013). Safety leadership: A meta-analytic review of transformational and transactional leadership styles as antecedents of safety behaviours. Journal of Occupational and Organizational Psychology, 86, 22–49.https://doi.org/10.1111/j.2044-8325.2012.02064.x

16.

Coenen

van der Molen

H. F.

Burdorf

Huysmans

M. A.

Straker

Frings-Dresen

M. H.

van der Beek

A. J

. (2019). Associations of screen work with neck and upper extremity symptoms: A systematic review with meta-analysis. Occupational and Environmental Medicine, 76, 502–509.https://doi.org/10.1136/oemed-2018-105553

30894425

17.

Commissaris

D. A.

Huysmans

M. A.

Mathiassen

S. E.

Srinivasan

Koppes

L. L.

Hendriksen

I. J

. (2016). Interventions to reduce sedentary behavior and increase physical activity during productive work: A systematic review. Scandinavian Journal of Work, Environment and Health, 42, 181–191.https://doi.org/10.5271/sjweh.3544

26683116

18.

Davis

K. G.

Kotowski

S. E

. (2014). Postural variability: An effective way to reduce musculoskeletal discomfort in office work. Human Factors, 56, 1249–1261.https://doi.org/10.1177/0018720814528003

25490805

19.

Davis

K. G.

Kotowski

S. E.

Daniel

Gerding

Naylor

Syck

. (2020). The home office: Ergonomic lessons from the “new normal”. Ergonomics in Design: The Quarterly of Human Factors Applications, 28, 4–10.https://doi.org/10.1177/1064804620937907

20.

Derks

van Duin

Tims

Bakker

A. B

. (2015). Smartphone use and work-home interference: The moderating role of social norms and employee work engagement. Journal of Occupational and Organizational Psychology, 88, 155–177.https://doi.org/10.1111/joop.12083

21.

Fogarty

G. J.

Shaw

. (2010). Safety climate and the theory of planned behavior: Towards the prediction of unsafe behavior. Accident Analysis & Prevention, 42, 1455–1459.https://doi.org/10.1016/j.aap.2009.08.008

20538101

22.

Grant

A. M.

Parker

S. K

. (2009). 7 redesigning work design theories: The rise of relational and proactive perspectives. Academy of Management Annals, 3, 317–375.https://doi.org/10.5465/19416520903047327

23.

Hammer

L. B.

Kossek

E. E.

Anger

W. K.

Bodner

Zimmerman

K. L

. (2011). Clarifying work–family intervention processes: The roles of work–family conflict and family-supportive supervisor behaviors. Journal of Applied Psychology, 96, 134–150.https://doi.org/10.1037/a0020927

24.

Hammer

L. B.

Kossek

E. E.

Yragui

N. L.

Bodner

T. E.

Hanson

G. C

. (2009). Development and validation of a multidimensional measure of family supportive supervisor behaviors (FSSB). Journal of Management, 35, 837–856.https://doi.org/10.1177/0149206308328510

21660254

25.

Harrington

S. S.

Walker

B. L

. (2004). The effects of ergonomics training on the knowledge, attitudes, and practices of teleworkers. Journal of Safety Research, 35, 13–22.https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jsr.2003.07.002

14992842

26.

Hertel

Geister

Konradt

. (2005). Managing virtual teams: A review of current empirical research. Human Resource Management Review, 15, 69–95.https://doi.org/10.1016/j.hrmr.2005.01.002

27.

Humphrey

S. E.

Nahrgang

J. D.

Morgeson

F. P

. (2007). Integrating motivational, social, and contextual work design features: A meta-analytic summary and theoretical extension of the work design literature. Journal of Applied Psychology, 92, 1332–1356.https://doi.org/10.1037/0021-9010.92.5.1332

17845089

28.

Kines

Andersen

L. P. S.

Spangenberg

Mikkelsen

K. L.

Dyreborg

Zohar

. (2010). Improving construction site safety through leader-based verbal safety communication. Journal of Safety Research, 41, 399–406.https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jsr.2010.06.005

21059457

29.

Konradt

Hertel

Schmook

. (2003). Quality of management by objectives, task-related stressors, and non-task-related stressors as predictors of stress and job satisfaction among teleworkers. European Journal of Work and Organizational Psychology, 12, 61–79.https://doi.org/10.1080/13594320344000020

30.

Konradt

Schmook

Wilm

Hertel

. (2000). Health circles for teleworkers: Selective results on stress, strain and coping styles. Health Education Research, 15, 327–338.https://doi.org/10.1093/her/15.3.327

10977380

31.

Kossek

E. E.

Pichler

Bodner

Hammer

L. B

. (2011). Workplace social support and WORK-FAMILY conflict: A meta-analysis clarifying the influence of general and work-family-specific supervisor and organizational support. Personnel Psychology, 64, 289–313.https://doi.org/10.1111/j.1744-6570.2011.01211.x

21691415

32.

Lal

Dwivedi

Y. K

. (2010). Investigating homeworkers’ inclination to remain connected to work at “anytime, anywhere” via mobile phones. Journal of Enterprise Information Management, 23, 759–774.https://doi.org/10.1108/17410391011088628

33.

Locke

E. A.

Latham

G. P

. (2002). Building a practically useful theory of goal setting and task motivation: A 35-year odyssey. American Psychologist, 57, 705–717.https://doi.org/10.1037/0003-066X.57.9.705

12237980

34.

Michel

J. S.

Mitchelson

J. K.

Pichler

Cullen

K. L

. (2010). Clarifying relationships among work and family social support, stressors, and work–family conflict. Journal of Vocational Behavior, 76, 91–104.https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jvb.2009.05.007

35.

Molino

Ingusci

Signore

Manuti

Giancaspro

M. L.

Russo

Zito

Cortese

C. G

et al. (2020). Wellbeing costs of technology use during COVID-19 remote working: An investigation using the Italian translation of the technostress creators scale. Sustainability, 12, 5911.https://doi.org/10.3390/su12155911

36.

Morgeson

F. P.

Campion

M. A

. (2002). Minimizing tradeoffs when redesigning work: Evidence from a longitudinal QUASI-EXPERIMENT. Personnel Psychology, 55, 589–612.https://doi.org/10.1111/j.1744-6570.2002.tb00122.x

37.

Mullen

J. E.

Kelloway

E. K

. (2009). Safety leadership: A longitudinal study of the effects of transformational leadership on safety outcomes. Journal of Occupational and Organizational Psychology, 82, 253–272.https://doi.org/10.1348/096317908X325313

38.

Murphy

D. R.

Murphy

R. H

. (2013). Teaching cybersecurity: Protecting the business environment [Paper presentation]. Proceedings of the 2013 on InfoSecCD'13: Information Security Curriculum Development Conference, Kennesaw, GA, USA.

39.

Odle-Dusseau

H. N.

Hammer

L. B.

Crain

T. L.

Bodner

T. E

. (2016). The influence of family-supportive supervisor training on employee job performance and attitudes: An organizational work-family intervention. Journal of Occupational Health Psychology, 21, 296–308.https://doi.org/10.1037/a0039961

26652264

40.

Pyöriä

. (2011). Managing telework: Risks, fears and rules. Management Research Review, 34, 386–399.https://doi.org/10.1108/01409171111117843

41.

Rasmussen

C. D. N.

Lindberg

N. K.

Ravn

M. H.

Jørgensen

M. B.

Søgaard

Holtermann

. (2017). Processes, barriers and facilitators to implementation of a participatory ergonomics program among eldercare workers. Applied Ergonomics, 58, 491–499.https://doi.org/10.1016/j.apergo.2016.08.009

27633246

42.

Reber

R. A.

Wallin

J. A

. (1984). The effects of training, goal setting, and knowledge of results on safe behavior: A component analysis. Academy of Management journal, 27, 544–560.

43.

Robertson

M. M.

Schleifer

L. M.

Huang

Y.-H

. (2012). Examining the macroergonomics and safety factors among teleworkers: Development of a conceptual model. Work, 41 (Suppl 1), 2611–2615.https://doi.org/10.3233/WOR-2012-1029-2611

22317115

44.

Robson

L. S.

Stephenson

C. M.

Schulte

P. A.

Amick

B. C.

Irvin

E. L.

Eggerth

D. E.

Chan

Bielecky

A. R.

Wang

A. M.

Heidotting

T. L.

Peters

R. H.

Clarke

J. A.

Cullen

Rotunda

C. J.

Grubb

P. L

. (2012). A systematic review of the effectiveness of occupational health and safety training. Scandinavian Journal of Work, Environment & Health, 38, 193–208.https://doi.org/10.5271/sjweh.3259

22045515

45.

Rudolph

C. W.

Allan

Clark

Hertel

Hirschi

Kunze

et al. (2020). Pandemics: Implications for research and practice in industrial and organizational psychology. Industrial and Organizational Psychology: Perspectives on Scienceand Practic.

46.

Sardeshmukh

S. R.

Sharma

Golden

T. D

. (2012). Impact of telework on exhaustion and job engagement: A job demands and job resources model. New Technology, Work and Employment, 27, 193–207.https://doi.org/10.1111/j.1468-005X.2012.00284.x

47.

Sinclair

R. R.

Allen

Barber

Bergman

Britt

Butler

et al. (2020). Occupational health science in the time of COVID-19: Now more than ever. Occupational Health Science, 1.

48.

Thorp

A. A.

Kingwell

B. A.

Owen

Dunstan

D. W

. (2014). Breaking up workplace sitting time with intermittent standing bouts improves fatigue and musculoskeletal discomfort in overweight/obese office workers. Occupational and Environmental Medicine, 71, 765–771.https://doi.org/10.1136/oemed-2014-102348

25168375

49.

Tims

Bakker

A. B.

Derks

. (2013). The impact of job crafting on job demands, job resources, and well-being. Journal of Occupational Health Psychology, 18, 230–240.https://doi.org/10.1037/a0032141

23506549

50.

Towers

Duxbury

Higgins

Thomas

. (2006). Time thieves and space invaders: Technology, work and the organization. Journal of Organizational Change Management, 19, 593–618.https://doi.org/10.1108/09534810610686076

51.

United States Department of Labor, Occupational Safety and Health Administration . (2020). Safety and health topics: COVID-19. Retrieved May 26, 2020, from https://www.osha.gov/SLTC/covid-19/

52.

Waizenegger

McKenna

Cai

Bendz

. (2020). An affordance perspective of team collaboration and enforced working from home during COVID-19. European Journal of Information Systems, 29, 429–442.https://doi.org/10.1080/0960085X.2020.1800417

53.

WHO . (2020). Coronavirus disease (COVID-19) outbreak: Rights, roles and responsibilities of health workers, including key considerations for occupational safety and health: Interim guidance. World Health Organization.

54.

Zohar

. (2002). Modifying supervisory practices to improve subunit safety: A leadership-based intervention model. Journal of Applied Psychology, 87, 156–163.https://doi.org/10.1037/0021-9010.87.1.156

11916209

55.

Zohar

Luria

. (2003). The use of supervisory practices as leverage to improve safety behavior: A cross-level intervention model. Journal of Safety Research, 34, 567–577.https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jsr.2003.05.006

14733991

56.

Zohar

Polachek

. (2014). Discourse-based intervention for modifying supervisory communication as leverage for safety climate and performance improvement: A randomized field study. Journal of Applied Psychology, 99, 113–124.https://doi.org/10.1037/a0034096

23937297

Evidence-Based Strategies for Improving Occupational Safety and Health Among Teleworkers During and After the Coronavirus Pandemic

Abstract

Objective

Background

Method

Results

Application

Keywords

Get full access to this article

References