The purpose of this study was to examine how intensity of wave motions affects the performance of a simulated maritime search and rescue (SAR) task.
Background
Maritime SAR is a critical maritime occupation; however, the effect of wave motion intensity on worker performance is unknown.
Methods
Twenty-four participants (12 male, 12 female) performed a simulated search and rescue task on a six-degree-of-freedom motion platform in two conditions that differed in motion intensity (low and high). Task performance, electromyography (EMG), and number of compensatory steps taken by the individual were examined.
Results
As magnitude of simulated motion increased, performance in the SAR task decreased, and was accompanied by increases in lower limb muscle activation and number of steps taken.
Conclusions
Performance of an SAR task and balance control may be impeded by high-magnitude vessel motions.
Application
This research has the potential to be used by maritime engineers, occupational health and safety professionals, and ergonomists to improve worker safety and performance for SAR operators.
AnderssonG.HagmanJ.TalianzadehR.SvedbergA.LarsenH. C. (2002). Effect of cognitive load on postural control. Brain Research Bulletin, 58, 135–139.doi:10.1016/S0361-9230(02)00770-012121823
2.
BurdenA.BartlettR. (1999). Normalisation of EMG amplitude: An evaluation and comparison of old and new methods. Medical Engineering & Physics, 21, 247–257.doi:10.1016/S1350-4533(99)00054-510514043
3.
CollinsA.MatthewsV.McNamaraR. (2000). Fatigue, health & injury among seafarers & workers on offshore installations: A review. Seafarers International Research Centre.
4.
CrosslandP.EvansM. J.GristD.LowtenM.JonesH.BridgerR. S. (2007). Motion-induced interruptions aboard SHIP: Model development and application to SHIP design. Occupational Ergonomics, 7, 183–199.
5.
CrosslandP.LloydA. (1993). Experiments to quantify the effects of ship motions on crew task performance-phase I, motion induced interruptions and motion induced fatigue. Defence Research Agency Farnborough.
6.
DuncanC. A. (2013). Examining the relationship between perturbation kinematics and motion induced interruptions in simulated marine environments. Memorial University of Newfoundland.
7.
DuncanC. A.AlbertW. J.LangloisR. G.MacKinnonS. N. (2014a). Stepping response during constrained and unconstrained standing in moving environments. International Journal of Maritime Engineering, 156, 207–212.
8.
DuncanC. A.HickeyC. J.ByrneJ. M. (2018). The effects of a moving environment on postural control and task performance during manual materials handling, visual tracking and arithmetic tasks. International Journal of Industrial Ergonomics, 66, 221–229.doi:10.1016/j.ergon.2018.03.007
9.
DuncanC. A.IngramT. G. J.MansfieldA.ByrneJ. M.McIlroyW. E. (2016). Population differences in postural response strategy associated with exposure to a novel continuous perturbation stimuli: Would dancers have better balance on a boat?Plos One, 11, e0165735.doi:10.1371/journal.pone.016573527806129
10.
DuncanC. A.IngramT. G. J.MansfieldA.McIlroyW. E.ByrneJ. M. (2018). Differences in lower limb muscle activation and centre of pressure movement between expert workers and novices in simulated maritime environments. IISE Transactions on Occupational Ergonomics and Human Factors, 6, 21–31.
11.
DuncanC. A.LangloisR. G.AlbertW. J.MacKinnonS. N. (2014b). The habituation of human postural responses to platform perturbations. International Journal of Industrial Ergonomics, 44, 874–881.doi:10.1016/j.ergon.2014.06.005
12.
DuncanC. A.MackinnonS. N.AlbertW. J. (2012). The effects of moving environments on thoracolumbar kinematics and foot center of pressure when performing lifting and lowering tasks. Journal of Applied Biomechanics, 28, 111–119.doi:10.1123/jab.28.2.11121911870
13.
DuncanC. A.MacKinnonS. N.AlbertW. J. (2013). A comparison of platform motion waveforms during constrained and unconstrained standing in moving environments. IIE Transactions on Occupational Ergonomics and Human Factors, 1, 140–151.doi:10.1080/21577323.2013.775195
14.
DuncanC. A.MacKinnonS. N.AlbertW. J.AntleD. M.MatthewsJ. (2007). Effect of simulated vessel motions on thoracolumbar and centre of pressure kinematics. Occupational Ergonomics, 7, 265–274.
15.
Fisheries and Oceans Canada. (2000). SAR Seamanship reference manual. Fisheries and Oceans Canada.
HolmesM. W.MacKinnonS. N.MatthewsJ.AlbertW. J.MillsS. (2008). Manual materials handling in simulated motion environments. Journal of Applied Biomechanics, 24, 103–111.doi:10.1123/jab.24.2.10318579902
18.
KomisarV.McIlroyW. E.DuncanC. A. (2019). A review of balance recovery in occupational environments: Insights to improve current practices and future research Endeavors for preventing falls. IISE Transactions on Occupational Ergonomics and Human Factors, 7, 92–118.
19.
LewisC. H.GriffinM. J. (1997). Evaluating the motions of a semi-submersible platform with respect to human response. Applied Ergonomics, 28, 193–201.doi:10.1016/S0003-6870(96)00065-89414357
20.
LynnS. K.BarrettL. F. (2014). “Utilizing” signal detection theory. Psychological Science, 25, 1663–1673.doi:10.1177/095679761454199125097061
21.
MatthewsJ. D.MacKinnonS. N.AlbertW. J.HolmesM.PattersonA. (2007). Effects of moving environments on the physical demands of heavy materials handling operators. International Journal of Industrial Ergonomics, 37, 43–50.doi:10.1016/j.ergon.2006.09.018
22.
PashlerH. (1994). Dual-task interference in simple tasks: data and theory. Psychological Bulletin, 116, 220–244.
23.
PearceyG. E. P.MacKinnonS. N.ButtonD. C. (2015). Simulated motion negatively affects motor task but not neuromuscular performance. Ergonomics, 58, 1701–1713.doi:10.1080/00140139.2015.102640525811424
24.
RileyM. A.BakerA. A.SchmitJ. M. (2003). Inverse relation between postural variability and difficulty of a concurrent short-term memory task. Brain Research Bulletin, 62, 191–195.doi:10.1016/j.brainresbull.2003.09.01214698352
25.
Schinkel-IvyA.DuncanC. A. (2018). The effects of short-term and long-term experiences on co-contraction of lower extremity postural control muscles during continuous, multi-directional support-surface perturbations. Journal of Electromyography and Kinesiology, 39, 42–48.
26.
TannerW.SwetsJ. (1954). The human use of information--I: Signal detection for the case of the signal known exactly. Transactions of the IRE Professional Group on Information Theory, 4, 213–221.doi:10.1109/TIT.1954.1057461
27.
VeitchB. J.BillardR. J.PattersonA. (2008a). Emergency response training using simulators[Paper presentation]. Offshore Technology Conference, Houston, Texas.
28.
VeitchB. J.BillardR. J.PattersonA. (2008b). Evacuation training using immersive simulators[Paper presentation]. The Eighteenth International Offshore and Polar Engineering Conference, Vancouver, British Columbia, Canada.
29.
VergheseP. (2001). Visual search and attention: A signal detection theory approach. Neuron, 31, 523–558.
30.
WertheimA. H. (1998). Working in a moving environment. Ergonomics, 41, 1845–1858.doi:10.1080/0014013981860189857842
31.
WertheimA. H.OomsJ.De RegtG. P.WientjesC. J. E. (1992). Incidence and Severeness of Sea-sickness: Validation of a rating Scale. TUDelft, Faculty of Marine Technology, Ship Hydromechanics Laboratory Report 957-O.
32.
WoollacottM.Shumway-CookA. (2002). Attention and the control of posture and gait: A review of an emerging area of research. Gait & Posture, 16, 1–14.doi:10.1016/S0966-6362(01)00156-412127181
33.
YuY.YankJ. R.KatsumataY.VillardS.KennedyR. S.StoffregenT. A. (2010). Visual vigilance performance and standing posture at sea. Aviation, Space, and Environmental Medicine, 81, 375–382.doi:10.3357/ASEM.2638.201020377140
34.
YuY.YankJ. R.VillardS.StoffregenT. A. (2010). Postural activity and visual vigilance performance during rough seas. Aviation, Space, and Environmental Medicine, 81, 843–849.doi:10.3357/ASEM.2768.201020824990
Supplementary Material
Please find the following supplemental material available below.
For Open Access articles published under a Creative Commons License, all supplemental material carries the same license as the article it is associated with.
For non-Open Access articles published, all supplemental material carries a non-exclusive license, and permission requests for re-use of supplemental material or any part of supplemental material shall be sent directly to the copyright owner as specified in the copyright notice associated with the article.
