Sage Journals: Discover world-class research

Abstract

Objective

The user experience of typing on a smartwatch was evaluated with three unique input methods (tap, trace, and handwriting) while standing and while walking.

Background

Despite widespread development within the technology industry, smartwatches have had a relatively slow adoption worldwide compared to smartphones. One limiting factor of smartwatches has been the lack of an efficient means of text entry. The 2017 release of Android Wear addressed this issue by providing support for native text entry (i.e., tap, trace, and handwriting). Determining how user performance and subjective ratings compare across these input methods is essential to understanding their contribution to smartwatch user experience.

Method

Twenty college-age individuals typed phrases using tap, trace, and handwriting input on a smartwatch in three different mobility scenarios (standing, walking a simple course, walking a complex course).

Results

Participants typed faster with trace (30 words per minute; WPM) than with tap (20 WPM) and handwriting (18 WPM), regardless of mobility. Trace also outperformed tap and handwriting across all subjective metrics, regardless of mobility.

Conclusion

Trace input appears to be especially well suited for typing on a smartwatch as it was found to be objectively and subjectively superior to tap and handwriting regardless of user mobility. Objectively, typing speeds with trace are shown to be nearly two times faster than most alternative input methods described in the literature.

Application

Results suggest smartwatch manufacturers should include QWERTY keyboards with trace input as a standard feature in order to provide the best overall typing experience for their users.

Keywords

wearable devices mobile devices product design interface evaluation usability testing and evaluation

Get full access to this article

View all access options for this article.

References

Arif

A. S.

Iltisberger

Stuerzlinger

. (2011, November). Extending mobile user ambient awareness for nomadic text entry. In Proceedings of the 23rd Australian Computer-Human Interaction Conference (pp. 21–30). ACM.

Arif

A. S.

Mazalek

. (2016). A survey of text entry techniques for smartwatches. In Kurosu

Masaaki.

(Ed.), Human-Computer Interaction. Interaction Platforms and Techniques: 18th International Conference, HCI International, Proceedings, Part II-Volume 9732 (pp. 255–267). Springer-Verlag, New York, Inc.

Baudisch

Chu

. (2009). Back-of-device interaction allows creating very small touch devices. In Proceedings of the SIGCHI Conference on Human Factors in Computing Systems (pp. 1923–1932). ACM.

Bergstrom-Lehtovirta

Oulasvirta

Brewster

. (2011). The effects of walking speed on target acquisition on a touchscreen interface. Proceedings of the 13th International Conference on Human Computer Interaction with Mobile Devices and Services, 2011, 143–146.

Brooke

. (2013). SUS: A retrospective. Journal of Usability Studies, 8, 29–40.

Castellucci

S. J.

MacKenzie

I. S

. (2008). Graffiti vs. unistrokes: an empirical comparison. In Proceedings of the SIGCHI Conference on Human Factors in Computing Systems (pp. 305–308). ACM.

Castellucci

S. J.

MacKenzie

I. S

. (2011). Gathering text entry metrics on Android devices. In CHI'11 Extended Abstracts on Human Factors in Computing Systems (pp. 1507–1512). ACM.

Chaparro

B. S.

Turner

. (2015). Is touch-based text input practical for a smartwatch? In HCI International 2015-posters’ extended abstracts (pp. 3–8). Springer.

Clawson

Starner

Kohlsdorf

Quigley

D. P.

Gilliland

. (2014). Texting while walking: an evaluation of mini-QWERTY text input while on-the-go. In Proceedings of the 16th International Conference on Human-Computer Interaction with Mobile Devices & Services (pp. 339–348). ACM.

10.

Connor

. (1995). Handwriting performance and GCSE concessions. Handwriting Review, 9, 7–21.

11.

Conradi

Busch

Alexander

. (2015). Optimal touch button size for the use of mobile devices while walking. Procedia Manufacturing, 3, 387–394.doi:10.1016/j.promfg.2015.07.182

12.

Costagliola

De Rosa

Fuccella

. (2017). Handwriting on smartwatches: An empirical investigation. IEEE Transactions on Human-Machine Systems, 47, 1100–1109.doi:10.1109/THMS.2017.2754938

13.

Darbar

Dash

Samanta

. (2016). ETAO Keyboard: Text input technique on smartwatches. Procedia Computer Science, 84, 137–141.doi:10.1016/j.procs.2016.04.078

14.

Dingwell

J. B.

Cusumano

J. P.

Cavanagh

P. R.

Sternad

. (2001). Local dynamic stability versus kinematic variability of continuous overground and treadmill walking. Journal of Biomechanical Engineering, 123, 27–32.doi:10.1115/1.1336798

15.

Dutton

K. P

. (1990). Writing under examination conditions: Establishing a baseline. Professional Development Initiatives, 1989–90, 189–210.

16.

Funk

Sahami

Henze

Schmidt

. (2014). Using a touch-sensitive wristband for text entry on smart watches. In CHI'14 Extended Abstracts on Human Factors in Computing Systems (pp. 2305–2310). ACM.

17.

Hart

S. G.

Staveland

L. E

. (1988). Development of NASA-TLX (Task Load Index): Results of empirical and theoretical research. Advances in Psychology, 52, 139–183.

18.

Hong

Heo

Isokoski

Lee

. (2015). SplitBoard: A simple split soft keyboard for wristwatch-sized touch screens. In Proceedings of the 33rd Annual ACM Conference on Human Factors in Computing Systems (pp. 1233–1236). ACM.

19.

Hong

Heo

Isokoski

Lee

. (2016). Comparison of three QWERTY Keyboards for a Smartwatch. Interacting with Computers, 28, 811–825.doi:10.1093/iwc/iww003

20.

IDC . (2016). Smartwatch market declines 51.6% in the third quarter as platforms and vendors realign, IDC finds. https://www.idc.com/getdoc.jsp?containerId=prUS41875116

21.

Jeong

Kim

Lee

Jeong

. (2017). Smartwatch wearing behavior analysis: A longitudinal study. Proceedings of the ACM on Interactive, Mobile, Wearable and Ubiquitous Technologies, 1, 60.

22.

Kane

S. K.

Wobbrock

J. O.

Smith

I. E

. (2008). Getting off the treadmill: evaluating walking user interfaces for mobile devices in public spaces. In Proceedings of the 10th International Conference on Human Computer Interaction With Mobile Devices and Services (pp. 109–118). ACM.

23.

Kim

Sohn

Pak

Lee

. (2006). One-key keyboard: A very small QWERTY keyboard supporting text entry for wearable computing. In Proceedings of the 18th Australia Conference on Computer-Human Interaction: Design: Activities, Artefacts and Environments (pp. 305–308). ACM.

24.

Kristensson

P. O.

Denby

L. C

. (2009). Text entry performance of state of the art unconstrained handwriting recognition: A longitudinal user study. In Proceedings of the SIGCHI Conference on Human Factors in Computing Systems (pp. 567–570). ACM.

25.

Lin

Chen

Chang

X. -W.

Liu

Wang

. (2018). Show: Smart handwriting on watches. Proceedings of the ACM on Interactive, Mobile, Wearable and Ubiquitous Technologies, 1, 151.

26.

Lyons

Nguyen

Ashbrook

White

. (2012). Facet: A multi-segment wrist worn system. In Proceedings of the 25th Annual ACM Symposium on User Interface Software and Technology (pp. 123–130). ACM.

27.

MacKenzie

I. S.

Chang

. (1999). A performance comparison of two handwriting recognizers. Interacting With Computers, 11, 283–297.doi:10.1016/S0953-5438(98)00030-7

28.

MacKenzie

I. S.

Soukoreff

R. W

. (2003). Phrase sets for evaluating text entry techniques. In CHI'03 Extended Abstracts on Human Factors in Computing Systems (pp. 754–755). ACM.

29.

MacKenzie

I. S.

Read

J. C

. (2007). Using paper mockups for evaluating soft keyboard layouts. In Proceedings of the 2007 Conference of the Center for Advanced Studies on Collaborative Research (pp. 98–108). IBM Corp.

30.

MacKenzie

I. S.

Tanaka-Ishii

. (2010). Text entry systems: Mobility, accessibility. Elsevier.

31.

Mizobuchi

Chignell

Newton

. (2005). Mobile text entry: Relationship between walking speed and text input task difficulty. In Proceedings of the 7th International Conference on Human Computer Interaction With Mobile Devices and Services (pp. 122–128). ACM.

32.

Oney

Harrison

Ogan

Wiese

. (2013). ZoomBoard: A diminutive qwerty soft keyboard using iterative zooming for ultra-small devices. Proceedings of the SIGCHI Conference on Human Factors in Computing Systems, 2799–2802.

33.

Pulvirent

. (2015). Does Anyone Really Want a Smartwatch?. https://www.bloomberg.com/news/articles/2015-01-08/does-anyone-really-want-a-smart-watch

34.

Schildbach

Rukzio

. (2010). Investigating selection and reading performance on a mobile phone while walking. In Proceedings of the 12th International Conference on Human-Computer Interaction With Mobile Devices and Services (pp. 93–102). ACM.

35.

Siek

K. A.

Rogers

Connelly

K. H

. (2005). Fat finger worries: How older and younger users physically interact with PDAs. In Costabile

M. F.

Paternò

(Eds.), Human Computer Interaction - INTERACT 2005. Lecture Notes in Computer Science (Vol. 3585 , pp. 267–280). Springer.

36.

Sonaike

I. A.

Bewaji

T. A.

Ritchey

Peres

S. C

. (2016). The ergonomic impact of Swype. Proceedings of the Human Factors and Ergonomics Society Annual Meeting, 60, 1374–1378.doi:10.1177/1541931213601317

37.

Thompson

. (2018). A Concise History of the Smartwatch?. https://www.bloomberg.com/news/articles/2018-01-08/a-concise-history-of-the-smartwatch

38.

Turano

K. A.

Geruschat

D. R.

Stahl

J. W

. (1998). Mental effort required for walking: Effects of retinitis pigmentosa. Optometry and Vision Science, 75, 879–886.doi:10.1097/00006324-199812000-00010

39.

Turner

C. J.

Chaparro

B. S.

. (2017). Text input on a smartwatch QWERTY keyboard: Tap vs trace. International Journal of Human–Computer Interaction, 33, 143–150.doi:10.1080/10447318.2016.1223265

40.

Turner

C. J.

Chaparro

B. S.

. (2018). Texting while walking: Is it possible with a Smartwatch? Journal of Usability Studies, 13.

41.

White

R. M

. (1980). Comparative anthropometry of the hand. (No NATICK/CEMEL-229). Army Natick Research and Development Labs Ma Clothing Equipment and Materials Engineering Lab.

42.

Zhai

Kristensson

P. O

. (2012). The word-gesture keyboard: Reimagining keyboard interaction. Communications of the ACM, 55, 91–101.

Supplementary Material

Please find the following supplemental material available below.

For Open Access articles published under a Creative Commons License, all supplemental material carries the same license as the article it is associated with.

For non-Open Access articles published, all supplemental material carries a non-exclusive license, and permission requests for re-use of supplemental material or any part of supplemental material shall be sent directly to the copyright owner as specified in the copyright notice associated with the article.

0.00 MB

1.27 MB

Typing on a Smartwatch While Mobile: A Comparison of Input Methods

Abstract

Objective

Background

Method

Results

Conclusion

Application

Keywords

Get full access to this article

References

Supplementary Material