Effects of Text Enhancement,Identical Prescription-Package Names,Visual Cues,and Verbal Provocation on Visual Searches of Look-Alike Drug Names: A Simulation and Eye-Tracking Study

Abstract

Objective

Simulation and eye tracking were used to examine the effects of text enhancement, identical prescription-package names, visual cues, and verbal provocation on visual searches of look-alike drug names.

Background

Look-alike drug names can cause confusion and medication errors, which jeopardize patient safety. The effectiveness of many strategies that may prevent these problems requires evaluation.

Method

We conducted two experiments that were based on a four-way, repeated-measures design. The within-subject factors were text enhancement, identical prescription-package names, visual cues, and verbal provocation. In Experiment 1, 40 nurses searched for and selected a target drug from an array of drug packages on a pharmacy shelf mock-up. In Experiment 2, the eye movements of another 40 nurses were tracked while they performed a computer-based drug search task.

Results

Text enhancement had no significant effect on the drug search. Nurses selected the target drugs more quickly and easily when the prescriptions and drug packages shared identical drug name formats. The use of a visual cue to direct nurses’ attention facilitated their visual searches and improved their eye gaze behaviors. The nurses reported greater mental effort if they were provoked verbally during the drug search.

Conclusion

Efficient and practical strategies should be adopted for designs that facilitate accurate drug search. Among these strategies are using identical name appearances on drug prescriptions and packages, using a visual cue to direct nurses’ attention, and avoiding rushing nurses while they are concentrating.

Application

The findings aim to inspire recommendations for work system designs that will improve the visual search of look-alike drug names.

Keywords

medication management and safety visual search decision making simulation eye movements

Get full access to this article

View all access options for this article.

References

Beck

V. M.

Hollingworth

Luck

S. J.

(2012). Simultaneous control of attention by multiple working memory representations. Psychological Science, 23, 887–898.

Cella

Dymond

Cooper

Turnbull

(2007). Effects of decision-phase time constraints on emotion-based learning in the Iowa Gambling Task. Brain and Cognition, 64, 164–169.

Cohen

M. R.

(1999). Medication errors. Washington, DC: American Pharmaceutical Association.

Cooper

Barron

Gallagher

Sciarra

(2007). Automated anesthesia medication dispensing systems: Single-issue, limited-access drawers may reduce medication errors. European Journal of Anaesthesiology, 24, 190–191.

Davis

N. M.

(1997). Drug names that look and sound alike. Hospital Pharmacy, 32, 1558–1570.

DeDonno

M. A.

Demaree

H. A.

(2008). Perceived time pressure and the Iowa Gambling Task. Judgment and Decision Making, 3, 636–640.

DeHenau

Becker

M. W.

Bello

N. M.

Liu

Bix

(2016). Tallman lettering as a strategy for differentiation in look-alike, sound-alike drug names: The role of familiarity in differentiating drug doppelgangers. Applied Ergonomics, 52, 77–84.

de Pontbriand

R. J.

Allender

L. E.

Doyle

F. J

. (2008). Temporal regulation and temporal cognition: Biological and psychological aspects of time stress. In Hancock

P. A.

Szalma

J. L.

(Eds.), Performance Under Stress (pp. 143–163). Hampshire, UK: Ashgate.

Dieckmann

Clemmensen

M. H.

Sorensen

T. K.

Kunstek

Hellebek

(2016). Identifying facilitators and barriers for patient safety in a medicine label design system using patient simulation and interviews. Journal of Patient Safety, 12, 210–222.

10.

Emmerton

L. M.

Rizk

M. F.

(2012). Look-alike and sound-alike medicines: Risks and “solutions.” International Journal of Clinical Pharmacy, 34, 4–8.

11.

Estock

J. L.

Murray

A. W.

Mizah

M. T.

Mangione

M. P.

Goode

J. S.

Jr. Eibling

D. E.

(2018). Label design affects medication safety in an operating room crisis: A controlled simulation study. Journal of Patient Safety, 14, 101–106.

12.

Filik

Purdy

Gale

Gerrett

(2004). Drug name confusion: Evaluating the effectiveness of capital (“Tall Man”) letters using eye movement data. Social Science & Medicine, 59, 2597–2601.

13.

Filik

Purdy

Gale

Gerrett

(2006). Labeling of medicines and patient safety: Evaluating methods of reducing drug name confusion. Human Factors, 48, 39–47.

14.

Flynn

E. A.

Baker

K. N.

Carnaham

B. J.

(2003). National observational study of prescription dispensing accuracy and safety in 50 pharmacies. Journal of the American Pharmaceutical Association, 43, 191–200.

15.

Franklin

B. D.

O’Grady

Voncina

Popoola

Jacklin

(2008). An evaluation of two automated dispensing machines in UK hospital pharmacy. International Journal of Pharmacy Practice, 16, 47–53.

16.

Gabriele

(2006). The role of typography in differentiating look-alike/sound-alike drug names. Healthcare Quarterly, 9, 88–95.

17.

Hampton

(2004). Similar drug names a risky prescription. The Journal of the American Medical Association, 291, 1948–1949.

18.

Hellier

Edworthy

Derbyshire

Costello

(2006). Considering the impact of medicine label design characteristics on patient safety. Ergonomics, 49, 617–630.

19.

Hellier

Tucker

Kenny

Rowntree

Edworthy

(2010). Merits of using color and shape differentiation to improve the speed and accuracy of drug strength identification on over-the-counter medicines by laypeople. Journal of Patient Safety, 6, 158–164.

20.

Hoffman

J. M.

Proulx

S. M.

(2003). Medication errors caused by confusion of drug names. Drug Safety, 26, 445–452.

21.

Holden

R. J.

Patel

N. R.

Scanlon

M. C.

Shalaby

T. M.

Arnold

J. M.

Karsh

B.-T.

(2010). Effects of mental demands during dispensing on perceived medication safety and employee well-being: A study of workload in pediatric hospital pharmacies. Research in Social and Administrative Pharmacy, 6, 293–306.

22.

Institute for Safe Medication Practices. (2016). FDA and ISMP lists of look-alike drug names with recommended Tall Man letters. Retrieved from https://www.ismp.org/sites/default/files/attachments/2017-11/tallmanletters.pdf

23.

Irwin

Mearns

Watson

Urquhart

(2013). The effect of proximity, Tall Man lettering, and time pressure on accurate visual perception of drug names. Human Factors, 55, 253–266.

24.

Kondrak

Dorr

(2006). Automatic identification of confusable drug names. Artificial Intelligence in Medicine, 36, 29–42.

25.

Lambert

B. L.

Chang

K. Y.

Lin

S. J.

(2001). Effect of orthographic and phonological similarity on false recognition of drug names. Social Science & Medicine, 52, 1843–1857.

26.

Lambert

B. L.

Lin

S. J.

Tan

H. K.

(2005). Designing safe drug names. Drug Safety, 28, 495–512.

27.

Lambert

B. L.

Schroeder

S. R.

Galanter

W. L.

(2016). Does Tall Man lettering prevent drug name confusion errors? Incomplete and Conflicting Evidence Suggest Need for Definitive Study, 25, 213–217.

28.

Larmené-Beld

K. H. M.

Alting

E. K.

Taxis

(2018). A systematic literature review on strategies to avoid look-alike errors of labels. European Journal of Clinical Pharmacology, 74, 985–993.

29.

Y.-C.

(2008). Drug sales before and after the application of automated pharmacy system in Shanghai “No.1 Pharmacy.” China Pharmacy, 19, 1279–1280.

30.

Liversedge

S. P.

Findlay

J. M.

(2000). Saccadic eye movements and cognition. Trends in Cognitive Sciences, 4, 6–14.

31.

MacKenzie

I. S.

(2013). Human-computer interaction: An empirical research perspective. Burlington, MA: Morgan Kaufmann.

32.

Mayall

(2002). Case-mixing effects on children’s word recognition: Lexical feedback and development. The Quarterly Journal of Experimental Psychology, 55, 525–542.

33.

Mayall

Humphreys

G. W.

(1996). Case mixing and the task-sensitive disruption of lexical processing. Journal of Experimental Psychology: Learning, Memory, and Cognition, 22, 278–294.

34.

Mullen

R. J.

Duhig

Russell

Scarazzini

Lievano

Wolf

M. S.

(2018). Best-practices for the design and development of prescription medication information: A systematic review. Patient Education and Counseling, 101, 1351–1367.

35.

Muller

H. J.

Rabbitt

P. M.

(1989). Spatial cueing and the relation between the accuracy of “where” and “what” decisions in visual search. The Quarterly Journal of Experimental Psychology, 41, 747–773.

36.

Najemnik

Geisler

W. S.

(2005). Optimal eye movement strategies in visual search. Nature, 434, 387–391.

37.

C. K. L.

Wang

(2014). A comparison of the effects of different typographical methods on the recognizability of printed drug names. Drug Safety, 37, 351–359.

38.

Poon

E. G.

Cina

J. L.

Churchill

Patel

Featherstone

Rothschild

J. M.

. . . Gandhi

T. K.

(2006). Medication dispensing errors and potential adverse drug events before and after implementing bar code technology in the pharmacy. Annals of Internal Medicine, 145, 426–434.

39.

Posner

M. I.

(1980). Orienting of attention. The Quarterly Journal of Experimental Psychology, 32, 3–25.

40.

Reason

(2001). Understanding adverse events: The human factor. In Vincent

(Ed.), Clinical risk management: Enhancing patient safety (pp. 9–30). London, England: BMJ Books.

41.

Rendon-Velez

van Leeuwen

P. M.

Happee

Horváth

van der Vegte

W. F.

de Winter

J. C. F.

(2016). The effects of time pressure on driver performance and physiological activity: A driving simulator study. Transportation Research Part F: Traffic Psychology and Behaviour, 41, 150–169.

42.

Rudnicky

A. I.

Kolers

P. A.

(1984). Size and case of type as stimuli in reading. Journal of Experimental Psychology: Human Perception and Performance, 10, 231–249.

43.

Schell

K. L.

(2009). Using enhanced text to facilitate recognition of drug names: Evidence from two experimental studies. Applied Ergonomics, 40, 82–90.

44.

Schulz

C. M.

Schneider

Fritz

Vockeroth

Hapfelmeier

Wasmaier

. . . Schneider

(2011). Eye tracking for assessment of workload: A pilot study in an anaesthesia simulator environment. British Journal of Anaesthesia, 106, 44–50.

45.

Sheedy

J. E.

Subbaram

M. V.

Zimmerman

A. B.

Hayes

J. R.

(2005). Text legibility and the letter superiority effect. Human Factors, 47, 797–815.

46.

Shomstein

Yantis

(2002). Object-based attention: Sensory modulation or priority setting? Perception & Psychophysics, 64, 41–51.

47.

Starcke

Wolf

O. T.

Markowitsch

H. J.

Brand

(2008). Anticipatory stress influences decision making under explicit risk conditions. Behavioral Neuroscience, 122, 1352–1360.

48.

Treisman

A. M.

(1982). Perceptual grouping and attention in visual search for features and for objects. Journal of Experimental Psychology Human Perception and Performance, 8, 194–214.

49.

Treisman

A. M.

Gelade

(1980). A feature-integration theory of attention. Cognitive Psychology, 12, 97–136.

50.

U.S. Food and Drug Administration. (2001). Medication errors: Name differentiation project. Retrieved from http://www.fda.gov/Drugs/DrugSafety/MedicationErrors/ucm164587.htm

51.

U.S. National Institutes of Health. (2016). National library of medicine: Common drug names. Retrieved from http://druginfo.nlm.nih.gov/drugportal/drug/names

52.

Vickery

T. J.

King

L. W.

Jiang

(2005). Setting up the target template in visual search. Journal of Vision, 5, 81–92.

53.

Wahlström

Hagberg

Johnson

Svensson

Rempel

(2002). Influence of time pressure and verbal provocation on physiological and psychological reactions during work with a computer mouse. European Journal of Applied Physiology, 87, 257–263.

54.

Zhong

Feinstein

J. A.

Patel

N. S.

Dai

Feudtner

(2016). Tall Man lettering and potential prescription errors: A time series analysis of 42 children’s hospitals in the USA over 9 years. BMJ Quality & Safety, 25, 233–240.