Smooth or Stepped? Laboratory Comparison of Enhanced Sonifications for Monitoring Patient Oxygen Saturation

Abstract

Background:

The pulse oximeter (PO) provides anesthesiologists with continuous visual and auditory information about a patient’s oxygen saturation (SpO₂). However, anesthesiologists’ attention is often diverted from visual displays, and clinicians may inaccurately judge SpO₂ values when relying on conventional PO auditory tones. We tested whether participants could identify SpO₂ value (e.g., “97%”) better with acoustic enhancements that identified three discrete clinical ranges by either changing abruptly at two threshold values (stepped-effects) or changing incrementally with each percentage value of SpO₂ (smooth-effects).

Method:

In all, 79 nonclinicians participated in a between-subjects experiment that compared performance of participants using the stepped-effects display with those who used the smooth-effects display. In both conditions, participants heard sequences of 72 tones whose pitch directly correlated to SpO₂ value, and whose value could change incrementally. Primary outcome was percentage of responses that correctly identified the absolute SpO₂ percentage, ±1, of the last pulse tone in each sequence.

Results:

Participants using the stepped-effects auditory tones identified absolute SpO₂ percentage more accurately (M = 53.7%) than participants using the smooth-effects tones (M = 47.9%, p = .038). Identification of range and detection of transitions between ranges showed even stronger advantages for the stepped-effects display (p < .005).

Conclusion:

The stepped-effects display has more pronounced auditory cues at SpO₂ range transitions, from which participants can better infer absolute SpO₂ values. Further development of a smooth-effects display for this purpose is not necessary.

Keywords

auditory displays sonification heterogeneity principle pulse oximetry oxygen saturation patient monitoring

Get full access to this article

View all access options for this article.

References

American Society of Anesthesiologists. (2010). Standards for basic anesthetic monitoring. Retrieved from https://www.asahq.org/standards-and-guidelines

Atyeo

Sanderson

P. M.

(2015). Comparison of the identification and ease of use of two alarm sound sets by critical and acute care nurses with little or no music training: A laboratory study. Anaesthesia, 70, 818–827. doi:10.1111/anae.13020

Bennett

C. L.

Dudaryk

Ayers

A. L.

McNeer

R. R.

(2015). Simulating environmental and psychological acoustic factors of the operating room. The Journal of the Acoustical Society of America, 138, 3855–3863.

Brown

Edworthy

Sneyd

J. R.

Schlesinger

(2015). A comparison of linear and logarithmic auditory tones in pulse oximeters. Applied Ergonomics, 51, 350–357. doi:10.1016/j.apergo.2015.06.006

Chandra

Tessler

M. J.

Usher

(2006). Audio spectrum and sound pressure levels vary between pulse oximeters. Canadian Journal of Anesthesia, 53, 26–32. doi:10.1007/BF03021524

Cherry

E. C.

(1953). Some experiments on the recognition of speech, with one and with two ears. Journal of the Acoustical Society of America, 25, 975–979. doi:10.1121/1.1907229

Deschamps

M. L.

Sanderson

Hinckfuss

Browning

Loeb

R. G.

Liley

Liu

(2016). Improving the detectability of oxygen saturation level targets for preterm neonates: A laboratory test of tremolo and beacon sonifications. Applied Ergonomics, 56, 160–169. doi:10.1016/j.apergo.2016.03.013

Edworthy

(2013). Medical audible alarms: A review. Journal of the American Medical Informatics Association, 20, 584–589. doi:10.1136/amiajnl-2012-001061

Edworthy

Hellier

Titchener

Naweed

Roels

(2011). Heterogeneity in auditory alarm sets makes them easier to learn. International Journal of Industrial Ergonomics, 41, 136–146. doi:10.1016/j.ergon.2010.12.004

10.

Edworthy

Schlesinger

McNeer

Kristensen

Bennett

(2017). Classifying alarms: Seeking durability, credibility, consistency, and simplicity. Biomedical Instrumentation & Technology, 51, 50–57. doi:10.2345/0899-8205-51.s2.50

11.

Faul

Erdfelder

Lang

A. G.

Buchner

(2007). G*power 3: A flexible statistical power analysis program for the social, behavioral, and biomedical sciences. Behavior Research Methods, 39, 175–191. doi:10.3758/BF03193146

12.

Hermann

Hunt

Neuhoff

J. G.

(2011). The sonification handbook. Berlin, Germany: Logos Publishing House.

13.

Hinckfuss

Sanderson

Loeb

R. G.

Liley

H. G.

Liu

(2016). Novel pulse oximetry sonifications for neonatal oxygen saturation monitoring: A laboratory study. Human Factors, 58, 344–359. doi:10.1177/0018720815617406

14.

Kramer

(1994). Some organizing principles for representing data with sound. In Kramer

(Ed.), Auditory display: Sonification, audification, and auditory interfaces (pp. 185–222). Reading, MA: Addison Wesley.

15.

Lacherez

Seah

E. L.

Sanderson

(2007). Overlapping melodic alarms are almost indiscriminable. Human Factors, 49, 637–645. doi:10.1518/001872007X215719

16.

Levitin

D. J.

Rogers

S. E.

(2005). Absolute pitch: Perception, coding, and controversies. Trends in Cognitive Science, 9, 26–33. doi:10.1016/j.tics.2004.11.007

17.

Loeb

R. G.

Brecknell

Sanderson

P. M.

(2016). The sounds of desaturation: A survey of commercial pulse oximeter sonifications. Anesthesia & Analgesia, 122, 1395–1403. doi:10.1213/ANE.0000000000001240

18.

Miller

G. A.

(1956). The magical number seven, plus or minus two: Some limits on our capacity for processing information. Psychological Review, 63, 81–97. doi:10.1037/h0043158

19.

Morris

Mohacsi

(2005). How well can anesthesiologists discriminate pulse oximeter tones? Anaesthesia and Intensive Care, 33, 497–500. Retrieved from http://www.aaic.net.au.ezproxy.library.uq.edu.au/

20.

Neuhoff

J. G.

Knight

Wayand

(2002, July). Pitch change, sonification, and musical expertise: Which way is up? Paper presented at the Proceedings of the International Conference on Auditory Display, Kyoto, Japan.

21.

Paterson

Sanderson

Brecknell

Paterson

Loeb

R. G.

(in press). Comparison of standard and enhanced pulse oximeter auditory displays of oxygen saturation: A laboratory study with clinician and non-clinician participants. Anesthesia & Analgesia.

22.

Paterson

Sanderson

P. M.

Paterson

Loeb

(2017). The effectiveness of enhanced pulse oximetry sonifications for conveying oxygen saturation ranges: A laboratory comparison of five auditory displays. British Journal of Anaesthesia, 119, 1224–1230. doi:10.1093/bja/aex343

23.

Paterson

Sanderson

P. M.

Paterson

N. A.

Liu

Loeb

R. G.

(2016). The effectiveness of pulse oximetry sonification enhanced with tremolo and brightness for distinguishing clinically important oxygen saturation ranges: A laboratory study. Anaesthesia, 71, 565–572. doi:10.1111/anae.13424

24.

Phipps

Meakin

G. H.

Beatty

P. C.

Nsoedo

Parker

(2008). Human factors in anaesthetic practice: Insights from a task analysis. British Journal of Anaesthesia, 100, 333–343. doi:10.1093/bja/aem392

25.

Rayo

M. F.

Moffatt-Bruce

S. D.

(2015). Alarm system management: Evidence-based guidance encouraging direct measurement of informativeness to improve alarm response. British Medical Journal: Quality & Safety, 24, 282–286. doi:10.1136/bmjqs-2014-003373

26.

Sanderson

Liu

Jenkins

S. A.

(2009). Auditory displays in anesthesiology. Current Opinion in Anaesthesiology, 22, 788–795. doi:10.1097/ACO.0b013e3283326a2f

27.

Santamore

D. C.

Cleaver

T. G.

(2004). The sounds of saturation. Journal of Clinical Monitoring and Computing, 18, 89–92. doi:10.1023/B:JOCM.0000032698.47717.06

28.

Schulte

G. T.

Block

F. E.

(1992). Can people hear the pitch change on a variable-pitch pulse oximeter? Journal of Clinical Monitoring, 8, 198–200.

29.

Shah

Shelley

K. H.

(2013). Is pulse oximetry an essential tool or just another distraction? The role of the pulse oximeter in modern anesthesia care. International Journal of Clinical Monitoring and Computing, 27, 235–242. doi:10.1007/s10877-013-9428-7

30.

Sharashova

Wilsgaard

Brenn

(2015). Resting heart rate on the decline: The Tromsø Study 1986–2007. International Journal of Epidemiology, 44, 1007–1017. doi:10.1093/ije/dyv061

31.

Vickers

Hogg

(2006, June). Sonification abstraite/sonification concrète: An “aesthetic perspective space” for classifying auditory displays in the ars musica domain. Paper presented at the 12th International Conference on Auditory Display, London, UK.

32.

Walker

B. N.

(2007). Consistency of magnitude estimations with conceptual data dimensions used for sonification. Applied Cognitive Psychology, 21, 579–599. doi:10.1002/acp.1291

33.

Walker

B. N.

Nees

M. A.

(2011). Theory of sonification. In Hermann

Hunt

Neuhoff

J. G.

(Eds.), The sonification handbook (pp. 9–40). Bielefeld, Germany: CITEC, Bielefeld University.

34.

Ward

W. D.

(1999). Absolute pitch. In Deutsch

(Ed.), The psychology of music (pp. 265–298). San Diego, CA: Academic Press.

35.

Watson

Sanderson

(2004). Sonification supports eyes-free respiratory monitoring and task time-sharing. Human Factors, 46, 497–517. doi:10.1518/hfes.46.3.497.50401

36.

Watson

Sanderson

Russell

W. J.

(2004). Tailoring reveals information requirements: The case of anaesthesia alarms. Interacting with Computers, 16, 271–293. doi:10.1016/j.intcom.2003.12.002

37.

Wee

A. N.

Sanderson

P. M.

(2008). Are melodic medical equipment alarms easily learned? Anesthesia & Analgesia, 106, 501–508. doi:10.1213/01.ane.0000286148.58823.6c

38.

Weinger

M. B.

Englund

C. E.

(1990). Ergonomic and human factors affecting anesthetic vigilance and monitoring performance in the operating room environment. Anesthesiology, 73, 995–1021. Retrieved from http://anesthesiology.pubs.asahq.org/article.aspx?articleid=1952513&resultClick=3

39.

Witting

M. D.

Scharf

S. M.

(2008). Diagnostic room-air pulse oximetry: Effects of smoking, race, and sex. The American Journal of Emergency Medicine, 26, 131–136. doi:10.1016/j.ajem.2007.04.002

40.

Woods

D. D.

(1995). The alarm problem and directed attention in dynamic fault management. Ergonomics, 38, 2371–2393. doi:10.1080/00140139508925274

41.

Zestic

Brecknell

Liley

Sanderson

(2019). A novel auditory display for neonatal resuscitation: Laboratory studies simulating pulse oximetry in the first 10 minutes after birth. Human Factors, 61, 119–138.

Supplementary Material

Please find the following supplemental material available below.

For Open Access articles published under a Creative Commons License, all supplemental material carries the same license as the article it is associated with.

For non-Open Access articles published, all supplemental material carries a non-exclusive license, and permission requests for re-use of supplemental material or any part of supplemental material shall be sent directly to the copyright owner as specified in the copyright notice associated with the article.

0.00 MB

0.40 MB

1.41 MB