The aim of this article is to analyze the influence of the variability of the standard time in the simulation of the assembly operations of manufacturing systems.
Background:
Discrete event simulation (DES) has been used to provide efficient analysis during the design of a process or scenario. However, the modeling activities of new configurations face the problem of data availability and reliability when it comes to seeking standard times that are effective in representing the actual process under analysis, especially when the process cannot be monitored.
Method:
The methods-time measurement (MTM) is used as a source of standard times for simulation. Assembly activities were performed at a Learning Factory facility, which provided the necessary structure for simulating real production processes. Simulation performances using different variability of standard times were analyzed to define the impact of data characteristics.
Results:
The MTM standard time presented an error of approximately 5%. The definition of the data variability of standard times and the statistical distribution impacts were shown in the simulation results, with errors above 6% being observed, interfering with the model reliability.
Conclusion:
Based on the study, to increase the adherence of a simulation to represent a real process, it is recommended to use triangular distributions with central values greater than those established via the MTM for the representation of the standard times of new assembly processes or scenarios using DES.
Application:
The study contributions can be applied in assembly line design, providing a reliable model representing real processes and scenarios.
AlrabghiA.TiwariA. (2016). A novel approach for modelling complex maintenance systems using discrete event simulation. Reliability Engineering & System Safety, 154, 160–170.
2.
ArgonetoP.RennaP. (2013). Capacity sharing in a network of enterprises using the Gale–Shapley model. The International Journal of Advanced Manufacturing Technology, 69(5–8), 1907–1916.
3.
AtiehA. M.KaylaniH.AlmuhtadyA.Al-TamimiO. (2016). A value stream mapping and simulation hybrid approach: Application to glass industry. The International Journal of Advanced Manufacturing Technology, 84(5–8), 1573–1586.
4.
BanksJ.ChwifL. (2011). Warnings about simulation. Journal of Simulation, 5(4), 279–291.
5.
BaraldiE. C.KaminskiP. C. (2011). Ergonomic planned supply in an automotive assembly line. Human Factors and Ergonomics in Manufacturing & Service Industries, 21(1), 104–119.
6.
BartonH.DelbridgeR. (2001). Development in the learning factory: Training human capital. Journal of European Industrial Training, 25(9), 465–472.
7.
BednyG. Z.HarrisS. R. (2013). Safety and reliability analysis methods based on systemic-structural activity theory. Proceedings of the Institution of Mechanical Engineers, Part O. Journal of Risk and Reliability, 227(5), 549–556.
8.
BednyG. Z.KarwowskiW.VoskoboynikovF. (2015). Application of standardized motions in temporal analysis of work activity. Human Factors and Ergonomics in Manufacturing & Service Industries, 25(4), 469–483.
9.
BudgagaW.MalensekM.PallickaraS.HarveyN.BreidtF. J.PallickaraS. (2016). Predictive analytics using statistical, learning, and ensemble methods to support real-time exploration of discrete event simulations. Future Generation Computer Systems, 56, 360–374.
10.
CakmakciM.KarasuM. K. (2007). Set-up time reduction process and integrated predetermined time system MTM-UAS: A study of application in a large size company of automobile industry. The International Journal of Advanced Manufacturing Technology, 33(3–4), 334–344.
11.
DesaiA. A.MitalA. (2010a). Facilitating design for assembly through the adoption of a proactive design methodology. International Journal of Industrial Engineering: Theory, Applications and Practice, 17(2).
12.
DesaiA. A.MitalA. (2010b). Improving maintainability of products through the adoption of a comprehensive DfX Methodology. International Journal of Industrial Engineering: Theory, Applications and Practice, 17(2).
13.
DesaiA.MitalA. (2011). Simplifying the product maintenance process by building ease of maintenance into the design. International Journal of Industrial and Systems Engineering, 9(4), 434–454.
14.
Di GironimoG.Di MartinoC.LanzottiA.MarzanoA.RussoG. (2012). Improving MTM-UAS to predetermine automotive maintenance times. International Journal on Interactive Design and Manufacturing, 6(4), 265–273.
15.
DinkelmannM.SiegertJ.BauernhanslT. (2014). Change management through learning factories. In ZaehM. (Ed.), Enabling Manufacturing Competitiveness and Economic Sustainability (pp. 395–399). Berlin: Springer International Publishing.
16.
DodeP.GreigM.ZolfaghariS.NeumannW. P. (2016). Integrating human factors into discrete event simulation: A proactive approach to simultaneously design for system performance and employees’ well being. International Journal of Production Research, 54(10), 3105–3117.
17.
DudleyN. A. (1963). Work-time distributions. The International Journal of Production Research, 2(2), 137–144.
18.
FowlerJ. W.RoseO. (2004). Grand challenges in modeling and simulation of complex manufacturing systems. Simulation, 80(9), 469–476.
19.
HellenoA. L.SimonA. T.PapaM. C. O.CeglioW. E.Rossa NetoA. S.MouradR. B. A. (2013). Integration university-industry: Laboratory model for learning lean manufacturing concepts in the academic and industrial environments. International Journal of Engineering Education, 29(6), 1387–1399.
20.
IannoneR.MirandaS.PriscoL.RiemmaS.SarnoD. (2016). Proposal for a flexible discrete event simulation model for assessing the daily operation decisions in a Ro–Ro terminal. Simulation Modelling Practice and Theory, 61, 28–46.
21.
KernC.RefflinghausR. (2013). Cross-disciplinary method for predicting and reducing human error probabilities in manual assembly operations. Total Quality Management & Business Excellence, 24(7–8), 847–858.
22.
KernbaumS.FrankeC.SeligerG. (2009). Flat screen monitor disassembly and testing for remanufacturing. International Journal of Sustainable Manufacturing, 1(3), 347–360.
23.
KnottK.SuryR. J. (1986). An investigation into the minimum cycle time restrictions of MTM-2 and MTM-3. IIE Transactions, 18(4), 380–391.
24.
KothiyalK. P.KayisB. (1995). Workplace design for manual assembly tasks: Effect of spatial arrangement on work-cycle time. International Journal of Occupational Safety and Ergonomics, 1(2), 136–143.
25.
KuhlangP.EdtmayrT.SihnW. (2011). Methodical approach to increase productivity and reduce lead time in assembly and production-logistic processes. CIRP Journal of Manufacturing Science and Technology, 4(1), 24–32.
26.
KuoC. F.WangM. J. (2009). Motion generation from MTM semantics. Computers in Industry, 60(5), 339–348.
27.
KuoC. F.WangM. J. J. (2012). Motion generation and virtual simulation in a digital environment. International Journal of Production Research, 50(22), 6519–6529.
28.
LawA. M. (2008). How to build valid and credible simulation models. In Proceedings of the 40th Conference on Winter Simulation, 39–47. doi:10.1109/WSC.2001.977242
29.
LehtoM. R.BuckJ. R. (2007). Introduction to human factors and ergonomics for engineers, Hillsdale, NJ: Erlbaum.
30.
LuR. F.PetersenT. D.StorchR. L. (2007). Modeling customized product configuration in large assembly manufacturing with supply-chain considerations. International Journal of Flexible Manufacturing Systems, 19(4), 685–712.
31.
MałachowskiB.KorytkowskiP. (2016). Competence-based performance model of multi-skilled workers. Computers & Industrial Engineering, 91, 165–177.
32.
MurrellK. F. H. (1961). Operator variability and its industrial consequences. The International Journal of Production Research, 1(3), 39–55.
33.
NakayamaS. I.NakayamaK. I.NakayamaH. (2002). A study on setting standard time using work achievement quotient. International Journal of Production Research, 40(15), 3945–3953.
34.
NegahbanA.SmithJ. S. (2014). Simulation for manufacturing system design and operation: Literature review and analysis. Journal of Manufacturing Systems, 33(2), 241–261.
35.
OliveiraJ. B.LimaR. S.MontevechiJ. A. B. (2016). Perspectives and relationships in supply chain simulation: A systematic literature review. Simulation Modelling Practice and Theory, 62, 166–191.
36.
OwidaA.ByrneP. J.HeaveyC.BlakeP.El-KilanyK. S. (2016). A simulation based continuous improvement approach for manufacturing based field repair service contracting. International Journal of Production Research, 54(21), 6458–6477.
37.
PrajapatN.TiwariA. (2017). A review of assembly optimisation applications using discrete event simulation. International Journal of Computer Integrated Manufacturing, 30(2–3), 215–228.
38.
RobinsonS. (2004). Simulation: The practice of model development and use. Hoboken, NJ: Wiley.
39.
RobinsonS. (2015, December). A tutorial on conceptual modeling for simulation. In Proceedings of the 2015 Winter Simulation Conference (pp. 1820–1834). doi:10.1109/WSC.2015.7408298
40.
SargentR. G. (2013). Verification and validation of simulation models. Journal of Simulation, 7(1), 12–24.
41.
SteinerL.Burgess-LimerickR.PorterW. (2014). Directional control-response compatibility relationships assessed by physical simulation of an underground bolting machine. Human Factors, 56(2), 384–391.
42.
TakoA. A.RobinsonS. (2012). The application of discrete event simulation and system dynamics in the logistics and supply chain context. Decision Support Systems, 52(4), 802–815.
43.
TischM.HertleC.AbeleE.MetternichJ.TenbergR. (2015). Learning factory design: A competency-oriented approach integrating three design levels. International Journal of Computer Integrated Manufacturing, 29(12), 1355–1375. doi:10.1080/0951192X.2015.1033017
44.
TsengH. E.TangC. E. (2006). A sequential consideration for assembly sequence planning and assembly line balancing using the connector concept. International Journal of Production Research, 44(1), 97–116.
45.
WickensC. D.SebokA.LiH.SarterN.GacyA. M. (2015). Using modeling and simulation to predict operator performance and automation-induced complacency with robotic automation: A case study and empirical validation. Human Factors, 57(6), 959–975.
46.
YangH.BukkapatnamS. T.BarajasL. G. (2013). Continuous flow modelling of multistage assembly line system dynamics. International Journal of Computer Integrated Manufacturing, 26(5), 401–411.
47.
ZengX.WongW. K.LeungS. Y. S. (2012). An operator allocation optimization model for balancing control of the hybrid assembly lines using Pareto utility discrete differential evolution algorithm. Computers & Operations Research, 39(5), 1145–1159.
