Crossmodal Matching: The Case for Developing and Employing a Valid and Feasible Approach to Equate Perceived Stimulus Intensities in Multimodal Research
Restricted accessResearch articleFirst published online February, 2019
Crossmodal Matching: The Case for Developing and Employing a Valid and Feasible Approach to Equate Perceived Stimulus Intensities in Multimodal Research
BondB.StevensS. S. (1969). Cross-modality matching of brightness to loudness by 5-year-olds. Perception & Psychophysics, 6(6), 337–339.
2.
CaldwellD. G.LawtherS.WardleA. (1996). Multi-modal cutaneous tactile feedback. In Proceedings of the IEEE International Conference on Intelligent Robots and Systems, 2, 465–472.
3.
ColmanA. M. (2008). A dictionary of psychology (3rd ed.). Oxford, UK: Oxford University Press.
4.
GomesK.RiggsS. L. (2016). Crossmodal matching: A comparison of two methods. In Proceedings of the Human Factors and Ergonomics Society 60th Annual Meeting (pp. 1595–1599). Santa Monica, CA: Human Factors and Ergonomics Society.
5.
PittsB. J.LuS. A.SarterN. B. (2013). Cross-modal matching: The development and evaluation of a new technique. In Proceedings of the Human Factors and Ergonomics Society 57th Annual Meeting (pp. 1760–1764). Santa Monica, CA: Human Factors and Ergonomics Society.
6.
PittsB.RiggsS. L.SarterN. (2016). Crossmodal matching: A critical but neglected step in multimodal research. IEEE Transactions on Human-Machine Systems, 46(3), 445–450.
7.
PittsB. J.SarterN. B. (2014). Crossmodal matching: Validation of a more reliable technique. In Proceedings of the Human Factors and Ergonomics Society 58th Annual Meeting (pp. 1751–1755). Santa Monica, CA: Human Factors and Ergonomics Society.
8.
SarterN. B. (2006). Multimodal information presentation: Design guidance and research challenges. International Journal of Industrial Ergonomics, 36(5), 439–445.
9.
StevensS. S. (1959). Cross-modality validation of subjective scales for loudness, vibration, and electric shock. Journal of Experimental Psychology, 57(4), 201–209.
