Fixation Differences in Visual Search of Accident Scenes by Novices and Expert Emergency Responders

Abstract

Objective:

We sought to investigate whether expert–novice differences in visual search behavior found in other domains also apply to accident scenes and the emergency response domain.

Background:

Emergency service professionals typically arrive at accidents only after being dispatched when a civilian witness has called an emergency dispatch number. Differences in visual search behavior between the civilian witness (usually a novice in terms of emergency response) and the professional first responders (experts at emergency response) could thus result in the experts being given insufficient or erroneous information, which would lead them to arrive unprepared for the actual situation.

Method:

A between-subjects, controlled eye-tracking experiment with 20 novices and 17 experts (rescue and ambulance service personnel) was conducted to explore expert–novice differences in visual search of accident and control images.

Results:

The results showed that the experts spent more time looking at task-relevant areas of the accident images than novices did, as predicted by the information reduction hypothesis. The longer time was due to longer fixation durations rather than a larger fixation count.

Conclusion:

Expert–novice differences in visual search are present in the emergency domain. Given that this domain is essential to saving lives and also relies heavily on novices as the first link in the chain of response, such differences deserve further exploration.

Application:

Visual search behavior from experts can be used for training purposes. Eye-tracking studies of novices can be used to inform the design of emergency dispatch interviews.

Keywords

visual search disaster response emergency medicine eye tracking expert–novice differences

Get full access to this article

View all access options for this article.

References

Blandford

Wong

B. L. W.

(2004). Situation awareness in emergency medical dispatch. International Journal of Human Computer Studies, 61, 421–452. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.ijhcs.2003.12.012

Chase

W. G.

Ericsson

K. A.

(1982). Skill and working memory. In Bower

G. H.

(Ed.), The psychology of learning and motivation (pp. 1–58). New York, NY: Academic Press.

Crundall

Chapman

France

Underwood

Phelps

(2005). What attracts attention during police pursuit driving? Applied Cognitive Psychology, 19, 409–420. https://doi.org/10.1002/acp.1067

Crundall

Chapman

Phelps

Underwood

(2003). Eye movements and hazard perception in police pursuit and emergency response driving. Journal of Experimental Psychology: Applied, 9, 163–174. https://doi.org/10.1037/1076-898X.9.3.163

Svedlund

(2014). Registered nurses’ experiences of their decision-making at an emergency medical dispatch centre. Journal of Clinical Nursing, 24, 1122–1131.

Ericsson

K. A.

Kintsch

(1995). Long-term working memory. Psychological Review, 102, 211–245.

Forslund

Kihlgren

(2004). Operators’ experiences of emergency calls. Journal of Telemedicine and Telecare, 10, 290–297. https://doi.org/10.1258/1357633042026323

Gegenfurtner

Lethinen

Sälsjö

(2011). Expertise differences in the comprehension of visualizations: A meta-analysis of eye-tracking research in professional domains. Educational Psychology Review, 23, 523–552.

Gibson

J. J.

(1979). The ecological approach to visual perception. Boston, MA: Houghton Mifflin.

10.

Haider

Frensch

P. A.

(1996). The role of information reduction in skill acquisition. Cognitive Psychology, 30, 304–337.

11.

Holmqvist

Nyström

Andersson

Dewhurst

Jarodzka

van de Weijer

(2011). Eye tracking: A comprehensive guide to methods and measures. New York, NY: Oxford University Press.

12.

Khorram-Manesh

Montán

K. L.

Hedelin

Kihlgren

Örtenwall

(2011). Prehospital triage, discrepancy in priority-setting between emergency medical dispatch centre and ambulance crews. European Journal of Trauma and Emergency Surgery, 37, 73–78. https://doi.org/10.1007/s00068-010-0022-0

13.

Kundel

H. L.

Nodine

C. F.

Conant

E. F.

Weinstein

S. P.

(2007). Holistic component of image perception in mammogram interpretation: Gaze-tracking study. Radiology, 242, 396–402.

14.

Madden

D. J.

Whiting

W. L.

Cabeza

Huettel

S. A.

(2004). Age-related preservation of top-down attentional guidance during visual search. Psychology and Aging, 19, 304.

15.

Normark

(2002). Sense-making of an emergency call. In Proceedings of the second Nordic Conference on Human–Computer Interaction: NordiCHI ’02 (p. 81). New York, NY: ACM Press. https://doi.org/10.1145/572020.572031

16.

Rogers

W. A.

Fisk

A. D.

Hertzog

(1994). Do ability-performance relationships differentiate age and practice effects in visual search?. Journal of Experimental Psychology: Learning, Memory, and Cognition, 20, 710.

17.

Scialfa

C. T.

Joffe

K. M.

(1997). Age differences in feature and conjunction search: Implications for theories of visual search and generalized slowing. Aging, Neuropsychology, and Cognition, 4, 227–246.

18.

Søreide

(2012). Strengthening the trauma chain of survival. British Journal of Surgery, 99(S1), 1–3. https://doi.org/10.1002/bjs.7795

19.

Treisman

(1986). Features and objects in visual processing. Scientific American, 255, 114–125. doi:10.1038/scientificam erican1186-114B

20.

Vickers

J. N.

Lewinski

(2012). Performing under pressure: Gaze control, decision making and shooting performance of elite and rookie police officers. Human Movement Science, 31, 101–117. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.humov.2011.04.004

21.

Weibel

Gabrion

Aussedat

Kreutz

(2003). Work-related stress in an emergency medical dispatch center. Annals of Emergency Medicine, 41, 500–506. https://doi.org/10.1067/mem.2003.109