Cumulative Mass and NIOSH Variable Lifting Index Method for Risk Assessment: Possible Relations

Abstract

Objective

The aim of this study was to explore whether the Variable Lifting Index (VLI) can be corrected for cumulative mass and thus test its efficacy in predicting the risk of low-back pain (LBP).

Background

A validation study of the VLI method was published in this journal reporting promising results. Although several studies highlighted a positive correlation between cumulative load and LBP, cumulative mass has never been considered in any of the studies investigating the relationship between manual material handling and LBP.

Method

Both VLI and cumulative mass were calculated for 2,374 exposed subjects using a systematic approach. Due to high variability of cumulative mass values, a stratification within VLI categories was employed. Dummy variables (1–4) were assigned to each class and used as a multiplier factor for the VLI, resulting in a new index (VLI_CMM). Data on LBP were collected by occupational physicians at the study sites. Logistic regression was used to estimate the risk of acute LBP within levels of risk exposure when compared with a control group formed by 1,028 unexposed subjects.

Results

Data showed greatly variable values of cumulative mass across all VLI classes. The potential effect of cumulative mass on damage emerged as not significant (p value = .6526).

Conclusion

When comparing VLI_CMM with raw VLI, the former failed to prove itself as a better predictor of LBP risk.

Application

To recognize cumulative mass as a modifier, especially for lumbar degenerative spine diseases, authors of future studies should investigate potential association between the VLI and other damage variables.

Keywords

manual materials handling job risk assessment low-back pain biomechanics cumulative mass cumulative load

Get full access to this article

View all access options for this article.

References

Ahsan

M. K.

Matin

Ali

M. I.

Ali

M. Y.

Awwal

M. A.

Sakeb

(2013). Relationship between physical work load and lumbar disc herniation. Mymensingh Medical Journal, 22, 533–540.

Battevi

Pandolfi

Cortinovis

(2016). Variable lifting index for risk assessment of manual lifting: A preliminary validation study. Human Factors, 58, 712–725. doi:10.1177/0018720816637538

Coenen

Kingma

Boot

C. R.

Bongers

P. M.

van Dieën

J. H.

(2013). Cumulative low back load at work as a risk factor of low back pain: A prospective cohort study. Journal of Occupational Rehabilitation, 23, 11–18. doi:10.1007/s10926-012-9375-z

Coenen

Kingma

Boot

Bongers

P. M.

van Dieën

J. H.

(2014). Cumulative mechanical low-back load at work is a determinant of low-back pain. Occupational and Environmental Medicine, 71, 332–337. doi:10.1136/oemed-2013-101862

European Committee for Standardization. (2003). EN 1005-2: Safety of machinery—Human physical performance. Part 2: Manual handling of machinery and component parts of machinery. Brussels, Belgium: Author.

Garg

Boda

Hegmann

K. T.

Moore

J. S.

Kapellusch

J. M.

Bhoyar

Thiese

M. S.

Merryweather

Deckow-Schaefer

Bloswick

Malloy

E. J.

(2014). The NIOSH lifting equation and low-back pain, Part 1: Association with low-back pain in the Backworks prospective cohort study. Human Factors, 56, 6–28.

Garg

Kapellusch

J. M.

(2016). The cumulative lifting index (CULI) for the revised NIOSH lifting equation: Quantifying risk for workers with job rotation. Human Factors, 58, 683–694. doi:10.1177/0018720815627405

Hung

Y. J.

Shih

T. T.-F.

Chen

B.-B.

Hwang

Y.-H.

L.-P.

Huang

W.-H.

Liou

S.-H.

I.-K.

Guo

Y. L.

(2014). The dose-response relationship between cumulative lifting load and lumbar disk degeneration based on magnetic resonance imaging findings. Physical Therapy, 94, 1582–1593. doi:10.2522/ptj.20130095

International Organization for Standardization. (2003). ISO 11228-1—Ergonomics—Manual handling—Part 1: Lifting and carrying. Geneva, Switzerland: Author.

10.

International Organization for Standardization. (2014). ISO-TR 12295—Ergonomics—Application document for ISO standards on manual handling (ISO 11228-1, ISO 11228-2 and ISO 11228-3) and evaluation of static working postures (ISO 11226). Geneva, Switzerland: Author.

11.

Kleinbaum

D. G.

Kupper

L. L.

Morgenstern

(Eds.). (1982). Epidemiologic research: Principles and quantitative methods. Hoboken, NJ: Wiley.

12.

Kumar

(1990). Cumulative load as a risk factor for back pain. Spine, 15, 1311–1316.

13.

Lavender

S. A.

Oleske

D. M.

Nicholson

Andersson

G. B.

Hahn

(1999). Comparison of five methods used to determine low back disorder risk in a manufacturing environment. Spine, 24, 1441–1448.

14.

M. L.

Waters

T. R.

Krieg

Werren

(2014). Efficacy of the revised NIOSH lifting equation to predict risk of low-back pain associated with manual lifting: A one-year prospective study. Human Factors, 56, 73–85.

15.

McGill

S. M.

(1997). The biomechanics of low back injury: Implications on current practice in industry and the clinic. Journal of Biomechanics, 30, 465–475.

16.

Neumann

W. P.

Wells

R. P.

Norman

R. W.

Frank

Shannon

Kerrb

M. S.

& OUBPS Working Group. (2001). A posture and load sampling approach to determining low-back pain risk in occupational settings. International Journal of Industrial Ergonomics, 27, 65–77.

17.

Norman

Wells

Neumann

Frank

Shannon

Kerr

(1998). A comparison of peak vs cumulative physical work exposure risk factors for the reporting of low back pain in the automotive industry. Clinical Biomechanics, 13, 561–573.

18.

Seidler

Bolm-Audorff

Heiskel

Henkel

Roth-Küver

Kaiser

Bickeböller

Willingstorfer

W. J.

Beck

Elsner

(2001). The role of cumulative physical work load in lumbar spine disease: Risk factors for lumbar osteochondrosis and spondylosis associated with chronic complaints. Occupational and Environmental Medicine, 58, 735–746.

19.

Seidler

Bolm-Audorff

Siol

Henkel

Fuchs

Schug

Leheta

Marquardt

Schmitt

Ulrich

P. T.

Beck

Missalla

Elsner

(2003). Occupational risk factors for symptomatic lumbar disc herniation: A case-control study. Occupational and Environmental Medicine, 60, 821–830.

20.

Village

Frazer

Cohen

Leyland

Park

Yassi

(2005). Electromyography as a measure of peak and cumulative workload in intermediate care and its relationship to musculoskeletal injury: An exploratory ergonomic study. Applied Ergonomics, 36, 609–618. doi:10.1016/j.apergo.2005.01.019

21.

Wang

M. J. J.

Garg

Chang

Y. C.

Shih

Y. C.

Yeh

W. Y.

Lee

C. L.

(1998). The relationship between low back discomfort ratings and the NIOSH lifting index. Human Factors, 40, 509–515.

22.

Waters

T. R.

Baron

S. L.

Piacitelli

L. A.

Anderson

V. P.

Skov

Haring-Sweeney

Wall

D. K.

Fine

L. J.

(1999). Evaluation of the revised NIOSH lifting equation: A cross-sectional epidemiologic study. Spine, 24, 386–394.

23.

Waters

T. R.

M. L.

Piacitelli

L. A.

Werren

Deddens

J. A.

(2011). Efficacy of the revised NIOSH lifting equation to predict risk of low back pain due to manual lifting: Expanded cross-sectional analysis. Journal of Occupational and Environmental Medicine, 53, 1061–1067.

24.

Waters

Occhipinti

Colombini

Alvarez-Casado

Fox

(2016). Variable lifting index (VLI): A new method for evaluating variable lifting tasks. Human Factors, 58, 695–711. doi:10.1177/0018720815612256

25.

Waters

T. R.

Putz-Anderson

Garg

(1994). Applications manual for the revised NIOSH lifting equation (Pub. No. 94-110). Washington, DC: National Institute for Occupational Safety and Health, Department of Health and Human Services.

26.

Waters

T. R.

Putz-Anderson

Garg

Fine

L. J.

(1993). Revised NIOSH equation for the design and evaluation of manual lifting tasks. Ergonomics, 36, 749–776. doi:10.1080/00140139308967940