The effects of performing a 90-minute computer task with a laptop versus a dual monitor desktop workstation were investigated in healthy young male and female adults.
Background:
Work-related musculoskeletal disorders are common among computer (especially female) users. Laptops have surpassed desktop computer sales, and working with multiple monitors has also become popular. However, few studies have provided objective evidence on how they affect the musculoskeletal system in both genders.
Methods:
Twenty-seven healthy participants (mean age = 24.6 years; 13 males) completed a 90-minute computer task while using a laptop or dual monitor (DualMon) desktop. Electromyography (EMG) from eight upper body muscles and visual strain were measured throughout the task. Neck proprioception was tested before and after the computer task using a head-repositioning test. EMG amplitude (root mean square [RMS]), variability (coefficients of variation [CV]), and normalized mutual information (NMI) were computed.
Results:
Visual strain (p < .01) and right upper trapezius RMS (p = .03) increased significantly over time regardless of workstation. Right cervical erector spinae RMS and cervical NMI were smaller, while degrees of overshoot (mean = 4.15°) and end position error (mean = 1.26°) were larger in DualMon regardless of time. Effects on muscle activity were more pronounced in males, whereas effects on proprioception were more pronounced in females.
Conclusion:
Results suggest that compared to laptop, DualMon work is effective in reducing cervical muscle activity, dissociating cervical connectivity, and maintaining more typical neck repositioning patterns, suggesting some health-protective effects.
Application:
This evidence could be considered when deciding on computer workstation designs.
AaråsA.HorgenG.BjørsetH.RoO.WalsøeH. (2001). Musculoskeletal, visual and psychosocial stress in VDU operators before and after multidisciplinary ergonomic interventions. A 6 year prospective study—Part II. Applied Ergonomics, 32, 559–571.
2.
AlabdulmohsenR. T. (2011). Effect of single/dual monitor use on the behavior of neck-shoulder musculature. Master’s thesis, West Virginia University, Morgantown, WV.
3.
AndersC.BretschneiderS.BernsdorfA.ErlerK.SchneiderW. (2004). Activation of shoulder muscles in healthy men and women under isometric conditions. Journal of Electromyography and Kinesiology, 14(6), 699–707. doi:10.1016/j.jelekin.2004.04.003
4.
ArmstrongB. S.McNairP. J.WilliamsM. (2005). Head and neck position sense in whiplash patients and healthy individuals and the effect of the cranio-cervical flexion action. Clinical Biomechanics, 20(7), 675–684. doi:10.1016/j.clinbiomech.2005.03.009
5.
BasmajianJ.BlumensteinR. (1980). Electrode placement in EMG biofeedback. Baltimore, MD: Williams & Wilkins.
6.
BergqvistU.KnaveB. (1994). Eye discomfort and work with visual display terminals. Scandinavian Journal of Work, Environment & Health, 20(1), 27–33.
7.
BlehmC.VishnuS.KhattakA.MitraS.YeeR. W. (2005). Computer vision syndrome: A review. Survey of Ophthalmology, 50(3), 253–262. doi:10.1016/j.survophthal.2005.02.008
8.
CôtéJ. N. (2012). A critical review on physical factors and functional characteristics that may explain a sex/gender difference in work-related neck/shoulder disorders. Ergonomics, 55(2), 173–182. doi:10.1080/00140139.2011.586061
9.
FallaD.Arendt-NielsenL.FarinaD. (2008). Gender-specific adaptations of upper trapezius muscle activity to acute nociceptive stimulation. Pain, 138(1), 217–225.
10.
FallaD.JullG.RussellT.VicenzinoB.HodgesP. (2007). Effect of neck exercise on sitting posture in patients with chronic neck pain. Physical Therapy, 87(4), 408–417.
11.
FedorowichL.EmeryK.CôtéJ. N. (2015). The effect of walking while typing on neck/shoulder patterns. European Journal of Applied Physiology, 115(8), 1813–1823. doi:10.1007/s00421-015-3163-3
12.
FedorowichL.EmeryK.GervasiB.CôtéJ. N. (2013). Gender differences in neck/shoulder muscular patterns in response to repetitive motion induced fatigue. Journal of Electromyography and Kinesiology, 23(5), 1183–1189. doi:10.1016/j.jelekin.2013.06.005
13.
FullerJ. R.FungJ.CôtéJ. N. (2011). Time-dependent adaptations to posture and movement characteristics during the development of repetitive reaching induced fatigue. Experimental Brain Research, 211(1), 133–143. doi:10.1007/s00221-011-2661-8
14.
HeikkiläH.WenngrenB. (1998). Cervicocephalic kinesthetic sensibility, active range of cervical motion, and oculomotor function in patients with whiplash injury. Archives of Physical Medicine and Rehabilitation, 79, 1089–1094.
15.
JensenM.ChenC.BruggerA. (2003). Interpretation of visual analog scale ratings and change scores: A reanalysis of two clinical trials of postoperative pain. The Journal of Pain, 4(7), 407–414. doi:10.1016/s1526-5900(03)00716-8
16.
JohansenT.SamaniA.AntleD. M.CôtéJ. N.MadeleineP. (2012). Gender effects on the coordination of subdivisions of the trapezius muscle during a repetitive box-folding task. European Journal of Applied Physiology, 113(1), 175–182. doi:10.1007/s00421-012-2425-6
17.
KangY.StaskoJ. (2008). Lightweight task/application performance using single versus multiple monitors: A comparative study. Paper presented at the Graphics Interface Conference, Windsor, Ontario, Canada.
18.
KendallF. P.McCrearyE. K.KendallH. O. (1993). Muscles, testing and function. Baltimore, MD: Williams & Wilkins.
19.
KristjanssonE.Dall’AlbaP.JullG. (2003). A study of five cervicocephalic relocation tests in three different subject groups. Clinical Rehabilitation, 17(7), 768–774. doi:10.1191/0269215503cr676oa
20.
LatashM. L.ScholzJ. P.SchonerG. (2002). Motor control strategies revealed in the structure of motor variability. Exercise and Sport Science Reviews, 30, 26–31.
21.
LieI.WattenR. G. (1994). VDT work, oculomotor strain, and subjective complaints: An experimental and clinical study. Ergonomics, 37(8), 1419–1433. doi:10.1080/00140139408964919
22.
LomondK.CôtéJ. N. (2010). Movement timing and reach to reach variability during a repetitive reaching task in persons with chronic neck/shoulder pain and healthy subjects. Experimental Brain Research, 206(3), 271–282. doi:10.1007/s00221-010-2405-1
23.
MadeleineP. (2010). On functional motor adaptations: From the quantification of motor strategies to the prevention of musculoskeletal disorders in the neck-shoulder region. Acta Physiologica, 199(Suppl. 679), 1–46.
24.
MadeleineP.MathiassenS. E.Arendt-NielsenL. (2008). Changes in the degree of motor variability associated with experimental and chronic neck-shoulder pain during a standardised repetitive arm movement. Experimental Brain Research, 185(4), 689–698. doi:10.1007/s00221-007-1199-2
25.
MadeleineP.SamaniA.BinderupA. T.StensdotterA. K. (2011). Changes in the spatio-temporal organization of the trapezius muscle activity in response to eccentric contractions. Scandinavian Journal of Medicince & Science in Sports, 21(2), 277–286. doi:10.1111/j.1600-0838.2009.01037.x
26.
MadeleineP.VoigtM.MathiassenS. E. (2008). The size of cycle-to-cycle variability in biomechanical exposure among butchers performing a standardised cutting task. Ergonomics, 51(7), 1078–1095. doi:10.1080/00140130801958659
27.
MalmstromE.KarlbergM.HolmstromE.FranssonP. A.HanssonG. A.MagnussonM. (2010). Influence of prolonged unilateral cervical muscle contraction on head repositioning—Decreased overshoot after a 5-min static muscle contraction task. Manual Therapy, 15(3), 229–234. doi:10.1016/j.math.2009.12.003
28.
MalmstromE.WestergrenH.FranssonP.KarlbergM.MagnussonM. (2013). Experimentally induced deep cervical muscle pain distorts head on trunk orientation. European Journal of Applied Physiology, 113(10), 2487–2499. doi:10.1007/s00421-013-2683-y
29.
MaslenB.StrakerL. (2009). A comparison of posture and muscle activity means and variation amongst young children, older children and young adults whilst working with computers. Work, 32(3), 311–320.
30.
MathiassenS.MollerT.ForsmanM. (2003). Variability in mechanical exposure within and between individuals performing a highly constrained industrial work task. Ergonomics, 46(8), 800–824. doi:10.1080/0014013031000090125
31.
MathiassenS.WinkelJ.HäggG. M. (1995). Normalization of suface EMG amplitude from the upper trapezius muscle in ergonomic studies—A review. Journal of Electromyography & Kinesiology, 5(4), 197–226.
32.
MessingK.PunnettL.BondM.AlexandersonK.PyleJ.ZahmS.. . . de GrosboisS. (2003). Be the fairest of them all: Challenges and recommendations for the treatment of gender in occupational health research. American Journal of Industrial Medicine, 43, 618–629.
33.
MessingK.StockS.CôtéJ.TissotF. (2015). Is sitting worse than static standing? How a gender analysis can move us toward understanding determinants and effects of occupational standing and walking. Journal of Occupational and Environmental Hygiene, 12(3), D11–D17. doi:10.1080/15459624.2014.987388
34.
MessingK.StockS. R.TissotF. (2009). Should studies of risk factors for MSDs be stratified by gender? Lessons from analyses of musculoskeletal disorders among respondents to the 1998 Quebec Health Survey. Scandinavian Journal of Work, Environment and Health, 35, 96–112.
35.
MoffetH.HagbergM.Hansson-RisbergE.KarlqvistL. (2002). Influence of laptop computer design and working position on physical exposure variables. Clinical Biomechanics, 17, 368–375.
36.
NakaishiH.YamadaY. (1999). Abnormal tear dynamics and symptoms of eyestrain in operators of visual display terminals. Occupational and Environmental Medicine, 56, 6–9.
37.
NimbarteA. D.AlabdulmohsenR. T.GuffeyS. E.EthertonJ. R. (2013). The impact of use of dual monitor screens on 3D head-neck posture and activity of neck muscles. IIE Transactions on Occupational Ergonomics and Human Factors, 1(1), 38–49. doi:10.1080/21577323.2012.667051
38.
OwensJ. W.TevesJ.NguyenB.SmithA.PhelpsM. C.ChaparroB. S. (2012). Examination of dual vs. single monitor use during common office tasks. Proceedings of the Human Factors and Ergonomics Society Annual Meeting, 56(1), 1506–1510. doi:10.1177/1071181312561299
39.
PinsaultN.FleuryA.VironeG.BouvierB.VaillantJ.VuillermeN. (2008). Test-retest reliability of cervicocephalic relocation test to neutral head position. Physiotherapy Theory Practice, 24(5), 380–391. doi:10.1080/09593980701884824
40.
PoderT. G.GodboutS. T.BellemareC. (2011). Dual vs. single monitor in a Canadian hospital archiving department: A study of eficiency and satisfaction. Health Information Management Journal, 40(3), 20–25.
41.
RevelM.Andre-DeshaysC.MinguetM. (1991). Cervicocephalic kinaesthetic sensibility in patients with cervical pain. Archives of Physical Medicine and Rehabilitation, 72, 288–291.
42.
SommerichC. M.StarrH.SmithC. A.ShiversC. (2002). Effects of notebook computer configuration and task on user biomechanics, productivity, and comfort. International Journal of Industrial Ergonomics, 30, 7–31.
43.
SrinivasanD.MathiassenS. E. (2012). Motor variability in occupational health and performance. Clinical Biomechanics, 27(10), 979–993.
44.
StrakerL.Burgess-LimerickR.PollockC.MaslenB. (2009). The influence of desk and display design on posture and muscle activity variability whilst performing information technology tasks. Applied Ergonomics, 40, 852–859.
45.
StrakerL.JonesK. J.MillerJ. (1997). A comparison of the postures assumed when using laptop computers and desktop computers. Applied Ergonomics, 28(4), 263–268.
46.
StrømV.RøeC.KnardahlS. (2009). Work-induced pain, trapezius blood flux, and muscle activity in workers with chronic shoulder and neck pain. Pain, 144(1–2), 147–155.
47.
SvendsenJ. H.SamaniA.MayntzhusenK.MadeleineP. (2011). Muscle coordination and force variability during static and dynamic tracking tasks. Human Movement Science, 30(6), 1039–1051.
48.
SzetoG.ChanC.ChanS.LaiH.LauE. (2014). The effects of using a single display screen versus dual screens on neck-shoulder muscle activity during computer tasks. International Journal of Industrial Ergonomics, 44(3), 460–465. doi:10.1016/j.ergon.2014.01.003
49.
SzetoG.StrakerL.O’SullivanP. (2005). A comparison of symptomatic and asymptomatic office workers performing monotonous keyboard work—1: Neck and shoulder muscle recruitment patterns. Manual Therapy, 10(4), 270–280. doi:10.1016/j.math.2005.01.004
50.
TierneyR.SitlerM.SwanikC.SwanikK.HigginsM.TorgJ. (2005). Gender differences in head-neck segment dynamic stabilization during head acceleration. Medicine & Science in Sports & Exercise, 37(2), 272–279. doi:10.1249/01.mss.0000152734.47516.aa
51.
TruemperJ. M.ShengH.HilgersM. G.HallR. H.KallinyM.TandonB. (2008). Usability in multiple monitor displays. The Data Base for Advances in Information Systems, 39(4), 74–89.
52.
WolkoffP.SkovP.FranckC.PetersenL. N. (2003). Eye irritation and environmental factors in the office environment—Hypotheses, causes and a physiological model. Scandinavian Journal of Work, Environment & Health, 29(6), 411–430.
53.
WoodsV. (2005). Musculoskeletal disorders and visual strain in intensive data processing workers. Occupational Medicine, 55(2), 121–127. doi:10.1093/occmed/kqi029
ZetterbergC.ForsmanM.RichterH. O. (2013). Effects of visually demanding near work on trapezius muscle activity. Journal of Electromyography and Kinesiology, 23(5), 1190–1198. doi:10.1016/j.jelekin.2013.06.003
