Evaluation of Simulated Clinical Breast Exam Motion Patterns Using Marker-Less Video Tracking

Abstract

Objective:

This study investigates using marker-less video tracking to evaluate hands-on clinical skills during simulated clinical breast examinations (CBEs).

Background:

There are currently no standardized and widely accepted CBE screening techniques.

Methods:

Experienced physicians attending a national conference conducted simulated CBEs presenting different pathologies with distinct tumorous lesions. Single hand exam motion was recorded and analyzed using marker-less video tracking. Four kinematic measures were developed to describe temporal (time pressing and time searching) and spatial (area covered and distance explored) patterns.

Results:

Mean differences between time pressing, area covered, and distance explored varied across the simulated lesions. Exams were objectively categorized as either sporadic, localized, thorough, or efficient for both temporal and spatial categories based on spatiotemporal characteristics. The majority of trials were temporally or spatially thorough (78% and 91%), exhibiting proportionally greater time pressing and time searching (temporally thorough) and greater area probed with greater distance explored (spatially thorough). More efficient exams exhibited proportionally more time pressing with less time searching (temporally efficient) and greater area probed with less distance explored (spatially efficient). Just two (5.9 %) of the trials exhibited both high temporal and spatial efficiency.

Conclusions:

Marker-less video tracking was used to discriminate different examination techniques and measure when an exam changes from general searching to specific probing. The majority of participants exhibited more thorough than efficient patterns.

Application:

Marker-less video kinematic tracking may be useful for quantifying clinical skills for training and assessment.

Keywords

hands-on clinical examination tactile inspection medical simulation examination technique

Get full access to this article

View all access options for this article.

References

American College of Obstetricians and Gynecologists. (2012). Well-woman visit. Committee Opinion No. 534. Obstetrics and Gynecology, 120, 421–424.

Barton

M. B.

Harris

Fletcher

S. W.

(1999). The rational clinical examination. Does this patient have breast cancer? The screening clinical breast examination: Should it be done? How? Journal of the American Medical Association, 282, 1270–1280.

Buyske

(2010). The role of simulation in certification. Surgical Clinics of North America, 90(3), 619–621.

Chen

C. H.

Azari

Y. H.

Lindstrom

M. J.

Thelen

Yen

T. Y.

Radwin

R. G.

(2015). The accuracy of conventional 2D video for quantifying upper limb kinematics in repetitive motion occupational tasks. Ergonomics. Advance online publication. doi:10.1080/00140139.2015.1051594

Chen

C. H.

Y. H.

Radwin

R. G.

(2014). A motion tracking system for hand activity assessment. In 2014 IEEE China Summit & International Conference on Signal and Information Processing (ChinaSIP) (pp. 320–324). Xi’an, China: IEEE.

Chen

C.- H.

Y. H.

Yen

T. Y.

Radwin

R. G.

(2013). Automated video exposure assessment of repetitive hand motion. Human Factors, 55(2), 298–308.

Day

N. B.

(2008). The need for performance and standardization of the best clinical breast exam. The Journal for Nurse Practitioners, 4(5), 342–349.

Gilliland

W. R.

La Rochelle

Hawkins

Dillon

G. F.

Mechaber

A. J.

Dyrbye

Papp

K. K.

Durning

S. J.

(2008). Changes in clinical skills education resulting from the introduction of the USMLE Step 2 clinical skills (CS) examination. Medical Teacher, 30(3), 325–327.

Goodson

W. H.

III Hunt

T. K.

Plotnik

J. N.

Moore

D. H.

II . (2014). Optimization of clinical breast examination. The American Journal of Medicine, 123(4), 329–334. doi:10.1016/j.amjmed.2009.08.023

10.

Jatoi

(2003). Screening clinical breast examination. Surgical Clinics of North America, 83, 789–801.

11.

Kaye

A. R.

Salud

L. H.

Domont

Z. B.

Blossfield Iannitelli

K. M.

Pugh

C. M.

(2011). Expanding the use of simulators as assessment tools: The new pop quiz. Studies in Health Technology and Informatics, 163, 271–273.

12.

Kwan

Salud

Ononye

C. I.

Zhao

Pugh

(2012). Moving past normal force: Capturing and classifying shear motion using 3D sensors. Studies in Health Technologies and Informatics, 173, 245–249.

13.

Laufer

Cohen

E. R.

Kwan

D’Angelo

A. D.

Pugh

C. M.

. (2015). Sensor technology in assessments of clinical skill. The New England Journal of Medicine, 372(8), 784.

14.

McDonald

Saslow

Alciati

M. H.

(2004). Performance and reporting of clinical breast examination: A review of the literature. CA: A Cancer Journal for Clinicians, 54(6), 345–361.

15.

Oestreicher

Lehman

C. D.

Seger

D. J.

Buist

D. S.

White

(2005). The incremental contribution of clinical breast examination to invasive cancer detection in a mammography screening program. American Journal of Roentgenology, 184, 428–432.

16.

Papadakis

M. A.

(2004). The Step 2 clinical-skills examination. New England Journal of Medicine, 350(17), 1703–1705.

17.

Peek

M. E.

Han

J. H.

(2004). Disparities in screening mammography: Current status, interventions, and implications. Journal of General Internal Medicine, 19(2), 184–194. doi:10.1111/j.1525-1497.2004.30254.x

18.

Salud

L. H.

Kwan

Pugh

C. M.

(2013). Simplifying touch data from tri-axial sensors using a new data visualization tool. Studies in Health Technologies and Informatics, 184, 370–376.

19.

Salud

L. H.

Ononye

C. I.

Kwan

Salud

J. C.

Pugh

C. M.

(2012). Clinical breast examination simulation: Getting to real. Studies in Health Technologies and Informatics, 173, 424–429.

20.

Saslow

Hannan

Osuch

Alciati

M. H.

Baines

Barton

. (2004). Clinical breast examination: Practical recommendations for optimizing performance and reporting. CA: A Cancer Journal for Clinicians, 54, 327–344.

21.

U.S. Preventive Services Task Force. (2009). Screening for breast cancer: U.S. Preventive Services Task Force Recommendation Statement. Annals of Internal Medicine, 151(10), 716–726.

22.

Venables

W. N.

Ripley

B. D.

(2002). Modern applied statistics with S (4th ed.). New York: Springer.

23.

Whelan

G. P.

Boulet

J. R.

McKinley

D. W.

Norcini

J. J.

van Zanten

Hambleton

R. K.

. (2005). Scoring standardized patient examinations: Lessons learned from the development and administration of the ECFMG Clinical Skills Assessment (CSA). Medical Teacher, 27(3), 200–206.