Performance and mental workload were observed for the administration of a rest break or exogenous vibrotactile signals in auditory and visual monitoring tasks.
Background:
Sustained attention is mentally demanding. Techniques are required to improve observer performance in vigilance tasks.
Method:
Participants (N = 150) monitored an auditory or a visual display for changes in signal duration in a 40-min watch. During the watch, participants were administered a rest break or exogenous vibrotactile signals.
Results:
Detection accuracy was significantly greater in the auditory than in the visual modality. A short rest break restored detection accuracy in both sensory modalities following deterioration in performance. Participants experienced significantly lower mental workload when monitoring auditory than visual signals, and a rest break significantly reduced mental workload in both sensory modalities. Exogenous vibrotactile signals had no beneficial effects on performance, or mental workload.
Conclusion:
A rest break can restore performance in auditory and visual vigilance tasks. Although sensory differences in vigilance tasks have been studied, this study is the initial effort to investigate the effects of a rest break countermeasure in both auditory and visual vigilance tasks, and it is also the initial effort to explore the effects of the intervention of a rest break on the perceived mental workload of auditory and visual vigilance tasks. Further research is warranted to determine exact characteristics of effective exogenous vibrotactile signals in vigilance tasks.
Application:
Potential applications of this research include procedures for decreasing the temporal decline in observer performance and the high mental workload imposed by vigilance tasks.
BaddeleyA. D. (1990). Human memory: Theory and practice (pp. 67–95). Boston, MA: Allyn & Bacon.
2.
ColquhounW. P. (1959). The effect of a short rest-pause on inspection efficiency. Ergonomics, 2, 367–372.
3.
ColquhounW. P. (1975). Evaluation of auditory, visual, and dual-mode displays for prolonged sonar monitoring in repeated sessions. Human Factors, 17, 425–437.
4.
DavenportW. G. (1972). Vigilance and arousal: Effects of different types of background stimulation. Journal of Psychology: Interdisciplinary and Applied, 82, 339–346.
5.
DaviesD. R.ParasuramanR. (1982). The psychology of vigilance. New York, NY: Academic Press.
6.
EndsleyM. R.KirisE. O. (1995). The out-of-the-loop performance problem and level of control in automation. Human Factors, 37, 381–394.
7.
FerrisT. K.SarterN. (2011). Continuously informing vibrotactile displays in support of attention management and multitasking in anesthesiology. Human Factors, 53, 600–611.
8.
FoxJ. G. (1975). Vigilance and arousal: A key to maintaining inspectors’ performance. In DruryC. G.FoxJ. G. (Eds.), Human reliability in quality control (pp. 89–98). New York, NY: Halsted Press.
9.
FrankmannJ. P.AdamsJ. A. (1962). Theories of vigilance. Psychological Bulletin, 59, 257–272.
10.
GalinskyT. L.RosaR. R.WarmJ. S.DemberW. N. (1993). Psychophysical determinants of stress in sustained attention. Human Factors, 35, 603–614.
11.
GescheiderG. A. (1997). Psychophysics: The fundamentals (3rd ed.). Mahwah, NJ: Lawrence Erlbaum.
12.
HartS. G.StavelandL. E. (1988). Development of NASA-TLX (Task Load Index): Results of empirical and theoretical research. In HancockP. A.MeshkatiN. (Eds.), Human mental workload (pp. 139–183). Amsterdam, Netherlands: North-Holland.
13.
HatfieldJ. L.LoebM. (1968). Sense mode and coupling in a vigilance task. Perception & Psychophysics, 4, 29–36.
14.
HebbD. O. (1955). Drives and the C.N.S. (conceptual nervous system). Psychological Review, 62, 243–254.
15.
HeltonW. S.HollanderT. D.WarmJ. S.MatthewsG.DemberW. N.WallaartM.BeauchampG.ParasuramanR.HancockP. A. (2005). Signal regularity and the mindlessness model of vigilance. British Journal of Psychology, 96, 249–261.
16.
HeltonW. S.HollanderT. D.WarmJ. S.TrippL. D.ParsonsK.MatthewsG.DemberW. N.ParasuramanR.HancockP. A. (2007). The abbreviated vigilance task and cerebral hemodynamics. Journal of Clinical and Experimental Neuropsychology, 29, 545–552.
17.
HoC.ReedN.SpenceC. (2007). Multisensory in-car warning signals for collision avoidance. Human Factors, 49, 1107–1114.
18.
HoppP. J.SmithC. A. P.CleggB. A.HeggestadE. D. (2005). Interruption management: The use of attention-directing tactile cues. Human Factors, 47, 1–11.
19.
JerisonH. J. (1963). On the decrement function in human vigilance. In BucknerD. N.McGrathJ. J. (Eds.), Vigilance: A symposium (pp. 199–216). New York, NY: McGraw-Hill.
20.
JohnsonA.ProctorR. W. (2004). Attention: Theory and practice. Thousand Oaks, CA: Sage.
21.
KoelegaH. S.BrinkmanJ. A. (1986). Noise and vigilance: An evaluative review. Human Factors, 28, 465–481.
22.
KramerG. (1994). An introduction to auditory display. In KramerG. (Ed.), Auditory display: Sonification, audification, and auditory interfaces (pp. 1–78). Reading, MA: Addison-Wesley.
23.
KurzbanR.DuckworthA.KableJ. W.MyersJ. (2013). An opportunity cost model of subjective effort and task performance. Behavioral and Brain Sciences, 36, 661–679.
24.
LittellR. C.MillikenG. A.StroupW. W.WolfingerR. D.SchabenbergerO. (2006). SAS for mixed models (2nd ed.). Cary, NC: SAS Institute.
25.
MackworthJ. F. (1969). Vigilance and habituation: A neuropsychological approach. Baltimore, MD: Penguin Books.
26.
MackworthN. H. (1950). Researches on the measurement of human performance (Special Report Series No. 268). London, UK: Medical Research Council, H. M. Stationery Office.
27.
MatthewsG.Reinerman-JonesL. E.WashburnD. A.WarmJ. S.LangheimL. K.TrippL. (2010). Task engagement, cerebral blood flow velocity, and diagnostic monitoring for sustained attention. Journal of Experimental Psychology: Applied, 16, 187–203.
28.
McBrideS. A.JohnsonR. F.MerulloD. J.BartowR. E.Jr. (2004). Effects of the periodic administration of odor or vibration on a 3-hr. vigilance task. Perceptual and Motor Skills, 98, 307–318.
29.
McCormackP. D. (1958). Performance in a vigilance task as a function of inter-stimulus interval and interpolated rest. Canadian Journal of Psychology, 12, 242–246.
30.
McGrathJ. J. (1963). Irrelevant stimulation and vigilance performance. In BucknerD. N.McGrathJ. J. (Eds.), Vigilance: A symposium (pp. 3–21). New York, NY: McGraw-Hill.
31.
NickersonR. S. (1992). Looking ahead: Human factors challenges in a changing world. Hillsdale, NJ: Lawrence Erlbaum.
NygrenT. E. (1991). Psychometric properties of subjective workload measurement techniques: Implications for their use in the assessment of perceived mental workload. Human Factors, 33, 17–33.
34.
PigeauR. A.AngusR. G.O’NeillP.MackI. (1995). Vigilance latencies to aircraft detection among NORAD surveillance operators. Human Factors, 37, 622–634.
35.
RobertsonI. H.ManlyT.AndradeJ.BaddeleyB. T.YiendJ. (1997). “Oops!” Performance correlates of everyday attentional failures in traumatic brain injured and normal subjects. Neuropsychologia, 35, 747–758.
36.
RoseC. L.MurphyL. B.ByardL.NikzadK. (2002). The role of the Big Five personality factors in vigilance performance and workload. European Journal of Personality, 16, 185–200.
37.
RossH. A.RussellP. N.HeltonW. S. (2014). Effects of breaks and goal switches on the vigilance decrement. Experimental Brain Research, 232, 1729–1737.
38.
ShawT. HWarmJ. S.FinomoreV.TrippL.MatthewsG.WeilerE.Parasuraman.R. (2009). Effects of sensory modality on cerebral blood flow velocity during vigilance. Neuroscience Letters, 461, 207–211.
39.
SheridanT. B. (1987). Supervisory control. In SalvendyG. (Ed.), Handbook of human factors (pp. 1243–1268). New York, NY: Wiley.
40.
SklarA. E.SarterN. B. (1999). Good vibrations: Tactile feedback in support of attention allocation and human–automation coordination in event-driven domains. Human Factors, 41, 543–552.
41.
SmithB. D.GuptaU.GuptaB. S. (Eds.). (2007). Caffeine and activation theory: Effects on health and mental behavior. Boca Raton, FL: Taylor Francis Group.
42.
SzalmaJ.WarmJ.MatthewsG.DemberW.WeilerE.MeierA.EggemeierF. T. (2004). Effects of sensory modality and task duration on performance, workload, and sustained attention. Human Factors, 46, 219–233.
43.
TempleJ. G.WarmJ. S.DemberW. N.JonesK. S.LaGrangeC. M.MatthewsG. (2000). The effects of signal salience and caffeine on performance, workload, and stress in an abbreviated vigilance task. Human Factors, 42, 183–194.
44.
WarmJ. S. (1984). An introduction to vigilance. In WarmJ. S. (Ed.), Sustained attention in human performance (pp. 1–14). Toronto, ON: Wiley.
45.
WarmJ. S.DemberW. N. (1998). Tests of vigilance taxonomy. In HoffmanR. R.SherrickM. F.WarmJ. S. (Eds.), Viewing psychology as a whole: The integrative science of William N. Dember (pp. 87–112). Washington, DC: American Psychological Association.
46.
WarmJ. S.DemberW. N.HancockP. A. (1996). Vigilance and workload in automated systems. In ParasuramanR.MoulouaM. (Eds.), Automation and human performance: Theory and applications (pp. 183–200). Hillsdale, NJ: Lawrence Erlbaum.
47.
WarmJ. S.DemberW. N.ParasuramanR. (1991). Effects of olfactory stimulation on performance and stress in a visual sustained attention task. Journal of the Society of Cosmetic Chemists, 42, 199–210.
48.
WarmJ. S.FinomoreV. S.VidulichM. A.FunkeM. E. (2015). Vigilance: A perceptual challenge. In HoffmanA.HancockP. A.ScerboM.ParasuramanR.SzalmaJ. L. (Eds.), The Cambridge handbook of applied perception research (pp. 241–283). Cambridge, UK: Cambridge University Press.
49.
WarmJ. S.JerisonH. J. (1984). The psychophysics of vigilance. In WarmJ. S. (Ed.), Sustained attention in human performance (pp. 15–59). Toronto, ON: Wiley.
50.
WarmJ. S.ParasuramanR. (2007). Cerebral hemodynamics and vigilance. In ParasuramanR.RizzoM. (Eds.), Neuroergonomics: The brain at work (pp. 146–158). New York, NY: Oxford University Press.
51.
WarmJ. S.ParasuramanR.MatthewsG. (2008). Vigilance requires hard mental work and is stressful. Human Factors, 50, 433–441.
52.
WickensC. D.HollandsJ. G.BanburyS.ParasuramanR. (2013). Engineering psychology and human performance (4th ed.). Upper Saddle River, NJ: Pearson.
53.
ZuercherJ. D. (1965). The effects of extraneous stimulation on vigilance. Human Factors, 7, 101–105.
