In a driving simulation, we investigated the efficacy of galvanic cutaneous stimulation (GCS) provided during curves or intermittently during the whole circuit to mitigate simulator syndrome (SS).
Background:
The literature on how GCS decreases SS, although scarce, has demonstrated the effectiveness of this technique. Stimulation with this and similar techniques has usually been provided in curves or continuously during the whole circuit but never intermittently. This stimulation method could generate a continued activation of processes related to GCS mitigating SS.
Method:
Fifteen drivers (8 men; mean age = 25.5 years) participated in this experiment. We compared the total scores of the Simulator Sickness Questionnaire (SSQ) across three stimulation conditions: (a) curve GCS condition, whereby GCS was provided in curves; (b) intermittent GCS condition, whereby GCS was provided intermittently during the whole circuit; and (c) no-stimulation condition, whereby no stimulation was provided (baseline condition).
Results:
The experimental outcomes revealed that GCS decreased SS in both the curve and intermittent stimulation conditions.
Conclusion:
We provide evidence that GCS is an effective countermeasure to decrease SS. It could be applied indifferently in curves or intermittently during the whole circuit.
Application:
For future interventions, we recommend the use of GCS to mitigate SS with similar intermittent stimulation programs. These programs have a crucial advantage as they are easily integrated into the simulator setup without the necessity of generating a complicated experimental design to stimulate during the curves.
AllenR. W.ParkG.CookM.RosenthalT. J. (2003). Novice driver training results and experience with a PC based simulator. In Proceedings of the 2nd International Driving Symposium on Human Factors in Driver Assessment, Training and Vehicle Design (pp. 165–170). Iowa City: University of Iowa.
2.
BentL. R.McFadyenB. J.MerkleyV. F.KennedyP. M.InglisJ. T. (2000). Magnitude effects of galvanic vestibular stimulation on the trajectory of human gait. Neuroscience Letters, 279, 157–160.
3.
ChryslerS. T.WilliamsA. A. (2005). Driving performance in a simulator as a function of pavement and shoulder width, edge line presence, and oncoming traffic. In Proceedings of the 3rd International Driving Symposium on Human Factors in Driver Assessment, Training and Vehicle Design (pp. 370–375). Iowa City: University of Iowa.
4.
ChuH.LiM. H.HuangY. C.LeeS. Y. (2013). Simultaneous transcutaneous electrical nerve stimulation mitigates simulator sickness symptoms in healthy adults: A crossover study. BMC Complementary and Alternative Medicine, 13, 84.
5.
ChuH.LiM. H.JuanS. H.ChiouW. Y. (2012). Effects of transcutaneous electrical nerve stimulation on motion sickness induced by rotary chair: A crossover study. Journal of Alternative and Complementary Medicine, 18, 494–500.
6.
DraperM. H.ViirreE. S.FurnessT. A.GawronV. J. (2001). Effects of image scale and system time delay on simulator sickness within head-coupled virtual environments. Human Factors, 43, 129–146.
7.
EdwardsC. J.CreaserJ. I.CairdJ. K.LamsdaleA. M.ChisholmS. L. (2003). Older and younger driver performance at complex intersections: Implications for using perception response time and driving simulation. In Proceedings of the 2nd International Driving Symposium on Human Factors in Driver Assessment, Training and Vehicle Design (pp. 33–38). Iowa City: University of Iowa.
8.
FreundB.GreenT. R. (2006). Simulator sickness amongst older drivers with and without dementia. Advances in Transportation Studies (Special issue), 71–74.
9.
GoldingJ. F. (1998). Motion Sickness Susceptibility Questionnaire revised and its relationship to other forms of sickness. Brain Research Bulletin, 47, 507–516.
10.
JaegerB. K.MourantR. R. (2001). Comparison of simulator sickness using static and dynamic walking simulators. In Proceedings of the Human Factors and Ergonomics Society 45th Annual Meeting (pp. 1896–1900). Santa Monica, CA: Human Factors and Ergonomics Society.
11.
JohnsonM. I. (2014). Transcutaneous electrical nerve stimulation (TENS): Research to support clinical practice. Oxford, UK: Oxford University Press.
12.
KemenyA.PaneraiF. (2003). Evaluating perception in driving simulation experiments. Trends in Cognitive Sciences, 7, 31–37.
13.
KennedyR. S.FrankL. H. (1986). Review of motion sickness with special reference to simulator sickness. Transportation Research Record, 1059, 75–80.
14.
KennedyR. S.LaneN.BerbaumK.LilienthalM. (1993). Simulator sickness questionnaire: An enhanced method for quantifying simulator sickness. International Journal of Aviation Psychology, 3, 203–220.
15.
KolasinskiE. M.GilsonR. D. (1998). Simulator sickness and related findings in a virtual environment. In Proceedings of the Human Factors and Ergonomics Society 42nd Annual Meeting (pp. 1511–1515). Santa Monica, CA: Human Factors and Ergonomics Society.
16.
MollenhauerM. A. (2004). Simulator adaptation syndrome literature review. Royal Oak, MI: Realtime Technologies.
17.
MoreyR. D. (2008). Confidence intervals from normalized data: A correction to Cousineau (2005). Reason, 4, 61–64.
18.
MossJ. D.MuthE. R. (2011). Characteristics of head-mounted displays and their effects on simulator sickness. Human Factors, 53, 308–319.
19.
MourantR. R.RengarajanP.CoxD.LinY.JaegerB. K. (2007). The effect of driving environments on simulator sickness. In Proceedings of the Human Factors and Ergonomics Society 51st Annual Meeting (pp. 1232–1236). Santa Monica, CA: Human Factors and Ergonomics Society.
20.
MourantR. R.ThattacherryT. R. (2000). Simulator sickness in a virtual environments driving simulator. In Proceedings of the IEA 2000/HFES 2000 Congress (pp. 534–537). Santa Monica, CA: Human Factors and Ergonomics Society.
21.
ParkG. R.AllenW.FiorentinoD. (2006). Simulator sickness scores according to symptom susceptibility, age, and gender for an older driver assessment study. In Proceedings of the Human Factors and Ergonomics Society 50th Annual Meeting (pp. 2702–2706). Santa Monica, CA: Human Factors and Ergonomics Society.
22.
Reed-JonesJ. (2011). Prediction and prevention of simulator sickness: An examination of individual differences, participant behaviours, and controlled interventions (Unpublished doctoral dissertation). University of Guelph, Guelph, Canada.
23.
Reed-JonesJ.Reed-JonesR.TrickL.ToxopeusR.VallisL. (2009). Comparing techniques to reduce simulator adaptation syndrome and improve naturalistic behaviour during simulated driving. In Proceedings of the 5th International Driving Symposium on Human Factors in Driver Assessment, Training and Vehicle Design (pp. 276–283). Iowa City: University of Iowa.
24.
Reed-JonesR.Reed-JonesJ.TrickL.VallisL. (2007). Can vestibular stimulation reduce simulator adaptation syndrome? In Proceedings of the 4th International Driving Symposium on Human Factors in Driver Assessment, Training and Vehicle Design (pp. 534–540). Iowa City: University of Iowa.
25.
Reed-JonesR.VallisL.Reed-JonesJ.TrickL. (2008). The relationship between postural stability and virtual environment adaptation. Neuroscience Letters, 435, 204–209.
26.
RiccioG.StoffregenT. (1991). An ecological theory of motion sickness and postural instability. Ecological Psychology, 3, 195–240.
27.
RizzoM.SheffieldR. A.StiermanL.DawsonJ. (2003). Demographic and driving performance factors in simulator adaptation syndrome. In Proceedings of 2nd International Driving Symposium on Human Factors in Driver Assessment, Training, and Vehicle Design (pp. 21–24). Iowa City: University of Iowa.
28.
SandersonJ. E.TomlinsonB.LauM. S.SoK. W.CheungA. H.CritchleyJ. A.WooK. S. (1995). The effect of transcutaneous electrical nerve stimulation (TENS) on autonomic cardiovascular reflexes. Clinical Autonomic Research, 5, 81–84.
29.
SharplesS.CobbS.MoodyA.WilsonJ. R. (2008). Virtual reality induced symptoms and effects (VRISE): Comparison of head mounted display (HMD), desktop and projection display systems. Displays, 29, 58–69.
30.
StanneyK.MourantR.KennedyR. (1998). Human factors issues in virtual environments: A review of the literature. Presence, 7, 327–351.
31.
van DijkK. R. A.ScherderE. J.ScheltensP.SergeantJ. A. (2002). Effects of transcutaneous electrical nerve stimulation (TENS) on non-pain related cognitive and behavioural functioning. Reviews in the Neurosciences, 13, 257–270.
32.
WebbC. M.BassJ. M.JohnsonD. M.KelleyA. M.MartinC. R.WildzunasR. M. (2009). Simulator sickness in a helicopter flight training school. Aviation, Space, and Environmental Medicine, 80, 541–545.
