A multiaxis dynamometer was used to quantify grip force vector angles and longitudinal centers of pressure (COPs) while varying handle size and effort used.
Background:
Authors of many studies have examined maximum grip strength using scalar instruments; a few have measured two-axis forces limited to one or more finger contact. This novel dynamometer uses two instrumented beams that are grasped by the distal fingers and proximal palm to compute two orthogonal components of force and the longitudinal COP through which the force acts.
Method:
Sixteen healthy, right-handed participants grasped the multiaxis dynamometer with plastic handles ranging in diameter from 3.81 to 7.62 cm. They were required to scale their effort to 25%, 50%, 75%, and 100% of maximum.
Results:
Grip force vector angles were affected by both handle diameter and effort level, with angles increasing an average of 8.1° from the least to greatest effort. Longitudinal COP, averaged among the two beams, shifted 1.75 cm radially as handle diameter increased from 3.81 cm to 7.62 cm. Average COP along the beam in contact with the distal finger segments shifted 0.75 cm ulnarly as effort level increased from 25% to 100% of maximum.
Conclusion:
Grip force characteristics changed with handle diameter and effort level. Overall grip force magnitude comprised both force components measured.
Application:
Understanding grip characteristics should be important for handle and grip design and for evaluating hand function.
AmisA. A. (1987). Variation of finger forces in maximal isometric grasp tests on a range of cylinder diameters. Journal of Biomedical Engineering, 9, 313–320.
2.
BlackwellJ. R.KornatzK. W.HeathE. M. (1999). Effect of grip span on maximal grip force and fatigue of flexor digitorum superficialis. Applied Ergonomics, 30, 401–405.
3.
DesrosiersJ.BravoG.HébertR.DutilE. (1995). Normative data for grip strength of elderly men and women. American Journal of Occupational Therapy, 49, 637–644.
4.
DongR. G.WuJ. Z.WelcomeD. E.McDowellT. W. (2008). A new approach to characterize grip force applied to a cylindrical handle. Medical Engineering and Physics, 30, 20–30.
5.
EdgrenC. S.RadwinR. G.IrwinC. B. (2004). Grip force vectors for varying handle diameters and hand sizes. Human Factors, 46, 244–251.
6.
EndersL. R.SeoN. J. (2011). Phalanx force magnitude and trajectory deviation increased during power grip with an increased coefficient of friction at the hand-object interface. Journal of Biomechanics, 44, 1447–1453.
7.
FitzhughF. E. (1973). Grip strength performance in dynamic gripping tasks. Occupational Health and Safety Engineering technical report, University of Michigan, Ann Arbor.
8.
FowlerN. K.NicolA. C. (1999). A force transducer to measure individual finger loads during activities of daily living. Journal of Biomechanics, 32, 721–725.
9.
GaleC. R.MartynC. N.CooperC.SayerA. A. (2007). Grip strength, body composition, and mortality. International Journal of Epidemiology, 36, 228–235.
10.
GriffithC. D. M.WhymanM.BasseyE. J.HopkinsonB. R.MakinG. S. (1989). Delayed recovery of hand grip strength predicts postoperative morbidity following major vascular-surgery. British Journal of Surgery, 76, 704–705.
11.
HallC. (1997). External pressure at the hand during object handling and work with tools. International Journal of Industrial Ergonomics, 20, 191–206.
12.
HyattR. H.WhitelawM. N.BhatA.ScottS.MaxwellJ. D. (1990). Association of muscle strength with functional status of elderly people. Age and Ageing, 19, 330–336.
13.
IrwinC. B.RadwinR. G. (2009, August). A novel instrument for estimating internal hand loading from external measurements. Paper presented at the International Ergonomics Association Conference, Beijing, China.
14.
IrwinC. B.SestoM. E. (2010). Test-retest reliability of the MAP (multi-axis profile) dynamometer with both young and elder participants. Journal of Hand Therapy, 23, 281–289.
15.
IrwinC. B.TowlesJ. D.RadwinR. G. (2013). An investigation into use of the MAP hand dynamometer for quantifying force vectors in biomechanical modeling. Ergonomics56(12), 1841–1849.
16.
JansenC. W.NiebuhrB. R.CoussiratD. J.HawthorneD.MorenoL.PhillipM. (2008). Hand force of men and women over 65 years of age as measured by maximum pinch and grip force. Journal of Aging and Physical Activity, 16, 24–41.
17.
JensenT. R.RadwinR. G.WebsterJ. G. (1991). A conductive polymer sensor for measuring external finger forces. Journal of Biomechanics, 24, 851–853, 855–858.
18.
KimJ. Y.YunM. H.LeeM. W. (1996). Design of optimum grip and control area for one-handed manual control devices. Computers & Industrial Engineering, 31, 661–664.
19.
KongY. K.FreivaldsA. (2003). Evaluation of meat-hook handle shapes. International Journal of Industrial Ergonomics, 32, 13–23.
20.
KongY. K.LoweB. D. (2005). Optimal cylindrical handle diameter for grip force tasks. International Journal of Industrial Ergonomics, 35, 495–507.
21.
LeeS. J.KongY. K.LoweB. D.SongS. (2009). Handle grip span for optimising finger-specific force capability as a function of hand size. Ergonomics, 52, 601–608.
22.
MathiowetzV.KashmanN.VollandG.WeberK.DoweM.RogersS. (1985). Grip and pinch strength: Normative data for adults. Archives of Physical Medicine and Rehabilitation, 66, 69–74.
23.
McDowellT. W.WimerB. M.WelcomeD. E.WarrenC.DongR. G. (2012). Effects of handle size and shape on measured grip strength. International Journal of Industrial Ergonomics, 42, 199–205.
24.
McGorryR. W. (2001). A system for the measurement of grip forces and applied moments during hand tool use. Applied Ergonomics, 32, 271–279.
25.
McMahonT. A. (1984). Fundamental muscle mechanics. In Muscles, reflexes and locomotion (pp. 3–26). Princeton, NJ: Prineton University Press:
26.
OhS. Y.RadwinR. G. (1993). Pistol grip power tool handle and trigger size effects on grip exertions and operator preference. Human Factors, 35, 551–569.
27.
RadwinR. G.MastersG. P.LuptonF. W. (1991). A linear force summing hand dynamometer independent of point of application. Applied Ergonomics, 22, 339–345.
28.
RadwinR. G.OhS. Y.JensenT. R.WebsterJ. G. (1992). External finger forces in submaximal 5-finger static pinch prehension. Ergonomics, 35, 275–288.
29.
RanganathanV. K.SiemionowV.SahgalV.YueG. H. (2001). Effects of aging on hand function. Journal of the American Geriatrics Society, 49, 1478–1484.
30.
ReilmannR.GordonA. M.HenningsenH. (2001). Initiation and development of fingertip forces during whole-hand grasping. Experimental Brain Research, 140, 443–452.
31.
SeoN. J.ArmstrongT. J. (2008). Investigation of grip force, normal force, contact area, hand size, and handle size for cylindrical handles. Human Factors, 50, 734–744.
32.
SeoN. J.ArmstrongT. J.Ashton-MillerJ. A.ChaffinD. B. (2007). The effect of torque direction and cylindrical handle diameter on the coupling between the hand and a cylindrical handle. Journal of Biomechanics, 40, 3236–3243.
33.
TalsaniaJ. S.KozinS. H. (1998). Normal digital contribution to grip strength assessed by a computerized digital dynamometer. Journal of Hand Surgery–British and European Volume, 23B, 162–166.
34.
WimerB.DongR. G.WelcomeD. E.WarrenC.McDowellT. W. (2009). Development of a new dynamometer for measuring grip strength applied on a cylindrical handle. Medical Engineering and Physics, 31, 695–704.
35.
WindsorJ. A.HillG. L. (1988). Grip strength: A measure of the proportion of protein loss in surgical patients. British Journal of Surgery, 75, 880–882.
36.
WuJ. Z.DongR. G.McDowellT. W.WelcomeD. E. (2009). Modeling the finger joint moments in a hand at the maximal isometric grip: The effects of friction. Medical Engineering and Physics, 31, 1214–1218.
