Sage Journals: Discover world-class research

Abstract

Objective:

The objective was to study the performance of a manual tracking task with system flexibility and time delays in the input channel and to examine the effects of input shaping the human operator’s commands.

Background:

It has long been known that low-frequency, lightly damped vibration hinders performance of a manually controlled system. Recently, input shaping has been shown to improve the performance of such systems in a compensatory-display tracking task. It is unknown if similar improvements are seen with pursuit-display tasks, or how the improvement changes when time delays are added to the system.

Method:

A total of 18 novice participants performed a pursuit-view tracking experiment with a spring-centered joystick. Controlled elements included an integrator, an integrator with a lightly damped flexible mode, and an input-shaped integrator with a flexible mode. The input to these controlled elements was delayed between 0 and 1 s. Tracking performance was quantified by root mean square tracking error, and subjective difficulty was quantified by ratings on a Cooper–Harper scale.

Results:

Performance was best with the undelayed integrator. Both time delay and flexibility degraded performance. Input shaping improved control of the flexible element, with a diminishing benefit as the time delay increased. Tracking error and subjective rating were significantly related. Some operators used a pulsive control strategy.

Conclusion:

Input shaping can improve the performance of a manually controlled system with flexibility, even when time delays are present.

Application:

This study is useful to designers of human-controlled systems, especially those with problematic flexibility and/or time delays.

Keywords

manual tracking input shaping human operator Cooper–Harper rating

Get full access to this article

View all access options for this article.

References

Adams

J. L.

(1961, December). An investigation of the effects of the time lag due to long transmission distance upon remote control: Phase I -tracking experiments (NASA technical note). National Aeronautics and Space Administration.

Allen

R. W.

McRuer

(1979). The man/machine control interface—Pursuit control. Automatica, 15, 683–686.

Banerjee

A. K.

(1993). Dynamics and control of the WISP shuttle-antennae system. Journal of the Astronautical Sciences, 41, 73–90.

Bekey

G. A.

Burnham

G. O.

Seo

(1977, August). Control theoretic models of human drivers in car following. Human Factors, 19, 399–413.

Cooper

G. E.

Harper

R. P.

Jr. (1969, April). The use of pilot rating in the evaluation of aircraft handling qualities (Tech. Rep. AGARD 567). Moffett Field, CA: Cornell Aeronautical Laboratory.

Drapeau

Wang

(1993, May). Verification of a closed-loop shaped-input controller for a five-bar-linkage manipulator. In IEEE International Conference on Robotics and Automation (pp. 216–221). Atlanta, GA: IEEE.

Gawron

V. J.

(2008). Human performance, workload, and situational awareness measures handbook (2nd ed.). New York, NY: Taylor & Francis.

Gerisch

Staude

Wolf

Bauch

(2013, May). A three-component model of the control error in manual tracking of continuous random signals. Human Factors, 55, 985–1000. doi:10.1177/0018720813480387

Gotelli

N. J.

Ellison

A. M.

(2004). A primer of ecological statistics. Sunderland, MA: Sinauer Associates.

10.

Hess

R. A.

(1979, May). A rationale for human operator pulsive control behavior. Journal of Guidance and Control, 2, 221–227.

11.

Hess

R. A.

(1984, July). Effects of time delays on systems subject to manual control. AIAA Journal of Guidance, Control, and Dynamics, 7, 416–421.

12.

Hess

R. A.

Modjtahedzadeh

(1990, August). A control theoretic model of driver steering behavior. IEEE Control Systems Magazine, 10(5), 3–8. doi:10.1109/37.60415

13.

Jagacinski

R. J.

(1977, August). A qualitative look at feedback control theory as a style of describing behavior. Human Factors, 19, 331–347.

14.

Khalid

Huey

Singhose

Lawrence

Frakes

(2006, December). Human operator performance testing using an input-shaped bridge crane. ASME Journal of Dynamic Systems, Measurement, and Control, 128, 835–841.

15.

Kim

Singhose

(2010, June). Performance studies of human operators driving double-pendulum bridge cranes. Control Engineering Practice, 18, 567–576.

16.

Kleinman

D. L.

Perkins

T. R.

(1974, August). Modeling human performance in a time-varying anti-aircraft tracking loop. IEEE Transactions on Automatic Control, AC-19, 297–306.

17.

Magee

D. P.

Book

W. J.

(1995, June). Filtering micro-manipulator wrist commands to prevent flexible base motion. In American Control Conference (pp. 924–928). Seattle, WA: American Automatic Control Council.

18.

Mansur

Tischler

Bielefield

Bacon

Cheung

Berrios

Rothman

(2011, May). Full flight envelope inner-loop control law development for the unmanned K-MAX. Paper presented at the American Helicopter Society Forum, Virginia Beach, VA.

19.

McRuer

D. T.

(1980, May). Human dynamics in man-machine systems. Automatica, 16, 237–253.

20.

McRuer

D. T.

Jex

H. R.

(1967, September). A review of quasi-linear pilot models. IEEE Transactions on Human Factors in Electronics, HFE-8, 231–249. doi:10.1109/THFE.1967.234304

21.

McRuer

D. T.

Krendel

E. S.

(1957, October). Dynamic response of human operators (Tech. Rep. No. WADC-TR-56-524). Wright-Patterson Air Force Base, Ohio: Wright Air Development Center.

22.

McRuer

D. T.

Krendel

E. S.

(1962, May). The man-machine system concept. Proceedings of the IRE, 50, 1117–1123.

23.

Potter

J. J.

Singhose

W. E.

(2013, January). Improving manual tracking of systems with oscillatory dynamics. IEEE Transactions on Human-Machine Systems, 43, 46–52.

24.

Ricard

G. L.

(1994, May). Manual control with delays: A bibliography. ACM SIGGRAPH Computer Graphics, 28, 149–154.

25.

Seth

Rattan

Brandstetter

(1993). Vibration control of a coordinate measuring machine. In IEEE Conference on Control Applications (pp. 368–373). Dayton, OH: IEEE.

26.

Singer

N. C.

Seering

W. P.

(1990, March). Preshaping command inputs to reduce system vibration. ASME Journal of Dynamic Systems, Measurement, and Control, 112, 76–82.

27.

Singhose

(2009). Command shaping for flexible systems: A review of the first 50 years. International Journal of Precision Engineering and Manufacturing, 10, 153–168.

28.

Singhose

Bohlke

Seering

(1996). Fuel-efficient pulse command profiles for flexible spacecraft. AIAA Journal of Guidance, Control, and Dynamics, 19, 954–960.

29.

Singhose

Seering

(2009). Command generation for dynamic systems. Raleigh, NC: Lulu Press.

30.

Smith

O. J. M.

(1957, September). Posicast control of damped oscillatory systems. Proceedings of the IRE, 45, 1249–1255.

31.

Sorensen

K. L.

Singhose

Dickerson

(2007, July). A controller enabling precise positioning and sway reduction in bridge and gantry cranes. Control Engineering Practice, 15, 825–837. doi:10.1016/j.conengprac.2006.03.005

32.

Starr

G. P.

(1985, March). Swing-free transport of suspended objects with a path-controlled robot manipulator. ASME Journal of Dynamic Systems, Measurement, and Control, 107, 97–100.

33.

Tustin

(1947, May). The nature of the operator’s response in manual control, and its implications for controller design. Journal of the Institution of Electrical Engineers, 94, 190–206.

34.

Tuttle

Seering

(1997, July). Experimental verification of vibration reduction in flexible spacecraft using input shaping. AIAA Journal of Guidance, Control, and Dynamics, 20, 658–664.

35.

Vaughan

Jurek

Singhose

(2011). Reducing overshoot in human-operated flexible systems. ASME Journal of Dynamic Systems, Measurement, and Control, 133, 011010.

36.

Vaughan

Yano

Singhose

(2008, September). Comparison of robust input shapers. Journal of Sound and Vibration, 315, 797–815. doi:10.1016/j.jsv.2008.02.032

37.

Young

L. R.

Meiry

J. L.

(1965, July). Bang-bang aspects of manual control in high-order systems. IEEE Transactions on Automatic Control, 10, 336–341.

Effects of Input Shaping on Manual Control of Flexible and Time-Delayed Systems

Abstract

Objective:

Background:

Method:

Results:

Conclusion:

Application:

Keywords

Get full access to this article

References