Objective: A novel vibrotactile display type was investigated to determine the potential benefits for supporting the attention and task management of anesthesiologists.
Background: Recent research has shown physiological monitoring and multitasking performance can benefit from displaying patient data via alarm-like tactile notifications and via continuously informing auditory displays (e.g., sonifications). The current study investigated a novel combination of these two approaches: continuously informing tactile displays.
Method: A tactile alarm and two continuously informing tactile display designs were evaluated in an anesthesia induction simulation with anesthesiologists as participants. Several performance measures were collected for two tasks: physiological monitoring and anesthesia induction. A multi-task performance score equivalently weighted components from each task, normalized across experimental scenarios. Subjective rankings of the displays were also collected.
Results: Compared to the baseline (visual and auditory only) display configuration, each tactile display significantly improved performance in several objective measures, including multitask performance score. The continuously informing display that encoded the severity of patient health into the salience of its signals supported significantly better performance than the other two tactile displays. Contrasting the objective results, participants subjectively ranked the tactile alarm display highest.
Conclusion: Continuously informing tactile displays with alarm-like properties (e.g., salience mapping) can better support anesthesiologists’ physiological monitoring and multitasking performance under the high task demands of anesthesia induction. Adaptive display mechanisms may improve user acceptance.
Application: This study can inform display design to support multitasking performance of anesthesiologists in the clinical setting and other supervisory control operators in work domains characterized by high demands for visual and auditory resources.
AndreA. D.WickensC. D. (1995). When users want what’s not best for them. Ergonomics in Design, 3(4), 10–14.
2.
CooperJ. B.NewbowerR. S.LongC. D.McPeekB. (1978). Preventable anesthesia mishaps: A study of human factors. Anesthesiology, 49, 399–406.
3.
FerrisT. (2010). Informative vibrotactile displays to support attention and task management in anesthesiology (Unpublished doctoral dissertation). University of Michigan, Ann Arbor.
4.
FerrisT.SarterN. (2009). Supporting anesthetic monitoring through tactile display of physiological parameters. In Proceedings of the Human Factors and Ergonomics Society 53rd annual meeting (pp. 1664–1668). Santa Monica, CA: Human Factors and Ergonomics Society.
5.
FerrisT.SarterN. (2010). When content matters: The role of processing code in tactile display design. IEEE Transactions on Haptics, 3, 199–210.
6.
FerrisT.StringfieldK.SarterN. (2010). Tactile “change blindness” in detection of vibration intensity. In Proceedings of the Human Factors and Ergonomics Society 54th annual meeting (pp. 1316–1320). Santa Monica, CA: Human Factors and Ergonomics Society.
7.
FitchW. T.KramerG. (1994). Sonifying the body electric: Superiority of an auditory over a visual display in a complex, multivariate system. In KramerG. (Ed.), Auditory display: Sonification, audification, and auditory interfaces (pp. 307-326). Reading, MA: Addison-Wesley.
8.
FordS.DanielsJ.LimJ.KovalV.DumontG.SchwarzS. K. W.AnserminoJ. M. (2008). A novel vibrotactile display to improve the performance of anesthesiologists in a simulated critical incident. Anesthesia & Analgesia, 106, 1182–1188.
9.
GabaD. M.LeeT. (1990). Measuring the workload of the anesthesiologist. Anesthesia & Analgesia, 71, 354–361.
10.
GörgesM.StaggersN. (2007). Evaluations of physiological monitoring displays: A systematic review. Journal of Clinical Monitoring and Computing, 22, 45–66.
11.
GrierR.WickensC.KaberD.StrayerD.Boehm-DavisD.TraftonJ. G.St. JohnM. (2008). The red-line of workload: Theory, research, and design. In Proceedings of the Human Factors and Ergonomics Society 52nd annual meeting (pp. 1204–1208). Santa Monica, CA: Human Factors and Ergonomics Society.
12.
HameedS.FerrisT.JayaramanS.SarterN. (2009). Using informative peripheral visual and tactile cues to support task and interruption management. Human Factors, 51, 126–135.
13.
HoC.-Y.NikolicM. I.WatersM. J.SarterN. B. (2004). Not now! Supporting interruption management by indicating the modality and urgency of pending tasks. Human Factors, 46, 399–409.
14.
HodgeB.ThompsonJ. F. (1990). Noise pollution in the operating theatre. Lancet, 335, 891–894.
15.
ImhoffM.KuhlsS. (2006). Alarm algorithms in critical care monitoring. Anesthesia & Analgesia, 102, 1525–1537.
16.
LiuD.GörgesM.JenkinsS. A. (2010, March). Collection of vital signs data for anesthesia monitoring research. Paper presented at the International Anesthesia Research Society annual meeting, Honolulu, HI.
17.
LoebR. G. (1994). Monitor surveillance and vigilance of anesthesia residents. Anesthesiology, 80, 527–533.
18.
MacLeanK. E. (2008). Foundations of transparency in tactile information design. IEEE Transactions on Haptics, 1, 84–95.
19.
NgJ. Y. C.ManJ. C. F.FelsS.DumontG.AnserminoJ. M. (2005). An evaluation of a vibro-tactile display prototype for physiological monitoring. Anesthesia & Analgesia, 101, 1719–1724.
20.
SandersonP. M. (2006). The multimodal world of medical monitoring displays. Applied Ergonomics, 37, 501–512.
21.
SeagullF. J.SandersonP. M. (2001). Anesthesia alarms in context: An observational study. Human Factors, 43, 66–78.
22.
SeagullF. J.WickensC.LoebR. G. (2001). When is less more? Attention and workload in auditory, visual, and redundant patient-monitoring conditions. In Proceedings of the Human Factors and Ergonomics Society 45th annual meeting (pp. 1395–1399). Santa Monica, CA: Human Factors and Ergonomics Society.
23.
SorkinR. D.KantowitzB.KantowitzS. (1988). Likelihood alarms. Human Factors, 30, 445–459.
24.
WalshT.BeattyP. C. W. (2002). Human factors error and patient monitoring. Physiological Measurement, 23, R111–R132.
25.
WatsonM. O.SandersonP. M. (2004). Sonification helps eyes-free respiratory monitoring and task timesharing. Human Factors, 46, 497–517.
26.
WickensC. D. (2008). Multiple resources and mental workload. Human Factors, 50, 449–455.
27.
WoodsD. D. (1995). The alarm problem and directed attention in dynamic fault management. Ergonomics, 38, 2371–2393.
