Objective: This study provides an historical and statistical analysis of archival data from the Hawthorne illumination experiments.
Background: Previous accounts of the illumination experiments are fraught with inconsistencies because they have been based on secondary sources. The general consensus has been that variations in light levels had no effect on worker productivity at Hawthorne. All reports and data were thought to have been destroyed, but an archive at Cornell University was found to contain copies of the original documentation and much of the data from all three illumination experiments. Conclusions were originally drawn from visual comparisons of productivity graphs, and the data have never been properly statistically analyzed.
Method: Archival reports, notes, photographs, and letters on the experiments were consulted. Productivity data were extracted from the tables and graphs in the reports and statistically analyzed for each experiment.
Results: Previously unpublished details of the illumination experiments emerged. An effect of lighting on productivity was found in the first treatment sequence for the first experiment, but this finding was not confirmed in the second sequence or in the second and third experiments.
Conclusion: Experimental results provided inconsistent evidence of an association between light levels and productivity. All three experiments were found to be seriously flawed.
Application: This study challenges popular accounts of the “Hawthorne effect,” and the shortcomings of these experiments also have implications for the design of field studies.
BeevisD.SladeI. M. (2003). Ergonomics: Costs and benefits. Applied Ergonomics, 34, 413–418.
4.
BloombaumM. (1983). The Hawthorne experiments: A critique and reanalysis of the first statistical analysis interpretation by Franke and Kaul. Sociological Perspectives, 26, 71–88.
5.
BoyceP. (2003). Human factors in lighting (2nd ed.). New York, NY: Macmillan.
6.
BranniganA. (2004). The rise and fall of social psychology: The use and misuse of the experimental method. Hawthorne, NY: Aldine de Gruyter.
7.
CareyA. (1967). The Hawthorne studies: A radical criticism. American Sociological Review, 32(3), 403–416.
8.
FrankeR. H.KaulJ. D. (1978). The Hawthorne experiments: First statistical interpretation. American Sociological Review, 43, 623–643.
9.
FrenchJ. R. P. (1950). Field experiments: Changing group productivity. In MillerJ. G. (Ed.), Experiments in social process: A symposium on social psychology (pp. 81–96). New York, NY: McGraw-Hill.
10.
FrenchJ. R. P. (1953). Experiments in field settings. In FestingerL.KatzD. (Eds.), Research methods in the behavioral sciences (pp. 98–135). New York, NY: Holt, Rinehart and Winston.
11.
GillespieR. (1991). Manufacturing knowledge: A history of the Hawthorne experiment. Cambridge, UK: Cambridge University Press.
12.
HartC. M. W. (1943). The Hawthorne experiments. Canadian Journal of Economics and Political Science, 9, 150–163.
13.
HibargerH. B. (1927). Report of special illumination test—relay assembly (Unpublished manuscript). Kheel Center for Labor-Management Documentation and Archives (Collection No. 5167). M. P. Catherwood Library, Cornell University, Ithaca, NY.
14.
Illuminating Engineering Society of North America. (2011). The lighting handbook (10th ed.). New York, NY: Author.
15.
JonesS. R. G. (1990). Worker interdependence and output: The Hawthorne studies reevaluated. American Sociological Review, 55, 176–190.
16.
JonesS. R. G. (1992). Was there a Hawthorne effect?American Journal of Sociology, 98, 150–168.
17.
LandsbergerH. (1958). Hawthorne revisited: Management and the worker, its critics, and developments in human relations in industry. Ithaca, NY: Cornell University Press.
18.
LevittS. D.ListJ. A. (2011). Was there really a Hawthorne effect at the Hawthorne plant? An analysis of the original illumination experiments. American Economic Journal: Applied Economics, 3, 224–238.
19.
LazarsfeldP. F. (1941). Repeated interviews as a tool for studying changes in opinion and their causes. American Statistical Associaion Bulletin, 2(1), 3–7.
20.
MallachS.SmithS. (Eds.). (1977). Daily history notes. Records of industrial relations experiment carried out by the Western Electric Company at the Hawthorne Works, Illinois, Reel 1 [Microfilm]. Kheel Center for Labor-Management Documentation and Archives. M. P. Catherwood Library, Cornell University, Ithaca, NY.
21.
MayoE. (1933). The human problems of an industrial civilization. New York, NY: Macmillan Company.
22.
MerrettF. (2006). Reflections on the Hawthorne effect. Educational Psychology, 26, 143–146.
23.
MurrellH. (1976). Motivation at work. London, UK: Methuen.
24.
ParsonsH. M. (1974). What happened at Hawthorne?Science, 188, 922–932.
25.
PitcherB. L. (1981). The Hawthorne experiments: Statistical evidence for a learning hypothesis. Social Forces, 61, 133–149.
26.
RoethlisbergerF. J.DicksonW. J. (1939). Management and the worker: An account of a research program conducted by the Western Electric Company, Hawthorne Works, Chicago. Cambridge, MA: Harvard University Press.
27.
SchlaiferR. (1980). The relay assembly test room: An alternative statistical interpretation. American Sociological Review, 45, 995–1005.
28.
SnowC. E. (1925). Report on illumination tests (Unpublished manuscript). Kheel Center for Labor-Management Documentation and Archives (Collection No. 5167). M. P. Catherwood Library, Cornell University, Ithaca, NY.
29.
SnowC. E. (1926). Report on second year’s test at the Hawthorne Works of the Western Electric Company (Unpublished manuscript). Kheel Center for Labor-Management Documentation and Archives (Collection No. 5167). M. P. Catherwood Library, Cornell University, Ithaca, NY.
30.
SnowC. E. (1927a). 1926-27 tests (Unpublished manuscript). Kheel Center for Labor-Management Documentation and Archives (Collection No. 5167). M. P. Catherwood Library, Cornell University, Ithaca, NY.
31.
SnowC. E. (1927b). Proposed final report (Unpublished manuscript). Kheel Center for Labor-Management Documentation and Archives (Collection No. 5167). M. P. Catherwood Library, Cornell University, Ithaca, NY.
32.
SnowC. E. (1927c). Research on industrial illumination: A discussion of the relation of illumination intensity to productive efficiency. Tech Engineering News, November. Kheel Center for Labor-Management Documentation and Archives (Collection No. 5167). M. P. Catherwood Library, Cornell University, Ithaca, NY.
33.
SonnenfeldJ. A. (1985). Shedding light on the Hawthorne studies. Journal of Occupational Behavior, 6, 111–130.
34.
WhiteheadT. N. (1938). The industrial worker. Cambridge, MA: Harvard University Press.
35.
WregeC. D. (1976). Solving Mayo’s mystery: The first complete account of the origin of the Hawthorne studies. The forgotten contributions of SnowC. E.HibargerH.. In Academy of Management Conference (pp. 12–16). Briarcliff Manor, NY: Academy of Management.
36.
WregeC. D. (1986). Facts and fallacies of Hawthorne: A historical study of the origins, procedures, and results of the Hawthorne Illumination Tests and their influence upon the Hawthorne Studies. New York, NY: Garland.
