Objective: This study examined how transitions in task demand during a driving and navigation task manifested themselves as delayed adaptation in driver mental workload.
Background: A delayed reaction to changes in demand levels, termed hysteresis, has been identified in a number of settings. However, little research has specifically examined the driving task for hysteresis effects.
Method: A total of 32 drivers completed drives while using a navigation system that would fail within the drive. Subjective mental workload was recorded prior to and following system failure as well as at the conclusion of the drive.
Results: Results indicated that a gradual reduction in overall mental workload across trials and a lagged recovery to reduction in task demand was present within trials. Analysis of the mental workload subscales within trials indicated that this effect was produced by the mental effort component of workload.
Conclusion: A moderate hysteresis effect is present in mental workload transitions within the driving task. Although subjective mental workload decreases across trials, the magnitude of the lagged recovery within trials remains unchanged.
Application: Scaling of in-vehicle information is beneficial with respect to driver mental workload. Display and communication technologies designers should consider not only the immediate task demand but also the driver’s task demand history when determining what and how to provide information.
BaddeleyA. D.HitchG. J. L. (1974). Working memory. In BowerG. A. (Ed.), The psychology of learning and motivation: advances in research and theory (Vol. 8, pp. 47–89). New York, NY: Academic Press.
3.
ChamberlainG. P. (1968). Human information processing under varying demand (Unpublished master’s thesis). University of Melbourne, Australia.
4.
ColquhounW. P.BaddeleyA. D. (1964). Role of pretest expectancy in vigilance decrement. Journal of Experimental Psychology, 68, 156–160.
5.
ColquhounW. P.BaddeleyA. D. (1967). Influence of signal probability during pretraining on vigilance decrement. Journal of Experimental Psychology, 73, 153–155.
6.
CummingR. W.CroftP. G. (1973). Human information processing under varying task demand. Ergonomics, 16, 581–586.
7.
DemberW. N.WarmJ. S.NelsonW. T.SimmonsK. G.HancockP. A.GluckmanJ. P. (1993). The rate of gain of perceived workload in sustained attention. Paper presented at the 37th Annual Meeting of the Human Factors Society, Seattle, WA.
8.
DesmondP. A.HancockP. A. (2001). Active and passive fatigue states. In HancockP. A.DesmondP. A. (Eds.), Stress, workload and fatigue (pp. 455–465). Mahwah, NJ: Erlbaum.
9.
DeWaardD. (1996). The measurement of drivers’ mental workload (PhD thesis). University of Groningen Traffic Research Center, Garen, Netherlands.
10.
DurinG.ZapperiS. (2006). The Barkhausen effect. In BertottiG.MayergoyzI. (Eds.), The science of hysteresis (Vol. 2, pp. 181–267). Amsterdam, Netherlands: Academic Press.
11.
FarrellP. S. E. (1999). The hysteresis effect. Human Factors, 41, 226–240.
12.
GoldbergR. A.StewartM. R. (1980). Memory overload or expectancy effect? “Hysteresis” revisited. Ergonomics, 23, 1173–1178.
13.
HancockP. A. (1996). Effect of control order, augmented feedback, input device and practice on tracking performance and perceived workload. Ergonomics, 39, 1146–1162.
14.
HancockP. A. (2009). Mind, machine, and morality. Chichester, England: Ashgate.
15.
HancockP. A.LeschM. F.SimmonsL. (2003). The distraction effects of phone use during a crucial driving maneuver. Accident Analysis & Prevention, 35, 501–514.
16.
HancockP. A.MoulouaM.SendersJ. W. (2008). On the philosophical foundations of driving distraction and the distracted driver. In ReganM. A.LeeJ. D.YoungK. L. (Eds.), Driver distraction: Theory, effects, and mitigation (pp. 11–31). Boca Raton, FL: CRC Press.
17.
HorreyW. J.WickensC. D.ConsalusK. P. (2006). Modeling drivers’ visual attention allocation while interacting with in-vehicle technologies. Journal of Experimental Psychology: Applied, 12, 67–78.
18.
HueyB. M.WickensC. D. (Eds.). (1993). Workload transitions: Implications for individual and team performance. Washington, DC: National Academy Press.
19.
KantowitzB. H. (1992). Selecting measures for human factors research. Human Factors, 34, 387–398.
20.
KantowitzB. H.KnightJ. L. (1976). Testing tapping timesharing: II. Auditory secondary task. Acta Psychologica, 40, 340–362.
21.
KennedyR. S.LaneN. E.BerbaumK. S.LilienthalM. G. (1993). Simulator Sickness Questionnaire (SSQ): A new method for quantifying simulator sickness. International Journal of Aviation Psychology, 3, 203–220.
22.
KrulewitzJ. E.WarmJ. S.WohlT. H. (1975). Effects of shifts in the rate of repetitive stimulation on sustained attention. Perception & Psychophysics, 18, 245–249.
23.
LuximonA.GoonetillekeR. S. (2001). Improvement of the Subjective Workload Analysis Technique. Ergonomics, 44, 229–243.
24.
MatthewsM. L. (1986). The influence of visual workload history on visual performance. Human Factors, 28, 623–632.
25.
MichonJ. A. (Ed.). (1993). Generic intelligent driver support: A comprehensive report on GIDS. London, England: Taylor & Francis.
26.
NormanD. A.BobrowD. G. (1975). On data-limited and resource limited processes. Cognitive Psychology, 7, 44–64.
27.
ReganM. A.LeeJ. D.YoungK. L. (Eds.). (2008). Driver distraction: Theory, effects, and mitigation. Boca Raton, FL: CRC Press.
28.
ReidG. B.NygrenT. E. (1988). The Subjective Workload Assessment Technique: A scaling procedure for measuring mental workload. In HancockP. A.MeshkatiN. (Eds.), Human mental workload (pp. 185–218). Amsterdam, Netherlands: Elsevier Science.
29.
ScerboM. W.WarmJ. S.FiskA. D. (1986). Event asynchrony and signal regularity in sustained attention. Current Psychological Research & Reviews, 5, 335–343.
30.
SendersJ. W.KristoffersonA. B.LevisonW. H.DietrichC. W.WardJ. L. (1967). The attentional demand of automobile driving. Highway Research Record, 195, 15–33.
31.
SmolenskyM. W. (1990). The effect of work load history on operational errors in air traffic control simulation: The hysteresis effect. Expectancy perseverance or short-term memory overload? (Unpublished doctoral dissertation). Texas Tech University, Lubbock.
32.
StantonN. A.YoungM. S.WalkerG. H.TurnerH.RandleS. (2001). Automating the driver’s control tasks. International Journal of Cognitive Ergonomics, 5(3), 221–236.
33.
StrayerD. L.DrewsF. A.JohnstonW. A. (2003). Cell phone induced failures of visual attention during simulated driving. Journal of Experimental Psychology: Applied, 9, 23–32.
34.
SzalmaJ. L.WarmJ. S.MatthewsG. D.WilliamN.WeilerE. M.MeierA.EggemeierF. T. (2004). Effects of sensory modality and task duration on performance, workload, and stress in sustained attention. Human Factors, 46, 219–233.
35.
VerhaveT.HermanR. L. (1967). A hysteresis-effect with amount of reinforcement as the independent variable [Abstract]. Psychonomic Bulletin, 1(2), 36.
36.
VerweyW. B. (1993). Effects of extended practice in a one-finger keypressing task. Acta Psychologica, 84, 179–197.
37.
VerweyW. B. (2001). Evaluating safety effects of in-vehicle information systems. In HancockP. A.DesmondP. A. (Eds.), Stress, workload, and fatigue (pp. 409–425). Mahwah, NJ: Erlbaum.
38.
WickensC. D. (2002). Multiple resources and performance prediction. Theoretical Issues in Ergonomic Science, 3, 159–177.
39.
WienerE. L. (1977). Stimulus presentation rate in vigilance. Human Factors, 19, 301–303.
40.
WienerN. (1954). The human use of human beings. New York, NY: Da Capo Press.
41.
WierwilleW. W.EggemeierF. T. (1993). Recommendation for mental workload measurement in a test and evaluation environment. Human Factors, 35, 263–281.
42.
YehY.WickensC. D. (1988). Dissociation of performance and subjective measures of workload. Human Factors, 30, 111–120.
