Objective: The objective of the present study was to examine the effect of working memory load on drivers’ responses to a suddenly braking lead vehicle and whether this effect (if any) is moderated by repeated scenario exposure.
Background: Several experimental studies have found delayed braking responses to lead vehicle braking events during concurrent performance of nonvisual, working memory—loading tasks, such as hands-free phone conversation. However, the common use of repeated, and hence somewhat expected, braking events may undermine the generalizability of these results to naturalistic, unexpected, emergency braking scenarios.
Method: A critical lead vehicle braking scenario was implemented in a fixed-based simulator. The effects of working memory load and repeated scenario exposure on braking performance were examined.
Results: Brake response time was decomposed into accelerator pedal release time and accelerator-to-brake pedal movement time. Accelerator pedal release times were strongly reduced with repeated scenario exposure and were delayed by working memory load with a small but significant amount (178 ms). The two factors did not interact. There were no effects on accelerator-to-brake pedal movement time.
Conclusion:The results suggest that effects of working memory load on response performance obtained from repeated critical lead vehicle braking scenarios may be validly generalized to real world unexpected events.
Application: The results have important implications for the interpretation of braking performance in experimental settings, in particular in the context of safety-related evaluation of in-vehicle information and communication technologies.
Alm, H., & Nilsson, L. ( 1995). The effects of a mobile telephone task on driver behaviour in a car following situation. Accident Analysis & Prevention , 27, 707-715.
2.
Baumann, M. R. K, Petzoldt, T., Hogema, J., & Krems, J.F. ( 2008). The effect of cognitive tasks on predicting events in traffic. In C. Brusque (Ed.), Proceedings of the European Conference on Human Centred Design for Intelligent Transport Systems (pp. 3-11). Lyon, France: HUMANIST.
3.
Brookhuis, K.A., de Vries, G., & de Ward, D. ( 1991). The effects of mobile telephoning on driving performance . Accident Analysis & Prevention, 23, 309-316.
4.
Chun, M.M., & Jiang, Y. ( 1999). Top-down attentional guidance based on implicit learning of visual covariation. Psychological Science, 10, 360-365.
5.
Corbetta, M., & Shulman, G.L. ( 2002). Control of goal-directed and stimulus-driven attention in the brain. Nature Neuroscience Reviews, 3, 201-215.
6.
DeLucia, P.R., & Tharanathan, A. (2009). Responses to deceleration during car following: Roles of optic flow, warnings, expectations, and interruptions . Journal of Experimental Psychology: Applied, 15, 334-350.
7.
Dingus, T.A., Klauer, S.G., Neale, V.L., Petersen, A., Lee , S.E., Sudweeks, J., Perez, M.A., Hankey, J., Ramsey, D., Gupta, S., Bucher, C., Doerzaph, Z.R., Jermeland, J., & Knipling, R.R. (2006). The 100-Car Naturalistic Driving Study Phase II: Results of the 100-car field experiment (Report No. DOT HS 810 593). Washington, DC : National Highway Traffic Safety Administration.
8.
Engström, J. (2010). Scenario criticality determines the effects of working memory load on brake response time. In J. Krems, T. Petzoldt, & M. Henning (Eds.), Proceedings of the European Conference on Human Centred Design for Intelligent Transport Systems (pp. 25-36). Lyon , France: HUMANIST.
9.
Engström, J., Åberg, N., Johansson, E., & Hammarbäck, J. (2005). Comparison between visual and tactile signal detection tasks applied to the safety assessment of in-vehicle information systems (IVIS). In T. Lopes (Ed.), Proceedings of the Third International Driving Symposium on Human Factors in Driver Assessment, Training and Vehicle Design (pp. 232-239). Iowa City: University of Iowa, Public Policy Center .
10.
Engström, J., Markkula, G., & Victor, T. ( 2009). Attention selection and task interference in driving: An action-oriented view. In M. Regan and T. Victor (Eds.), Proceedings of the First International Conference on Driver Distraction and Inattention . Available from http://www.chalmers.se/safer/driverdistraction-en/programme/documentation
11.
Green, M. ( 2000). "How long does it take to stop?" Methodological analysis of driver perception-brake times. Transportation Human Factors , 2, 195-216.
12.
Jonides, J. ( 1981). Voluntary versus automatic control over the mind’s eye’s movement. In J. B. Long & A. D. Baddeley (Eds.), Attention and performance IX (pp. 187-203). Hillsdale, NJ: Erlbaum .
13.
Keele, S.W. ( 1967). Compatibility and time sharing in serial reaction time . Journal of Experimental Psychology, 75, 529-539.
14.
Lee, J.D., Caven, B., Haake, S., & Brown, T.L. ( 2001) Speech-based interaction with in-vehicle computers: The effect of speech-based e-mail on drivers’ attention to the roadway. Human Factors, 43, 631-640.
15.
Lee, J.D., McGehee, D.V., Brown, T., & Reyes, M.L. ( 2002). Collision warning, driver distraction, and driver response to rear-end collisions in a high-fidelity driving simulator. Human Factors, 44, 314-334.
16.
Mattes, S., Föhl, U., & Schindhelm, R. (2007). AIDE Deliverable 2.2.7: Empirical comparison of methods for off-line workload measurement (Project No. IST-1-507674-IP). Brussels, Belgium: European Commission.
17.
Merat, N., & Jamson, A.H. ( 2008). The effect of stimulus modality on signal detection: Implications for assessing the safety of in-vehicle technology. Human Factors, 50, 145-158.
18.
Muttart, J.W., Fisher, D.L., Knodler, M., & Pollatsek, A. ( 2007). Driving without a clue: Evaluation of driver simulator performance during hands-free cell phone operation in a work zone. Transportation Research Record: Journal of the Transportation Research Board , 2018, 9-14.
19.
Norman, D., & Shallice, T. ( 1986). Attention to action: Willed and automatic control of behavior. In R. Davidson, G. Schwartz, & D. Shapiro (Eds.), Consciousness and self regulation (Vol. 4, pp.1-18). New York, NY: Plenum .
20.
Olson, R.L., Hanowski, R.J., Hickman, J.S., & Bocanegra, J. ( 2009). Driver distraction in commercial vehicle operations (Report No. FMCSA-RRR-09-042). Washington, DC: Department of Transportation, Federal Motor Carrier Safety Administration .
21.
Posner, M.I. ( 1980). Orienting of attention. Quarterly Journal of Experimental Psychology, 32, 3-25.
22.
Salvucci, D.D., & Beltowska, J. ( 2008). Effects of memory rehearsal on driver performance: Experiment and theoretical account. Human Factors, 50, 834-844.
23.
Schiff, W., Caviness, J.A., & Gibson, J.J. ( 1962). Persistent fear responses in rhesus monkeys to the optical stimulus of "looming." Science, 136, 982-963.
24.
Strayer, D.L., & Drews, F.A. ( 2004). Profiles in driver distraction: Effects of cell phone conversations on younger and older drivers. Human Factors , 46, 640-649.
25.
Strayer, D.L., & Drews, F.A., & Johnston, W.A. (2003). Cell phone induced failures of visual attention during simulated driving. Journal of Experimental Psychology: Applied, 9, 23-52.
