Objective: Our aim was to review empirical studies of complacency and bias in human interaction with automated and decision support systems and provide an integrated theoretical model for their explanation.
Background: Automation-related complacency and automation bias have typically been considered separately and independently.
Methods: Studies on complacency and automation bias were analyzed with respect to the cognitive processes involved.
Results: Automation complacency occurs under conditions of multiple-task load, when manual tasks compete with the automated task for the operator’s attention. Automation complacency is found in both naive and expert participants and cannot be overcome with simple practice. Automation bias results in making both omission and commission errors when decision aids are imperfect.Automation bias occurs in both naive and expert participants, cannot be prevented by training or instructions, and can affect decision making in individuals as well as in teams.While automation bias has been conceived of as a special case of decision bias, our analysis suggests that it also depends on attentional processes similar to those involved in automation-related complacency.
Conclusion: Complacency and automation bias represent different manifestations of overlapping automation-induced phenomena, with attention playing a central role. An integrated model of complacency and automation bias shows that they result from the dynamic interaction of personal, situational, and automation-related characteristics.
Application: The integrated model and attentional synthesis provides a heuristic framework for further research on complacency and automation bias and design options for mitigating such effects in automated and decision support systems.
Alberdi, E., Povyakalo, A.A., Strigini, L., & Ayton, P. ( 2004). Effects of incorrect computer-aided detection (CAD) output on human decision-making in mammography. Academic Radiology , 11, 909-918.
2.
Alberdi, E., Povyakalo, A.A., Strigini, L., Ayton, P., & Given-Wilson, R. (2008). CAD in mammography: Lesion-level versus case-level analysis of the effects of prompts on human decisions. International Journal of Computer-Assisted Radiology and Surgery, 3, 115-122.
3.
Bagheri, N., & Jamieson, G.A. (2004). Considering subjective trust and monitoring behavior in assessing automation-induced ‘‘complacency ." In D. A. Vicenzi, M. Mouloua, & O. A. Hancock (Eds.), Human performance, situation awareness, and automation: Current research and trends (pp. 54-59). Mahwah, NJ: Erlbaum.
4.
Bahner, J.E., Elepfandt, M., & Manzey, D. ( 2008). Misuse of diagnostic aids in process control: The effects of automation misses on complacency and automation bias. In Proceedings of the 52nd Meeting of the Human Factors and Ergonomics Society (pp. 1330-1334). Santa Monica, CA: Human Factors and Ergonomics Society.
5.
Bahner, E., Huper, A.-D., & Manzey, D. ( 2008). Misuse of automated decision aids: Complacency, automation bias and the impact of training experience. International Journal of Human-Computer Studies, 66, 688-699.
6.
Bailey, N., & Scerbo, M.S. ( 2007). Automation-induced complacency for monitoring highly reliable systems: The role of task complexity, system experience, and operator trust. Theoretical Issues in Ergonomics Science, 8, 321-348.
7.
Bainbridge, L. ( 1983). Ironies of automation. Automatica, 19, 775-779.
8.
Billings, C.E., Lauber, J.K., Funkhouser, H., Lyman, G., & Huff, E.M. ( 1976). Aviation Safety Reporting System (Technical Report TM-X-3445) . Moffett Field, CA: National Aeronautics and Space Administration Ames Research Center.
9.
Casey, S.M. ( 1998). Set phasers on stun: And other true tales of design, technology, and human error. Santa Barbara, CA: Aegean.
10.
Corbetta, M. ( 1998). Frontoparietal cortical networks for directing attention and the eye to visual locations: Identical, independent, or overlapping neural systems?Proceedings of the National Academy of Sciences (USA), 95, 831-838.
11.
Craig, A. ( 1984). Human engineering: The control of vigilance. In J. S. Warm (Ed.), Sustained attention in human performance (pp. 247-291). New York, NY: Wiley.
12.
Crocoll, W.M., & Coury, B.G. (1990). Status or recommendation: selecting the type of information for decision aiding . In Proceedings of the Human Factors Society 34th Annual Meeting (pp. 1525-1528). Santa Monica, CA: Human Factors and Ergonomics Society.
13.
Cummings, M.L. (2003). Designing decision support systems for revolutionary command and control domains (PhD dissertation). University of Virginia, Charlottesville.
14.
Cummings, M.L. (2004, September). Automation bias in intelligent time critical decision support systems. Paper presented to the American Institute for Aeronautics and Astronautics First Intelligent Systems Technical Conference , Reston, VA. Retrieved from http://citeseerx.ist.psu.edu/viewdoc/summary?doi=10.1.1.91.2634
15.
Davies, D.R., & Parasuraman, R. (1982). The psychology of vigilance. London, England: Academic Press.
16.
Degani, A. (2001). Taming Hal: Designing interfaces beyond 2001. New York, NY: Macmillan.
17.
Dekker, S.W.A., & Hollnagel, E. ( 2004). Human factors and folk models. Cognition, Technology, and Work, 6, 79-86.
18.
Dekker, S.W.A., & Woods, D.D. ( 2002). MABA-MABA or abracadabra? Progress on human automation coordination. Cognition, Technology, and Work, 4, 240-244.
19.
de Visser, E., & Parasuraman, R. (2007). Effects of imperfect automation and task load on human supervision of multiple uninhabited vehicles. In Proceedings of the 51st Annual Meeting of the Human Factors and Ergonomics Society (pp. 1081-1085). Santa Monica, CA: Human Factors and Ergonomics Society.
20.
De Waard, D., van der Hulst, M., Hoedemaeker, M., & Brookhuis, K.A. (1999). Driver behavior in an emergency situation in the automated highway system. Transportation Human Factors, 1, 67-82.
21.
Domeinski, J., Wagner, R., Schoebel, M., & Manzey, D. ( 2007). Human redundancy in automation monitoring: Effects of social loafing and social compensation. In Proceedings of the Human Factors and Ergonomics Society 51st Annual Meeting (pp. 587-591). Santa Monica, CA: Human Factors and Ergonomics Society .
22.
Duley, J.A., Westerman, S., Molloy, R., & Parasuraman, R. (1997). Effects of display superimposition on monitoring of automation. In Proceedings of the 9th International Symposium on Aviation Psychology (pp. 322-326). Columbus, OH: Association of Aviation Psychology.
23.
Dzindolet, M.T., Beck, H.P., Pierce, L.G., & Dawe, L.A. ( 2001). A framework of automation use (Report No. ARL-TR-2412) . Aberdeen Proving Ground, MD: Army Research Laboratory.
24.
Dzindolet, M.T., Pierce, L.G., Beck, H.P., & Dawe, L.A. ( 2002). The perceived utility of human and automated aids in a visual detection task. Human Factors, 44, 79-94.
25.
Frey, D., & Schulz-Hardt, S. (1997). Eine Theorie der gelernten Sorglosigkeit [A theory of learned carelessness]. In H. Mandl (Ed.), Bericht über den 40. Kongress der Deutschen Gesellschaft für Psychologie (pp. 604-611). Goettingen , Germany: Hogrefe.
26.
Funk, K., Lyall, B., Wilson, J., Vint, R., Niemczyk, M., Suroteguh, C., & Owen, G. ( 1999). Flight deck automation issues. International Journal of Aviation Psychology, 9, 109-123.
27.
Galster, S., Duley, J.A., Masalonis, A., & Parasuraman, R. (2001). Air traffic controller performance and workload under mature Free Flight: Conflict detection and resolution of aircraft self-separation. International Journal of Aviation Psychology, 11, 71-93.
28.
Galster, S., & Parasuraman, R. (2001). Evaluation of countermeasures for performance decrements due to automated-related complacency in IFR-rated general aviation pilots. In Proceedings of the International Symposium on Aviation Psychology (pp. 245-249). Columbus, OH : Association of Aviation Psychology.
29.
Gigerenzer, G., & Todd, P.A. ( 1999). Simple heuristics that make us smart. London, England: Oxford University Press.
30.
Gopher, D. ( 1996). Attention control: Explorations of the work of an executive controller. Cognitive Brain Research, 5, 23-38.
31.
Gopher, D., Weil, M., & Siegel, D. ( 1989). Practice under varying priorities: An approach to the training of complex skills. Acta Psychologica, 71, 147-177.
32.
Hardy, D., Mouloua, M., Dwivedi, C., & Parasuraman, R. (1995). Monitoring of automation failures by young and older adults. In Proceedings of the International Symposium on Aviation Psychology (pp. 1382-1386). Columbus, OH: Association of Aviation Psychology.
33.
Hoffman, J.E., & Subramaniam, B. (1995). The role of visual attention in saccadic eye movements. Perception and Psychophysics, 57, 787-795.
34.
Hurst, K., & Hurst, L. ( 1982). Pilot error: The human factors. New York, NY: Aronson.
35.
Kahnemann, D., Slovic, P., & Tversky, A. ( 1982). Judgement under uncertainty: Heuristics and biases. New York, NY: Cambridge University Press.
36.
Karau, S.J., & Williams, K.D. (1993). Social-loafing: A meta-analytic review and theoretical integration. Journal of Personality and Social Psychology, 65, 681-706.
Layton, C., Smith, P.J., & McCoy, C.E. (1994). Design of cooperative problem-solving system for en-route flight planning: an empirical evaluation. Human Factors, 36, 94-119.
41.
Lee, J.D., & Moray, N. ( 1992). Trust, control strategies and allocation of function in human-machine systems. Ergonomics, 35, 1243-1270.
42.
Lee, J.D., & Moray, N. ( 1994). Trust, self-confidence, and operators’ adaptation to automation. International Journal of Human-Computer Studies , 40, 153-184.
43.
Lee, J.D., & See, J. ( 2004). Trust in automation and technology: Designing for appropriate reliance. Human Factors, 46, 50-80.
44.
Lee, J.D., & Seppelt, B.D. ( 2009). Human factors in automation design. In S. Nof (Ed.), Springer handbook of automation (pp. 417-436). New York, NY: Springer.
45.
Locke, E.A., & Latham, G.P. ( 1990). A theory of goal setting and task performance. Englewood Cliffs, NJ: Prentice Hall.
46.
Lorenz, B., Di Nocera, F., Rottger, S., & Parasuraman, R. (2002). Automated fault-management in a simulated spaceflight micro-world. Aviation, Space, and Environmental Medicine, 73, 886-897.
47.
Luedtke, A., & Moebus, C. ( 2005). A case study for using a cognitive model of learned carelessness in cognitive engineering. In G. Salvendy (Ed.), Proceedings of the 11th International Conference of Human-Computer Interaction . Mahwah, NJ: Erlbaum. Retrieved from http://www.lks.uni-oldenburg.de/download/abteilung/Luedtke_Moebus_crv.pdf
48.
Mack, A., & Rock, I. ( 1998). Inattentional blindness. Cambridge, MA: MIT Press.
49.
Madhavan, P., Wiegmann, D.A., & Lacson, F.C. ( 2006). Automation failures on tasks easily performed by operators undermine trust in automated aids. Human Factors, 48, 241-256.
50.
Manzey, D., & Bahner, J.E. (2005). Vertrauen in Automation als Aspekt der Verlaesslichkeit von Mensch-Maschine-Systemen [Trust in automation as an aspect of dependability of human-machine-systems] . In K. Karrer, B. Gauss, & C. Steffens (Eds.), Mensch-Maschine-Systemtechnik aus Forschung und Praxis (pp. 93-109). Duesseldorf , Germany: Symposion.
51.
Manzey, D., Bleil, M., Bahner-Heyne, J.E., Klostermann, A., Onnasch, L., Reichenbach, J., & Röttger, S. ( 2008). AutoCAMS 2.0 manual. Berlin, Germany: Berlin Institute of Technology, Chair of Work, Engineering and Organisational Psychology. Retrieved from http://www.aio.tu-berlin.de/?id=30492
52.
Manzey, D., Reichenbach, J., & Onnasch, L. ( 2008). Performance-consequences of automated aids in supervisory control: The impact of function allocation. In Proceedings of the 52nd Meeting of the Human Factors and Ergonomics Society (pp. 297-301). Santa Monica, CA: Human Factors and Ergonomics Society .
53.
Manzey, D., Reichenbach, J., & Onnasch, L. ( 2009). Human performance consequences of automated decision aids in states of fatigue. In Proceedings of the 53rd Meeting of the Human Factors and Ergonomics Society (pp. 329-333). Santa Monica, CA: Human Factors and Ergonomics Society .
54.
May, P., Molloy, R., & Parasuraman, R. (1983, October). Effects of automation reliability and failure rate on monitoring performance in a multi-task environment . Paper presented at the annual meeting of the Human Factors Society, Santa Monica, CA.
55.
McGuirl, J.M., & Sarter, N.B. ( 2006). Supporting trust calibration and the effective use of decision aids by presenting dynamic system confidence information. Human Factors, 48, 656-665.
56.
McKibbon, K.A., & Fridsma, D.B. ( 2006). Effectiveness of clinical-selected electronic information resources for answering primary care physician’s information needs. Journal of the American Medical Informatics Association, 13, 653-659.
57.
Merlo, J.L., Wickens, C., & Yeh, M. ( 2000). Effect of reliability on cue effectiveness and display signaling. In Proceedings of the 4th Annual Army Federated Laboratory Symposium (pp. 27-31). College Park, MD : Army Research Laboratory.
58.
Merritt, S.M., & Ilgen, D.R. ( 2008). Not all trust is created equal: Dispositional and history-based trust in human-automation interactions. Human Factors, 50, 194-210.
59.
Metzger, U., Duley, J., Abbas, R., & Parasuraman, R. (2000). Effects of variable-priority training on automation-related complacency: Performance and eye movements . In Proceedings of the IEA 2000/HFES 2000 Congress (pp. 2-346-2-349). Santa Monica, CA: Human Factors and Ergonomics Society.
60.
Metzger, U., & Parasuraman, R. (2001). The role of the air traffic controller in future air traffic management: An empirical study of active control versus passive monitoring. Human Factors, 43, 519-528.
61.
Metzger, U., & Parasuraman, R. (2005). Automation in future air traffic management: Effects of decision aid reliability on controller performance and mental workload. Human Factors, 47, 35-49.
62.
Molloy, R., & Parasuraman, R. (1996). Monitoring an automated system for a single failure: Vigilance and task complexity effects. Human Factors, 38, 311-322.
63.
Moray, N. ( 1984). Attention to dynamic visual displays in man-machine systems . In R. Parasuraman & D. R. Davies (Eds.), Varieties of attention (pp. 485-513). San Diego, CA: Academic Press.
64.
Moray, N. ( 2003). Monitoring, complacency, scepticism and eutactic behaviour . International Journal of Industrial Ergonomics, 31, 175-178.
65.
Moray, N., & Inagaki, T. ( 2000). Attention and complacency. Theoretical Issues in Ergonomics Science, 1, 354-365.
66.
Mosier, K.L. ( 2002). Automation and cognition: Maintaining coherence in the electronic cockpit. In E. Salas (Ed.), Advances in human performance and cognitive engineering research (Vol. 2, pp. 93-121). Amsterdam, Netherlands: Elsevier Science.
67.
Mosier, K.L., Palmer, E.A., & Degani, A. ( 1992). Electronic checklists: Implications for decision making . In Proceedings of the Human Factors Society 36th Annual Meeting (pp. 7-11). Santa Monica, CA: Human Factors and Ergonomics Society.
68.
Mosier, K.L., & Skitka, L.J. ( 1996). Human decision makers and automated decision aids: Made for each other? In R. Parasuraman & M. Mouloua (Eds.), Automation and human performance: Theory and application (pp. 201-220). Mahwah, NJ: Erlbaum.
69.
Mosier, K.L., Skitka, L.J., Dunbar, M., & McDonnell, L. ( 2001). Aircrews and automation bias: The advantages of teamwork ? International Journal of Aviation Psychology, 11, 1-14.
70.
Mosier, K.L., Skitka, L.J., Heers, S., & Burdick, M. ( 1998). Automation bias: Decision-making and performance in high-tech cockpits. International Journal of Aviation Psychology, 8, 47-63.
71.
National Transportation Safety Board. (1997 ). Grounding of the Panamanian passenger ship Royal Majesty on Rose and Crown shoal near Nantucket, Massachusetts, June 10, 1995 (Report NTSB/MAR-97-01). Washington, DC: Author.
72.
Parasuraman, R. ( 2000). Designing automation for human use: Empirical studies and quantitative models. Ergonomics, 43, 931-951.
73.
Parasuraman, R., Cosenzo, K., & de Visser, E. ( 2009). Adaptive automation for human supervision of multiple uninhabited vehicles: Effects on change detection, situation awareness, and mental workload. Military Psychology, 21, 270-297.
74.
Parasuraman, R., Molloy, R., & Singh, I.L. ( 1993). Performance consequences of automation-induced "complacency."International Journal of Aviation Psychology, 3, 1-23.
75.
Parasuraman, R., Mouloua, M., & Molloy, R. ( 1996). Effects of adaptive task allocation on monitoring of automated systems. Human Factors, 38, 665-679.
76.
Parasuraman, R., & Riley, V. ( 1997). Humans and automation: Use, misuse, disuse, abuse. Human Factors, 39, 230-253.
77.
Parasuraman, R., Sheridan, T.B., & Wickens, C.D. ( 2000). A model for types and levels of human interaction with automation. IEEE Transactions on Systems, Man, and Cybernetics, Part A: Systems and Humans, 30, 286-297.
78.
Parasuraman, R., Sheridan, T.B., & Wickens, C.D. ( 2008). Situation awareness, mental workload, and trust in automation: Viable, empirically supported cognitive engineering constructs. Journal of Cognitive Engineering and Decision Making, 2, 141-161.
79.
Parasuraman, R., & Wickens, C.D. ( 2008). Humans: Still vital after all these years of automation . Human Factors, 50, 511-520.
80.
Parasuraman, S., Singh, I.L., Molloy, R., & Parasuraman, R. (1992). Automation-related complacency: A source of vulnerability in contemporary organizations. In R. Aiken (Ed.), Education and society: Information processing 92 (Vol. 2, pp. 426-432). Amsterdam, Netherlands: Elsevier Science.
81.
Prinzel, L.J. ( 2002). The relationship of self-efficacy and complacency in pilot-automation interaction (Technical Memorandum No. TM-2002-211925). Hampton, VA: National Aeronautics and Space Administration Langley Research Center.
82.
Prinzel, L.J., De Vries, H., Freeman, F.G., & Mikulka, P. ( 2001). Examination of automation-induced complacency and individual difference variates (Technical Memorandum No. TM-2001-211413). Hampton, VA: National Aeronautics and Space Administration Langley Research Center.
83.
Rasmussen, J. (1986). Information processing and human-computer interaction. Amsterdam, Netherlands: North Holland.
84.
Reichenbach, J., Onnasch, L., & Manzey, D. (in press). Misuse of automation: The impact of system experience on complacency and automation bias in interaction with automated aids. In Proceedings of the 54th Meeting of the Human Factors and Ergonomics Society. Santa Monica, CA: Human Factors and Ergonomics Society .
85.
Rovira, E., McGarry, K., & Parasuraman, R. (2007). Effects of imperfect automation on decision making in a simulated command and control task. Human Factors, 49, 76-87.
86.
Sarter, N.B., & Schroeder, B. ( 2001). Supporting decision making and action selection under time pressure and uncertainty: The case of in-flight icing. Human Factors, 43, 573-583.
87.
Senders, J.W. ( 1964). The human operator as a monitor and controllers of multidegree of freedom systems. IEEE Transactions on Human Factors in Electronics, HFE-5, 1-6.
88.
Shepherd, M., Findlay, J.M., & Hockey, R.J. ( 1986). The relationship between eye movements and spatial attention . Quarterly Journal of Experimental Psychology A, 38, 475-491.
89.
Sheridan, T.B. ( 1970). On how often the supervisor should sample. IEEE Transactions on Systems Science and Cybernetics, SSC-6(2), 140-145.
90.
Sheridan, T.B. ( 2002). Humans and automation: Systems design and research issues . Santa Monica, CA: Human Factors and Ergonomics Society.
91.
Sheridan, T.B., & Verplank, W.L. (1978). Human and computer control of undersea teleoperators (Technical Report, Man-Machine Systems Laboratory, Department of Mechanical Engineering). Cambridge, MA: MIT.
92.
Simons, D.J., & Rensink, R.A. ( 2005). Change blindness: Past, present, and future. Trends in Cognitive Sciences, 9, 16-20.
93.
Singh, I.L., Molloy, R., Mouloua, M., Deaton, J., & Parasuraman, R. (1998). Cognitive ergonomics of cockpit automation. In I. L. Singh & R. Parasuraman (Eds.), Human cognition: A multidisciplinary perspective (pp. 242-253). New Delhi, India: Sage.
94.
Singh, I.L., Molloy, R., & Parasuraman, R. (1993a). Automation-induced "complacency": Development of the complacency-potential rating scale. International Journal of Aviation Psychology, 3, 111-121.
95.
Singh, I.L., Molloy, R., & Parasuraman, R. (1993b). Individual differences in monitoring failures of automation. Journal of General Psychology , 120, 357-373.
96.
Singh, I.L., Molloy, R., & Parasuraman, R. (1997). Automation-related monitoring inefficiency: The role of display location. International Journal of Human-Computer Studies, 46, 17-30.
97.
Singh, I.L., Sharma, H.O., & Parasuraman, R. (2001). Effects of manual training and automation reliability on automation induced complacency in a flight simulation task. Psychological Studies, 46, 21-27.
98.
Skitka, L.J., Mosier, K.L., & Burdick, M. ( 1999). Does automation bias decision-making? International Journal of Human-Computer Studies, 51, 991-1006.
99.
Skitka, L.J., Mosier, K.L., & Burdick, M. ( 2000). Accountability and automation bias. International Journal of Human-Computer Studies, 52, 701-717.
100.
Skitka, L.J., Mosier, K.L., Burdick, M., & Rosenblatt, B. (2000). Automation bias and errors: Are crews better than individuals? International Journal of Aviation Psychology, 10, 85-97.
101.
St John, . M., Smallman, H.S., Manes, D.I., Feher, B.A., & Morrison, J.G. (2005). Heuristic automation for decluttering tactical displays. Human Factors, 47, 509-525.
102.
Szalma, J. ( 2009). Incorporating human variation into human factors/ ergonomics research and practice [Special issue]. Theoretical Issues in Ergonomics, 10, 377-488.
103.
Taylor, P.M., Champness, J., Given-Wilson, R.M., Potts, H.W.E., & Johnston, K. ( 2004). An evaluation of the impact of computer-based prompts on screen readers’ interpretation of mammograms. British Journal of Radiology, 77, 21-27.
104.
Thackray, R.I. ( 1981). The stress of boredom and monotony: A consideration of the evidence. Psychosomatic Medicine, 43, 165-176.
105.
Thackray, R.I., & Touchstone, R.M. (1989). Detection efficiency on an air traffic control monitoring task with and without computer aiding. Aviation, Space, and Environmental Medicine, 60, 744-748.
106.
Thomas, L., & Wickens, C.D. ( 2006). Effects of battlefield display frames of reference on navigation tasks, spatial judgments, and change detection. Ergonomics, 49, 1154-1173.
107.
Tsai, T.L., Fridsma, D.B., & Gatti, G. ( 2003). Computer decision support as a source of interpretation error: the case of electrocardiograms. Journal of the American Medical Informatics Association, 10, 478-483.
108.
Tversky, A., & Kahneman, D. ( 1974). Judgement under uncertainty: Heuristics and biases. Science, 185, 1124-1131.
109.
Vincenzi, D.A., Muldoon, R., Mouloua, M., Parasuraman, R., & Molloy, R. ( 1996). Effects of aging and workload on monitoring of automation failures. In Proceedings of the 40th Annual Meeting of the Human Factors and Ergonomics Society (pp. 1556-1561). Santa Monica, CA: Human Factors and Ergonomics Society .
110.
Westbrook, J.I., Coiera, W.E., & Gosling, A.S. ( 2005). Do online information retrieval systems help experienced clinicians answer clinical questions? Journal of the American Medical Informatics Association, 12, 315-321.
111.
Wickens, C.D., & Dixon, S. ( 2007). The benefits of imperfect diagnostic automation: A synthesis of the literature. Theoretical Issues in Ergonomics Science , 8, 201-212.
112.
Wickens, C.D., Dixon, S., Goh, J., & Hammer, B. ( 2005). Pilot dependence on imperfect diagnostic automation in simulated UAV flights: An attentional visual scanning analysis. In Proceedings of the 13th International Symposium on Aviation Psychology (pp. 919-923). Columbus, OH: Association of Aviation Psychology.
113.
Wickens, C.D., Gempler, K., & Morphew, M.E. ( 2000). Workload and reliability of traffic displays in aircraft traffic avoidance. Transportation Human Factors Journal, 2, 99-126.
114.
Wickens, C.D., & Hollands, J.G. (2000). Engineering psychology and human performance. New York, NY: Prentice Hall.
115.
Wickens, C.D., McCarley, J.S., Alexander, A., Thomas, L., Ambinder, M., & Zheng, S. ( 2007). Attention-situation awareness (A-SA) model of pilot error . In D. Foyle & B. Hoeey (Eds.), Pilot performance models (pp. 213-240). Mahwah, NJ: Erlbaum.
116.
Wiegmann, D.A. ( 2002). Agreeing with automated diagnostic aids: A study of users’ concurrence strategies. Human Factors, 44, 44-50.
117.
Wiener, E.L. ( 1981). Complacency: Is the term useful for air safety? In Proceedings of the 26th Corporate Aviation Safety Seminar (pp. 116-125). Denver, CO: Flight Safety Foundation
Woods, D.D. ( 1996). Decomposing automation: Apparent simplicity, real complexity . In R. Parasuraman & M. Mouloua (Eds.), Automation and human performance (pp. 3-18). Mahwah, NJ: Erlbaum.
