Socializing the Human Factors Analysis and Classification System: Incorporating Social Psychological Phenomena Into a Human Factors Error Classification System
Restricted accessResearch articleFirst published online August, 2009
Socializing the Human Factors Analysis and Classification System: Incorporating Social Psychological Phenomena Into a Human Factors Error Classification System
Objective: The presence of social psychological pressures on pilot decision making was assessed using qualitative analyses of critical incident interviews. Background: Social psychological phenomena have long been known to influence attitudes and behavior but have not been highlighted in accident investigation models. Method: Using a critical incident method, 28 pilots who flew in Alaska were interviewed. The participants were asked to describe a situation involving weather when they were pilot in command and found their skills challenged. They were asked to describe the incident in detail but were not explicitly asked to identify social pressures. Pressures were extracted from transcripts in a bottom-up manner and then clustered into themes. Results: Of the 28 pilots, 16 described social psychological pressures on their decision making, specifically, informational social influence, the foot-in-the-door persuasion technique, normalization of deviance, and impression management and self-consistency motives. Conclusion: We believe accident and incident investigations can benefit from explicit inclusion of common social psychological pressures. Application: We recommend specific ways of incorporating these pressures into the Human Factors Analysis and Classification System.
Get full access to this article
View all access options for this article.
References
1.
Aronson, E., Cohen, G., & Nail, P.R. (1999). Self-affirmation theory: An update and appraisal. In E. Harmon-Jones & J. S. Mills (Eds.), Cognitive dissonance: Progress on a pivotal theory in social psychology (pp. 127-147). Washington, DC: American Psychological Association .
2.
Asch, S.E. (1951). Effects of group pressure upon the modification and distortion of judgments . In H. Guetzkow (Ed.), Groups, leadership, and men (pp. 177-190). Pittsburgh, PA: Carnegie.
3.
Asch, S.E. ( 1956). Studies of independence and conformity: 1. A minority of one against a unanimous majority. Psychological Monographs , 70(416).
4.
Baron, R.S., Vandello, J.A., & Brunsman, B. ( 1996). The forgotten variable in conformity research: Impact of task importance on social influence. Journal of Personality and Social Psychology, 71, 915-927.
5.
Bearman, C.R., Paletz, S.B.F., & Orasanu, J. ( 2008, April). Organizational pressures and mitigating strategies in Alaska aviation. Paper presented at the 8th International Symposium of the Australian Aviation Psychology Association , Sydney, Australia.
6.
Bearman, C.R., Paletz, S.B.F., & Orasanu, J. ( 2009). Situational pressures on aviation decision making: Goal seduction and situation aversion. Aviation, Space, and Environmental Medicine, 80, 556-560.
7.
Beauregard, K.S., & Dunning, D. ( 1998). Turning up the contrast: Self-enhancement motives prompt egocentric contrast effects in social judgments. Journal of Personality and Social Psychology, 74, 606-621.
8.
Burger, J.M. ( 1999). The foot-in-the-door compliance procedure: A multiple-process analysis and review. Personality and Social Psychology Review , 3, 303-325.
9.
Cartwright, D., & Zander, A. ( 1968). Power and influence in groups: Introduction. In D. Cartwright & A. Zander (Eds.), Group dynamics: Research and theory (pp. 215-235). New York: Harper and Row.
10.
Cialdini, R.B., & Trost, M.R. ( 1998). Social influence: Social norms, conformity, and compliance . In D. T. Gilbert, S. T. Fiske, & G. Lindzey (Eds.), The handbook of social psychology (Vol. 2, pp. 151-192). Boston: McGraw-Hill.
11.
Cialdini, R. B., Trost, M. R., & Newsom, J. T. ( 1995). Preference for consistency: The development of a valid measure and the discovery of surprising behavioral implications. Journal of Personality and Social Psychology, 69, 318-328.
12.
Deutsch, M., & Gerard, H.B. ( 1955). A study of normative and informational social influences upon individual judgment. Journal of Abnormal and Social Psychology , 51, 629-636.
13.
Dubitzky, M., & Schwartz, J.L. (1969). Cognitive dissonance and changes in cigarette smoking in an organized control program. Journal of Social Psychology, 79, 219-225.
14.
Fischer, U., & Orasanu, J. ( 1999). Say it again, Sam! Effective communication strategies to mitigate pilot error. In R. S. Jensen & L. A. Rakovan (Eds.), Proceedings of the 10th International Symposium on Aviation Psychology (pp. 362-366). Columbus: Ohio State University.
Freedman, J.L., & Fraser, S.C. ( 1966). Compliance without pressure: The foot-in-the-door technique . Journal of Personality and Social Psychology, 4, 195-202.
17.
Green, R.G., Muir, H., James, M., Gradwell, D., & Green, R.L. ( 1991). Human factors for pilots. Aldershot, UK: Avebury Technical.
18.
Guadagno, R.E., Asher, T., Demaine, L.J., & Cialdini, R.B. (2001). When saying yes leads to saying no: Preference for consistency and the reverse foot-in-the-door effect . Personality and Social Psychology Bulletin, 27, 859-867.
19.
Hawkins, F.H. ( 1993). Human factors in flight (H. W. Orlady, Ed.; 2nd ed.). Brookfield, VT: Ashgate.
20.
Higgins, E.T. ( 1987). Self-discrepancy: A theory relating self and affect. Psychological Review, 94, 319-340.
21.
Hobbs, A. ( 1997). Decision making for helicopter pilots. Asia Pacific Air Safety, 15, 8-12.
22.
Holbrook, J.B., Orasanu, J., and McCoy, C.E. ( 2003). Weather-related decision making by aviators in Alaska . In R. Jensen (Ed.), Proceedings of the 12th International Symposium on Aviation Psychology (pp. 576-581). Mahwah, NJ: Lawrence Erlbaum.
23.
Hollnagel, E.,Woods, D. D., & Leveson, N. (Eds.) (2006). Resilience engineering: Concepts and precepts . Aldershot, UK: Ashgate.
24.
Hunter, D.R., Martinussen, M., & Wiggins, M. ( 2003). Understanding how pilots make weather-related decisions . International Journal of Aviation, 13, 73-87.
25.
Johnson, R.E. ( 1968). Smoking and the reduction of cognitive dissonance. Journal of Personality and Social Psychology, 9, 260-265.
26.
Klein, G.A., Calderwood, R., & MacGregor, D. ( 1989). Critical decision method for eliciting knowledge. IEEE Transactions on Systems, Man, and Cybernetics, 19, 462-472.
27.
Klein, G.A., Militello, L., & Crandall, B. ( 1999). Critical incident/ critical decision method. In D. H. Jonassen, M. Tessmer, & W. H. Hannum (Eds.), Task analysis methods for instructional design (pp. 181-192). Mahwah, NJ: Lawrence Erlbaum.
28.
Lewin, K. ( 1936). Principles of topological psychology. New York: McGraw-Hill.
29.
Lewin, K. ( 1938). The conceptual representation and the measurement of psychological forces. Durham, NC: Duke University Press.
30.
Lewin, K. ( 1997). Resolving social conflicts and field theory in social science. Washington, DC: American Psychological Association. (Originally published 1948)
31.
Li, W.-C., & Harris, D. ( 2006). Pilot error and its relationship with higher organizational levels: HFACS analysis of 523 accidents. Aviation, Space, and Environmental Medicine, 77, 1056-1061.
32.
McCoy, E., & Mickunas, A. ( 2000). The role of context and progressive commitment in plan continuation error. In Proceedings of the IEA 2000 and HFES 2000 Congress (pp. 26-29). Santa Monica, CA: Human Factors and Ergonomics Society.
33.
Orasanu, J., Fischer, U., McDonnell, L., Davison, J., Haars, K.E., Villeda, E., & VanAken, C. ( 1998). How do flight crews detect and prevent errors? Findings from a flight simulation study. In Proceedings of the Human Factors and Ergonomics Society 42nd Annual Meeting (pp. 191-195). Santa Monica, CA: Human Factors and Ergonomics Society .
34.
Orasanu, J., Martin, L., & Davison, J. ( 2002). Cognitive and contextual factors in aviation accidents: Decision errors. In E. Salas & G. Klein (Eds.), Linking expertise and naturalistic decision making (pp. 209-226). Mahwah, NJ: Lawrence Erlbaum.
35.
Pryor, J. B., & Reeder G. D. (Eds.). (1993). The social psychology of HIV infection. Hillsdale, NJ: Lawrence Erlbaum.
36.
Reason, J. (1990). Human error. Cambridge, UK: Cambridge University.
37.
Rhoda, D.A., & Pawlak, M.L. (1999). An assessment of thunderstorm penetrations and deviations by commercial aircraft in the terminal area (Project Rep. NASA/A-2). Lexington : Massachusetts Institute of Technology, Lincoln Laboratory .
38.
Rohner, R.P. ( 1984). Toward a conception of culture for cross-cultural psychology . Journal of Cross-Cultural Psychology, 15, 111-138.
39.
Shappell, S., Detwiler, C., Holcomb, K., Hackworth, C., Boquet, A., & Wiegmann, D. ( 2007). Human error and commercial aviation accidents: An analysis using the Human Factors Analysis and Classification System. Human Factors, 49, 227-242.
40.
Shappell, S.A., & Wiegmann, D.A. (2001). Applying Reason: The Human Factors Analysis and Classification System (HFACS). Human Factors and Aerospace Safety, 1, 59-86.
41.
Shappell, S.A., & Wiegmann, D.A. ( 2003). A human error analysis of general aviation controlled flight into terrain accidents occurring between 1990-1998 (Rep. No. DOT/FAA/AM-03/4) . Washington, DC: Office of Aerospace Medicine.
42.
Steele, C.M. ( 1988). The psychology of self-affirmation: Sustaining the integrity of the self. In L. Berkowitz (Ed.), Advances in experimental social psychology (Vol. 21, pp. 261-302). New York: Academic Press.
43.
Swann, W.B. ( 1983). Self-verification: Bringing social reality into harmony with the self. In J. Suls & A. G. Greenwald (Eds.), Social psychological perspectives on the self (Vol. 2, pp. 33-66). Hillsdale, NJ: Lawrence Erlbaum.
44.
Vaughan, D. ( 1996). The Challenger launch decision: Risky technology, culture, and deviance at NASA. Chicago: University of Chicago Press.
45.
Wiegmann, D.A., & Shappell, S.A. (2003). A human error approach to aviation accident analysis: The Human Factors Analysis and Classification System. Burlington, VT: Ashgate .
46.
Wiener, E. L., Kanki, B. G., & Helmreich, R. L. (Eds.) (1993). Cockpit resource management. San Diego, CA: Academic Press.
