Objective: The goal of this study was to provide a better understanding of driver behavior in fog. Background: Impaired perception of changes in headway is hypothesized to be one of the reasons for shorter following distances in foggy conditions as compared with clear weather. Method: In the experiments described here, we measured response time for discriminating between whether the vehicle ahead is getting closer or farther away. Several visibility conditions were studied, ranging from a no-fog condition to a condition in which the vehicle could be seen only by its rear fog lights. Results: Fog conditions increased response times when the outline of the vehicle was barely visible or not visible at all. The longer response times in fog were attributable to the low contrast of the vehicle outline when still visible and to the smaller spacing between the two lights when the outline could not be properly perceived. Moreover, response times were found to be shorter for shorter following distances and for faster accelerations. Conclusion: Reducing headway could be a way for drivers to achieve faster discrimination of relative motion in foggy weather. More specifically, shortening one’s following distance until visibility of the lead vehicle changes from bad to good may have a perceptual control benefit, insofar as the response time gain compensates for the reduction in headway under these conditions. Applications: Potential applications include improving traffic safety. The results provide a possible explanation for close following in fog and point out the importance of rear-light design under these conditions.
Andersen, G.J., & Sauer, C.W. ( 2007). Optical information for car following: The driving by visual angle (DVA) model. Human Factors, 49, 878-896.
2.
Anstis, S. ( 2003). Moving objects appear to slow down at low contrasts. Neural Networks, 16, 933-938.
3.
Blakemore, M.R., & Snowden, R.J. ( 1999). The effect of contrast upon perceived speed: A general phenomenon? Perception, 28, 33-48.
4.
Boer, E.R. ( 1999). A statistical model of looming detection. In A. G. Gale, I. D. Brown, C. M. Haslegrave, & S. P. Taylor (Eds.), Vision in vehicles VII (pp. 319-327). Amsterdam, Netherlands: Elsevier.
5.
Boer, E.R., Caro, S., & Cavallo, V. ( 2007). A cybernetic perspective on car following in fog. In Proceedings of the 4th International Driving Symposium on Human Factors in Driver Assessment, Training and Vehicle Design (pp. 452-458). Iowa City: University of Iowa.
6.
Broughton, K.L.M., Switzer, F., & Scott, D. ( 2007). Car following decisions under three visibility conditions and two speeds tested with a driving simulator. Accident Analysis & Prevention, 39, 106-116.
7.
Brown, I. ( 1970). Motorway crashes in fog: Who’s to blame? New Scientist, 24, 12.
8.
Buchner, A., Brandt, M., Bell, R., & Weise, J. ( 2006). Car backlight position and fog density bias observer-car distance estimates and time-to-collision judgments. Human Factors, 48, 300-317.
9.
Bulté, B. ( 1985). Brouillard: Comportement par visibilité réduite [Fog: Behavior under reduced visibility conditions] [Technical report]. Lille, France: Centre d’Etudes Techniques de l’Equipement Nord Picardie.
10.
Caro, S. ( 2008). Perception et contrôle de la distance intervéhiculaire en condition de brouillard : Etude sur simulateur [Perception and control of distance headway in fog conditions: A simulator study]. PhD thesis, Université Pierre Mendès France, Grenoble , France.
11.
Caro, S., Cavallo, V., Marendaz, C., Boer E.R., & Vienne, F. (2007). The influence of fog on motion discrimination thresholds in car following . In Proceedings of the 4th International Driving Symposium on Human Factors in Driver Assessment, Training and Vehicle Design (pp. 446-451). Iowa City: University of Iowa.
12.
Cavallo, V. (2002). Perceptual difficulties when driving in fog. In K. Wang, G. Xiao, L. Nie, & H. Yang (Eds.), Proceedings of the Third International Conference on Traffic and Transportation Studies (ICTTS) (pp. 965-972). Reston, VA: American Society of Civil Engineers.
13.
Cavallo, V., Caro, S., Doré, J., Colomb, M., & Dumont, E. (2007). Risky driving in fog: Psychological explanations. In Proceedings of the 14th International Conference Road Safety on Four Continents (pp. 1-11). Linköping, Sweden: VTI.
14.
Cavallo, V., Colomb, M., & Doré, J. (2000). La surestimation de la distance intervéhiculaire dans le brouillard [Overestimation of distance headway in fog]. Recherche Transports Sécurité , 66, 81-99.
15.
Cavallo, V., Colomb, M., & Doré, J. (2001). Distance perception of vehicle rear lights in fog. Human Factors, 43, 442-451.
16.
Debus, G., Heller, D., Wille, M., Dütschke, E., Normann, M., & Placke, L. ( 2005). Risikoanalyse von Massenunfällen bei Nebel [Risk analysis for multiple car collisions in fog] (Bast Report 82.108/1997). Bergisch-Gladbach, Germany: Bundesanstalt für Strassenwesen.
17.
Duckstein, L., Unwin, E.A., & Boyd, E.T. ( 1970). Variable perception time in car following and its effect on model stability. IEEE Transactions on Man-Machine Systems , 11, 149-156.
18.
Dumont, E., & Cavallo, V. ( 2004). Extended photometric model of fog effects on road vision . Transportation Research Record, 1862, 77-81.
19.
Edwards, M., Badcock, D.R., & Nishida, S. ( 1996). Contrast sensitivity of the motion system. Vision Research, 36, 2411-2421.
20.
Evans, L., & Rothery, R. ( 1974). Detection of the sign of relative motion when following a vehicle. Human Factors, 16, 161-173.
21.
Harvey, L.O., & Michon, J.A. ( 1974). Detectability of relative motion as a function of exposure duration, angular separation, and background. Journal of Experimental Psychology, 103, 317-325.
22.
Hawkins, R.K. ( 1988). Motorway traffic behaviour in reduced visibility conditions . In M. H. Freeman, P. Smith, A. G. Gale, S. P. Taylor, & C. M. Haslegrave (Eds.), Vision in vehicles II (pp. 9-18). AmsterdamElsevier.
23.
Hoffmann, E.R., & Mortimer, R.G. (1996). Scaling of relative velocity between vehicles. Accident Analysis & Prevention, 28(4), 415-421.
24.
Hogema, J.H., & van der Horst, A.R.A. (1994). Driving behaviour in fog: Analysis of inductive loop data (TNO Report TM 1994 C-6). Soesterberg, Netherlands: TNO Human Factors Research Institute.
25.
Janssen, W.H., Michon, J.A., & Harvey, L.O. ( 1976). The perception of lead vehicle movement in darkness. Accident Analysis & Prevention, 8, 151-166.
26.
Kang, J.J., Ni, R., & Andersen, G.J. (2008). Effects of reduced visibility from fog on car-following performance. Transportation Research Record, 2069, 9-15.
27.
Kiegeland, P. ( 1996). Fahrzeugführung im Nebel [Driving in fog]. Zeitschrift für Verkehrssicherheit, 42, 78-81.
28.
Lamble, D., Kauranen, T., Laakso, M., & Summala, H. ( 1999). Cognitive load and detection thresholds in car following situations: Safety implications for using mobile (cellular) telephones while driving. Accident Analysis & Prevention, 31, 617-623.
29.
Lee, D.N. ( 1976). A theory of visual control of braking based on information about time-to-collision. Perception, 5, 437-459.
30.
Malaterre, G., Hary, A., & Quéré, F. (1991). Analyse spectrale des mouvements de volant par temps de brouillard sur simulateur de conduite [Spectral analysis of steering wheel movements when driving a simulator in foggy conditions] . Recherche Transport Sécurité, 30, 52-56.
31.
Mars, F. ( 2006, July). Driving in curves with constrained gaze orientation in the vicinity of the tangent point. Paper presented at the International Conference on Vision in Vehicles XI, Dublin, Ireland.
32.
Mortimer, R.G. ( 1971). The value of an accelerator release signal. Human Factors, 13, 481-486.
33.
Paulmier, G. ( 2004). Fog luminance evaluation in daytime. Transportation Research Record, 1862, 82-88.
34.
Probst, T., Krafczyk, S., & Brandt, T. ( 1987). Object-motion detection affected by concurrent self-motion perception: Applied aspects for vehicle guidance. Ophthal Physiology Optics, 7, 309-314.
Reinhardt-Rutland, A.H. ( 1986). Misleading perception and vehicle guidance under poor conditions of visibility. In A. G. Gale , M. H. Freeman, C. M. Haslegrave, P. Smith, & S. P. Taylor (Eds.), Vision in vehicles I (pp. 413-416). AmsterdamElsevier.
37.
Ross, H. ( 1975). Mist, murk and visual perception. New Scientist, 66, 658-660.
38.
Santos, J.A., Berthelon, C., & Mestre, D.R. ( 2002). Perception of road users’ motion. In R. Fuller & J. A. Santos (Eds.), Human factors for highway engineers (pp. 115-130). Oxford, UK: Pergamon.
39.
Santos, J., Noriega, P., & Albuquerque, P. (1997, June/July). Perceptual cues in vehicle’s motion detection. Paper presented at the 13th Triennial Congress of the International Ergonomics Association , Tampere, Finland.
40.
Santos, J., Noriega, P., & Albuquerque, P. (1999). Vehicle’s motion detection: Influence of road layout and relation with visual driver’s assessment. In A. G. Gale, I. D. Brown, S. P. Taylor, & C. M. Haslegrave (Eds.), Vision in vehicles VII (pp. 337-355). Amsterdam, Netherlands: Elsevier.
41.
Santos, J., Noriega, P., Correia, M., Campilho, A., & Albuquerque, P. (2000). Object motion segmentation and optical flow contrast (Report: Relatórios de Investigação C.E.E.P.). Braga, Portugal: Universidade do Minho.
42.
Schönbach, P. ( 1996). Massenunfälle bei Nebel [Multiple car collisions in fog]. Zeitschrift für Sozialpsychologie, 109-125.
43.
Summala, H., Lamble, D., & Laakso, M. ( 1998). Driving experience and perception of the lead car’s braking when looking at in-car targets. Accident Analysis & Prevention, 30, 401-407.
44.
Thompson, P., Brooks, K., & Hammett, S.T. ( 2006). Speed can go up as well as down at low contrast: Implications for models of motion perception. Vision Research, 46, 782-786.
45.
van der Hulst, M., Rothengatter, T., & Meijman, T. ( 1998). Strategic adaptations to lack of preview in driving. Transportation Research, Part F: Traffic Psychology and Behaviour, 1, 59-75.
46.
White, M.E., & Jeffery, D.J. ( 1980). Some aspects of motorway traffic behaviour in fog (TRRL Laboratory Report 958). Crowthorne, UK: Transportation and Road Research Laboratory.
47.
Yonas, A., & Zimmerman, L. ( 2006). Improving the ability of drivers to avoid collision with snowplows in fog and snow (Technical Report MN/RC-2006-29). St. Paul, MN: Department of Transportation.
