Abstract
Background:
Spontaneous adverse drug reaction (ADR) reporting is a cornerstone of pharmacovigilance but remains underutilized globally and in Vietnam. Evidence on healthcare professionals’ knowledge of ADR reporting procedures and related determinants is essential to inform system-level improvements.
Objectives:
To assess ADR-reporting procedure knowledge (practice-related knowledge) among healthcare professionals (HCPs) and to identify associated factors, perceived barriers, and support needs in public hospitals.
Methods:
A multicenter cross-sectional survey was conducted among 372 HCPs (nurses/midwives, 67.6%; physicians, 22.7%; pharmacists, 9.6%) across 3 public hospitals. A structured instrument assessed 5 scored procedural items: ADR detection, appropriate receiving unit, reporting timelines, access to reporting forms, and minimum required fields. Attainment of ADR-reporting procedure knowledge was defined as ≥4 of 5 correct items (≥80%). Chi-square tests and logistic regression analyses examined associations with age, sex, tenure, profession, and prior pharmacovigilance training.
Results:
Overall, 47.8% of respondents achieved the predefined attainment threshold (hospital range 32.5%-59.9%). Correct response rates were high for identifying the appropriate receiving unit (83.3%), reporting timelines (83.1%), and access to forms (79.6%), but lower for ADR detection (46.5%) and identification of minimum required fields (54.6%). Although 82.8% of HCPs reported having encountered suspected ADRs, only 14.9% had ever submitted an ADR report. In multivariable analysis, profession remained the only independent predictor of attainment (pharmacists vs nurses/midwives: OR 2.50, 95% CI 1.10-5.69; physicians vs nurses/midwives: OR 1.92, 95% CI 1.11-3.33). Commonly reported barriers included difficulty identifying suspected drugs (80.1%), grading severity (54.3%), and form complexity (30.1%). The most frequently requested supports were peer assistance (95.4%), feedback after submission (93.3%), and targeted training (89.2%).
Conclusions:
ADR-reporting procedure knowledge among HCPs was suboptimal, with profession-related disparities and specific gaps in ADR detection and documentation of minimum required fields. These findings underscore the need for system-level approaches that support clinical recognition, role-tailored collaboration, and feedback-enabled reporting processes to strengthen hospital pharmacovigilance.
Get full access to this article
View all access options for this article.
References
Supplementary Material
Please find the following supplemental material available below.
For Open Access articles published under a Creative Commons License, all supplemental material carries the same license as the article it is associated with.
For non-Open Access articles published, all supplemental material carries a non-exclusive license, and permission requests for re-use of supplemental material or any part of supplemental material shall be sent directly to the copyright owner as specified in the copyright notice associated with the article.
