THE attention given to and the quality of information provided on the topic of immunisation by Britain's quality and popular press were compared. The hypothesis that the availability of information in these two groups of newspapers would follow the same pattern as class inequalities in the take-up of vaccination was shown to be incorrect. In fact, although the level of information and general coverage were poor, the popular press tended to display a more responsible attitude towards vaccination. Hence there was no evidence to suggest that press coverage of immunisation might be one socio-economic factor which might account for the differences in vaccination levels between the different social classes. The implications of these results are discussed with reference to proposals that progress in reducing inequalities in health could be made by encouraging health education.
Get full access to this article
View all access options for this article.
References
1.
Townsend P, Davidson N (Eds ) Inequalities in health The Black ReportHarmondsworthPelican Books, 1982
2.
McCarthy M.Epidemiology and policies for health planningLondonKing Edward's Hospital Fund for London, 1982
3.
Tichenor P.J. , Donohue G.A., Olien C.N.Mass media flow and differential growth in knowledgePublic Opinion Quarterly1970 , 34: 159-170
4.
Kristiansen C.M., Harding C.M.A comparison of the coverage of health issues by Britain's quality and popular pressEuropean Health Education Research Monographs (in press)
5.
Wade S.Schramm W.Mass media as sources of public affairs, science and health knowledgePublic Opinion Quarterly1969; 33: 197-209
6.
Wade S.Trends in public knowledge about health and illnessAmerican Journal of Public Health1970. 60: 485-491
7.
Wright W.R.Mass media as sources of medical informationJournal of Communication1975, 25: 171-173
8.
Harding C.M. , Bolden K.J.Whooping cough vaccination a worrying decision for parentsThe Practitioner1983, 227: 283-287
9.
Church M.A.Return of whooping coughBritish Medical Journal1979, i: 195
10.
McKinnon J.A.The impact of the media on whooping cough immunisationHealth Education Journal1979, 37: 198-202
11.
Kristianen C.M., Harding C.M.Mobilization of health behavior by the press inBritain Journalism Quarterly1984, 61: 364-370, 398
12.
Best G., Dennis J., Draper P.Health, the mass media and theNational Health Service London Unit for the study of health policy, Guy's Hospital, 1977
13.
Seymour-Ure C.Science and medicine and the press In O Boyd-Barrett, C Seymour-Ure and J Tunstall (Eds ) Royal Commission on the press Studies on the press, working paper no 3LondonHMSO, 1977
14.
Taylor S.E. , Thompson S.C.Stalking the elusive "vividness" effectPsychological Review1982, 89: 155-181
15.
Nisbett R., Ross L.Human inference Strategies and shortcomings of social judgmentEnglewood Cliffs, N JPrentice-Hall, 1980
16.
McQuail D.Review of sociological writing on the press Royal Commission on the press, working paper no 2LondonHMSO, 1976
17.
Joint Industry Committee for National Readership Surveys National Readership Survey 1981 London JICNARS, 1981
18.
Budd R.W.Attention score a device for measuring 'newsplay' JournalismQuarterly1964, 41: 259-262
19.
Harding CM Immunisation as depicted by the British national press Community Medicine (in press)
