RESEARCH in any specialty of nursing education is not presently noted for its product ivity. An increasing number of studies may be noted in nursing journals, but the vast majority of these research endeavours are better described as programme innovations with some evaluative criteria applied, rather than systematic research. In fact, many teaching nurses know precious little about the effectiveness of their programmes that has been garnered by careful research procedures. There are at least several reasons for this condition.
Get full access to this article
View all access options for this article.
References
1.
Barzun, J., and H.F. GraffThe Modern Researcher, New York: Harcourt, Brace, and World, Inc., 1957.
2.
The Nature and History of Experimental Control, American Journal of Psychology, LXVII (1954), 573-89.
3.
Festinger, Leon, and Daniel Katy (eds.), Research Methods in the Behavioural Sciences , New York: The Dryden Press, Inc. , 1953.
4.
Gulliksen, H.Intrinsic Validity, American Psychologist, V (1950), 511-17.
5.
Notter, L.E.Nursing Research Is Every Nurse's Business, Nursing Outlook , II (1963), 49.
6.
Price Joseph L.Consumer Research in Nursing, Laramie: University of Wyoming School of Nursing, 1971.
7.
Rabinowitz, W., and R.M.W. Travers, Problems of Defining and Assessing Teacher
8.
Effectiveness, Educational Theory, III (1953), 212-219.
9.
Soloman, R.L. An Extension ofControl Group DesignPsychological Bulletin, XLVI (1949), 137-50.
10.
Travers, R.M.W.An Introduction to Educational Research, New York: The MacMillan Company, 1965.
