Lessons learned from a gender-specific educational programme supporting young women with experience of domestic abuse

Abstract

Background:

Domestic abuse is a public health issue, and increasing evidence suggests that young women are more likely to suffer than older women, yet limited evidence exists in England about educational and intervention programmes for young women at risk.

Study’s objectives:

To evaluate a gender-specific (women-only) programme aimed at educating young women aged 13–25 years about abuse and staying safe in one English city.

Setting:

A third sector (charitable) organisation, aiming to improve women’s health in one English city delivered the programme over a 3-year period, funded by the Big Lottery Fund. Young women received both peer and one-to-one support, to educationally inform them, develop their skills and improve their capabilities in responding to abuse.

Method:

This qualitative evaluation captured the perspectives of young women accessing the programme (n = 33), exploring the positive difference that it made to their lives. We also captured the views of internal stakeholders in 2018 (n = 2), then followed up in 2020 (n = 3), and external stakeholders referring young women to the programme (n = 8).

Results:

The programme met its aims. Self-reported changes in young women’s lives included increased knowledge about staying safe and being happier. Some young women gained or retained custody of their children, and others exited harmful relationships. Young women identified a range of mechanisms of success including a non-judgemental approach from workers, peer support and a trusted space in which to meet and learn. The programme increased young women’s skills to stay safe while improving their mental wellbeing.

Conclusion:

The programme worked well for young women who accessed it. However, it could not reach all those in need, was only funded in the short-term and tended to individualise the responsibility for staying safe. Further research is needed in other community-based educational programmes to provide evidence of their effectiveness as well as transferrable models for workers in other contexts.

Keywords

Domestic abuse evaluation gender (young women)health education

Get full access to this article

View all access options for this article.

References

Abell

Myers

(2008) Analysing research interviews. In: Wodak

Krzyanowski

(eds) Qualitative Discourse Analysis in the Social Sciences. Basingstoke: Palgrave Macmillan, pp. 145–161.

Baldridge

(2020) The youthwork paradox: A case for studying the complexity of community-based youth work in education research. Educational Researcher 48(8): 618–625.

BBC News (2021) #IsThisOk: Greater Manchester sexual harassment video targets men and boys. Available at: https://www.bbc.co.uk/news/uk-england-manchester-59698000 (accessed 28 March 2022).

Crooks

Jaffe

Dunlop

, et al. (2019) Preventing gender-based violence among adolescents and young adults: Lessons from 25 years of program development and evaluation. Violence against Women 25(1): 29–55.

Cross

Warwick-Booth

(2015) Using storyboards in participatory research. Nurse Researcher 23(3): 8–12.

Cross

Warwick-Booth

(2018) Neoliberal salvation through a gendered intervention: A critical analysis of vulnerable young women’s talk. Alternative Routes 29. Available at: http://www.alternateroutes.ca/index.php/ar/article/view/22449

Davies

(2019) This is abuse? Young women’s perspectives of what’s ‘OK’ and ‘not OK’ in their intimate relationships. Journal of Family Violence 34: 479–491.

Denzin

Lincoln

(2000) Handbook of Qualitative Research. 2nd ed. London: SAGE.

de St Croix

(2018) Youth work, performativity and the new youth impact agenda: Getting paid for numbers. Journal of Educational Policy 33(3): 414–438.

10.

Ellsberg

Arango

Morton

, et al. (2015) Prevention of violence against women and girls: What does the evidence say? The Lancet 385(9977): 1555–1566.

11.

Foshee

Bauman

Arriaga

, et al. (1998) An evaluation of safe dates: An adolescent dating violence prevention program. American Journal of Public Health 88(1): 45–50.

12.

Gadd

Corr

M-L

Fox

, et al. (2014) This is abuse – or is it? Domestic abuse perpetrators’ responses to anti-domestic violence publicity. Crime Media Culture 10(1): 3–22.

13.

Gormally

Coburn

(2014) Finding nexus: Connecting youth work and research practices. British Educational Research Journal 40(5): 869–885.

14.

gov.uk (2021a) Relationships and sex education (RSE) and health education. Available at: https://www.gov.uk/government/publications/relationships-education-relationships-and-sex-education-rse-and-health-education (accessed 6 July 2022).

15.

gov.uk (2021b) Review of Sexual Abuse in Schools and Colleges. Available at: https://www.gov.uk/government/publications/review-of-sexual-abuse-in-schools-and-colleges/review-of-sexual-abuse-in-schools-and-colleges#methodology (accessed 11 June 2021).

16.

gov.uk (2022) Domestic Abuse Act 2021: Overarching Factsheet. Available at: https://www.gov.uk/government/publications/domestic-abuse-bill-2020-factsheets/domestic-abuse-bill-2020-overarching-factsheet (accessed 6 July 2022).

17.

Home Office (2021) Tackling Violence against Women and Girls Strategy. Available at: https://www.gov.uk/government/publications/tackling-violence-against-women-and-girls-strategy (accessed 11 March 2022).

18.

Joppa

(2020a) citing Mille

Breslau

Chung

, et al. (2011) Adverse childhood experiences and risk of physical violence in adolescent dating relationships. Journal of Epidemiology and Community Health 65: 1006–1013.

19.

Joppa

(2020b) Dating violence in adolescence: Implications for girls’ sexual health. Journal of Pediatric and Adolescent Gynecology 33(4): 332–338.

20.

Kiani

Simbar

Rashdu Fakari

, et al. (2021) A systematic review: Empowerment interventions to reduce domestic violence? Aggression and Violent Behaviour 58: 101585.

21.

Levesque

Johnson

Prochaska

(2017) Teen choices, an online stage-based program for healthy, nonviolent relationships: Development and feasibility trial. Journal of School Violence 16(4): 376–385.

22.

Lloyd

(2018) Domestic violence and education: Examining the impact of domestic violence on young children, and young people and the potential roles of school. Frontiers in Psychology 9: 2094.

23.

Montesanti

Thurston

(2015) Mapping the role of structural and interpersonal violence in the lives of women: Implications for public health interventions and policy. BMC Women’s Health 15: 100.

24.

Morgan

Harland

(2009) The ‘Lens Model’: A practical tool for developing and understanding gender conscious practice. Youth and Policy 101: 67–81.

25.

Office for National Statistics (ONS) (2020) Domestic Abuse Victim Characteristics, England and Wales. Available at: https://www.ons.gov.uk/peoplepopulationandcommunity/crimeandjustice/articles/domesticabusevictimcharacteristicsenglandandwales/yearendingmarch2020#age (accessed 5 January 2021).

26.

Orr

(1992) Working with women’s health groups. In: Abbott

Sapsford

(eds) Research into Practice: A Reader for Nurses and the Caring Professions. Buckingham: Open University Press, pp. 23–38.

27.

Paulino

(2017) Domestic violence: Psychological issues related to the victim and offender. In: Petherick

Sinnamon

(eds) The Psychology of Criminal and Antisocial Behavior. Victim and Offender Perspectives. San Diego, CA: Elsevier, pp. 343–359.

28.

Rawlinson

(2021) Don’t be that guy: Activists praise campaign tackling sexual violence. The Guardian. Available at: https://www.theguardian.com/society/2021/oct/14/dont-be-that-guy-activists-praise-campaign-tackling-sexual-violence (accessed 28 October 2021).

29.

Ritchie

Spencer

LO’

Connor

(2003) Carrying out qualitative analysis. In: Ritchie

Lewis

Nicholls

, et al. (eds) Qualitative Research Practice: A Guide for Social Science Students and Researchers. London: SAGE, pp. 219–262.

30.

Sonneveld

Rijnders

Metz

, et al. (2020) The contribution of professional youth work to the development of socially vulnerable youngsters: A multiple case study. Children and Youth Services Review 118: 105476.

31.

Taylor

Shrive

(2021) ‘I thought it was just a part of life’: Understanding the scale of violence committed against women in the UK since birth. Victim Focus. Available at: https://www.victimfocus.org.uk/womens_experiences_violence_abuse_study (accessed 21 March 2022).

32.

Warwick-Booth

Coan

(2020) Using Creative Qualitative Methods in Evaluating Gendered Health Promotion Interventions. SAGE Research Methods Cases Medicine and Health. Epub ahead of print 15 January. DOI: 10.4135/9781529707281.

33.

Warwick-Booth

Cross

(2018) ‘Journeys through a gender specific intensive intervention programme: Disadvantaged young women’s experiences within the way forward project. Health Education Journal 77(6): 644–655.

34.

Warwick-Booth

Cross

(2020) Changing lives, saving lives: Women centred working – An evidence-based model from the UK. Critical Studies 15(1): 7–21.

35.

Warwick-Booth

Cross

Coan

(2022) The practices of feminist stakeholders supporting social change and health improvement for women experiencing domestic abuse in England. In: Potvin

Jourdain

(eds) Global Handbook on Health Promotion Research Knowledge Production and Sharing, vol. 3. Cham: Springer.

36.

Wilkinson

(1999) Focus groups. A feminist method. Psychology of Women Quarterly 23: 221–244.

37.

Wilson

Long

(2009) Big Book of Blob Trees. London: Routledge.