Digital citizenship among Appalachian middle schoolers: The common sense digital citizenship curriculum

Abstract

Background:

Nearly 60% of teenagers in the USA have experienced abusive online behaviour. Identifying effective programmes to address these behaviours and promote digital citizenship is a research priority to reduce the rate of occurrence and consequential harmful effects of abusive online behaviour.

Purpose:

To evaluate the effectiveness of a Digital Citizenship Curriculum in increasing knowledge of digital citizenship and reducing cyberbullying and online aggression among middle-schoolers in an underserved community using a free curriculum.

Method:

Middle-schoolers participated in pilot implementation of a Digital Citizenship Curriculum (DCC) to evaluate its effectiveness in increasing knowledge of digital citizenship and reducing cyberbullying and online aggression. Follow up interviews were conducted to explore participants’ perceptions of the curriculum.

Results:

Participants demonstrated a statistically significant increase in their knowledge of digital citizenship with an increase of 2.96 in the mean score (p < .001). Paired t-tests by gender demonstrated a significant difference in pre-post assessment mean scores for girls (p < .001). Post-intervention perceptions indicate the curriculum was positively received and informative.

Conclusion:

Identifying cost-effective and resource-friendly programmes that support social-emotional learning and promote digital citizenship is crucial for underserved populations. Regions such as Appalachian Ohio often lack the resources to fund costly curriculum aimed at online aggression prevention. This study supports the implementation of the DCC and indicates the need for future research on the long-term effects of the curriculum on middle school participants.

Keywords

Adolescents Appalachia cyberbullying digital citizenship middle school

Get full access to this article

View all access options for this article.

References

Anderson

Rainie

(2018) The future of well-being in a tech-saturated world. Pew Research Center: Internet, Science & Technology. Available at: https://www.pewresearch.org/internet/2018/04/17/the-future-of-well-being-in-a-tech-saturated-world/ (accessed 3 December 2020).

Anderson

(2018) A majority of teens have experienced some form of cyberbullying. Pew Research Center: Internet, Science & Technology. Available at: https://www.pewresearch.org/internet/2018/09/27/a-majority-of-teens-have-experienced-some-form-of-cyberbullying/ (accessed 3 December 2020).

Anderson

Jiang

(2018a) Teens, social media and technology 2018. Pew Research Center: Internet, Science & Technology. Available at: https://www.pewresearch.org/internet/2018/05/31/teens-social-media-technology-2018/ (accessed 3 December 2020).

Anderson

Jiang

(2018b) Teens’ social media habits and experiences. Available at: https://www.pewresearch.org/internet/2018/11/28/teens-social-media-habits-and-experiences/

Anderson

Perrin

(2018) Nearly one-in-five teens can’t always finish their homework because of the digital divide. Available at: https://www.pewresearch.org/fact-tank/2018/10/26/nearly-one-in-five-teens-cant-always-finish-their-homework-because-of-the-digital-divide/ (accessed 3 December 2020).

Appalachian Regional Commission [ARC] (2019) Distressed designation and county economic status classification system. Available at: https://www.arc.gov/distressed-designation-and-county-economic-%20status-classification-system/ (accessed 27 March 2020).

Association for Supervision and Curriculum Development [ASCD] (2012) Making the case for educating the whole child. Available at: http://www.wholechildeducation.org/assets/content/WholeChild-MakingTheCase.pdf (accessed 18 January 2020).

Children’s Defense Fund-Ohio (2014) Issue brief: Health disparities are leaving Ohio’s rural children behind. Available at: www.cdfohio.org/research-library/2014/health-disparities-are.pdf (accessed 20 February 2020).

Children’s Defense Fund Ohio [CDFO] (2020) Ohio’s Appalachian children at a crossroads: A roadmap for action. Available at: https://cdfohio.org/wp-content/uploads/sites/6/2018/07/OH-appalachian-children-crossroads.pdf (accessed February 2020).

10.

Choi

(2016) A concept analysis of digital citizenship for democratic citizenship education in the internet age. Theory & Research in Social Education 44: 565–607.

11.

Collaborative for Academic, Social, and Emotional Learning (CASEL) (2017) CASEL: What are the core competence areas and where are they promoted? Available at: https://casel.org/core-competencies/ (accessed 11 July 2020).

12.

Common Sense Media (2019) Digital citizenship curriculum. Available at: https://www.commonsense.org/education/digital-citizenship/curriculum?grades=6%2C7%2C8 (accessed 19 January 2020).

13.

Eisman

Kilbourne

Ngo

, et al. (2020) Implementing a state-adopted high school health curriculum: A case study. Journal of School Health 90(6): 447–456.

14.

Fahy

Stansfeld

Smuk

, et al. (2016) Longitudinal associations between cyberbullying involvement and adolescent mental health. Journal of Adolescent Health 59(5): 502–509.

15.

Gaffney

Farrington

Espelage

, et al. (2018) Are cyberbullying intervention and prevention programs effective? A systematic and meta-analytical review. Aggression and Violent Behavior 45: 134–153.

16.

Haidt

Allen

(2020) Scrutinizing the effects of digital technology on mental health. Nature 587: 226–227.

17.

Hargittai

Micheli

(2019) Internet skills and why they matter. In: Graham

Dutton

(eds) Society and the Internet: How Networks of Information and Communication Are Changing Our Lives. Oxford: Oxford University Press, pp. 109–124.

18.

Hertz

Everett-Jones

Barrios

, et al. (2015) Association between bullying victimization and health risk behaviors among high school students in the United States. Journal of School Health 85(12): 833–842.

19.

Hinduja

Patchin

(2015) Bullying beyond the Schoolyard: Preventing and Responding to Cyberbullying. Thousand Oaks, CA: Corwin.

20.

James

Weinstein

Mendoza

(2019) Teaching Digital Citizens in Today’s World: Research and Insights behind the Common Sense K-12 Digital Citizenship Curriculum. San Francisco, CA: Common Sense Media.

21.

Jensen

George

Russell

, et al. (2019) Young adolescents’ digital technology use and mental health symptoms: Little evidence of longitudinal or daily linkages. Clinical Psychological Science 7(6): 1416–1433.

22.

Kusel

(2020) The influence of social media on social-emotional learning: Entering a new era. Available at: https://www.unchartedlearning.org/blog/the-influence-of-social-media-on-social-emotional-learning (accessed 3 February 2020).

23.

Landoll

La Greca

Lai

, et al. (2015) Cyber victimization by peers: Prospective associations with adolescent social anxiety and depressive symptoms. Journal of Adolescence 2: 77–86.

24.

Lenhart

(2015) Teens, technology and friendships. Available at: https://www.pewresearch.org/internet/2015/08/06/teens-technology-and-friendships/ (accessed 9 January 2020).

25.

Marshall

Thomas

Lane

, et al. (2017) Creating a culture of health in Appalachia, disparities and bright spots: Health disparities in Appalachia. Available at: https://www.unchartedlearning.org/blog/the-influence-of-social-media-on-social-emotional-learning (accessed 22 November 2019).

26.

Mossberger

Tolbert

McNeal

(2008) Excerpts from digital citizenship: The Internet, society, and participation (Cambridge, Mass.: MIT Press, 2007). First Monday 13. Available at: https://journals.uic.edu/ojs/index.php/fm/article/view/2131

27.

Nash

(2019) The politics of children’s internet use. In Graham

Dutton

(eds) Society and the Internet: How Networks of Information and Communication Are Changing Our Lives. Oxford: Oxford University Press, pp. 357–370.

28.

Odgers

(2018) Smartphones are bad for some adolescents, not all. Nature 554(7693): 432–434.

29.

Odgers

Jensen

(2020) Annual research review: Adolescent mental health in the digital age: Facts fears, and future directions. Journal of Child Psychology and Psychiatry 61(3): 336–348.

30.

Ohio Department of Education (2019) Ohio’s K-12 social and emotional learning standards. Available at: http://education.ohio.gov/getattachment/Topics/Learning-in-Ohio/Social-and-Emotional-Learning/Social-and-Emotional-Learning-Standards/K-12-SEL-Standards-Full-Final.pdf.aspx?lang=en-US (accessed 22 November 2019).

31.

Orben

(2020) Teenagers, screens, and social media: A narrative review of reviews and key studies. Social Psychiatry and Psychiatric Epidemiology 55: 407–414.

32.

Park

Kim

(2014) The relationship between online activities, netiquette and cyberbullying. Child Youth Service Review 42: 74–81.

33.

Prensky

(2001) Digital natives, digital immigrants. On the Horizon 9. Available at: https://www.marcprensky.com/writing/Prensky%20-%20Digital%20Natives,%20Digital%20Immigrants%20-%20Part1.pdf

34.

Rainie

Wellman

(2019) The Internet in daily life: The turn to networked individualism. In: Graham

Dutton

(eds) Society and the Internet: How Networks of Information and Communication Are Changing Our Lives. Oxford: Oxford University Press, pp. 27–42.

35.

Ribble

(2004) Digital citizenship: Addressing appropriate technology behavior. Learning & Leading with Technology 32(1): 6–11.

36.

Rideout

Robb

(2019) The Common Sense census: Media use by tweens and teens, 2019. Available at: https://www.commonsensemedia.org/research/the-common-sense-census-media-use-by-tweens-and-teens-2019

37.

Robinson

Cotton

Ono

, et al. (2015) Digital inequalities and why they matter. Information, Communication & Society 18(5): 569–582.

38.

Twenge

Campbell

(2019) Media use is linked to lower psychological well-being: Evidence from three datasets. Psychiatric Quarterly 90(2): 311–331.

39.

Van Cleemput

DeSmet

Vandebosch

, et al. (2014) A systematic review and meta-analysis of the efficacy of cyberbullying prevention programs. In: Paper presented at Etmaal Van De Communicatiewetenschap, Wageningen, 3–4 February.

40.

Vlaanderen

Bevelander

Kleemans

(2020) Empowering digital citizenship: An anti-cyberbullying intervention to increase children’s intentions to intervene on behalf of the victim. Computers in Human Behavior 112: 106459.

41.

Vogels

(2020) 59% of U. S. parents with lower incomes say their child may face digital obstacles in schoolwork. Available at: https://www.pewresearch.org/fact-tank/2020/09/10/59-of-u-s-parents-with-lower-incomes-say-their-child-may-face-digital-obstacles-in-schoolwork/

42.

Zweig

Lachman

Yahner

, et al. (2013) Correlates of cyber dating abuse among teens. Journal of Youth and Adolescence 43(8): 1306–1321.