Numerous studies have examined the effectiveness of graphic health warnings on different population segments, including male and female smokers, in an effort to reduce health disparities in Europe and the USA. However, research exploring the impact of gender-specific tobacco control interventions on Asian smokers is lacking. This study aimed to assess the perceived effectiveness of graphic health warning images featuring women smokers compared to gender-neutral warnings on South Korean women and men, by smoking status.
Setting:
Online survey with 1,200 adults (500 women; 475 smokers) in South Korea
Design:
A survey with four graphic health warnings (two female-focused and two gender-neutral warnings).
Method:
Participants were assigned to view two female-focused warnings (depicting smoking during pregnancy and risk of premature skin aging) or two gender-neutral warnings (depicting lung cancer and oral cancer), and rated their effectiveness in terms of persuading smokers to quit smoking and non-smokers to not begin smoking.
Results:
A significant interaction between gender and smoking status was found with the pregnancy warning. A post hoc comparison showed a significant difference between female smokers and female non-smokers, between male smokers and male non-smokers, and between female non-smokers and male non-smokers in their perceptions of warning effectiveness. Female non-smokers showed higher perceived effectiveness than male non-smokers and female smokers. Male non-smokers rated its perceived effectiveness lower than male smokers. Regarding the gender-neutral warnings, a participant’s age affected their perceived effectiveness of the cancer warnings.
Conclusion:
Findings suggest that graphic health warnings of smoking during pregnancy are perceived more effective by female non-smokers than female smokers and male non-smokers. Gender-neutral warnings with cancer images are perceived differently by age group. Future studies need to examine how social and cultural factors surrounding female smokers in South Korea affect their perceptions about female-focused warnings and the effects of the warnings on their motivation to quit smoking.
AmosAGreavesLNichterM, et al. (2012) Women and tobacco: A call for including gender in tobacco control research, policy and practice. Tobacco Control21(2): 236–243.
2.
BergCJLustKASanemJR, et al. (2009) Smoker self-identification versus recent smoking among college students. American Journal of Preventive Medicine36: 333–336.
3.
BrehmJW (1966) A Theory of Psychological Reactance. Oxford: Academic Press.
4.
CantrellJValloneDThrasherJ, et al. (2013) Impact of tobacco-related health warning labels across socioeconomic, race and ethnic groups. PLoS ONE8(1): e52206.
5.
ChoHJ (2014) The status and future challenges of tobacco control policy in Korea. Journal of Preventive Medicine & Public Health47(3): 129–135.
6.
DenscombeMDrucquerN (2000) Diversity within ethnic groups: Alcohol and tobacco consumption by young people in the East Midlands. Health Education Journal59(4): 340–350.
7.
DillardAJMagnanREKöblitzAR, et al. (2013) Perceptions of smokers influence nonsmoker attitudes and preferences for interactions. Journal of Applied Social Psychology43(4): 823–833.
8.
FongGTHammondDJiangY, et al. (2010) Perceptions of tobacco health warnings in China compared with picture and text-only health warnings from other countries. Tobacco Control19(Suppl. 2): i69–i77.
9.
FrancisDBHallMGNoarSM, et al. (2017) Systematic review of measures used in pictorial cigarette pack warning experiments. Nicotine & Tobacco Research19: 1127–1137.
10.
FreimanABirdGMetelitsaA, et al. (2004) Cutaneous effects of smoking. The Journal of Cutaneous Medicine and Surgery8(6): 415–423.
11.
GroganSFlettKClark-CarterD, et al. (2011a) A randomized controlled trial of an appearance-related smoking intervention. Health Psychology30(6): 805–809.
12.
GroganSFlettKClark-CarterD, et al. (2011b) Women smokers’ experiences of an age-appearance anti-smoking intervention. British Journal of Health Psychology16(4): 675–689.
13.
HallMGSheeranPNoarSM, et al. (2016) Reactance to health warnings scale: Development and validation. Annals of Behavioral Medicine50(5): 736–750.
14.
HayashHTanAKawachI, et al. (2018) Does segmentation really work? Effectiveness of matched graphic health warnings on cigarette packaging by race, gender and chronic disease conditions on cognitive outcomes among vulnerable populations. Journal of Health Communication23(6): 523–533.
15.
HwangJEChoSI (2016) Introduction process of the tobacco graphic health warning law in Korea. Health Policy & Management26(4): 279–288.
16.
HysertPEMirandALGiovinoGA, et al. (2003) ‘At face value’: Age progression software provides personalised demonstration of the effects of smoking on appearance. Tobacco Control12(2): 238–240.
17.
ITC Project (2012) ITC Korea National Report. Findings from the Wave 1 to 3 Surveys (2005–2010). Waterloo, ON, Canada: National Cancer Center and Korean Association on Smoking or Health.
18.
Jung- ChoiKKhangYChoH (2012) Hidden female smokers in Asia: A comparison of self-reported with cotinine-verified smoking prevalence rates in representative national data from an Asian population. Tobacco Control21(6): 536–542.
19.
KangEJ (2017) Assessing health impacts of pictorial health warning labels on cigarette packs in Korea using DYNAMO-HIA. Journal of Preventive Medicine & Public Health50(4): 251–261.
20.
KangSNKimHWLimJ, et al. (2017) Characteristics of intermittent smokers in Korean adults. Journal of the Korean Society for Research on Nicotine and Tobacco8(2): 58–64.
21.
KeesJBurtonSAndrewsJC, et al. (2006) Tests of graphic visuals and cigarette package warning combinations. Journal of Public Policy Marketing25(2): 212–223.
22.
Kollath-CattanoCOsmanAThrasherJF (2017) Evaluating the perceived effectiveness of pregnancy-related cigarette package health warning labels among different gender/age groups. Addictive Behaviors66: 33–40.
Korean Ministry of Health and Welfare, Korea Centers for Disease Control and Prevention (2018) Korea Health Statistics 2016: Korea National Health and Nutrition Examination Survey. Cheongju, South Korea: Centers for Disease Control and Prevention.
25.
Korean Women’s Development Institute (2016) A Report on the Development of Smoking Cessation Strategies for High-risk Female Populations. Seoul, South Korea: Korean Ministry of Health & Welfare, EWHA Womans University.
26.
LeeDRKimHSLeeJ (2014) The characteristics of false respondents on a self-reported smoking survey of Korean women: Korean National Health and Nutrition Examination Survey, 2008. Korean Journal of Family Medicine35(1): 28–34.
27.
LevisDMStone-WigginsBO’HegartyM, et al. (2014) Women’s perspectives on smoking and pregnancy and graphic warning labels. American Journal of Health Behavior38(5): 755–764.
28.
MillerCLQuesterPGHillD, et al. (2011) Smokers’ recall of Australian graphic cigarette pack warnings and awareness of associated health effects, 2005–2008. BMC Public Health11: 238–248.
29.
NakhaeeNDivsalarKBahreinifarS (2011) Prevalence of and factors associated with cigarette smoking among university students: A study from Iran. Asia Pacific Journal of Public Health23(2): 151–156.
30.
National Cancer Institute (2008) The role of the media in promoting and reducing tobacco use (Tobacco Control Monograph No. 19). Bethesda, MD: US Department of Health and Human Services, National Institutes of Health, National Cancer Institute. Available at: https://cancercontrol.cancer.gov/brp/tcrb/monographs/19/m19_complete.pdf
NoarSMFrancisDBBridgesC, et al. (2016a) The impact of strengthening cigarette pack warnings: Systematic review of longitudinal observational studies. Social Science & Medicine164: 118–129.
33.
NoarSMHallMGFrancisDB, et al. (2016b) Pictorial cigarette pack warnings: A meta-analysis of experimental studies. Tobacco Control25(3): 341–354.
34.
ParkMBKimCBNamEW, et al. (2014) Does South Korea have hidden female smokers: Discrepancies in smoking rates between self-reports and urinary cotinine level. BMC Women’s Health14(1): 156–163.
35.
RainsSATurnerMM (2007) Psychological reactance and persuasive health communication: A test and extension of the intertwined model. Human Communication Research33: 241–269.
36.
StylesMWilliamsBHumphrisG (2012) Is the effectiveness of tobacco image-based warning labels likely to vary by socio-demographic variable? Findings from an online survey of 19,000 members of the UK public. Health Education Journal72(3): 351–362.
37.
SuhDTorabiMRKimN, et al. (2013) Smoking among East Asian college students. American Journal of Health Behavior37(2): 199–207.
TsaiYWTsaiTIYangCL, et al. (2008) Gender differences in smoking behaviors in an Asian population. Journal of Women’s Health17(6): 971–978.
40.
US Centers for Disease Control and Prevention (1994) Cigarette smoking among adults – United States, 1992, and changes in the definition of current cigarette smoking. Morbidity & Mortality Weekly Report43(19): 342–346.
41.
US Department of Health and Human Services (2014) The Health Consequences of Smoking – 50 Years of Progress: A Report of the Surgeon General. Atlanta, GA: US Department of Health and Human Services, Centers for Disease Control and Prevention, National Center for Chronic Disease Prevention and Health Promotion, Office on Smoking and Health.
42.
WeinsteinNDMarcusSMoserR (2005) Smokers’ unrealistic optimism about their risk. Tobacco Control14(1): 55–59.
43.
WeissCHanebuthDCodaP, et al. (2010) Aging images as a motivational trigger for smoking cessation in young women. International Journal of Environmental Research and Public Health7(9): 3499–3512.
44.
WilsonDParsonsJWakefieldM (1999) The health-related quality-of-life of never smokers, ex-smokers, and light, moderate, and heavy smokers. Preventive Medicine29(3): 139–144.
45.
WooJ (2018) Gendered stigma management among young adult women smokers in South Korea. Sociological Perspectives61(3): 487–508.
46.
World Health Organization (WHO) (2001) Women and the Tobacco Epidemic: Challenges for the 21St Century. Geneva: WHO.
47.
World Health Organization (WHO) (2004) Gender, Health and Tobacco. Geneva: WHO.
48.
World Health Organization (WHO) (2015) WHO Global Report on Trends in Prevalence of Tobacco Smoking 2015. Geneva: WHO.
49.
WuDYangTCottrellRR, et al. (2015) The effects of tobacco-related health-warning images on intention to quit smoking among urban Chinese smokers. Health Education Journal74(3): 287–298.
