Marginalisation of men in family planning texts: An analysis of training manuals

Abstract

Objective:

Men’s engagement in family planning has become part of the global health agenda; however, little is known about the training manuals health practitioners’ use and how these manuals describe and explain men’s roles within a family planning context.

Design:

To further understand engagement, this paper examines how training manuals written for health practitioners describe and define men’s participation within family planning.

Setting:

The training manuals were written for UK health practitioners and covered men’s contributions to family planning.

Method:

Discourse analysis was used to examine the three training manuals focused upon.

Results:

Three main discourses were identified: ‘contraception is a woman’s responsibility’, ‘men disengage with health practitioners’ and ‘men are biologically predisposed to avoid sexual responsibility’.

Conclusion:

Together, these three discourses function to marginalise men in family planning, constructing them as detached accessories that lack the ability to engage.