Considerable attention has been focused on the impact of young people’s alcohol use. To address this, schools often implement alcohol and drug education and there are many potential programmes to choose from.
Objective:
The aim of this study was to identify evidence-based alcohol education programmes for schools.
Methods:
A systematic review was undertaken of school-based programmes that targeted alcohol within a school setting and included at least one alcohol behaviour or knowledge change outcome. Six-hundred seventy-five abstracts were screened resulting in 454 studies assessed for eligibility, with 70 studies, evaluating 40 individual programmes, included in the final review.
Results:
Of the 40 programmes, 3 had good evidence of a positive effect. They included CLIMATE Schools (Australia), Project ALERT (USA) and All Stars (USA). Of the others, 4 showed some evidence of positive effect, 1 had no evidence of effect, 29 were inconclusive and 2 showed negative outcomes, such as increases in alcohol use. Although many programmes were evaluated, very few had sufficient evidence to be able to endorse their widespread implementation in schools.
Conclusion:
Three programmes included in the review had sufficient positive outcomes to be recommended for implementation, and four showed good outcomes in some areas. Schools should consider these results when deciding on introducing alcohol education. Overall, the evidence base is broad but relatively weak and further research is required, focusing on programmes identified as having good or potentially good outcomes.
AndersonSWMoorePA (2008) The impact of education and school-based counseling on children’s and adolescents’ views of substance abuse. Journal of Child & Adolescent Substance Abuse18(1): 16–23.
2.
AshtonM (1999) Confident kids … like to party. Drug and Alcohol Findings11: 22–23.
3.
BotvinGJBakerEDusenburyL. (1995) Long-term follow-up results of a randomized drug abuse prevention trial in a white middle-class population. Journal of the American Medical Association273(14): 1106–1112.
4.
BotvinGJGriffinKWDiazT. (2001) Preventing binge drinking during early adolescence: One- and two-year follow-up of a school-based preventive intervention. Psychology of Addictive Behaviors15(4): 360–365.
5.
CariaMPValenteTWFaggianoF. (2011) Effects of a school-based prevention program on European adolescents’ patterns of alcohol use. Journal of Adolescent Health48(2): 182–188.
6.
ConrodPJO’Leary-BarrettMNewtonN. (2013) Effectiveness of a selective, personality-targeted prevention program for adolescent alcohol use and misuse: A cluster randomized controlled trial. JAMA Psychiatry70(3): 334–342.
7.
CuijpersP (2002) Effective ingredients of school-based drug prevention programs: A systematic review. Addictive Behaviors27(6): 1009–1023.
8.
DirALCydersMACoskunpinarA (2013) From the bar to the bed via mobile phone: A first test of the role of problematic alcohol use, sexting, and impulsivity-related traits in sexual hookups. Computers in Human Behavior29(4): 1664–1670.
9.
DurlakJAWeissbergRPDymnickiAB. (2011) The impact of enhancing students’ social and emotional learning: A meta-analysis of school-based universal interventions. Child Development82(1): 405–432.
10.
EllicksonPLMcCaffreyDFGhosh-DastidarB. (2003) New inroads in preventing adolescent drug use: Results from a large-scale trial of project ALERT in middle schools. American Journal of Public Health93(11): 1830–1836.
11.
EnnettSTToblerNSRingwaltCL. (1994) How effective is Drug Abuse Resistance Education? A meta-analysis of project DARE outcome evaluations. American Journal of Public Health84(9): 1394–1401.
12.
FaggianoFGalantiMRBohrnK. (2008) The effectiveness of a school-based substance abuse prevention program: EU-Dap cluster randomised controlled trial. Preventive Medicine47(5): 537–543.
13.
FlayBR (2000) Approaches to substance use prevention utilizing school curriculum plus social environment change. Addictive Behaviors25(6): 861–885.
14.
FoxcroftDRTsertsvadzeA (2011) Universal school-based prevention programs for alcohol misuse in young people. Cochrane Database of Systematic Reviews5: CD009113.
15.
FoxcroftDRTsertsvadzeA (2012) Universal alcohol misuse prevention programmes for children and adolescents: Cochrane systematic reviews. Perspectives in Public Health132(3): 128–134.
16.
FoxcroftDRIrelandDLister-SharpDJ. (2003) Longer-term primary prevention for alcohol misuse in young people: A systematic review. Addiction98(4): 397–411.
17.
Ghosh-DastidarBLongshoreDLEllicksonPL. (2004) Modifying pro-drug risk factors in adolescents: Results from project ALERT. Health Education & Behavior31(3): 318–334.
18.
GoreFMBloemPJPattonGC. (2011) Global burden of disease in young people aged 10–24 years: A systematic analysis. Lancet377(9783): 2093–2102.
19.
GormanDM (1996) Do school-based social skills training programs prevent alcohol use among young people?Addiction Research & Theory4(2): 191–210.
20.
HicksBMIaconoWGMcGueM (2010) Consequences of an adolescent onset and persistent course of alcohol dependence in men: Adolescent risk factors and adult outcomes. Alcoholism, Clinical and Experimental Research34(5): 819–833.
21.
HughesKAndersonZMorleoM. (2008) Alcohol, nightlife and violence: The relative contributions of drinking before and during nights out to negative health and criminal justice outcomes. Addiction103(1): 60–65.
22.
Joanna Briggs Institute (2011) Joanna Briggs Institute Reviewers’ Manual. Adelaide, SA, Australia: Joanna Briggs Institute.
23.
KuntscheEKnibbeRGmelG. (2006) Who drinks and why? A review of socio-demographic, personality, and contextual issues behind the drinking motives in young people. Addictive Behaviors31(10): 1844–1857.
24.
LeeNKCameronJBattamS. (2014) Alcohol Education for Australian Schools: A Review of the Evidence. Adelaide, SA, Australia: National Centre for Education and Training on Addiction.
25.
LiberatiAAltmanDGTetzlaffJ. (2009) The PRISMA statement for reporting systematic reviews and meta-analyses of studies that evaluate health care interventions: Explanation and elaboration. Annals of Internal Medicine151(4): W65–W94.
26.
LongshoreDEllicksonPLMcCaffreyDF. (2007) School-based drug prevention among at-risk adolescents: Effects of ALERT plus. Health Education & Behavior34(4): 651–668.
27.
LoxleyWToumbourouJStockwellT. (2004) The Prevention of Substance Use, Risk and Harm in Australia: A Review of the Evidence. Canberra, ACT, Australia and Melbourne, VIC, Australia: National Drug Research Institute and the Centre for Adolescent Health.
28.
LynamDRMilichRZimmermanR. (1999) Project DARE: No effects at 10-year follow-up. Journal of Consulting and Clinical Psychology67(4): 590–593.
29.
McBrideN (2003) A systematic review of school drug education. Health Education Research18(6): 729–742.
30.
McBrideNFarringdonFMidfordR. (2003) Early unsupervised drinking–reducing the risks. The School Health and Alcohol Harm Reduction Project. Drug and Alcohol Review22(3): 263–276.
31.
McBrideNFarringdonFMidfordR. (2004) Harm minimization in school drug education: Final results of the School Health and Alcohol Harm Reduction Project (SHAHRP). Addiction99(3): 278–291.
32.
MacKillopJRyabchenkoKALismanSA (2006) Life skills training outcomes and potential mechanisms in a community implementation: A preliminary investigation. Substance Use & Misuse41(14): 1921–1935.
33.
McNealRBHansenWBHarringtonNG. (2004) How all stars works: An examination of program effects on mediating variables. Health Education & Behavior31(2): 165–178.
34.
MidfordRCahillHRamsdenR. (2012) Alcohol prevention: What can be expected of a harm reduction focused school drug education programme?Drugs: Education, Prevention & Policy19(2): 102–110.
35.
MoherDLiberatiATetzlaffJ. (2010) Preferred reporting items for systematic reviews and meta-analyses: The PRISMA statement. International Journal of Surgery8(5): 336–341.
36.
NationMCrustoCWandersmanA. (2003) What works in prevention. Principles of effective prevention programs. The American Psychologist58(6–7): 449–456.
37.
NewtonNAndrewsGTeessonM. (2009a) Delivering prevention for alcohol and cannabis using the internet: A cluster randomised controlled trial. Preventive Medicine48(6): 579–584.
38.
NewtonNTeessonTVoglLE. (2010) Internet-based prevention for alcohol and cannabis use: Final results of the Climate Schools course. Addiction105(4): 749–759.
39.
NewtonNVoglLETeessonM. (2009b) CLIMATE Schools: Alcohol module: Cross-validation of a school-based prevention programme for alcohol misuse. The Australian and New Zealand Journal of Psychiatry43(3): 201–207.
40.
NHMRC (2000) How to Review the Evidence: Systematic Identification and Review of the Scientific Literature. Canberra, ACT, Australia: National Health and Medical Research Council.
41.
NHMRC (2009) NHMRC Additional Levels of Evidence and Grades for Recommendations for Developers of Guidelines. Canberra, ACT, Australia: National Health and Medical Research Council.
42.
OrlandoMEllicksonPLMcCaffreyDF. (2005) Mediation analysis of a school-based drug prevention program: Effects of Project ALERT. Prevention Science6(1): 35–46.
43.
OstaszewskiKZimmermanM (2006) The effects of cumulative risks and promotive factors on urban adolescent alcohol and other drug use: A longitudinal study of resiliency. American Journal of Community Psychology38(3): 237–249.
44.
RingwaltCLPankratzMMHansenWB. (2007) The potential of coaching as a strategy to improve the effectiveness of school-based substance use prevention curricula. Health Education & Behavior36(4): 696–710.
45.
ScheierLMBotvinGJGriffinKW. (1999) Latent growth models of drug refusal skills and adolescent alcohol use. Journal of Alcohol and Drug Education44(3): 21–48.
Scott-SheldonLAJCareyMPCareyKB (2010) Alcohol and risky sexual behavior among heavy drinking college students. AIDS Behavior14(4): 845–853.
48.
SlobodaZStephensRCStephensPC. (2009) The Adolescent Substance Abuse Prevention Study: A randomized field trial of a universal substance abuse prevention program. Drug and Alcohol Dependence102(1–3): 1–10.
49.
SpaethMWeicholdKSilbereisenRK. (2010) Examining the differential effectiveness of a life skills program (IPSY) on alcohol use trajectories in early adolescence. Journal of Consulting and Clinical Psychology78(3): 334–348.
50.
StormshakEAConnellAMVeronneauMH. (2011) An ecological approach to promoting early adolescent mental health and social adaptation: Family-centered intervention in public middle schools. Child Development82(1): 209–225.
51.
PierreTLStOsgoodDWSiennickSE. (2007) Project ALERT with outside leaders: What leader characteristics are important for success?Prevention Science8(1): 51–64.
52.
TangKCNutbeamDAldingerC. (2009) Schools for health, education and development: A call for action. Health Promotion International24(1): 68–77.
53.
TeasdaleBStephensPCSlobodaZ. (2009) The influence of program mediators on eleventh grade outcomes for seventh grade substance users and nonusers. Drug and Alcohol Dependence102(1–3): 11–18.
54.
ToblerNS (1997) Meta-analysis of adolescent drug prevention programs: Results of the 1993 meta-analysis. In: BukoskiWJ (ed.) NIDA Research Monograph, vol. 170. Rockville, MD: National Institute on Drug Abuse, pp. 5–68.
55.
ToblerNSRoonaMROchshornP. (2000) School-based adolescent drug prevention programs: 1998 meta-analysis. Journal of Primary Prevention20(4): 275–336.
56.
ValenteTWRitt-OlsonAStacyA. (2007) Peer acceleration: Effects of a social network tailored substance abuse prevention program among high-risk adolescents. Addiction102(11): 1804–1815.
57.
VoasRBTorresPRomanoE. (2012) Alcohol-related risk of driver fatalities: An update using 2007 data. Journal of Studies on Alcohol and Drugs73(3): 341–350.
58.
VoglLETeessonMAndrewsG. (2009) A computerized harm minimization prevention program for alcohol misuse and related harms: Randomized controlled trial. Addiction104(4): 564–575.
WenzelVWeicholdKSilbereisenRK (2009) The life skills program IPSY: Positive influences on school bonding and prevention of substance misuse. Journal of Adolescence32(6): 1391–1401.
61.
WestSLO’NealKK (2004) Project D.A.R.E. outcome effectiveness revisited. American Journal of Public Health94(6): 1027–1029.
62.
WhiteDPittsM (1998) Educating young people about drugs: A systematic review. Addiction93(10): 1475–1487.
Supplementary Material
Please find the following supplemental material available below.
For Open Access articles published under a Creative Commons License, all supplemental material carries the same license as the article it is associated with.
For non-Open Access articles published, all supplemental material carries a non-exclusive license, and permission requests for re-use of supplemental material or any part of supplemental material shall be sent directly to the copyright owner as specified in the copyright notice associated with the article.
