In countries such as the USA, colleges and universities are focusing on how best to serve their students in tough fiscal times and a highly competitive marketplace. Boise State University has specifically focused on providing online courses as one option to meet student needs. However, more recently, the university has begun developing high-enrolment online courses to resolve bottlenecks in enrolments, while maintaining robust, interactive and engaging learning experiences.
Design:
Mixed-methods case study.
Setting:
Three high-enrolment health studies online courses offered at a 4-year university in Boise, Idaho, USA.
Method:
A systemic analysis of final course evaluations, student grades and course reports from the Learning Management System were examined to investigate the effectiveness and student perceptions of high-enrolment online courses.
Results:
Findings provide support for the premise that offering the high-enrolment courses met enrolment demand, provided high-quality instruction and maintained student satisfaction.
Conclusion:
Student perceptions of high-enrolment health studies online courses designed and implemented in the manner specified here can be positive. Lesson learned and suggestions for faculty members, instructional designers and administrators are identified.
AndersonJProvant-RobishawC (2013) Conversion of medical terminology course to high-enrollment online course. Paper presented at the 29th annual conference on distance teaching and learning, Madison, WI, 8–9 August.
3.
BillingsDM (2007) Guest editorial: Optimizing distance education in nursing. Journal of Nursing Education46: 247–248.
CicchinoR (2008) Getting the best out of your faculty with a course template. Distance Education Report12(1): 5–7.
8.
DiekelmannNMendiasEP (2005) Being a supportive presence in online courses: Knowing and connecting with students through writing. Journal of Nursing Education44: 344–346.
9.
Distance Education at Boise State 2000–2010 (2010) Boise, ID: The eCampus Center, Boise State University (Internal Report).
10.
DrayBJLowenthalPRMiszkiewiczMJ. (2011) Developing an instrument to assess student readiness for online learning: A validation study. Distance Education32(1): 29–47.
11.
eCampus Strategic Plan (2012) Boise, ID: The eCampus Center, Boise State University (Internal Report).
12.
Educause (2011) Find BSU Strategic Planning Reports. Boise, ID: The eCampus Center, Boise State University (Internal Report).
HummerDSimsBWooditchA. (2010) Considerations for faculty preparing to develop and teach online criminal justice courses at traditional institutions of higher learning. Journal of Criminal Justice Education21: 285–310.
15.
HuunKHughesL (2014) Autonomy among thieves: Template course design for student and faculty success. Journal of Educators Online11(2): 1–30.
16.
Idaho State Board of Education (2011) Complete College Idaho: A Plan for Growing Talent to Fuel Innovation and Economic Growth in the Gem State. Boise, ID: Idaho State Board of Education.
17.
JaggarsSS (2014) Choosing between online and face-to-face courses. American Journal of Distance Education28(1): 27–38.
18.
JiangHEmmertonLMcKaugeL (2013) Academic integrity and plagiarism: A review of the influences and risk situations for health students. Higher Education Research & Development32(3): 369–380.
Mancuso-MurphyJ (2006) Distance education in nursing: An integrated review of online nursing students’ experiences with technology-delivered instruction. Journal of Nursing Education45: 252–260.
RadfordAW (2011) Learning at a distance: Undergraduate enrollment in distance education courses and degree programs. Stats in Brief, NCES 2012-154. Washington, DC: National Center for Education Statistics.
30.
RainesD (2007) Using the Blackboard platform – More than a course site. Journal of Nursing Education46: 243–244.
31.
RiffellSSibleyD (2005) Using web-based instruction to improve large undergraduate biology courses: An evaluation of a hybrid course format. Computers and Education44: 217–235.
SchollJThomasA (2012) Considerations for the Structure of Large Online Classes. Washington, DC: Education Advisory Board.
34.
SheppardM (2005) Handling a high-enrollment hybrid course. OnlineCl@ssroom5(1): 1–3.
35.
ThieleJE (2003) Learning patterns of online students. Journal of Nursing Education42: 364–366.
36.
TomeiLA (2006) The impact of online teaching on faculty load: Computing the ideal class size for online courses. Journal of Technology & Teacher Education14: 531–541.
37.
TurcoT (2014) Development of new online courses in environmental health. In: International environmental health faculty forum. Las Vegas, NV, 6 July.
38.
TwiggCA (1999) Improving Learning and Reducing Costs: Redesigning Large-Enrollment Courses. Troy, NY: The Pew Learning and Technology Program.
39.
WiesenbergFMassey-HicksR (2005) Lessons learned from co-teaching a high-enrollment online course. OnlineCl@ssroom5(2): 6–8.
40.
ZusmanA (2005) Issues facing higher education in the twenty-first century. In: AltbachPGBerdahlROGumportPJ (eds) American Higher Education in the Twenty-First Century: Social, Political, and Economic Challenges. Baltimore, MA: Johns Hopkins University Press, pp. 109–150.
