Sage Journals: Discover world-class research

Abstract

Objective:

Melanoma incidence and mortality rates continue to rise globally, making it essential for researchers to identify effective approaches to disseminating information to the public that improve key outcomes. This study compared two skin self-examination (SSE) educational strategies: the ABCDE (asymmetry, border irregularity, multiple colours, diameter greater than 6 mm and evolution over time) approach and the ugly duckling sign (UDS).

Design:

A randomised experiment testing different presentations of SSE techniques and visual image dose.

Setting:

The experiment took place at a shopping centre in the Midwest USA.

Method:

Participants (N = 301) participated in the study in which they viewed brochures featuring one of two SSE training methods, ABCDE or UDS, along with a low, moderate or high dosage (frequency) of visual images.

Results:

The brochures improved willingness to perform SSE and skin cancer knowledge across all groups, with brochures featuring the UDS increasing willingness to perform SSE as visual image dose increased. Sensitivity and specificity outcomes were similar across all groups, with a slight advantage found for displaying a moderate visual image dose visualising the ABCDE condition (sensitivity = .63, specificity = .79).

Conclusions:

Overall, both the ABCDE and UDS approaches demonstrated utility in improving early skin cancer detection and education. A balanced presentation of typical and atypical nevi images seems to be an important consideration when presenting visual and written information about melanoma to laypersons.

Keywords

Cancer of the skin health communication melanoma secondary prevention visual perception

Get full access to this article

View all access options for this article.

References

Abbasi

Shaw

Rigel

. (2004) Early diagnosis of cutaneous melanoma: Revisiting the ABCD criteria. Journal of the American Medical Association 292: 2771–2776.

Borland

Marks

Gibbs

. (1995) Effects of type of information in health education brochures upon performance on an experimental melanoma detection task. Health Education Research 10: 191–198.

Borland

Mee

Meehan

(1997) Effects of photographs and written descriptors on melanoma detection. Health Education Research 12: 375–384.

Bränström

Hedblad

M-A

Krakau

. (2002) Laypersons’ perceptual discrimination of pigmented skin lesions. Journal of the American Academy of Dermatology 46: 667–673.

Bull

Holt

Kreuter

. (2001) Understanding the effects of printed health education materials: Which features lead to which outcomes? Journal of Health Communication 6: 265–279.

Cho

Boster

(2008) First and third person perceptions on anti-drug ads among adolescents. Communication Research 35: 169–189.

Friedman

Rigel

Kopf

(1985) Early detection of malignant melanoma: The role of physician examination and self-examination of the skin. CA: A Cancer Journal for Clinicians 35: 130–151.

Girardi

Gaudy

Gourvernet

. (2006) Superiority of a cognitive education with photographs over ABCD criteria in the education of the general population to the early detection of melanoma: A randomized study. International Journal of Cancer 118: 2276–2280.

Glanz

Schoenfeld

Weinstock

. (2003) Development and reliability of a brief skin cancer risk assessment tool. Cancer Detection and Prevention 27: 311–315.

10.

Grob

Bonerandi

(1998) The ‘ugly duckling’ sign: Identification of the common characteristics of nevi in an individual as a basis for melanoma screening. Archives of Dermatology 134: 103–104.

11.

Hanrahan

Hersey

Menzies

. (1997) Examination of the ability of people to identify early changes of melanoma in computer-altered pigmented skin lesions. Archives of Dermatology 133: 301–311.

12.

Houts

Doak

. (2006) The role of pictures in improving health communication: A review of research on attention, comprehension, recall, and adherence. Patient Education and Counseling 61: 173–190.

13.

King

(2014) A content analysis of visual cancer information: Prevalence and use of photographs and illustrations in printed health materials. Health Communication. Epub ahead of print 25 July. DOI: 10.1080/10410236.2013.878778.

14.

King

Jensen

Davis

. (2014) Perceived visual informativeness (PVI): Construct and scale development to assess visual information in printed materials. Journal of Health Communication 19: 1099–1115.

15.

Kirsner

Wilkinson

. (2005) The association of Medicare health care delivery systems with stage at diagnosis and survival for patients with melanoma. Archives of Dermatology 141: 753–757.

16.

Kundu

Kamaria

Ortiz

. (2010) Effectiveness of a knowledge-based intervention for melanoma among those with ethnic skin. Journal of the American Academy of Dermatology 62: 777–784.

17.

McWhirter

Hoffman-Goetz

(2013) Visual images for patient skin self-examination and melanoma detection: A systematic review of published studies. Journal of the American Academy of Dermatology 69: 47–55.

18.

McWhirter

Hoffman-Goetz

(2014) A systematic review of visual image theory, assessment, and use in skin cancer and tanning research. Journal of Health Communication 19: 738–757.

19.

Muhn

From

Glied

(2000) Detection of artificial changes in mole size by skin self-examination. Journal of the American Academy of Dermatology 42: 754–759.

20.

National Cancer Institute (NCI) (2010) What you need to know about: Melanoma and other skin cancers. NIH Publication no. 10-7625. Rockville, MD: NCI. June 2010.

21.

National Cancer Institute (NCI) (2014) NCI Visuals Online. Available at: https://visualsonline.cancer.gov (accessed 8 March 2014).

22.

Norman

Hoyle

(2004) The theory of planned behavior and breast self-examination: Distinguishing between perceived control and self-efficacy. Journal of Applied Social Psychology 34: 694–708.

23.

Prior

(2014) Visual political knowledge: A different road to competence? Journal of Politics 74: 41–57.

24.

Rigel

Russak

Friedman

(2010) The evolution of melanoma diagnosis: 25 years beyond the ABCDs. CA: A Cancer Journal for Clinicians 60: 301–316.

25.

Robinson

Ortiz

(2009) Use of photographs illustrating ABCDE criteria in skin self-examination. Archives of Dermatology 145: 332–333.

26.

Robinson

Turrisi

(2006) Skills training to learn discrimination of ABCDE criteria by those at risk of developing melanoma. Archives of Dermatology 142: 447–452.

27.

Robinson

Turrisi

Mallett

. (2010) Comparing the efficacy of an in-person intervention with a skin self-examination workbook. Archives of Dermatology 146: 91–94.

28.

Scope

Marghoob

(n.d.) The ‘ugly duckling’ sign: An early melanoma recognition tool for clinicians and the public. Available at: http://www.skincancer.org/skin-cancer-information/melanoma/melanoma-warning-signs-and-images/the-ugly-duckling-sign (accessed 25 August 2014).

29.

Scope

Dusza

Halpern

. (2008) The ‘ugly duckling’ sign: Agreement between observers. Archives of Dermatology 144: 58–64.

30.

Siegel

Zou

. (2014) Cancer statistics, 2014. CA: A Cancer Journal for Clinicians 64: 9–29.

31.

Steed

(2006) Attribute activation: An approach for learning visual representation. In: Proceedings of the 33rd international conference and exhibition on computer graphics and interactive techniques, Boston, MA. Available at: http://dl.acm.org/citation.cfm?id=1179295.1179336

32.

Tsao

Bevona

Goggins

. (2003) The transformation rate of moles (melanocytic nevi) into cutaneous melanoma. Archives of Dermatology 139: 282–288.

33.

Tucker

(2009) Melanoma epidemiology. Hematology/Oncology Clinics of North America 23: 383–395.

34.

U.S. Preventive Services Task Force (2009) Screening for skin cancer: U.S. Preventive Services Task Force recommendation statement. Annals of Internal Medicine 150: 188–193.

35.

Zillmann

(1999) Exemplification theory: Judging the whole by the sum of its parts. Media Psychology 1: 69–94.

36.

Zillmann

(2006) Exemplification effects in the promotion of safety and health. Journal of Communication 56: S221–S337.

Supplementary Material

Please find the following supplemental material available below.

For Open Access articles published under a Creative Commons License, all supplemental material carries the same license as the article it is associated with.

For non-Open Access articles published, all supplemental material carries a non-exclusive license, and permission requests for re-use of supplemental material or any part of supplemental material shall be sent directly to the copyright owner as specified in the copyright notice associated with the article.

0.00 MB

0.92 MB

A randomised test of printed educational materials about melanoma detection: Varying skin self-examination technique and visual image dose

Abstract

Objective:

Design:

Setting:

Method:

Results:

Conclusions:

Keywords

Get full access to this article

References

Supplementary Material