Evaluation of a health education programme about traumatic brain injury

Abstract

Objective:

Our aim was to evaluate a health education programme (TBIoptions: Promoting Knowledge) designed to increase public awareness and understanding about traumatic brain injury (TBI) through in-person (classroom) and computer-based (electronic) learning environments.

Design:

We used a pre-post survey design with randomization of participants to classroom (N = 22) or electronic (N = 22) delivery of the programme, in classroom and computer laboratory settings on the campus of Kansas State University, Manhattan, KS.

Method:

Forty-four participants rated areas of knowledge about TBI prior to and after the programme experience. They also rated health programme quality and instructional strategies (e.g. video vignettes). Written responses provided information for qualitative analysis.

Results:

Participants reported significantly higher ratings of knowledge after the programme experience. Qualitative analysis of written responses provided further evidence to support quantitative outcomes. There were no significant differences in comparing the two methods of delivery (classroom versus electronic learning format). Participants rated the quality of the programme and various instructional strategies very highly.

Conclusion:

TBIoptions: Promoting Knowledge offers a health education programme to increase understanding about TBI. Both modes of delivery, classroom and electronic, appeared equally effective in terms of self-report of change.

Keywords

Traumatic brain injury education learning computer-mediated instruction public awareness

Get full access to this article

View all access options for this article.

References

Faul

Wald

. Traumatic brain injury in the United States: Emergency department visits, hospitalizations and deaths 2002–2006. Atlanta (GA): Centers for Disease Control and Prevention, National Center for Injury Prevention and Control, 2010.

Rotondi

Sinkule

Spring

. An interactive web-based intervention for persons with TBI and their families: Use and evaluation by female significant others. J H Trauma Rehabil 2005; 20: 173–185.

Sample

Langlois

. Linking people with traumatic brain injury to services: Success and challenges in Colorado. J Head Trauma Rehabil 2005; 20: 270–278.

Katz

Zasler

Zafonte

. Clinical continuum of care and natural history. In: Zasler

Katz

Zafonte

(eds) Brain injury medicine: Principles and practice. New York: Demos Medical, 2007, pp.3–13.

Sander

Clark

Pappadis

. What is community integration anyway? Defining meaning following traumatic brain injury. J Head Trauma Rehabil 2010; 25: 121–127.

Schneider

Haack

Owens

. An interdisciplinary treatment approach for soldiers with TBI/PTSD: Issues and outcomes. Perspect Neurophysiol Neurogenic Speech Lang Disord 2009; 19: 36–46.

Lecours

Sirois

Ouellet

. Long-term functional outcome of older adults after a traumatic brain injury. J Head Trauma Rehabil 2012; 27: 379–390.

Corrigan

Whiteneck

Mellick

. Perceived needs following traumatic brain injury J Head Trauma Rehabil 2004; 19: 205–216.

Hux

Schram

Goeken

. Misconceptions about brain injury: A survey replication study. Brain Inj 2006; 20: 547–553.

10.

McClure

. The role of causal attributions in public misconceptions about brain injury. Rehabil Psychol 2011; 56: 85–93.

11.

Guilmette

Paglia

. The public’s misconceptions about traumatic brain injury: A follow up survey. Arch Clin Neuropsychol 2004; 19: 183–189.

12.

Evans

Hux

Chleboun

. Persistence of brain injury misconceptions among speech-language pathology graduate students. Contemp Issues Commun Sci Disord 2009; 36: 166–173.

13.

Whiteneck

Gerhart

Cusick

. Identifying environmental factors that influence the outcomes of people with traumatic brain injury. J Head Trauma Rehabil 2004; 19: 191–204.

14.

Centers for Disease Control and Prevention, National Center for Chronic Disease Prevention and Health Promotion. Heart disease and stroke prevention: Addressing the nation’s leading killers. Online. Available from http://www.cdc.gov/chronicdisease/resources/publications/aag/pdf/2011/Heart-Disease-and-Stroke-AAG-2011.pdf. (2011, accessed 2 August 2011).

15.

Rotondi

Sinkule

Balzer

. A qualitative needs assessment of persons who have experienced traumatic brain injury and their primary family caregivers. J Head Trauma Rehabil 2007; 22: 14–25.

16.

Forducey

Ruwe

Dawson

. Using telerehabilitation to promote TBI recovery and transfer of knowledge. NeuroRehabilitation 2003; 18: 103–111.

17.

Sander

Clark

Atchison

. A web-based videoconferencing approach to training caregivers in rural areas to compensate for problems related to traumatic brain injury. J Head Trauma Rehabil 2009; 24: 248–261.

18.

Atack

Luke

. The impact of validated, online health education resources on patient and community members’ satisfaction and health behavior. Health Educ J 2012; 71: 211–218.

19.

Charmaz

. Constructing grounded theory: A practical guide through qualitative analysis. Thousand Oaks, CA: Sage, 2006.

20.

Glaser

Strauss

. The discovery of grounded theory: Strategies for qualitative research. Piscataway, NJ: Aldine Transaction, 1967.

21.

Marsh

. Personal accounts of consumers/survivors: Insights and implications. J Clin Psychol 2000; 56: 1447–1457.

22.

Kumagai

Murphy

Ross

. Diabetes stories: Use of patient narratives of diabetes to teach patient-centered care. Adv Health Sci Educ 2009;14: 315–326.

23.

Cason

Stiller

. Performance outcomes of an online first aid and CPR course for laypersons. Health Educ J 2011; 70: 458–467.

24.

Laakso

Armstrong

Usher

. Cyber-management of people with chronic disease: A potential solution to eHealth challenges. Health Educ J 2012; 71: 483–490.