Objective: The National Health and Hospitals Reform Commission Report suggests introducing an internship period for all newly qualified dental/oral health practitioners in Australia. This study gauged the opinions of undergraduates from three dental schools in Australia.
Methods: An online survey collected demographic information on gender and age, the program registered for, year and place of study. The level of support for an internship was gauged using a five-point scale. Open-ended questions on the concerns, advantages and disadvantages of an internship concluded the survey. All students in the participating universities were invited to participate via email.
Results: There were 445 responses. Forty per cent of students were supportive of an internship scheme. The level of support differed by gender, age, relationship status, having a previous tertiary qualification and year of study. Males, older participants, those with children and those with previous qualifications were less supportive. The main concerns related to issues around choice, family commitments, location of internship placements and salary levels.
Conclusion: Support for an internship scheme for dental graduates elicited a divided opinion amongst dental students. Many issues around financing and logistics have to be addressed before any such scheme could be implemented in Australia: there is a need to consult with dental graduates and promote the benefits to the student body.
National Health and Hospitals Reform Commission. A Healthier Future For All Australians. Barton, ACT: Commonwealth of Australia, 2009.
2.
MarshallRISpencerAJ. Accessing oral health care in Australia. Med J Aust2006: 185: 59–60.
3.
Australian Research Centre for Population Oral Health. Australian dentist labour force 2003. Aust Dent J2006: 51: 191–194.
4.
AIHW Dental Statistics and Research Unit. Economic Aspects of Dentistry. Adelaide: ARCPOH, University of Adelaide, 2004.
5.
Australian Dental Association. Proposal for a National Dental Foundation Year Program. Sydney: Australian Dental Association, 2009.
6.
NaidooSChikteU. Community dental service—the first year. SADJ2002: 57: 193–196.
7.
NaidooS. Community dental service—four years on. SADJ2007: 62: 250, 252–253.
8.
BhayatAYengopalVRudolphMJNaidooUVayejA. Attitudes of South African oral hygienists towards compulsory community service. Int J Dent Hyg2008: 6: 8–12.
9.
BhayatAYengopalVRudolphMJGovenderU. Attitudes of South African dental therapy students toward compulsory community service. J Dent Educ2008: 72: 1135–1141.
10.
BonettiDYoungLRennieJClarksonJ. Evaluating dental vocational training: how does Scotland compare to the rest of the UK?Br Dent J2008: 204:195–202.
11.
LevineRS. Experience, skill and knowledge gained by newly qualified dentists during their first year of general practice. Br Dent J1992: 172: 97–102.
12.
BartlettDWCowardPYWilsonRGoodsmanDDarbyJ. Experiences and perceptions of vocational training reported by the 1999 cohort of vocational dental practitioners and their trainers in England and Wales. Br Dent J2001:191: 265–270.
BazenJJKrugerEDysonKTennantM. An innovation in Australian dental education: rural, remote and Indigenous pre-graduation placements. Rural Remote Health2007: 7: 703.
15.
LallooR. What is best about the Rural, Remote and Indigenous Oral Health Dental Clinic placement in Brewarrina, NSW? A students’ perspective. ADAQ News, August. Brisbane: ADAQ, 2009.
